While everyone is distracted by Justice Roberts' antics in the Supreme Court ruling over Obamacare, the Supreme Courts' ruling over Arizona's immigration law, the presidential campaign, and a myriad of other political happenings, the international leftists are working to destroy civilization as we know it with a draconian gun treaty that will chew up and spit out the 2nd Amendment.
The average liberal progressive will argue that the democrats, and Barack Obama, have not made any moves towards gun control. They will ask you to state evidence, and Fast and Furious still doesn't count to these people.
The U.N. Arms Trade Treaty is evidence enough of the liberal left's attempt to take away our right to bear arms.
Obama has indicated a number of times he is a big gun control guy, but like the rest of the democrats, he wants to do it without being very open about it. He has realized he can't do it through American laws, so he is figuring the best way to circumvent the Constitution regarding gun rights is through international intrusion.
Article VI of the U.S. Constitution is clear. Treaties are the Supreme Law of the Land just like the Constitution, and any laws made in pursuance of the Constitution. That means that a properly ratified treaty can indeed supersede the Constitution.
The problem for the democrats is that there are enough pro-gun democrats that even with a lame duck Congress at the end of the year they may not be able to get the Senate to ratify a gun control treaty. . . therefore, I think they will deem it valid, and bypass the Senate completely.The gun control democrats have been working on this for a while. Fast and Furious was their final attempt to do this without calling on international control over guns, but now that they have decided to work openly with the international leftists, it turns out the plans of the American liberal left mirrors that of the United Nations left - and the plan is nothing new.
The Obama administration is currently negotiating the final details of the new global agreement through the United Nations, claiming the arms trade treaty and the small arms treaty are necessary to fight terrorism, insurgency, and international crime syndicates. They believe taking guns out of the hands of people will eliminate gun violence, when in reality crazies always find a way to get their hands on firearms, and crazies also love their victims unarmed. Statistics at Gun Facts shows that whenever a government tightens their grip on gun control laws, or eliminates the right to bear arms, violent crime goes up.
The George W. Bush administration voted against a similar resolution in 2006. The Obama administration strongly supports the enactment of an anti-gun treaty. In January 2010, U.S. representatives joined with those of 152 other countries in endorsing a U.N. Arms Treaty Resolution to draft a blueprint for enactment in 2012. This activity is planned to be completed by July 27, and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has pledged to push hard for Senate ratification.
The beginnings of this global treaty, however, may not be something recent, but a blast from the past, or more specifically, from back in the sixties. This U.N. treaty reads like a 1961 State Department memorandum. The memorandum in 1961 explains how the United Nations will oversee “complete disarmament” of the American people under the ruse of preventing war.
Anti-gun activists blame guns, all guns, for the threat posed by terrorists, insurgents and “international crime syndicates.” They have decided that all guns are involved in illegal activity on a global scale and should therefore be controlled and regulated by a global authority. To the international progressives, it couldn't possibly be because the terrorists, insurgents and international crime syndicates are evil, and with or without gun control will find a way to spread their madness.
The eventual plan is to take firearms out of the hands of all law-abiding citizens, and only manufacture firearms for the purpose of keeping the U.N. Peace Force armed, as if the so-called benevolence of the United Nations can be trusted.
Who is watching the watchers?
Does that one world government conspiracy theory still sound like a theory?
The memorandum doesn't stop with the plan to disarm citizens. It also calls for the elimination of national borders, destroying national sovereignty, and creating a world army to replace national armies to enforce the global dictates of the United Nations.
Does that one world government conspiracy theory still sound like a theory?
The small arms treaty and arms trade treaty, combined with the Rights of the Child treaty, Law of the Sea Treaty, Agenda 21, and a number of other insidious treaties, along with a number of past treaties we have already been willing to bow to, strip the United States of its sovereignty and its power to decide its own laws.
With Libya, Obama already has proven to us that to him the approval of the international community is more important to him than the approval of Congress, or the American People.
With Libya, Obama already has proven to us that to him the approval of the international community is more important to him than the approval of Congress, or the American People.
The U.N. Gun Treaty, if not stopped, will ultimately result in the destruction of the 2nd Amendment, and our right to keep and bear arms. With as many gun owners there are in this country, the ultimate result will not be the silent compliance by the American populace the leftists are expecting. Stopping this treaty, then, is also an attempt to stop the occurrence of blood in the streets.
Be involved, tell your representatives your dissatisfaction with international intrusion upon our gun rights. If we fail, violence will come to the streets of America.
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
UN Gun Grab Follows State Department Plan - Prison Planet
Heritage Action on Sinking of the Law of the Sea Treaty - Heritage Foundation
"...from my cold, dead hands!"
ReplyDelete