Syria Chemical Warfare a Grand Deception?

By Douglas V. Gibbs

On Sunday at the end of a post titled Obama Backs Off On Syria. . . because of narcissism right here on Political Pistachio, I speculated based on limited information working its way through the Internet that it was possible that the rebels in Syria were the ones behind the chemical attack for the purpose of deception, and that it was possible the Obama administration knew about the grand deception, and may have even assisted in it.

Here is what I wrote:

Oh, and by the way, in Syria it may be more than Assad using these weapons. In fact, perhaps Assad didn't use them at all. Some stories claim the rebels might be drawing the gullible American President into the conflict. Amateurs are easy to manipulate, and the Islamists are using that to the hilt.

Syria chemical weapons attack blamed on Assad, but where's the evidence?

Is It Possible The Syrian Rebels (Not Assad) Used Chemical Weapons?

Evidence: Syria gas attack work of U.S. allies

Rebels Admit Responsibility for Chemical Weapons Attack

In other words, "Could the Islamists be using Obama for a fool?"

It is easy to fool fools. . .

And this is not the first time Obama has tried to criminally assist the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Islamist Jihad:

Video: Uncovered Muslim Brotherhood Documents Could Put Obama In Prison

Quote from Article: We’re not just talking about the bribes the Muslim Brotherhood received in Egypt,but the entire Muslim Brotherhood finances—worldwide—that more than likely included an astounding $8 billion dollar bribe to the Muslim Brotherhood made by the Obama regime.

According to a character named Yossef Bodansky, this attack was a complete work of deception, and he confirms everything I thought was possible regarding Obama, his relationship with Islamism, and the possibility of a grand deception (from Benghazi to Egypt to Syria).  In his article, Did the White House Help Plan the Syrian Chemical Attack?, Yossef asserts that the Syrian rebels gassed their own people, and did it to deceive the world so that America would get involved and unseat Syrian dictator Assad. American assistance in the deception, according to Bodansky, played a part.

In another article, Sarajevo, 1995 and Damascus, 2013: The use of mass attack deception to decide wars, Mr. Bodansky suggests that the chemical attack deception in Syria is not the first time Islamists have done this, and fooled the Americans (or did it with a Democrat President working in cahoots with them), either.  

Is this the scandal of all scandals?  Or is this just a conspiracy theory that deserves no attention?  With the current liberal left media in America that tries to do everything it can to protect Obama we may never know. . . then again, with the new media, the truth may surface.

Though I am not completely confident that the deception argument is a legitimate one, I will say that it would not surprise me.  Islam is all about deception, and they will go to any length to further the cause of Fundamental Muslim expansionism.  The democrats are also a wicked source of constant deception, and since they receive a good share of money from Islamic sources, their greed for power and money would not keep them from participating in this kind of deception.  The puzzle pieces all fit.  Only the verification of hard evidence remains.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary