Hillary Bashed In Secret Emails, Warren Backed

by JASmius



Anybody still think Mrs. Clinton is the "frontrunner"?:

Liberal activists are slamming Hillary Clinton in a members-only group on Google, with some calling for Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren to run for the White House in 2016 to teach the former secretary of State and mainstream Democrats a lesson.

Wow.  Even though the Empress is no less hard-left than Fauxcahontas.  Surely the highly politically savvy Nutroots haven't forgotten that.  Have they?

Or maybe it's that they see Warren as Hillary circa 1992 - i.e. the same Marxist revolutionary without the past twenty-plus years' worth of scandal baggage, most especially Benghazi.  The Nutroots only back winners, you know.

Or perhaps they're just following the Tea Party's fratricidal example:

"The establishment Dems need to be punished, and the best way for that to happen is for Warren to beat Hillary in the primary on a populist message," Carl Gibson, a progressive activist and writer for Occupy.com, wrote in an email obtained by the Hill. [emphasis added]

Even if that puts Scott Walker in the White House, Carl?  And for what, exactly, do "establishment Dems" need to be punished?  What haven't they done to your satisfaction?  You got the Stimulus, you got Dodd-Frank, you got ObamaCare, you'll get Executive amnesty after the midterms.  What more do you want?  And who exactly, aside from Mrs. Clinton, are these "establishment Dems" you're referring to?  "Red" state Donk senators?  Do you want to see them all "punished" as well?  Hand the Senate over to us on a silver platter?

'cause we'll be happy to take it.

Exit question: Where does Red Barry fit into this equation?  Are even the Nutroots (including, but not limited to, "prominent Democrats, executives of such powerful unions as the SEIU and AFL-CIO, and officials and members of such organizations as Planned Parenthood, the Sierra Club and the Progressive Change Campaign Committee.   The president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, Nancy Keenan, is a member — as well as journalists who work for such liberal news organizations as the Nation magazine and the Huffington Post.") unaware that he likely isn't leaving?  Or is Senator Warren the next "socialist that can make socialism work"?