Monday, October 31, 2016

Obama, Hillary, & Media Display Bigotry Toward Christians

By Capt Joseph R. John, October 30, 2016

For a political party that loves to label their opponents as bigots, it’s remarkable how bigoted the Obama administration has been for the last 8 years against Christian religious teachings and Christians in the US Armed Forces who can’t fight back,  Christians who have deep religious convictions also have their well held and sincere religious beliefs with regard to abortion, homosexuality, males using girls bathrooms & showers in schools, and have their opposition to teaching very young & innocent grammar school students about homosexuality.  According to  former counter-terrorism training officer and American police detective George Tobias, in the below listed article, the Clinton administration would continue Obama’s bigotry toward Christians,”

The latest WikiLeaks dump of John Podesta E-mails shows that the Obama administration kept a list of high-profile Muslims it wanted to appoint to top Obama administration jobs, sub-cabinet jobs, outside boards, agencies, and policy committees.  The 2008 E-mails reveal that it wasn’t enough to be Arab American, you had to be Arab and Muslim to make it onto Obama’s list.
“Many Lebanese Americans, for example, are Christian,” notes one E-mail written by Preeta Bansal, who worked on the Obama transition team headed by John Podesta.  John Podesta is now Hillary Clinton’s Presidential Campaign Chairman. “In the last list (of outside boards/commissions), most who are listed appear to be Muslim American, except that a handful (where noted) may be Arab American but of an unacceptable religion (esp. Christian).”

In another indication of outright the bigotry against Christians by the Obama administration, a law suit was filed against DHS by the Heartland Alliance’s National Immigrant Justice Center, a progressive liberal advocacy organization.  Heartland is “dedicated to ensuring human rights protections” for immigrants and asylum seekers—including apparently for terrorists.  Heartland filed a FOIA lawsuit against the Department of Homeland Security for discriminating against Syrian and Assyrian Christian refugees for the last 5 years.
In an otherwise unremarkable opinion, obtained after filing, a Federal Freedom of Information Act request, a Federal Appellate Court Judge issued a sharp rejoinder to the Obama administration over an issue that has been written about and broadcast in the national news media.  The Appellate Judge said there was almost a complete lack of Syrian Christian refugees being brought into the US—the numbers are included in the below listed article.

The lawsuit also claimed that DHS was refusing to release the identity of Tier III terrorist organizations, unlike the identities of what are defined as Tier I and Tier II terrorist organizations that are publicly identified.

Tier III terrorist organizations “tend to be groups about which the U.S. government does not have good intelligence, making it essential that [DHS] be able to obtain information about them during screening interviews that are as focused and complete as possible.”  Despite the lack of information, Obama refused to let the FBI interview entering Muslim refugees to determine if they had terrorist ties

To further reveal the bigotry against Christians practiced by Obama and Hillary’s State Department the following facts are submitted.  Although ten percent of the population of Syria are Syrian and Assyrian Christian, yet despite that fact, less than one-half of 1 percent of the Syrian Refugees admitted to the United States over the last 8 years were Christian.  Syrian and Assyrian Christians have been in desperate need of a safe haven from ISIS Radical Islamic Terrorists who have been butchering, and slaughtering Christians for those 5 years. 

ISIS has been crucifying Christians, burning them alive, drowning them in cages, beheading them, burying them alive, and making them kneel before shooting them in the back of their heads.  Of the nearly 11,000 Syrian Refugees recently allowed to enter the United States by Obama, only 56 Christians were among them.  The Greek Catholic Relief Agency has over 300,000 Syrian and Assyrian Christians in camps seeking entry into the US, but Obama has refused to let them enter the US for the last 5 years.

Few if any of the ISIS Radical Islamic Terrorists are being held accountable for their heinous crimes against Syrian and Assyrian Christians.  Besides slaughtering Syrian and Assyrian Christians, much of Iraq’s Christian community has been ripped from their ancient ancestral homes on the Plains of Nineveh. The ISIS Radical Islamic Terrorists are also responsible for the destruction of their Christians’ cultural heritage symbols in their churches, ancient bibles, 2000 year old Christian churches, and Assyrian Christian monasteries. However, while Obama frets over Islamophobia, hardly anything is said about the horrors faced by the defenseless followers of Jesus Christ.
So while the Obama administration has brought in over 900,000+ Middle East Muslim Refugees into the US, and has resettled them in 187 cities throughout the United States, much less than ½ of 1 percent of the entering refugees were Christians.  Obama has been concealing basic information about the entering Muslim refugees, behind a wall of government secrecy, and at the same time refusing to let the FBI interview entering Muslim refugees to determine if they have terrorist ties, 

The 900,000+ Middle East Muslim Refugees that have been resettled throughout the US, without strict instruction to the resettling agencies not to inform elected local & state officials and their law enforcement agencies where those refugees are being placed.  Despite the fact that the Syrian refugee crisis is the catalyst that was responsible for the infiltration ISIS Radical Islamic Terrorists into Western Europe, resulting in many murderous Radical Islamic Terrorist attacks against unsuspecting Europeans.   ISIS has openly bragged that the terrorists that they trained, would also be infiltrated into the United States.   

Obama is threatening to veto the current Military Budget passed by Congress that is currently sitting on his desk awaiting his signature, because it protects Christians religious beliefs.  Obama wants the absolute freedom to discriminate against Christian social service providers who interact with the government—all because many of those religious organizations are unable to endorse the LGBT cause, because of their well held religious teachings and beliefs. The Russell Amendment in the budget, authored by an endorsed Combat Veteran For Congress, Cong Steve Russell. LTC-USA (Ret) (R-OK-5), merely reaffirms the protection of Christians and Jewish members of the military, while clarifying that religious organizations (Jewish and Christian) have a right to employ people committed to authentically live and operate in accordance with their faith tenets. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act already specifically protects a religious organizations’ ability to hire based on religion. In short, Christian and Jewish religious organizations are free to be religious organizations.

Obama’s previously violated the Religious Freedom of Chaplins who were refused the right to read letters to their congregations from the pulpit from their Cardinals (the very reason why the Pilgrims left England and migrated to America in 1620).  That restriction imposed by Obama, not only violates the Chaplin’s Freedom of Religion, it also a violates their Freedom of Speech.  When it comes to sexual orientation and gender identity policies Obama’s restrictions of the religious beliefs of members of the US Armed Forces is egregious.  Obama is the first occupant of the Oval Office to refuse to guarantee Religious Freedom for members of the US Armed Forces. 

By clicking on the below listed link, you will be able to watch a video of Dinesh D’Souza, who was a Keynote Speaker at one of the Combat Veterans For Congress Patriotic Gala Events, defend Christianity from Obama’s oppression.  Dinesh provides his “Words of Wisdom to Christians”, and details Obama’s and Hillary’s opposition to Freedom of Religion.

Copyright by Capt Joseph R. John.  All Rights Reserved.  The material can only posted on another Web site or distributed on the Internet by giving full credit to the author.  It may not be published, broadcast, or rewritten without the permission from the author.

Joseph R. John, USNA ‘62
Capt     USN(Ret)/Former FBI
Chairman, Combat Veterans For Congress PAC
2307 Fenton Parkway, Suite 107-184
San Diego, CA 92108

Then I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, “Whom shall I send, and who will go for Us?” Then I said, “Here am I. Send me!”
-Isaiah 6:8
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Not Halloween

By Douglas V. Gibbs
AuthorSpeakerInstructorRadio Host 

October 31 is not Halloween for my household.  Every year we celebrate my wife's birthday on that day.  It's pretty nice, usually.  While everyone is out Trick-Or-Treating, or getting funky at some Halloween Party, we have our choice of empty restaurants to go to so as to celebrate her birthday.

This year we decided to do a little traveling to the Central Coast of California.  Below are a handful of the pictures from that trip as we approach the day we will be returning to our everyday lives.

We drove up Interstate 5 and then cut across to the Pacific Coast Highway at about Morro Bay.  We traveled PCH (Highway 1) along the coast between Morrow Bay and Monterey, going through areas like Big Sur and Carmel by the Sea.  The scenery was breathtaking, but as we were reminded from the last time we drove that route, it can be a brutal drive.

We stopped a few times along the way to breath in the cool, fresh air, and snap a few images.  We got our feet wet in the Pacific Ocean.  We observed sea lions.  We viewed lighthouses.  And then, on the way back down along Highway 101 we visited two Spanish Missions.

In short, it was a pretty spectacular weekend. . . despite a constant battle with rain and overcast conditions.

The grand finale today will be a quick jaunt to Universal Studios.  We have annual passes so it only costs us the parking every time we go. . . which happens about once per month.  The above pic of my wife with Frankenstein is from the time before last we were at the Los Angeles amusement park.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

October Scramble Targets Swing States and Blue States

By Douglas V. Gibbs
AuthorSpeakerInstructorRadio Host

Despite the mainstream media's frantic attempt to ignore and cover-up the crimes and untrustworthiness of Hillary Clinton, the rising mountain of new information as we approach the election in the last days of October have caused a great deal of damage to the Democrat Party's attempt to keep the White House in their clutches.

The sudden emergence of Anthony Weiner's computer, which it turns out is filled with 650,000 emails that the FBI feels needs to be investigated, returns voters to questioning the relationship between Hillary Clinton and her top aid Huma Abedin, and how deep the rabbit hole goes when it comes to the Democrat Party presidential nominee's willingness to place the national security of the United States at risk for her own political and financial advancement.  The interest in Abedin's estranged husband's computer was triggered by an investigation into Weiner's alleged activities of sending sexual messages to a fifteen year old.  While searching the computer for child pornography, investigators stumbled upon the hundreds of thousands of emails either sent to, or sent from, the private email server of Hillary Clinton while she was Secretary of State.

While the Clinton Campaign states the emails are duplicates of what has already been revealed, the FBI says it will take weeks to confirm that.  An extensive combing of the emails is necessary so as to determine if in those emails either classified information or important new evidence in the Clinton email probe are contained within them.  Even then, the start of the probe into the emails was delayed by the need for a court order.

Within the FBI itself there is now an internal battle regarding whether or not to proceed, with the Department of Justice head Loretta Lynch remarking the timing during a national election campaign makes the probe inappropriate.  The infighting in the FBI also reminds us about the fact that Andrew McCabe, the second in command at the bureau, is married to Jill McCabe who received $467,500 in campaign funds in late 2015 from the political-action committee of Virginia Gov.Terry McAuliffe, a longtime ally of the Clintons and, until he was elected governor in November 2013, a Clinton Foundation board member.

The appearance of financial crimes and influence-peddling regarding Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation has Democrats scrambling for cover, denying any wrong doing.

Or as Dinesh D'Souza said in his film "Hillary's America," when caught they "Deny, Deny, Deny."

A recent survey shows that the Email scandal has been damaging to the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, with 45% saying that the scandal is worse than Watergate, and 61% saying that they fear that a probe of Hillary's criminal activity will drag into White House if she is elected.  Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton's unfavorable rating has hit a new high.  60% of voters say they view Hillary Clinton unfavorably according to a ABC News/Washington Post poll released Monday morning.

Even the mainstream media has been unable to fully shield Hillary Clinton from the emerging information, largely because of the alternative media reporting the news on the internet.  Encouraged by the fact that Hillary Clinton is off-balance and back-pedaling the Trump Campaign is targeting swing States and blue States during the final week before the federal election.

Trump held rallies Sunday in Colorado and New Mexico, and he was scheduled to make two stops Monday in Michigan — and visit Wisconsin the day after that.

Clinton, meanwhile, is focusing on shoring up turnout and enthusiasm, particularly among minority voters, in such critical battlegrounds as North Carolina, Florida and Ohio. Early voting data from Ohio contains ominous signs of a lack of enthusiasm for Clinton, notably in places such as Cleveland’s Cuyahoga County, where high black turnout propelled President Obama to victory in 2008 and 2012.

The Trump camp is working to bring home GOP voters, while also hoping that a turnout of independents and blue-collar workers could bring new states into play beyond Pennsylvania, Nevada and Colorado — Democratic strongholds where Trump has been campaigning for months but according to mainstream media polls he remains behind in.  In Colorado surveys are showing that Trump has been successful in creating doubt and skepticism about Hillary through his claim that the system is rigged and that she is crooked.  Even the media's polls show Colorado may not be as solid for Hillary as the Democrats desire, possibly making the State a toss-up State.

In swing States, Republican leaners who have been hesitant about Trump, with the resurrection of the FBI investigation into Clinton’s email scandal, are considering coming home to the GOP nominee.  In Vermont the heavy write-in vote for Bernie Sanders may split the blue State's Democrat Party vote, giving the State to Trump.  According to Politico, even Michigan might be in play.

On the map at the top of this article we must if we may be seeing the gray States go red on November 8th?

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Trump's Bradley Effect

By Douglas V. Gibbs
AuthorSpeakerInstructorRadio Host 

Conventional Wisdom, according to the liberal left Democrats and the mainstream media, says that Hillary Clinton is destined to win the Presidential Election of 2016.  Hillary Clinton is so confident that she should win by a landslide that at one point she actually cried about why she's not ahead by 50 points.  If Hillary Clinton were a racehorse, a football team, or a boxer, betting against her would be only something a sucker would do.

Donald Trump says the system is rigged.  Rumors circulate each and every election.  I am a firm believer that Romney won that last election, but lost only because of the fraud and corruption committed by those supporting Barack Obama.  There were, after all, in 2012, instances where in some districts the number of voters exceeded the number of those registered, and other instances where in some districts 100% or 99% voted for Barack Obama - a situation that is a statistical impossibility.

In this election we have learned from the Wikileaks released Podesta emails that the polls are being skewed by an oversampling of Democrats, but even with the manipulation Hillary is only barely ahead.  Does that mean that a number of the Democrats polled say they will be voting for Mr. Trump?

I have talked to people who support Trump, but won't put Trump bumper stickers on their cars for fear of the car being keyed.

Wait a second.  The Founding Fathers were willing to put on the line their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor, and we are worried about a paint job?

Which brings us back to the polls.  Are some of the people being polled afraid to admit they will be voting for Trump?

In 1982 the governor's race in California included candidate Tom Bradley of Los Angeles.  All of the polls said the first black mayor of L.A. was a shoe-in for governor.  Yet, on election day, Bradley lost.  A number of people had said they were voting for Bradley, but didn't.  They were too afraid they'd be considered racist if they said otherwise.  So, it turned out the polls were wrong.

The Bradley Effect may also apply in the 2016 Presidential Race.  How many people who haven't admitted they will vote for Trump will be happy to pull the lever for him in the privacy of the voting booth?  Could it be that Hillary Clinton is leading in the polls, be it because of a manipulation of the polls, or the fact that some persons are too afraid to tell the pollsters they are voting for Trump, but in the end she will lose?

Aside from oversampling Democrats, the pollsters say they are targeting "likely voters."  How many people who have voted in the past might not be this time, and how many folks who have not been voting in recent elections will be?  After all, more than 40 percent of Americans eligible to vote have not cast a ballot in the last two presidential elections.

Remember, the polls four years ago predicted Romney would beat Obama.  But Obama had pulled into the voting booths a large number of voters who were considered "not likely" to vote.  Might that happen this year with Trump supporters?

This election also has another unique factor when you campare it to past elections.  Trump is like no other candidate in recent history, so how can it be determined from traditional methods if any particular voter will be voting for him, or not?  He defied conventional wisdom in the primaries, and he is defying those ideas now.  While a good portion of Obama voters are not likely to vote for Trump in this election, a few might be.  And, Trump has activated a silent voting block that has been sick of the system, tired of the political machine, and then here comes Trump claiming to be the champion of bringing down that system.  He's anti-establishment, and a number of voters, though they may not be in full agreement with all of his policies, like the fact that he's the stick in the spokes of the establishment, and will vote for him because, as Michael Moore put it, Trump is the biggest F-You to the political elite in American History.

All of this has also been terrorized by recent events that makes Hillary look even more untrustworthy than she already is.  We have the Wikileaks email releases, Project Veritas videos exposing the Democrat Party and Hillary Clinton election campaign corruption, and then there's the FBI stuff going on which has been re-accelerated by Anthony Weiner's computer.  The emerging information that the media has been trying to ignore reveals how much of a corrupt and unlikable person Hillary truly is.  And don't think voters aren't paying attention.  With the latest revelations, Hillary's lead has plummeted, and in the case of the Washington Post ABC News poll, she's lost 11 points in one week.

While the Democrats and media are busy Borking Donald J. Trump, is it possible he's going to pull off a victory despite their corruption and deception?

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Video: Islamic State of Germany

By Douglas V. Gibbs
AuthorSpeakerInstructorRadio Host 

Never mind Halloween, here's the real horror coming to America. . .

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Beaumont Trump Rallies Continue

By Douglas V. Gibbs
AuthorSpeakerInstructorRadio Host 

The picture to the left shows yours truly (NRA hat and Hillary for Prison sign at the ready) at the Beaumont Trump Rally on October 21, 2016.  While I was up north in Hillary Land, also known as Northern California, the Banning-Beaumont-Cherry Valley Tea Party held another such rally on October 28th.  There is one more Friday left before the election, and they will be out there again.  Join the Tea Party at the Beaumont Ave. overpass bridge over Interstate 10 from 2pm to 5pm.

While the world says the Tea Party has vanished, or is silent, I assure you that here in Southern California that is not the case.  A number of Tea Party groups are operating, influencing elections, and rallying as needed to turn this country around.

Fight for freedom, defend freedom, join us on the streets rallying to stop a Hillary Clinton White House.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

You Tube Channel where the rally videos are at can be visited by clicking here.

Sunday, October 30, 2016

Trump Searches for Homeless Woman

By Douglas V. Gibbs
AuthorSpeakerInstructorRadio Host 

There is a clear message by the liberal left Democrat Hillary Clinton supporters. They are all about their political agenda and acting in violence against all dissent, not the love and care for the poor they claim to be. After a violent liberal left Democrat destroyed Donald Trump's star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame, a new one was put in, and a homeless Trump supporter decided to protect it. Afterward, liberal left loonies attacked the protector. Message? You can have free speech as long as you agree with progressive Democrats. Otherwise, be prepared to have your ass kicked.

So much for liberal left tolerance.

Donald Trump has heard about what happened, and he is prepared to help make things right.

Even before the attack against her, Trump wanted to give her a gift.  Now, he wants her to have the last laugh.

See the Twitter Exchange at Gateway Pundit:

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Huma Pleads Ignorance

By Douglas V. Gibbs
AuthorSpeakerInstructorRadio Host 

Isn't it amazing that the Democrats say they know everything, until it comes to scandals?  Then, they know nothing.

Huma Abedin is acting very Clintonesque when it comes to her estranged husband's (Anthony Weiner) computer, and the fact that it was packed with Hillary Clinton emails.  She says she knows nothing about it.  Full ignorance.

Or, as Dinesh D'Souza pointed out in his film "Hillary's America," when caught, the Democrats "Deny, Deny, Deny."

The Washington Post reported that Huma Abedin, Hillary Clinton's closest aide, was not a regular user of the laptop in question, and her lawyers did not bother to search the device for work-related emails after she agreed to turn over such messages to the State Department.

Now that the FBI has gotten into Anthony Weiner's computer over his perverted chase of a 15 year old, it has been revealed that the computer holds at least 10,000 emails of interest to investigators.

While the Clinton camp says they are simply duplicates (nothing to see here, move along), law enforcement officials say otherwise.

The New York Times says Clinton allies have suggested that Hillary Clinton should distance herself from Abedin.  Rumors about them being lesbian lovers, and a history of standing by each other, means it may be emotionally difficult for the presidential candidate to abandon Abedin - especially since the relationship, at least from a professional standpoint, is two decades old.

Clinton's team has also already made a major investment in Huma, defending her unusual employment arrangement in which Abedin was paid by the Clinton Foundation, a consulting firm called Teneo and the State Department all at once.

"We of course stand behind her," Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta told reporters, adding Abedin has "completely and voluntarily complied with and cooperated with the investigation."

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

More Wikileaks Emails Released

By Douglas V. Gibbs
AuthorSpeakerInstructorRadio Host 

RELEASE: The Podesta Emails Part 22   http

In the latest Wikileaks release Clinton continues to be portrayed as crooked and diabolical.  There's even evidence of Clinton money laundering revealed.  There is illegally donated money to both the Clinton Campaign, and political accounts.  An email from March 2009 reveals potential impropriety in shifting money from one democratic donor group to another, the Center for American Progress (whose also been under fire in the Project Veritas video relases).

The Department of Justice, under Lynch's leadership, will continue to look the other way, I am sure.

An email from August 2015 reveals German politician Michael Werz advising John Podesta that Turkish president Erdogan "is making substantial investments in U.S. to counter opposition (CHP, Kurds, Gulenists etc.) outreach to policymakers" and the US Government.

Erdogan got a favor back, with the U.S. Government saying nothing about his unprecedented crackdown on "coup plotters" which resulted in 100,000 workers losing their jobs, being arrested, or otherwise removed from Erdogan's political opposition.

Favors, and corruption.  It's the Clinton, and Democrat Party, way.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Gay Trump Supporters Reveal Homosexual Agenda's Thuggery

By Douglas V. Gibbs

According to Breitbart. . .
A gay couple who are both supporters of Trump's bid for President said they have a lot of gay friends who support Trump.

Among the reasons?  They are "tired of the bullsh*t government. Time for a change. Trump’s the man for it" and that Trump "would bring more jobs to the country."

Since the gay couple revealed they are voting for Trump, they "have received death threats from gay people warning them not to leave their house or go to any gay clubs. One message to them, they say, told them to drink bleach."

One critic of the gay Ohio couple wrote "How do they rectify their support for Trump with his statements that he would nominate judges to the Supreme Court who would overturn marriage equality?"

Other comments use words like “idiots,” “twats,” and “dumbasses.”

The writer of the Breitbart article compares the hateful reactions to his "first 23 years in the Soviet Union."  The gay writer says he was often bullied by cruel homophobic teenagers and teachers.

The Trump supporting gay couple mentioned above are not towing the LGBT party line, and they’re paying the price for it.  One suggestion was that someone should “take away their gay card.”

Intimidation, which is what the left is so good about.

As a conservative I don't believe marriage should be redefined.  As a constitutionalist, I believe marriage is none of the federal government's business (that includes the federal activist judges).  Send the issue to the States.  Let the States decide.

Like their Democrat counterparts who attacked the homeless guy protecting Trump's star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame, the gay community by attacking the couple listed above are denying them their right to an opposing opinion.  Is that what being gay is all about when it comes to politics?  Thuggery?  

It sounds like they are not in favor of us being a republic, but would rather the United States be a country ruled by an angry mob. .  . and as we've seen, mob rule becomes mob violence.  The gay “Thought Police” going after the Trump supporting gay pair is hardly American.  Freedom of Speech and Assembly both require that those who oppose an opinion accept it.  They don't have to like it, and they sure as hell don't have to agree with it, but this attempt to silence dissent through thuggery is un-American.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Hillary Suggests Rigging Palestinian Election

By Douglas V. Gibbs
AuthorSpeakerInstructorRadio Host 

September 5, 2006.  Eli Chomsky and Hillary Clinton.  Exposed by the Observer.

Tape is 45 minutes, fourteen seconds in audio file above.

Speaking to the Jewish Press about the January 25, 2006, election for the second Palestinian Legislative Council (the legislature of the Palestinian National Authority), Clinton weighed in about the result, which was a resounding victory for Hamas (74 seats) over the U.S.-preferred Fatah (45 seats).

“I do not think we should have pushed for an election in the Palestinian territories. I think that was a big mistake,” said Sen. Clinton. “And if we were going to push for an election, then we should have made sure that we did something to determine who was going to win.”

Hillary and the Democrats understand how to use fraud and corruption to win elections.  The Democrat Party has been doing exactly that for decades right here in America.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Hillary White House a National Security Risk

By Douglas V. Gibbs
Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host

When people have secrets, they can be manipulated. Intimidated. Extorted. Blackmailed.

The more we learn about Hillary Clinton, her emails, and the Clinton Foundation, the more we realize she is hiding a lot.

With the recent Anthony Weiner revelation that has encouraged the FBI to reexamine the Clinton email scandal, we must realize that the very fact that Hillary Clinton has so much to hide makes her a national security risk should she attain a new position of power. . . especially if she becomes President of the United States.  Never mind whether or not she can be bought - it turns out she can be blackmailed.

Hillary Clinton couldn't even pass a basic background check if she wanted to be a janitor in a government building, yet we have voters willing to make the most crooked, corrupt and untrustworthy politician in this country's history a return resident to the White House.  For the intelligence community, the fact that she has so much to hide, and that it can be used to intimidate the United States and blackmail her, creates an intelligence nightmare.

She had access to highly classified information, and purposely used her private email server (among other things) to sell that information for favors, or future contributions to her and her husband, often in the form of exorbitant speaking fees and donations to the Clinton Foundation.

Understand, this is not just a risk regarding foreign characters.  Evil exists within, as well, and the ability of actors both international and domestic to use her for their own evil and destructive means through blackmail places the United States (should she become President) at a level of risk never seen before in our history.

While the FBI swears they can't find proof Hillary's private email server was hacked into by bad guys, the reality is that means she likely allowed that information to be accessed, and she's hiding that fact.  However, there are those out there who know the truth.  What price will Hillary be willing to entertain to ensure that information regarding her treasonous activities doesn't get out to the general public?

Wikileaks has been revealing much of what Hillary has been hiding, but understand that so far, according to Assange, none of those leaks came from Hillary’s personal account - which means the real corruption hasn't even been seen, yet.  We have barely been exposed to the tip of Hillary's corruption iceberg.

It also means that the information wasn't hacked by the Russians like the Democrats keep saying.  The information regarding her emails that is being exposed is out there among accounts of various bad actors, floating around to be used, and abused.  Her exchange of favors through the Clinton Foundation, and the State Department when she was Secretary of State may now be beginning to haunt us as a country, and imagine how sever that haunting will become if she becomes President of the United States.  Hillary in the White House would accelerate the danger of enemies of America using what she knows, and what they know she doesn't want us to know, placing at serious risk the security of this country.

In other words, Hillary Clinton in the White House is a severe national security threat because she would be the target of international and internal blackmail in the White House.

The blackmail card was nearly played regarding Bill Clinton's sexual escapades, and it will be used against Hillary.  Blackmail is always the card played by bad actors when someone has something they are trying to hide - especially when that thing being hidden is treasonous.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Saturday, October 29, 2016

Trump: Weiner will tell world about Hillary Clinton's Emails

Posted by Douglas V. Gibbs
AuthorSpeakerInstructorRadio Host

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Constitution Radio: Diabolical Catastrophe

1:00 PM, Saturdays

  • In Segment #1 we will be talking to Ed Pozzuoli, a Top Political Strategist, GOP Insider, and former Florida GOP Chair to discuss that it is time for the
    Republican Party and Conservatives to accept Donald Trump as their candidate.
  • In Segment #2 we will be interviewing Craig Huey, the man behind The Huey Report which is not only in existence to help businesses, but also includes among the most effective and informative voter guides out there. . . and it covers all of California.  You will be educated, empowered, and engaged to vote for Your values!
I will be hosting from out of town, and will also be telling you about what my surroundings are, and my constitutionally based opinion on a number of issues in the AllStar Collision Big Stories of the Week segment.

Huma's Weiner Destroying Hillary Campaign

By Douglas V. Gibbs
AuthorSpeakerInstructorRadio Host 

Nothing like more scandals to expose Crooked Hillary for what she really is.

The presidential campaign was rocked on Friday after federal law enforcement officials said that emails pertinent to the closed investigation into Hillary Clinton's private email server were discovered on a computer belonging to Anthony D. Weiner, the estranged husband of a top Clinton aide (Huma Abedin). 

Hillary Clinton’s allies were cast into a state of anger and disbelief over the FBI’s stunning announcement that it is reviewing new emails “pertinent” to Clinton’s use of a private email server.

That shocking development — revealed in a letter to Congress by FBI Director James Comey — pushed some of Clinton’s allies past the boiling point.

They said they were “dumbfounded” by the revelation that the new FBI review may have been spurred by a separate investigation into Anthony Weiner sending lewd texts to a minor. Weiner is separated from wife Huma Abedin, one of Clinton’s closest aides.

There is no question that re-opening the FBI Investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email server is a big deal. The FBI normally avoids acting just before an election in order to avoid charges of political manipulation.  NBC reports: The FBI is reviewing a new batch of Hillary Clinton emails, bureau director James Comey said in a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Friday. "In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation … I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation," he wrote. The very first thing to note is that Comey made no mention of a grand jury.  The emails whose existence he learned of may have been the result of a subpoena in another investigation.

Lynch expressed her preference that Comey follow the department’s longstanding practice of not commenting on ongoing investigations, and not taking any action that could influence the outcome of an election, but he said that he felt compelled to do otherwise.

Two sources close to the investigation said the latest emails were discovered not during an investigation into Clinton, but rather as part of a separate probe into Anthony Weiner, the estranged husband of top Clinton aide Huma Abedin.

The FBI has been investigating illicit text messages allegedly sent from Weiner to a 15-year-old girl in North Carolina, and found the Clinton emails on a device related to that investigation, the sources said.

Abedin told federal investigators in April that she used several email accounts for her work, including a Yahoo email, according to a summary of the interview released by the FBI in September. She said it was difficult to print from the State Department's email system so she routinely forwarded documents to her private accounts when she needed to print them out, according to the summary.

Abedin announced her separation from Weiner in August after a sex scandal similar to an earlier incident that led him to resign from the U.S. Congress.

Lawyers representing Abedin did not respond to questions sent by email on Friday. Weiner did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment, and he did not respond to phone calls.

With furious Democrats - and the Clinton Campaign - now openly blasting the FBI's reopened investigation (as Republicans take delight for once in having a government agency reinforce their side of events), the question turns to just what emails were found on Weiner's laptop, and how damaging their contents are for the FBI to take the unprecedented step of "intervening" in a major political event just days before the national election.

We first laid what was the most likely explanation yesterday, when we showed several examples of Huma Abedin emails being sent from her work email account to her personal account at, courtesy of a Judicial Watch FOIA release. Of the more than 160 emails in the latest Judicial Watch release, some 110 emails – two-thirds of the total – were forwarded by Abedin to two personal addresses she controlled. The Washington Times reported in August 2015 that the State Department had admitted to a federal judge that Abedin and Mills used personal email accounts to conduct government business in addition to Clinton’s private to transact State Department business.

One email from May 15, 2009, was sent by Abedin from her State Department email to her personal email. Abedin was archiving in her personal email account an email Hillary Clinton sent her from Clinton’s private email server at Abedin was asked to print out attachments to an email Mills sent via a private address the previous day to Clinton involving “timetables and deliverables” for her review via Alec Ross, a technology policy expert who then held the title of senior adviser for innovation to Secretary Clinton.

FBI Director James B. Comey decided to inform Congress that he would look again into Hillary Clinton’s handling of emails during her time as secretary of state for two main reasons: a sense of obligation to lawmakers and a concern that word of the new email discovery would leak to the media and raise questions of a coverup.

The rationale, described by officials close to Comey’s decision-making on the condition of anonymity, prompted the FBI director to release his brief letter to Congress on Friday and upset a presidential race less than two weeks before Election Day. It placed Comey again at the center of a highly partisan argument over whether the nation’s top law enforcement agency was unfairly influencing the campaign.

In a memo explaining his decision to FBI employees soon after he sent his letter to Congress, Comey said he felt “an obligation to do so given that I testified repeatedly in recent months that our investigation was completed.”

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary