Friday, December 11, 2009

Obama's Birth Certificate: What is the Democrats Really Hiding?

By Douglas V. Gibbs

In response to a post I wrote about an Obama Treason Case in Tennessee Seeking the president's Birth Certificate, a long-time friend of mine asked in the comment section:

I know Doug you say that your concern is why he has not produced a legitimate document, but you don't necessarily believe Obama was born outside the USA, but if that is the case, then why hide the real birth certificate? If he's eligible, then what else could he be hiding?

My Response Is As Follows:

Rick,

Because I address the issue of the birth certificate, write about stories like the belief a forgery has been created and has been aged under ultraviolet lamps, or because I have interviewed folks like Orly Taitz on the matter, it is automatically assumed by the leftists that I am a "birther" to the extreme. That is how they are. Give them something that may be construed a certain way, then their warped minds try to read into it, and a whole series of accusations rise to the surface.

I realize you are of the mind that he [Obama] was born in Kenya. I don't know if that is the case, although there is some testimonial evidence from a number of folks, including his paternal grandmother, that he was born in Kenya. I believe it is very possible he was born in Hawaii, but I don't know for sure. Like the fact the birthers haven't provided enough evidence that Obama is not a natural born citizen, Obama and gang have not provided enough evidence to the contrary either. Therefore, that leaves the issue open to a lot of speculation.

Considering how much effort Obama and the Democrats have gone to silence those folks asking for a birth certificate, and how much money Obama has spent on sealing records and ensuring "birther" court cases don't see the light of day, it seems reasonable to ask, "If Obama was not born outside of the USA, then what is he hiding?" That is the key, isn't it?

As Andrea Shea King suggested on her show last night, reading a letter she received regarding the issue, it may be something catastrophic to Obama, or it may be something simply embarrassing, something Obama does not desire to be made public. It [what is being hidden] could be something as simple as the word "UNKNOWN" in the slot where it asks for his father's name, or something so profound that it would make his books obvious lies and fabrications. Whatever it is, the Obama-mafia has determined the best way to combat it is to say nothing, and seal everything. Then, as the "birthers" continue their march for the truth, the very fact there is silence from the Obama camp makes the "birthers" look like they are making a lot out of nothing at all - eventually becoming, in the eyes of Obama supporters, and pretty much anybody else that is not searching for answers, a bunch of conspiracy nuts that obviously made it all up for attention, or to try to unseat Obama because they hate him so much.

The travesty of such progression of thought is that in the long run, the truth is never revealed, and Obama's silence becomes the winning hand. Personally, I believe that all trails should be traveled, and every cave should be investigated. If they turn out to be rabbit trails and empty caves, then so be it. But when roadblocks are set up along the trail, and an iron door with multiple locks and alarms [shields] the cave entrance, despite the fact that those guarding the entrance are saying "nothing to see here, move along," it doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that something is being hidden from view, and for reasons one can only imagine.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

No comments: