Microchipped Humans Are Easier To Track, and Control

By Douglas V. Gibbs
Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host

When it comes to the new world order of global governance, we are about half of a decade behind Europe in the race towards absolute tyranny.  They start the madness, and then our American Democrats scream, "we want to be just like them!"

In the movie Casino Royale, Daniel Craig's first foray into the world of 007 James Bond, when Bond's boss, M, decides her new double-oh is getting out of control, she has a technician punch a device into his arm.  Under X-Ray, it looks to be a complex pill full of technological goodies.

"So you can keep an eye on me?" Bond asks as he recognizes what was just inserted under his skin.

M responded, "Yes."

Hollywood, and Britain's companions in the industry, all understand that slipping a piece of computer technology under one's skin is a sure-fire way to track and control people.  They admit it in the movies they star in.  Yet, the liberal left Marxists are using embedded microchip technology on the public at large and they are telling us it's nothing to worry about.  In Sweden, a microchip embedded under the skin is being established to replace credit cards and keys.  At Sweden’s largest state owned train system the operators don't have to worry about the presentation of tickets, because they can simply scan the chips under the skin of their customers instead.

Around 3,000 people in Sweden have already had a chip embedded in their hand in order to access secure areas of buildings.

The liberal left, however, well-knowing that science fiction writers throughout modern history, and the modern film industry (and television, for that matter) portray such technology as being draconian and a tool of tyrants, they say out of the other side of their mouths that there are no concerns about privacy.  They are benevolent guardians, they claim, and big government in this day and age could not possibly become tyrannical, unless a position of power is held by someone who is conservative and believes in limited government.

Isn't that quite the contradiction?

America's NBC News has already reported that microchipping of the citizens is on the way, but it will begin with your children.  You will pass away, and the children will be chipped into the new camp.  Then, once the older generation passes away, the younger folks will already be accustomed to being microchipped.  They will accept it as being something just as normal as the barcode.

“It’s not a matter of if it will happen, but when,” electronics expert Stuart Lipoff told the network.

Christians compare the practice to biblical passages stating that there will be a mark of the beast on the forehead or the back of the hand.  Constitutionalists recognize the practice as pure tyranny, and a move by government to deepen its claws into our lives so that we lose our individualism, and become simply electronic numbers in a massive collective of obedient automatons.

Once society is all microchipped, it'll be easier to track down those who dare to disagree with the political agenda of the ruling elite.  In Canada, currently without the help of microchips, the government is prosecuting those who dare to disagree with the concept of man-made climate change.  To be a climate change denier is to be an enemy of the state, and once we are microchipped, shutting down our ability to buy and sell, and therefore our ability to survive in a technocracy, will be eliminated. Therefore, everyone will be compliant.

In America, the leftists are fully convinced that when we had no hurricanes, it was the fault of man-made climate change.  Now that we've had more hurricanes than we can handle, it is also the fault of man-made climate change.  If chipped, there would be no disagreement with those statements, anymore.  People would know better.  Their microchips would mean death to the citizen, if they dared to have a contrary opinion.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary