No Constitution Classes Valentines Day Week

No Constitution Classes Valentines Day Week

Thursday, March 23, 2023

Thursday Constitution Classes (Beaumont, Carlsbad)

 

10:00 am

Beaumont Constitution Class

6:00 pm

Carlsbad Constitution Class

Beaumont Constitution Class

BEAUMONT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 702 EUCLID ST, BEAUMONT.

10:00 am, Thursdays


Preamble, U.S. Constitution

Carlsbad Constitution Class

Health From Within Family Wellness Center

1818 Marron Rd., #103

Carlsbad, CA 92008

6:00 pm, Thursdays


This class is also available on Zoom,

https://1776foreverfree.com/


Doug will be speaking at an event in Orange County, so Brady the "War Hamster" will be carrying out class teaching duties this week...


Lesson 21 Final Amendments

Wednesday, March 22, 2023

Breakfast with Mr. Constitution...Banning, Thursday

 

Mr. Constitution

Douglas V. Gibbs

Invites You To:


Breakfast with Mr. Constitution

8:00 am, Thursday, March 23, 2023

Patsy's Country Kitchen

300 S. Highland Springs Ave., Banning, CA

Murrieta Constitution Class: 11th & 12th Amendments

 


6:00 pm. Wednesday Evening. 

Siggys Restaurant

26820 Jefferson Ave.

Murrieta


Lesson 17 Eleventh and Twelfth Amendments

Monday, March 20, 2023

Tuesday Constitution Classes: Fallbrook, Online, Capistrano

Tuesday Constitution Classes

11:00 AM


Fallbrook

3:00 PM


Online

6:00 PM


San Juan Capistrano

Tuesday Morning, 11:00 am, Fallbrook Constitution Class, Emmanuel Baptist Church, 911 E. Elder Street.


Lesson 21 Final Amendments

Online Mr. Constitution Class: we air weekly live on YouTube, with a chatroom, or you can listen any time later. 


This week: Enumerated Powers, Article I, Section 8, Implied Powers/Necessary and Proper

This week: 

Lesson 18 War Between the States


Tuesday Night, 6:00 pm, Bravos California Fresh at 31722 Rancho Viejo Road in San Juan Capistrano in the outdoor patio area.

Learn about all of the classes at:

http://www.douglasvgibbs.com/constitution-classes.php

Grant's Pass, Oregon Teachers fired for religious belief regarding gender

 This is from an email received by an ally of Mr. Constitution, the Pacific Justice Institute...

Dear Douglas,


Rachael Damiano and Katie Medart were educators in the Grants Pass School District in Oregon—until they started an organization and posted content about gender confusion on their personal social media platforms.


Rachel and Katie advocated that parents should have the right to know about their child’s gender confusion and that school restrooms should be identified as “Biologically Male” or “Biologically Female.”


Both educators wanted to advance the idea that teachers should be allowed to work without violating their sincerely held religious beliefs, like being forced to address students by their “preferred pronouns.”


The School District reacted by placing Rachel and Katie on leave and ultimately firing them. Pacific Justice Institute represents Rachel and Katie in court. Their union has not helped them. Many teachers have privately voiced their “silent support” for them, in fear of being retaliated against by their own school districts.


But PJI publicly and steadfastly stands with Rachel and Katie, and we will take this First Amendment case all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.


.........


You may donate to assist PJI in this case, and others, on their donation page: 




Sunday, March 19, 2023

Monday Night Chino Constitution Class, Legislative Prohibitions

archibalds chino.jpg

Chino Constitution Class

Monday Evening, 6:00 pm,

Archibald's, 15421 Fairfield Ranch Rd in Chino Hills (right off Central and the 71 Freeway)


Lesson 4 Article I, Sections 9 and 10

Federalist Paper #10: Explained and Debated, For the Republic

Mr. Constitution Douglas V. Gibbs, Alan Myers (FedEd) and Brady the War Hamster on For the Republic, Sunday Night, 5pm.


Join us as we go through the Federalist Papers, and the Anti-Federalist Papers.


Last week we thought we'd get to Federalist #10, but we filled the show with a discussion about the banking situation and Anti-Federalist Paper #9 (watch it here if you missed it). This week, Federalist Paper #10 will be discussed, join us tonight...


For the Republic

Sunday 5:00 - 7:00 PM

Host: Alan Myers

Guests: Douglas V. Gibbs "Mr. Constitution"

& Brady "War Hamster"


https://dlive.tv/psb


https://patriotssoapbox.com/

Exculpatory Evidence

By Douglas V. Gibbs
Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host

Exculpatory Evidence is evidence that supports a defendant's innocence.  In the American Legal System it is required that all evidence be made available in the court of law.  In the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution the rights of a person to "be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor" are all enumerated in the founding document, which is The Supreme Law of the Land (Article VI.).  That includes all evidence.  It is a crime to hide evidence, or disallow it from being made available when it is pertinent and directly connected.

Exculpatory Evidence, according to the modern legal industry, can include proof of an alibi, an eyewitness statement, video footage, audio recordings or any other physical evidence that shows doubt that the person or persons in question committed the crime.

Unfortunately, tyrants and those who seek to control certain situations or narratives have this incredible ability to either diminish the visibility of Exculpatory Evidence or ensure it is completely hidden all together.

As a result of the actions of those who seek to hide or diminish the availability of Exculpatory Evidence the general public or certain figures watching what is going on remain unaware that Exculpatory Evidence exists in the first place.  Without being exposed to Exculpatory Evidence we, for some reason, easily decide it must not exist; and when presented with arguments that such evidence does indeed exist, we have this strange tendency to jump to conclusions that anyone who argues such must be a "hater," a "denier," and that those people screaming there's more to the issue than what we are being shown must be silenced or censored for daring to challenge the accepted narrative which is based on the evidence presented.  As a society we fall for the madness of assuming we know the truth based on limited information, rejecting the possibility there might be more to the issue than what is being revealed.  We should know better.  I am a firm believer that everyone realizes that what we see does not always reveal the full story.  Have we not spent our whole lives maintaining a certain level of distrust for government and large corporations, especially when they collude together against us?

Years ago I was injured on the job, but despite my complaints the doctors kept advising all I had was "bumps and bruises," and that I was fine to continue to work.  I pushed the issue, and wound up with a worker's compensation case, which included investigators following me around, video recording my every move, and then cherry-picking what was presented to those involved in the case.  Despite me finding a doctor that, after a full work-up including MRIs, declared that I was having serious issues and my ability to perform the tasks my job required was impaired by my injuries, the "other side" treated me as if I was a criminal, they played games including accusations of insurance fraud, and a letter to the radio station I have a show on that I was guilty of insurance fraud and that they should drop me as a broadcaster, and ultimately I lost the case because of what was presented without me being given the opportunity to provide Exculpatory Evidence.  When I tried to explain there was more to it than what the eye could see, I was admonished for not answering questions directly, and silenced on the stand.  Since then I lost all of my medical care, I lost my job, and due to those issues I have not had a day-job since.  We have been living on my wife's income after I worked for thirty years as the primary bread-winner.  Now, I am a constitutionalist fulltime.  While I do perform my constitution duties quite well, I perform my tasks most of the time under great duress.  Most folks don't know simply because I have become very skilled at hiding how I physically feel.

I don't tell the story I just told you for sympathy, I want none of that.  I bear and grin it, well knowing that when someone asks you how you are doing, they expect, "Fine, how about you?"  Nobody likes being around the person who, after being asked how they feel, goes through a long list of infirmaries, aches, and pains.  I do what I do, and I do it because it is important to me regardless of how I may "feel."  I told the story above not for any reason other than to show how throughout our legal system the presence of Exculpatory Evidence is often minimal, and the tyrants are particularly skilled at ensuring that it never makes it up to eye-level, be it a worker's comp case, or a congressional investigative hearing.  

Most of you reading this have probably figured out that the primary issue I am addressing is January 6, 2021.  The progressive left commies of the Democrat Party call it the "Capitol Riot," or the "Capitol Insurrection."  Like the lawyers and employer that decided I must be crushed in my worker's comp case, they have used deceptions and a presentation of only a small part of the evidence to establish a narrative that they want.  The truth, the deep down nitty-gritty, doesn't matter to the people pushing the anti-liberty narrative.  They know that perception is everything.  All the public needs to see, from their point of view, is just a part of what happened, and if it is done skillfully enough, that small part of the whole, with the Exculpatory Evidence absent, becomes the truth.  

How often has the Democrats lied, cheated and deceived to convince Americans of a certain narrative?  Even good, conservative, Christian Republicans fall for it.  That is how effective they are.  I can't count how many people in my life I have lost contact with because they refuse to talk to me because I disagree with the commonly accepted narrative that the enemies of liberty and the enemies of the Constitution have put out there for everyone to see.  I support Donald J. Trump, I knew the pandemic was being used for nefarious reasons the moment it shot through the chute, I didn't wear a worthless mask, I did not let them jab me with their poison, and I knew that January 6 was the modern Democrat Party's version of the NAZI Reichstag Fire on day one.  They have manipulated elections, they have manipulated the message being told to us by the press, and they have manipulated the minds of Americans through education, entertainment, news coverage, censorship and particular messaging in social media.  And like my former boss, Americans have jumped all over a guilty verdict, despite what the truth might really be.  They have come to these conclusions based on data they have not been exposed to, because of what they thought they saw based on what they were allowed to see by people who want nothing less than to control the entire narrative through less-than-honest means.

Sometimes, truth is not self-evident when we allow the enemy to cloud the screen, shape the view, and disallow all of the evidence to be seen and known.

Now, surveillance footage from January 6 that challenges the official narrative has been shown, largely thanks to the Republican Party gaining control of the House of Representatives, and that group of Republicans delivering Exculpatory Evidence regarding January 6 to Tucker Carlson.  The reaction?

Chuck Schumer has since called for a violation of the First Amendment in order to try to silence Tucker Carlson for daring to reveal that there's more to the January 6 Insurrection story than meets the eye.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Saturday, March 18, 2023

Mr. Constitution Hour: KPRZ Radio ... January 6


Mr. Constitution Hour airs every Saturday Night at 9pm.


K-Praise (www.kprz.com)


Mr. Constitution Hour on KPRZ is a radio broadcast that looks at The United States Constitution through the lens of Christianity. The program is hosted by Mr. Constitution Douglas V. Gibbs.


Mr. Constitution Hour by Douglas V. Gibbs: January 6 Exposed - We take a break from history and Constitutional Studies this week for a special episode regarding the release of over 40,000 hours of January 6, 2021 "Capitol Riot" footage.  Mr. Constitution discusses the footage, and what the evidence elsewhere also provides, regarding the Capitol Breach on January 6.


Past episodes are available at the radio station's podcast page set up for Doug at -------> https://omny.fm/shows/douglas-v-gibbs/playlists/mr-constitution-hour-by-douglas-v-gibbs


And on the following podcast platforms:


I-Heart Radio

Spotify

Audacy

Apple

Tune-In

Audible

Amazon

ListenNotes


Help support the program with your donations, this program has no advertisers and depends completely on contributor dollars!



Give to Doug to help Fund His Radio Ministry!

Election Integrity California Lawsuit, Constitution Association Meeting

 


Constitution Radio: Diverse

Constitution Radio with Douglas V. Gibbs

Saturdays, 1:00 - 3:00 pm Pacific Time

KMET 1490-AM (www.kmet1490am.com)

KMET Show Page

Doug's Show Page

2022/2023 Podcast Page

Classic Podcast Page on SoundCloud (for pre-2022 episodes)

Call in Live during the Program!









Topics on Today's program:

·  Is Affirmative Action Constitutional?

·  Trump to be arrested Tuesday?

Friday, March 17, 2023

Constitutional Roundtable

 

Mr. Constitution joins Andrew "The Citizen 1776" on a live YouTube vidcast: The Constitutional Roundtable ... Watch at 5:30 pm Pacific on Friday Night, or watch at any time later after it posts on YouTube.


https://www.youtube.com/@TheCitizen1776/streams

Libertas Americana

By Douglas V. Gibbs
Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host

Libertas Americana: Medal (coin) made by Benjamin Franklin to commemorate the American Revolution.  It was fashioned after Franklin was asked to create a monument in honor of the Siege of Yorktown.  His idea for the coin was originally outlined March 4, 1782 in a letter to Robert Livingston.  Esprit-Antoine Gibelin Augustin Dupr√© developed the design on the reverse side of the coin.


NON SINE DIIS ANIMOSUS INFANS, from Horace's ode "Descende coelo", which translates to "The infant is not bold without the aide of the gods."

Front: Goddess of Liberty – Roman goddess, symbol of the Roman Republic, uncomfortably co-opted by the empire; she was a defender of the Roman Republic honored during the second Punic War (218-210 B.C.).  On the Libertas Americana coin she is depicted with the Phrygian cap (Roman: Pileus), a soft cap symbolizing the granting of freedom to former slaves, of which she never wears.  The cap is on a rod, which is used in a ceremony of Manumission, the act of freeing enslaved people from their enslavers.

Reverse: The infant Hercules represents the United States.  The attacking lion represents the British Empire.  The protector is Athena, ancient Greek goddess of wisdom and welfare which represents France.  The infant is strangling two snakes as he is protected by Athena from the attacking lion.  The image was designed to show appreciation to France for the aid provided in America’s struggle for Liberty against Britain during the American Revolution.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Wednesday, March 15, 2023

Thursday Constitution Class: Beaumont, Carlsbad

 

10:00 am

Beaumont Constitution Class

6:00 pm

Carlsbad Constitution Class

Beaumont Constitution Class

BEAUMONT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 702 EUCLID ST, BEAUMONT.

10:00 am, Thursdays


Introduction to the U.S. Constitution, Continued

Carlsbad Constitution Class

Health From Within Family Wellness Center

1818 Marron Rd., #103

Carlsbad, CA 92008

6:00 pm, Thursdays


This class is also available on Zoom,

https://1776foreverfree.com/


Lesson 21 Final Amendments

The January 6 Mob That Wasn't

By Douglas V. Gibbs
Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host

The claim by Democrats and their Establishment Republican allies that January 6 was an attempt at overturning the 2020 Election, that it was an attempt to stage an insurrection, that it was a violent riot, and that Donald J. Trump was guilty of inciting violence has all been debunked, again, this time with the release of over 40,000 hours of video footage from the alleged Capitol Riot over two years ago.  The footage was provided to Fox News for Tucker Carlson.  Tucker Carlson's team went through tens of thousands of hours of video footage, and Carlson delivered on his program, March 6 and 7, blockbuster material that confirmed what I have believed about January 6, 2001 all along.  It was not a violent riot, it was not Trumpster Nationalism (whatever that is) attempt to overturn the election or overturn the government, it was not a staged event that Trump Supporters organized and carried out.

The "nationalist" part really burns my bacon.  I have never been fond of the word nationalism. It's a shame that the Democrats and Trump Camp both misunderstand what it even means.  Nationalism is presented as being something that means "my people over your people."  Hitler claimed his system was socialist nationalism, so the word nationalism is tied to his whole master race thing, and now the Democrats claim it's just another way to say "white supremacy."  Just because someone uses a term inaccurately does not mean it suddenly means what they think it means.  

Meanwhile, Trump and many of his supporters have embraced the word "nationalism," claiming it is just another way of saying patriotism.

From the Founding Fathers' point of view "patriotism" means love of country, and "nationalism" is love of government and support of a centralized government system that consolidates all political power into a single governmental system.  Despite some of my colleagues using the word "nationalism" to describe Trump's movement, I have not, and I will not, because unlike most of the commentators out there, I actually know what the word means.

So, when January 6 is uttered in mixed company, thanks to the deceptive use of the word "nationalism" through anti-Trump propaganda, the "Capitol Riot" from a couple years ago has been spun as a nationalist mob of violent insurrectionists attempting to overturn an election and doing so in such a manner that the violent white supremacist nationalists under the orders of Trump’s riot-inciting words committed crimes against the United States that can be compared to Pearl Harbor and 9/11.  If you believe any of that crap you are an idiot, and I implore you to keep reading.  Hell, you might actually depart from Political Pistachio a little more educated than you were when you arrived.

Recently I was shouted down by someone who disagrees with me, and his statements were quite interesting.  He shouted over me, not allowing me to get a word in edgewise.  "You love violence," he screamed.  "That's why you defend January 6, isn't it!  You love violence, you are an insurrectionist, and I know you knew a bunch of Oath Keepers.  I ought to call the FBI right now and have you arrested for being an insurrectionist."

He, like many of the average folk out there, had been convinced anyone like me was a racist, too.  The leftist propaganda has worked well on the weak minds of Americans.

Kind of reminds me of that Obi Wan Kenobi scene.  "These are not the droids you are looking for.  He can go about his business.  Move along. The Force can have a strong influence on the weak-minded.."

The adult temper tantrum by the individual shouting at me included a number of ridiculous accusations, but the January 6 one had me shaking my head the most.  He had also said he listened to my radio programs, and it was the most "narrow-minded thing" he had ever listened to.

The public believes that January 6, 2021 was a violent insurrection, and many Americans, even friends and former battlemates of mine, believe the lies, even to the point of severing relationships.

I knew the person shouting at me was lying about listening to my show because if he listened to my radio broadcasts he would know my opinion about January 6, 2001 because I talk about it often; and what he spewed was not even close to the truth.  I knew from the beginning the January 6 narrative being presented by the Democrats and establishment GOP was all lies.  I knew people who were there on that day, and I used some logic and critical thinking to try to put together the pieces.  I knew immediately that the puzzle pieces were not fitting into place as we were being instructed.  The narrative being given by politicians and the media was untrue.

The short-quick version is that the breach of The Capitol, and the actions of people who were acting in a manner that filled leftist video-screens constantly afterward to shape the "insurrectionist" narrative all happened prior to the folks at the Trump Rally nearby even arrived (in other words the crowd was infiltrated by leftists).  When the Trump Supporters arrived, they were confused, didn't know what was going on, and were being herded and guided by Antifa and government operatives (largely FBI and the Capitol Police) into the Halls of Congress.  The Trump supporters were not violent, they did not act in an insurrectionist manner, and if anything they treated the whole situation more like a tourist visit than an attempt to "overthrow the election."  Did they believe the election was stolen?  Yes, and there is plenty of evidence to support that claim.  But, they weren't there to do anything other than show support for their President and voice their concerns.  They were there to pray, speak out, podcast, peaceably gather together to show their support, and use that action to ensure their frustrations were heard by Congress and the people who might be able to do something about the stolen election.  In other words, they were there to exercise the five rights listed in the First Amendment:
  1. Religion/Prayer
  2. Speech
  3. Press
  4. Assembly
  5. Petition the Government for a Redress of Grievances
By the way, that amendment begins with the words, "Congress shall make no law respecting..."

  1. 12:00 pm: Trump's speech began.
  2. 1:00 pm: Outer barricades stormed by protesters.
  3. 1:10 pm: Trump's speech ended according to Washington Post.
  4. 1:30 pm: Capitol Police overtaken at steps of Capitol.
  5. 1:41 pm: Arrival of first Trump speech attendees, which would be those who did not stop to use the restroom, grab a bite to eat, or go to their hotel first, but walked immediately to the Capitol at the pace suggested as the average time it takes according to Google Navigator.  Understand, it likely took longer since so many people clogged the streets.
  6. 2:15 pm: Capitol building actually breached by protesters.
  7. 2:50-3:00 pm: Likely earliest arrival time of Trump supporters from rally who heard Trump speak if they lingered, or grabbed a bite to eat, or went to their hotel rooms before proceeding towards Capitol.
By the way, even the FBI, who has not exactly been allies of the American People in recent years, recognized that there was no insurrection on January 6, that Trump Supporters in no way had orchestrated a planned attack, which means Donald J. Trump DID NOT incite rebellion or insurrection...





Nonetheless, The Democrat Party's Standing Army, a.k.a. FBI and other federal agencies, went after anyone and everyone who may have been in the area on January 6.  They raided the homes of some friends of mine who were there near the Capitol to pray for truth to be revealed, and to pray for President Trump.  They arrested the brother of a friend of mine for being there, and he wasn't.  Then, the House of Representatives held an unconstitutional hearing, and while it was going on released thousands of social security numbers to the public, in an alleged leak, of their political opponents.  Then, a year and a half later Biden threatened all who stands against him and his cronies in a speech that had lighting that looked eerily authoritarian.

In my heart of hearts I know that Trump supporters are not violent people, and somehow the information coming out of the news and political outlets from Washington D.C. was not telling the whole story, and was painting these concerned Americans in a manner that made them look like terrorists.  The narrative was a lie, and there was much more to the story than we were being told.  The official story, in short, was a total lie.  A sham.  And what was worse is the Democrats and their violent allies were doing worse than what the Trump Supporters were being accused of on January 6, and the lefties were getting away with all of it with impunity.

I spoke with a minister, Ren Schuffman, who was there on January 6.  He confirmed for me what I believed, and then told me a story about how on January 7 another confrontation almost broke out...until the crowd broke out into a singing of Amazing Grace and Prayer.


→ Screenshots from a Discord chat channel allegedly hosted by John Sullivan – a far-left, anti-Trump activist who appears to have incited violence at the U.S. Capitol while posing as a journalist – reveal he and his followers infiltrated the January 6th Save America March in Washington, D.C. ... https://thenationalpulse.com/news/chat-logs-rally-plot-trump/

→ ANTIFA Activist Daniel Alan Baker Arrested For Plotting To MURDER Trump Supporters...Says He ‘Received Soros Money’ In Youtube Video ... https://100percentfedup.com/antifa-activist-daniel-alan-baker-arrested-for-plotting-to-murder-trump-supporters-says-he-received-soros-money-in-youtube-video/

→ James, brother of accused leftist provocateur John Sullivan, claims 226 Antifa members started Capitol riots -- As Rudy Giuliani noted on Twitter, why wasn't this brought up during the sham impeachment hearings? ... https://noqreport.com/2021/01/15/james-brother-of-accused-leftist-provocateur-john-sullivan-claims-226-antifa-members-started-capitol-riots/

→ BLM instigator of Capitol riots, John Earle Sullivan, arrested: The Utah Black Lives Matter "activist" has been bragging about his involvement in instigating the Capitol riots. Now, he's been arrested. ... https://noqreport.com/2021/01/14/blm-instigator-of-capitol-riots-john-earle-sullivan-arrested/

→ Feds admit Capitol “siege” was planned in advance by Trump haters, not Trump supporters ... https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-01-15-feds-admit-capitol-siege-planned-trump-haters.html

→ ‘We Did It!’: CNN’s Jade Sacker caught celebrating with BLM instigator John Sullivan during Capitol riots ... https://noqreport.com/2021/01/15/we-did-it-cnns-jade-sacker-caught-celebrating-with-blm-instigator-john-sullivan-during-capitol-riots/

→ Investigators believe riot at Capitol was planned and not inspired by President Donald Trump. But Democrats impeached before they had any information from investigators. ... https://trendingpolitics.com/breaking-investigators-release-huge-bombshell-that-could-change-the-entire-narrative-about-january-6th/?utm_source=economics

→ The Capitol Hill Riot Was Pelosi’s Fault, Not Trump’s ... https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/01/capitol-hill-riot-was-pelosis-fault-not-trumps-daniel-greenfield/

→ The media has manipulated public opinion to demonize protesters as a violent threat when in actuality they were the ones getting brutalized and even killed for exercising their 1st Amendment rights ... https://bigleaguepolitics.com/new-footage-shows-pro-trump-demonstrators-being-let-into-capitol-orderly-protesting-dubious-electoral-certification/

→ Did You Notice the Jan 6 Crowd Cheered When Trump Touted Harsher Penalties for Monument-Trashers? ... https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-taft/2021/01/12/did-you-notice-the-jan-6-crowd-cheered-when-trump-touted-harsher-penalties-for-monument-trashers-n1334441

→ Antifa 'Provoked' Ashli Babbitt Shooting at Capitol, Expert Analysis Concludes: Misako Ganaha reveals far-left 'agitators' triggered fatal shooting ... https://neonnettle.com/news/13848-antifa-provoked-ashli-babbitt-shooting-at-capitol-expert-analysis-concludes

We know the leftist Democrats lie about everything, so how is it that anyone was foolish enough to believe their narrative about what happened on January 6?

I am especially disappointed in the "conservative never-Trumpers", one of whom wrote on my Twitter page, "If you supported this challenge, you are dead to me. Never speak to me again. Get off my site and never come back." ... Once, you were my friend. Once, you (perhaps) were a constitutional originalist. Now, you are the Constitution's enemy - and my own. ... The nauseating scene in Washington, D.C., is Trump’s fault." 

 How is it that a conservative, blinded by their hatred for Trump, can become so blind? So filled with hate? So off the reservation? So quick to believe that what the Democrats were presenting had any truth to it?

Nancy Pelosi held a January 6 commission to double-down on the lie.  The Democrats decided to use some sleight of hand to get you away from the facts, and then mixed in all kinds of Hollywood worthy acting, false testimony, and other lies to make you believe that Trump Supporters in general were guilty of domestic terrorism.  They want you to believe it is not they who are tearing down the American System, but that it is their opponents; those who dare to support Donald J. Trump.

The chairman, Mississippi Representative Bennie Thompson, during the January 6 hearing, made a shocking statement about how he intended to deal with a subpoenaed Trump supporter who worked at the Justice Department, Jeffrey Clark –- someone who never entered the Capitol that day and was never accused of any crime.

“Our charge is to get to the facts,” he said on MSNBBC. “Mr. Clark, through his attorney, has been deliberately avoiding us...Obviously, he is aware that something went on that’s illegal. And rather than be responsible and answer, he’s pleading the Fifth. But if he’s saying, ‘Okay, I’ll come, but I’ll plead the Fifth, then in some instances, that says you’re, part and parcel, guilty to what occurred.”

The stage show by the Democrats was remarkable, moving to the front of the line regarding Congressional duties.  And for refusing to comply, the committee voted unanimously to recommend that Clark be charged with contempt of Congress.

Jeffrey Clark knew his testimony might be twisted and used by these partisan crazies to make him LOOK guilty.  So, he refused.  

Tucker Carlson long before his recent big reveal of all of the January 6 footage noted that Democrats on the committee (including Liz Cheney) subpoenaed AT&T for the phone records of Caroline Wren, who used to work as a fundraiser for Republican Sen. Lindsay Graham and who helped organize donations for the January 6 rally. This includes all records, including text messages, from November 1, 2020, to January 31, 2021. They also want her bank records and even everything she’s written in her own handwriting, including personal diary entries. Talk about an overreach --- this is monstrous.

https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/210929%20Caroline%20Wren%20Letter.pdf

And apparently that was just one example. Others who have yet to be accused of any crime are being treated the same way. Republican attorney Cleta Mitchell was informed by AT&T that the committee wanted several months of her phone records. This is because she was on a phone call with President Trump and the Georgia secretary of state about problems with the vote in Georgia. (Oh, goodness, don’t tell me there might have been problems with the vote in Georgia!)

AT&T is complying with the committee’s requests.

Another Trump supporter targeted with a subpoena was attorney John Eastman, who worked with Trump in the election aftermath and spoke at the January 6 rally.  Verizon notified him that unless he got a court order to stop it, they would turn over his personal text messages to the committee. The Washington Examiner reported on it.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/house/ex-trump-lawyer-john-eastman-plans-to-plead-the-fifth-to-the-jan-6-committee

I expressed strong suspicions that the FBI had agents mixed in with the crowd during Trump’s rally, spurring on the “insurrection;" leading it.  Causing it.  

Those arrested were denied due process.  The federal government continually violated the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Eighth Amendments with their treatment of those they arrested regarding January 6.  During all of it we began to wonder if the Republicans would ever get a shot at looking into the whole issue.  We all knew what the whole thing really was.  It was a warning to the American People, in case they too thought they might also question government and make a stance against the power-players in charge.

The whole process cherry-picked opponents of the Democrats, while leaving their allies alone.  The enemies of Donald Trump, during their witch hunt based on false data and a massive deceptive narrative about January 6, used everything at their disposal.  Judges allied with the criminals in government ruled Trump was complicit in trying to overturn the election, political opponents were being targeted by the Democrats as they searched to arrest as many people associated with January 6 as possible, even going after any Republican Party connected fundraising effortsDoctoring the footage and refusing to show us the whole story was all a part of doing what they could to keep power, and throw anyone like Trump who might expose them off their backs.  The whole operation included undercover agents who had infiltrated the ranks of Trump Supporters, with Capitol Police literally leading people into the Capitol, and at one point even pushing people toward the Capitol.  Meanwhile, those falsely arrested and held for their alleged crimes on January 6 were denied due process, and treated inhumanely.

Tucker Carlson has revealed what really happened, and now the other side is freaking out because the truth is exposing their corruption.  Yet, the members of Congress on the January 6 Committee also admitted that they had never seen the footage Tucker Carlson showed, before.

Here's some other headlines regarding January 6 you need to know about:

Occam's Razor and My Hunch About January 6

Judge Dismisses Obstruction Charge Against Texas Defendant in January 6 Breach of U.S. Capitol

DOJ Uses Diabolical Plan, Encouraging Children to Say False Things about their January 6 Attending Parents

Merrick Garland Dismisses Charges against Violent Antifa Terrorists, but Leaves January 6 Persons Behind Bars without Due Process Afforded to them

Steve Bannon Subpoenas Democratic House Leadership Over Contempt Trial Evidence

My Letter to Steve Bannon's Legal Team over Unconstitutional Congressional Subpoena

January 6 Committee Another Democrat Cover-Up Attempt

Steve Bannon's Subpoenas Scaring Corrupt January 6 House Hearing Members to Death

January 6 Prisoner Held in a Cage Like a Dog

Epoch Times Real Story of January 6 Documentary

Representative Thomas Massie Exposes Glaring Omission in January 6 Committee Report

Q-Anon Shaman Allies Release Post January 6 Interview with FBI

The Parliamentary Motive Behind the January 6 Fedsurrection

Never Seen Before Footage of Jacob Chansley Q-Anon Shaman