The New York Times, and the liberal establishment, are so excited that the Taliban is willing to talk peace. Islam does not engage in peace. Islam uses deception about peace to regroup, re-arm, and re-attack later. The following is a ruse by the Taliban, but the democrats are so wanting peace and safety, and to prove to their opposition that their policy of appeasement and negotiations without pre-conditions will bring peace in our time. See Neville Chamberlain's appeasement of Adolf Hitler to see an example of how the liberal left's policies don't work. . .
And now for the breath panting, heart pounding, action alert by the New York Times:
| BREAKING NEWS ALERTBREAKING NEWS Tuesday, June 18, 2013 10:31 AM EDT
Taliban Signal Readiness for Peace Talks
In a potentially groundbreaking move, the Taliban announced on Tuesday they were prepared to take the first step towards peace negotiations with the Afghanistan government after 12 years of war.
The announcement came in Doha, the capital of Qatar, where negotiations have been underway for more than two years with a range of international participants to attempt start peace talks between the Taliban and the Afghan government.
It would be the first time that the antagonists in the Afghanistan war have undertaken peace negotiations to end a conflict that has encumbered the United States since 2001, when American forces entered the country to rout Al Qaeda.
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
1 comment:
Could this be a hudna?
A hudna is a temporary truce which muslims will seek when they're weak, which they will break when they've regained their strength.
Post a Comment