|
|
|
|
|
|
I have always loved science, especially when it comes to things that exist beyond this Earth. Astronomy has always been a favorite of mine.
I was excited when the Space Force was created. After Obama's desire to kill the space program it ensured the push to reach for the stars would continue.
An extinction event collision with Earth by some heavenly object has been a concern of humanity as long as I can remember. Science Fiction writers have written about it, and movies have played out the scenario. History provides that such an event likely happened. Some scientists claim that is how the dinosaurs were wiped out.
Protecting our little blue marble from those kinds of collisions is actually something they are working on at NASA. It's Reagan's Star Wars, I suppose, but a defense system against extraterrestrial threats.
NASAs program, DART, or the Double Asteroid Redirection Test, is a strategy to deflect asteroids by changing an asteroid's motion in space.
But, to make sure it works the plan needs to be tested. Plans for such a test is in the works. An asteroid called Didymos B was classified as "both a potentially hazardous asteroid and a near-Earth object" when it was first discovered. The asteroid's proximity to Earth makes it the perfect test asteroid to see if NASA's plan to nudge an asteroid off its path will work.
The mission to impact and move Didymos B will happen on Sept. 26, 2022, at 7:14 pm EST.
The DART mission will be viewable live by the public. Coverage will start at 6 pm EST on Sept. 26 and it will be streamed on NASA's website, as well as YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook.
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chino Constitution Class
Monday Evening, 6:00 pm,
Archibald's, 15421 Fairfield Ranch Rd in Chino Hills (right off Central and the 71 Freeway)
https://www.iheart.com/podcast/1300-mr-constitution-hour-by-d-85390944/episode/religious-freedom-101226387/
Religious Freedom
In Article III of the U.S. Constitution, where it talks about treason, the founding document states that "no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood." What that means is that the person convicted of treason is the only person who can legally be punished for his act. His family, nor his descendants, may not be held responsible, nor pay any debt or punishment, for the crimes of the convicted and attainted.
Suddenly, reparations don't sound very constitutional.
In my Constitution Classes I talk often about how the Constitution is based on biblical principles.
While in the cultural sense the sins of the father may haunt his descendants, in the legal since, from the Bible's point of view, as with the Constitution, no corruption of blood shall be worked.
Deuteronomy 24:16; King James Version
The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin.
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
KMET 1490-AM (www.kmet1490am.com)
Classic Podcast Page on SoundCloud (for pre-2022 episodes)
Call in Live during the Program!
951-922-3532In recent news the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) was provided the opportunity to massively increase their numbers with 87,000 additions, and arm those agents with plenty of firearms and ammunition. To become an IRS Agent new rules require the recruit to acknowledge that they may need to use "deadly force" while carrying out their duties.
Why would a tax collector need to use deadly force?
Could that not be considered a standing army? The truth is, the expansion of the IRS is the largest expansion of the federal government's law enforcement agencies in U.S. History. Remember, this is the same IRS used to target the Tea Party in 2013 under Barack Obama's watch.
The FBI is also acting as a dangerous part of the federal government's rising police state. The FBI has been used in a gestapo manner against folks who were in Washington D.C. on January 6, 2021, and when they were used to raid President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence just recently.
What is fascinating is that some of the cronies of the hard left tyrants of the Democrat Party are worried this all might backfire. The New York Times has gone so far as to indicate they believe the FBI raid on Trump's Florida home may lead to his reelection as President of the United States.
As the "right-wingers are insurrectionists" narrative falls apart (pipe bomb narrative has exploded in their face) the fact is the progressive left democrat commies are dangerous, they are moving into a fight or flight position, and we should be very worried that they were willing to go so far as to raid Trump's home using essentially a militarized (standing army) version of the FBI.
Even education has become a weapon against us.
That said, whistleblowers are appearing. The FBI, the IRS, and other agencies have become Biden's standing army, and we should be concerned, and we need to be all over it as citizens, seeking ways to decentralize the police state that seems to be expanding before our very eyes.
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
What is insurrection? We seem to be hearing the word all of the time, right now, and frankly, people are confused.
Is insurrection a move to burn down cities and set up sovereign zones claiming to be separate from the United States as we saw in Ferguson, Missouri; Baltimore, Maryland; Seattle, Washington; and Portland, Oregon? Or was that simply a peaceful protest?
Is insurrection a bunch of patriots descending upon The Capitol rallying in support of the President of the United States, but dissatisfied with what they considered to be irregularities in the election, carrying out their rights enumerated in the First Amendment (Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, and to Petition the government for a redress of grievances); a scene that got a little out of control because of a small number of radicals (and likely infiltrators/plants) broke some windows and urged everyone to enter the building?
Is insurrection a group of politicians seizing control of a government, ignoring the original intent of the constitution and proclaiming that their interpretation is the way it is even though everyone knows it's a tyrannical power grab and not in line with the original intent of the language used in the U.S. Constitution?
Amendment 14, Section 3 states that insurrection has been committed when someone who has taken an oath to the Constitution of the United States rebels against the same (the Constitution).
Who's the insurrectionists? ⬜ The violent radicals burning the cities? ⬜ The patriots who descended upon The Capitol? ⬜ The government whores of the Democratic Party (and a good number of Republicans) who have decided the Constitution means what they say it means, despite their interpretation being in conflict with the original definitions and principles, and then using their propagandized version of the Constitution to seize power and control the United States passing laws the federal government never had any authority to pass, and acting in a manner the Founding Fathers would never have approved of?
check all that apply...
It seems the democrats and their cronies have accused Americans of insurrection, but it is they who truly are committing insurrection. They are indeed working to overthrow the Constitution which is the established government of the United States of America.
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
Douglas V. Gibbs, "Mr. Constitution", will be discussing constitutional principles with The Citizen 1776 on Instagram tonight, Friday, 5pm Pacific Time...
|
|
|
Douglas V. Gibbs
Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host
Biden is following in the footsteps of Josef Stalin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|