Monday, March 28, 2011

Scientific Consensus Does Not Equal Truth

Dinosaurs and Global Warming

Santa Claus, The Easter Bunny, and [man-made] Global Warming. . .

By Douglas V. Gibbs

Global Warming, err, uhh, Climate Change, seems to be something not mentioned much by the media these days. The indoctrination is complete, or so they thought. Even with all of the glaring evidence that man-made global warming is a hoax, aside from an occasional crackpot claiming the earthquake in Japan was caused by Global Warming, or an Al Gore faithful screaming about the global warming snow they are buried under, the "theory" has more or less vanished from the propaganda networks.

Natural warming and cooling, or I guess you could say "natural climate change," is a more reasonable argument. We have seen the planet cool and warm a number of times in human history, and the majority of those trends occurred long before the first SUV hit the road. In our modern age, however, despite the evidence that the Earth warms and cools naturally, and despite the fact that the "green house gases" we throw into the atmosphere, when compared to that which is produced by the oceans and volcanoes, is a minuscule fraction of a single percentage point, alarmists have decided that industry is to be blamed for the climate trends we experience.

Carbon dioxide has become the big culprit. Never mind that all life on this big blue marble is, like oxygen, dependent on CO2. Never mind that core samples have shown that carbon level increases and decreases "follow" climate rises and drops in temperature, so it is reasonable to assume that an increase in carbon in the atmosphere is not the "cause" of temperature shifts.

Despite the obvious, the environmental wackos continue to push their hoax, and the indoctrination even continued while in November 2009 there was a release of thousands of “Climategate” emails between the meteorologists supplying the bogus data that the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was using to generate this incredible hoax that has more to do with an authoritarian idea of controlling people's use of energy, than anything to do with the environment.

The complete fabrication of "Climate Change" ranks right up there with the 100 year mistake of the brontosaurus, the "Piltdown Man" hoax, and the Easter Bunny. Pandora's Box has been opened, and it turns out that the global warming scientists have been using falsified computer model data. Why? Believe it or not, the question is best answered when you follow the money, and discover that billions of dollars in grant money was involved. In other words, continue to perpetuate the hoax, and you get your money.

The United Nations being behind the global warming hoax should have been our first clue that something was amiss. The leftist idea that fills the heads of the U.N. delegates is that the West is too rich, and their wealth must be redistributed (sound familiar?). Skeptical scientists were silenced, and money was paid to those willing to push forward the propaganda.

Despite the proof against the hoax, leaders like Obama are still trying to push "green" technologies. The EPA is unconstitutionally moving forward with a regulation scheme against energy usage and carbon emissions. Australia and the European countries have their carbon tax scheme full throttle ahead. They are putting up windmills and solar panels, wasting billions of dollars on unproven alternative energy sources at a time when the world's economies can't take much more strain.

Despite the indoctrination, however, public acceptance of the “global warming” hoax has waned. To fight their defeat, the mainstream media has been trying to conceal the truth, but the wild wild west Internet has seen to it that the truth, including things like "Climategate," works its way to the surface.

Granted, the global warming hoax still resides in the minds of the most gullible sheep out there, but like the brontosaurus, it looks like the fraud is breathing its final breaths - at least until the leftist environmentalists find another way to convince the world that capitalism and industry is to blame for something else, and it is somehow connected to Climate Change.

I have a feeling this is TO BE CONTINUED. . .

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary


Tom said...

Speaking of dinosaurs.. isn't it pretty funny that mankind and the fearsome reptiiles co-existed? That is, if you're completely insane.

I also like how Noah managed to get them all on the ark, and then after the water receeded, there ensued a lot of incest that we're all a product of. I mean.. ewwwwww..

How was it that the world flooded? A shift in the magnetic poles or something?


Douglas V. Gibbs said...

Noah probably carried eggs or dinosaur infants. As for the incest to repopulate the Earth - the sons had their wives with them, though the children would have resorted to that - to repopulate the Earth I am sure it wasn't viewed in the way we view it. I don't know, I wasn't there, I am only going by the historical text. Of course, just because that kind of measure had to be used historically, it doesn't make it doctrinal. As far as how the Earth flooded, a shift in the magnetic poles is one theory presented, yes. But, God's way of doing it, though fun to try to figure out, is not the important part about that particular historical period. The evil of the world, and the presence of the Nephilim was the primary point of the story, and how God dealt with such a problem on Earth at that time.