tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27654025.post2268980474372899703..comments2024-03-07T03:25:23.835-08:00Comments on Political Pistachio: Understanding the Commerce ClauseDouglas V. Gibbshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09388639848567082980noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27654025.post-70854744826740120732012-06-30T08:17:12.710-07:002012-06-30T08:17:12.710-07:00Anonymous, you are correct, but the whole thing is...Anonymous, you are correct, but the whole thing is unconstitutional. Every last bit of it. The thing is, the argument they are using was that the bill originated in the House, and the Senate amended it.Douglas V. Gibbshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09388639848567082980noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27654025.post-33252244941161305662012-06-30T00:44:35.164-07:002012-06-30T00:44:35.164-07:00By changing the law and making it a tax does that ...By changing the law and making it a tax does that not void the law? Follow this for a moment. All tax bills must start in the House. As this was introduced as a Senate Bill would that not make it unconstitutional? Perhaps I don't understand that part of the constitution but it reads pretty clear.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com