True, it's not the level of "generosity" being put on display by the Germans (until they swiftly shut it down, anyway), but even importing a Muzzie Palm Springs every year adds up at a rapid demographic clip:
The figures come as Barack Obama has ordered the United States to accept at least 10,000 Syrian refugees that have been pouring into Europe. The number may top 100,000, and concerns many observers who fear the vetting process may not keep out Islamic State (ISIS) infiltrators.
What vetting process? We don't need no steenking vetting process! Only "Islamophobes" would even suggest anything so "racist"! Right?
I wonder if by using the number ten thousand, that means Obama is designating the jihadist infiltrators to be absorbed all at once in the same bloc.
Now this is a counterintuitive statistic if ever I've seen one:
Muslim immigration has been rising since the September 11th, 2001 terrorist attacks, Breitbart notes, and between 2001 and 2013, 1.5 million Muslim immigrants entered the United States.
Wouldn't you think that number would have moved in the opposite direction after that particular "stimulus"? Heck, after Pearl Harbor FDR put Japanese-Americans in internment camps. Nobody was going to do that to Muslims after 9/11 - I don't think al Qaeda nuking New York City and Washington, D.C. would have prompted that - but cutting off Muslim immigration into the country, or even slowing it down, would have seemed instinctive - and eminently reasonable.
Instead, the floodgates were thrown open. And now there are, by the 10% rule, approximately 150,000 more jihadists within our borders, or about eight thousand more 9/11's, corresponding to roughly twenty-four million massacred American civilians just waiting for their toe tags.
Or, if you go by the ISIS average of a hundred dead "infidels" per attack, maybe it's "only" fifteen million.
Today, of course, 9/11 is long forgotten, which renders this next stat as inevitable as the sunrise:
The numbers are expected to rise, and Middle Eastern immigrants are now the largest group admitted through the visa process.
"Arabic is now the most common language spoken by refugees, and 91.4% of recent refugees from the Middle East are on food stamps," Breitbart reports.
Let's put aside the direct jihad for a moment and think in terms of the political jihad. Hispanics are now considered the critical, must-have voting demographic, yes? Approximately one out of every six U.S. residents (since we can't use the term "citizens" anymore, given that it's been drained of all meaning) is of Latin American descent. By that metric, that's approximately fifty-four million people total. Blacks come in second at forty-five million. Jews bring up the rear at five million.
The number of Muslims currently in the U.S. is estimated to be about twelve million, not an a par with the first two demographics, but more than twice the size of their Jewish enemies. By immigration alone it would take well over a century for Muslim numbers to rise to the level of Hispanics and blacks. But figure in much higher Muslim birthrates than the U.S. norm and the fact that Islam is by far the fastest-growing "religion" in America and the multiplicative interaction of all these factors, and that time horizon shrinks to as little as a quarter of a century.
A single generation, in other words.
It harkens me back to the words of Irina Spalko once again:
Imagine. To peer across the world and know the enemy's secrets. To place our thoughts into the minds of your leaders. Make your teachers teach the true version of history, your soldiers attack on our command. We'll be everywhere at once, more powerful than a whisper, invading your dreams, thinking your thoughts for you while you sleep. We will change you, Dr. Jones, all of you, from the inside. We will turn you into us. And the best part? You won't even know it's happening.
And if that doesn't work, they can always fall back on "the direct approach" with what would, at that point, be five million jihadists.
I would call that "fundamentally transformative," wouldn't you?