Sunday, June 22, 2014

Islamist Terror Increases Worldwide, Aided by Obama Administration

By Douglas V. Gibbs

The large number of former Muslims that I have interviewed over the years on my radio programs have all given the same testimony: There may be peaceful Muslims, but it is not because of Islam, it is despite Islam.

 These same "apostates" also told me that "every Muslim is a potential terrorist."

Opposition to Islam is death.

All nations, all neighborhoods, all places dominated by Islam become a war zone, where non-Muslims fear even approaching these areas.  In France, there are over 750 no-go zones where even the police won't even go into the Muslim dominated areas.

In Kenya, a coastal town was attacked for hours, with the Islamic terrorists killing those who couldn't answer questions about Islam and those who didn't know the Somali language. At least 48 people were killed and two hotels were set on fire.

One witness said, "They came to our house at around 8 p.m. and asked us in Swahili whether we were Muslims. My husband told them we were Christians and they shot him in the head and chest," said Anne Gathigi.

Another resident said his two brothers were killed because the attackers did not like that the brothers did not speak Somali.

At least 67 people were killed in September when four al-Shabab gunmen attacked an upscale mall in the Kenyan capital, Nairobi.

In Pakistan, The Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) concluded their 192nd meeting with the ruling that women are un-Islamic and that their mere existence contradicted Sharia and the will of Allah. As the meeting concluded CII Chairman Maulana Muhammad Khan Shirani noted that women by existing defied the laws of nature, and to protect Islam and the Sharia women should be forced to stop existing as soon as possible. The announcement comes a couple of days after CII’s 191st meeting where they dubbed laws related to minimum marriage age to be un-Islamic.

After declaring women to be un-Islamic, Shirani explained that there were actually two kinds of women – haraam and makrooh. “We can divide all women in the world into two distinct categories: those who are haraam and those who are makrooh. Now the difference between haraam and makrooh is that the former is categorically forbidden while the latter is really really disliked,” Shirani said.

He further went on to explain how the women around the world can ensure that they get promoted to being makrooh, from just being downright haraam. “Any woman that exercises her will is haraam, absolutely haraam, and is conspiring against Islam and the Ummah, whereas those women who are totally subservient can reach the status of being makrooh. Such is the generosity of our ideology and such is the endeavour of Muslim men like us who are the true torchbearers of gender equality,” the CII chairman added.

In Sweden, there has been a rise in female genital mutilation, also often referred to as "female circumcision."  The serious problem is a direct result in the increase of the Muslim population in that country.  The law enables genital examination of children to be carried out without parents’ consent, and what has been found is that the crime of female genital mutilation, a crime in Sweden since 1982, and punishable by up to four years in prison (10 years if judged to be an aggravated offense), is spreading rapidly.

The practice became widespread in Sweden in the early and mid-1990s with the influx of Somali migrants.

Presently, the risk of the procedure being practiced increases in the summer when many schoolgirls visit their parents’ home country.  “We're working to inform parents that they could face prison if they come back and their children have undergone female genital mutilation,” said Petra Blom Andersson, student health coordinator in Norrköping.

Mutilation carried out abroad has been a crime in Sweden since 1999.

In 2013, Somalis were the third largest group granted asylum in the EU countries.  Sweden gave refugee status to 26,400 people last year, more than any other EU country. The third largest group arriving in Sweden came from Eritrea, a country in which according to a UN report female genital mutilation is illegal but widely practiced, with the rate estimated at 94 per cent.

Female circumcision is carried out in 28 countries in the world, involving the cutting and/or the removal of the clitoris and other vaginal tissue, often under unsanitary conditions.
In the United States, female genital mutilation is also on the rise, imported from Muslim countries.  According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, at least 150,000 to 200,000 girls in the U.S. are at risk of being forced to undergo cutting.  The practice was banned in the United States in 1996.

The reason for the rise is contributed by the growth of communities that are historically female genital mutilation practicing, especially in the last two or three years.

Immigration to the U.S. from countries in Africa quadrupled between 1990 and 2011 from 360,000 to 1.6 million according to a recent report released by New York City’s planning department.

In Phoenix, Arizona, a staggering 98 percent of Somali women being treated at the Refugee Women’s Health Clinic have been circumcised.

The most horrifying part of all of this is that there has only been one successful prosecution in the U.S.

People won't report against their families, and the mutilation is usually organized by the child’s mother or grandmother and supported by the father, therefore, many cases go unreported.

In France, which is also home to significant communities which traditionally practice female genital mutilation, experts say enforcing the law and outreach to practicing communities must go together.

In stark comparison to the single American case, there have been over 100 successful prosecutions in France, with prison sentences for those found guilty of cutting or of allowing their daughters to be cut.

In France, prosecution uses existing child protection laws.  There is no specific legislation regarding female genital mutilation, for fear of pointing a discriminatory finger towards immigrants.

In America, federal legislation was passed in January 2013 making “vacation cutting” illegal – when girls are taken during their school vacations to countries where female genital mutilation is widely practiced to be cut there.

In New York the local police department disbanded its anti-terrorism unit, yet, al-Qaeda has been meeting in the open, in larger numbers.  As President Obama claims the terrorist group is on the run, al-Qaeda leaders have been appearing brazenly out in the open, and have been openly claiming that they have plans to attack the United States.

In Iraq, as ISIS (a hardline Islamic force) cuts its way through the country, slaughtering any opposition along the way, graphic images showing captured Iraqi government soldiers being loaded by the dozen onto trucks, then gunned down in a Nazi-style mass grave on the side of the road, have escaped the region.

Despite the fact that Barack Obama pulled all American forces out of Iraq, and has used a posture comparable to Neville Chamberlaine's when the British Prime Minister was dealing with Adolph Hitler, the Democrats blame George W. Bush for the current crisis in Iraq.

The leader of ISIS does not see republican and democrat when it comes to the United States.  Their intention, according to the leader of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, is to march on Baghdad, and move into "direct confrontation" with the United States.

"The sons of Islam have prepared for such a day."

While the White House claims they take terrorist threats seriously, behind the scenes the reality is terrifying.

There was more to the Bergdahl prisoner exchange than President Obama acting unconstitutionally without consenting Congress as required by Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution where the document grants to Congress the authority to "make rules concerning captures on land and water."  In the process of the exchange the President also illegally provided material support to the Taliban, by releasing dangerous personnel, and now it is emerging there were also cash payments involved in the deal.  The Islamic terrorist group holding Bergdahl demanded a cash ransom.  One source indicates that the group holding Bergdahl could care less about prisoners, all they wanted was cash.

Only one of the released terrorists, in fact, was a part of the Islamist network holding Bergdahl.  The group did not benefit whatsoever from the exchange, and it may be possible the exchange was an unnecessary part of the deal, and the Obama administration used it as an excuse to release dangerous terrorists.  In other words, the Obama administration aided Islamic terrorism by releasing dangerous Islamic terrorists without the group holding Bergdahl even requesting their release.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

at

No comments:

Post a Comment