"Obama Risks Constitutional Crisis"

by JASmius

"Risks," Professor Turley?  This is, and has always been, his intended endgame:

Barack Obama is acting like "a bad gambler at Vegas" by doubling down on executive actions less than a week after a stinging Supreme Court defeat, says George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley....

Turley, appearing on Fox News Channel's "Special Report, " called that "a pretty surprising statement" considering that "the ink is barely dry" on Thursday's 9-0 decision saying Obama was wrong to have made recess appointments when the Senate had declared itself to be in session.

"For him now to double down makes him look like a bad gambler at Vegas," said Turley, who agrees with many of Obama's policies, but has warned of a constitutional crisis if Obama continues implementing those policies by bypassing Congress.

What's so surprising about it, Professor?  He's been ruling by decree ever since his party lost the House four years ago.  He's suffered a dozen such unanimous SCOTUS rebukes over the past five years, and it hasn't slowed him down in the least.  He orchestrated the illegal alien invasion to bring about precisely the constitutional crisis you say he's "risking".  Are you under the same misapprehension from which so many other Americans, including most conservatives, still suffer that the Old American Republic still exists?

If so, consider O's "risked" constitutional crisis your "EUREKA!" moment.

"At some point this is going to cause serious problems for his administration. He's going to start to lose Democrats," Turley said. "The president of the United States can't say the solution to gridlock is you simply have to resolve it on my terms."

Yes!...He!...Can!   C'mon, Professor, you have to stop feeding me such easy straight lines like that.

At just exactly which point is "this" going to cause "serious problems" for the Regime?  What "serious problems"?  Which Democrats will he lose?  And for how long?

In reality, "this" isn't going to cause any "serious problems" for The One because he's not a "president," he's a monarch, doesn't recognize anybody's authority but his own, and knows that the defunct American constitutional system couldn't restrain him even if it wasn't in its death throes.  Which, in turn, is why Democrats won't desert him, especially after they lose the Senate this November.  He'll be all they have left, and will rally around him no matter what he does.  As they pretty much still do already.

We should all have learned by now to stop assuming Barack Obama's defeat.  What we should be asking ourselves is what the next crisis will be that distracts us from this one.  It's what he's been doing ever since the ObamaCare rollout nine months ago, after all.

At the rate events are escalating, martial law can't be that far away.