Gayscrimination

by JASmius

Ya know, if homosexuals wanted to have their own march in New York City, and I was so grievously unfortunate as to have to live in the city whose reflected Seahawk glory has to be wearing off by now, I wouldn't give it no nevermind so long as they kept their clothes on, their hands off each other (and everyone else), and their signs unprofane.

But then I would expect them not to crash the marches of groups they hate, and vice versa.

If, however, it wasn't really that homosexuals wanted to have their own march, but were trying to harass groups they hate by crashing their marches, and those groups fought back to where the homosexuals were relegated to their own march, then if some sort of equal, respectful exchange could be negotiated allowing cross-participation without being obnoxious about it, I wouldn't give that any nevermind either, so long as that agreement was kept.

Problem is, homosexuals want to cross-participate in only one direction, and they insist on being obnoxious about it, and !#$% the groups they hate if they want equal time:

Organizers of New York's annual Gay Pride Parade have invited Bill Donohue to march this year — but the Catholic League president says the offer comes with impossible conditions which include attending a training session and wearing a shirt that promotes gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender lifestyles.

"Quite frankly as a straight guy, I don't go to gay training sessions," Donohue said Thursday on "The Steve Malzberg Show" on Newsmax TV. "I'm pretty much of an untrainable guy when it comes these things."

Donohue also insisted he would never wear an LGBT t-shirt.

Donohue got the green light from NYC Pride, which organizes the parade, Thursday morning — a day after he revealed to Malzberg that he was challenging the group to let him march with a banner proclaiming, "Straight is Great!"

"Mr. Donohue and his group are free to participate in the 2014 March," said David Studinski, director of the NYC Pride event.

"His group's presence affirms the need for this year's Pride theme, 'We Have Won When We're One.' Straight is great — as long as there's no hate."

Quite a revealing slogan, that.  Another version would be, "We Will Cheer When We're All Queer (Now Come Over Here....)".  If that isn't homosexual supremacism, I'll personally polish "Stud"inski's rocket.  And if you're not down with that - ALL of it - then congratulations, you're a "hater".

Given that "Stud"inski's ilk has for years demanded to participate in the Big Apple's St. Patrick's Day march for the express purpose of shoving the faces of New Yorkers in general and Catholics in particular in their dinnermashing social feces, one would think that such ostensible practitioners of kumbayahism would be willing to reciprocate in their own event.

But....no.  Homosexuals insist on promoting their retrograde sexuality in all its carnal visceralness in the St. Paddy's Day parade, but if Bill Donohue is going to join their procession, he's gotta "get with the program," which probably includes popping his back-door "fruit".

Now is that "Stud"inski's way of telling Donohue that he's not wanted at the NYC Shame....oh, sorry, "Pride" event?  Obviously.  So why couldn't he just say so?  It's not like anybody wouldn't be able to discern the reasons why.  And, you know, "the right of the people to peaceably assemble" and all that.  But cathartically disseminating those reasons is the whole point.  It isn't enough to send Donohue a letter politely but formally informing him that he is not invited; "Stud"inski has to flip him off as well.

Because for the Lavender Lobby, Christophobic hate IS their pride.

Sure glad I don't live in Gotham.  On days like this, even being on the same continent seems too close.