'Hannity' panel's debate on Jesse Jackson's 'apartheid' in America becomes heated.
You know, I was going to do my journalistic duty and sit through all seven minutes and twenty one seconds of this racist tirade, and then I saw the title of the segment - "Apartheid in America?" - and the identity of its subject matter source - Jesse Jackson (aka The Sinister Minister) - and I knew, even had I not known in advance about Terrell's hate-harangue, that it would be good neither for my blood pressure nor my lofty IQ level to force myself to endure the open mouth of this piece of baktag. I'm forced to concur with this commenter:
Why Hannity even has him on is beyond me.
But it isn't just Terrell - why did Hannity dignify this tiresome slander from the Grand Dragon of race-baiters with even three seconds of airtime, much less an entire segment? Apartheid, as the term is rationally understood, ended in 1964 with the Civil Rights Act of that year - on the strength, of course, of Republican votes, as the vast majority of Democrats - the party of slavery, Jim Crow, and the Ku Klux Klan - adamantly opposed it to the bitter end. Black oppression ever since has come via the state-enforced debasement of cultural and welfare dependency and accompanying cultivation of an impenetrably oblivious victimhood obsession so pervasive and insidious that even half a century later, under a two-term black president, purveyors of black racial supremacy like those on this "discussion" panel are still ranting and raving like they rode to the Fox studios in the back of a bus.
Seriously, was this Hannity's call or someone higher up at Fox? Since when is Jesse Jackson a "newsmaker" anymore? All this asshole has to do is say something publicly incendiary and he still is considered worthy of being talked about? Or is it that Hannity is having difficulties in his new 10PM time slot and is having to resort to this sort of political "Springerization"? Speaking as my own producer, I wouldn't waste a single syllable on the topic at all, much less invite a Leo Terrell on my podcast to have an obscenity-laced shouting match over it. It's garbage, it isn't entertaining, it isn't worth my time, and frankly, it bores me to death - just as it would my listeners, and just as I'm sure it did Hannity's viewers.
Besides, does anybody honestly believe that JJ didn't set this fire on Red Barry's orders, or at the very least, on his behalf? The Obamidency is crumbling, after all; this is a frantic panic, bordering on rabid. So why not starve it of propaganda oxygen? Let the Sinister Ministers and Terrell and whoever else do their crazed braying down the street at the MSNBCCCP asylum, where they'd be right at home and nobody else will pay them the slightest attention who aren't as criminally insane as they are.
Sean, take my advice: Whosever idea this segment was ought to be slapped. Next time, fire their ass.
No comments:
Post a Comment