I didn't think that Barack Obama could resist delivering another patronizingly racist sermon for long:
I think there are police departments that have to do some soul searching. I think there are some communities that have to do some soul searching. But I think we, as a country, have to do some soul searching.
I think Jim Geraghty speaks for us all in today's Morning Jolt e-newsletter:
No, we don’t!
This is not a time for the usual “Socialism of Blame” where responsibility for what happened gets spread far and wide and equally to everybody.
Why do we have to do some soul searching? We didn't do anything to Freddie Gray, the man who died after being arrested. The police actions are being investigated. We didn't set fire to a senior center under construction. We didn't run into a CVS and grab everything we could. We didn't set police cruisers on fire, or jump atop smashed police cruisers.
You know who’s responsible for the punctured fire hose? The SOB who reached down with a knife and stabbed the fire hose!
All over Twitter Monday evening, people linked to that video and asked, “Why would he do that?” as if the answer were unimaginable. He did it because he didn't want the firefighters to put the fire out. He wanted the businesses to burn. He wanted the buildings to burn. He wanted to destroy. This may reflect his inability to create anything of value in his life so far, or it may reflect an anarchic desire to see destruction, which motivates many arsonists. After a while, the “why” stops mattering that much. It pales in comparison to the need to stop a guy like this.
“We, as a country, have to do some soul searching”? I’m sure there’s a significant chunk of you who have never even been to Baltimore.
We can shut down our entire chain of soul stores and do a complete inventory, counting what’s on every shelf, and it’s not going to change one fact on the ground in Baltimore. [emphases added]
True, every last word of it. But Barack Obama doesn't want to change one, or any, facts on the ground in Baltimore. The burning down and destruction of that city, as with Ferguson, Missouri before it, is part and parcel of his racist, Ameriphobic agenda. It suits his purposes of encouraging and stoking a coast-to-coast race war that he can exploit to impose national martial law, AND blame it all on "white America".
That is what "We, as a nation, have to do some soul-searching" means. He doesn't mean all Americans; he means white America. Because "white America" is irredeemably "racist" and will ultimately have to be put down and enslaved "for its own good" by forcing it - us - to "confront our racism" and "confess our sins" and accept permanent anti-white apartheid - and reverse slavery, if necessary, which it will be - as "penance" and "atonement" for our "race's" sins of centuries ago that we have nothing whatsoever to do with.
Collective guilt versus individual responsibility - or the "socialism of blame". If each one of us is responsible for our own actions, there's nothing, no opening, for a tyrant to exploit to further and expand his tyranny. But if guilt can be assigned on a political and group basis by the tyrant, there is no end of the reign of terror that can be visited upon the groups that are, shall we say, out of political favor, and politically favored groups have a blank check to engage in the worst evil, and unlimited atrocities.
Which brings us to Ebony Dickens, the individual pictured above:
An East Point woman accused of making serious threats against police officers on her Facebook page is in jail.
Channel 2’s Liz Artz learned the FBI, Homeland Security, the District Attorney’s office and the New York Police Department assisted East Point police with Ebony Dickens’ arrest.
Dickens is accused of writing a Facebook post Monday using the name Tiffany Milan in which she called for “death to all white cops nationwide.”
The post went on to say, “I thought about shooting every white cop I see in the head until I’m either caught by the police or killed by them… Might kill at least fifteen tomorrow, I’m plotting now.”
“That’s fifteen people that she’s talking about killing within a day or so, so whether she is serious or not that’s something that we have to take seriously,” said East Point police Lieutenant Cliff Chandler.
In the post, Dickens says she condones black-on-white killings. She took down the post on Tuesday, just hours before she was arrested.
The post was also shared on the WSB-TV Facebook page Tuesday. We took it down immediately and reported it to Atlanta Police and our FBI contacts....
Dickens has been charged with disseminating information related to terrorist acts. [emphasis added]
I'm actually surprised that Miss Dickens was taken into custody. In fact, her arrest was, in the current ruling "soul-searching" paradigm, "proof" of "white racism". After all, she's black, of a politically favored group, and thus she's entitled to murder white cops, because, "social justice". Because those white cops are, per the "official" group definition, "racists," and thus their lives are worthless, don't matter, and are forfeit to any black person who wants to take them.
This is the madness that is poisoning America in 2015. And it is being administered from the very top.
The one interesting question to take out of this story is why Miss Dickens publicized her white cop-killing spree beforehand instead of just doing it. It's not as if doing it wouldn't have made her famous after the fact. My guess is twofold: Either (1) she thought she could announce her intentions, then carry them out, and be celebrated for the mass blow she struck against American Crackerdom; or, a little more rationally, (2) her Facebook manifesto was intended to provoke her arrest, thus "proving" white racism" by denying her her "right" to murder dozens of white cops.
Was that Barack Obama's fault? Nope. Ebony Dickens is responsible for her own actions.
But Barack Obama is responsible for his as well, which have implanted this mentality in the minds of so many African-Americans.
Or, at least, he would be if he wasn't president-for-life, and unaccountable to anybody.
After all, it's good to be god AND king.
Exit questions: (1) Does this mean that Charles Dickens was "Ivory"? And (2) do you want to say, "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times," or shall I?
No comments:
Post a Comment