Tuesday, December 02, 2014

Ferguson, Slavery & The Second Amendment

by JASmius



Well, I guess it just wouldn't be a proper race war without the corrupt, racist, 23-term Representative Charlie Rangel (D-NY18/19/16/15/13) making a crazed pitch for slavery reparations and the ubiquity of "collective white guilt":

Late Monday night, after the House took its final votes, members of the Congressional Black Caucus took the floor to speak for about one hour about race in the wake of a grand jury’s decision last week not to indict police officer Darren Wilson in the August shooting death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri.

“Hands up, don’t shoot,” Representative Hakeem Jeffries of New York-8 began.

How about, "Hands down, shut up, and learn the facts" Congressman?

Charles Rangel, the longtime New York Democrat, followed Jeffries and CBC Chairwoman Marcia Fudge of Ohio to deride America’s “cancer” and those who don’t acknowledge it. “Like anything else you love, if there’s an illness, if there’s a problem, you would want to know: What can you do to cure it? How can you make it all that our country can be?” Rangel said. “How can we say that we have a cancer until we recognize that we do, then we don’t really love the country? How can we be able to say that white and black in this country are equal and that those who work hard and live by the rules have the same opportunities as each other, when we know that we have this cancer?”

Rangel went on to address the idea of reparations for slavery, suggesting that it goes beyond money. “Some people may talk about payment for restitution for past crimes committed against human beings,” he said. “But that restitution could be the ability to say that we’re going to make certain that people of color in this country would be able to have access to the same type of education, live where they want to live, compete against anybody for the job, and not feeling that they’re inferior because people have been taught that just because they have a different complexion that they are superior.”



No, Representative Rangel, the only "cancer" from which America is suffering is hard-left black racists like you who refuse to permit racial/ethnic healing and unity around common, traditional, American values.  Or, as I've dubbed it, the "African-American Spring," a realization on the part of a small but growing number of black Americans that half a century of blind allegiance and fealty to the Democrat Party has yielded them nothing other than family destruction, poverty, welfare dependence, black-on-black crime, hopelessness, and an insatiable racist anger that has culminated in the Age Of Obama, the singularly most divisive, hate-mongering era this country has seen since at least the 1960s, and perhaps dating back to the (first) Civil War itself.  The dynamic, in short, that cost Michael Brown his life.

You want that cancer, Mr. Rangel, because without it where would you be?  Answer: Out of power, out of a job, and in need of having to earn an honest living for a change.  It's people like you, and the malignant mentality you represent, who preach black superiority, who need to be cut out of American society as the tumors they are every bit as thoroughly as already has white supremacism.  We cannot all move forward together as Americans until we ALL harken back to the words of Dr. Martin Luther King:



All Americans being "judged not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character" is not something that can, nor will ever be, tolerated by Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Marcia Fudge, Hakeem Jeffries, Charlie Rangel, or the "protestors" in Ferguson, Missouri, and their rabblerousing sympathizers around the country.  Because they hate white people, they hate America, which is why they want to "fundamentally transform" it, and shove all whites to the "back of the bus".

The Black Klan is much like Kyle Reece's description of the Terminator:



Or at least reverse-enslaved for at least 246 years.  Because nothing less will satisfy them.

Yes, it is madness.  But madness taken to a level never before seen.

Would you believe....a (selective) embrace of the Second Amendment?:

I never thought I’d be an open-carry advocate.

However, I’m a firm believer in working within the American political system in order to change the status quo. If the Second Amendment is cherished by millions of Americans, then why not use it to further certain liberal ideals?

Which, of course, are anti-American.

Protecting African-American lives and alleviating tensions between the black community and law enforcement should be a top priority of all Americans and especially Congress; however, this is not the case.

So the way to "alleviate tensions between the black community and law enforcement" is to arm the Ferguson "protestors" and thugs like Michael Brown?  Enable rolling, endless inter-racial gun-battles throughout the streets of America?  Escalate the race war?

Yes!  It!  Is!

It speaks volumes that African-Americans vote over 90% Democrat during national elections, yet our future nominee in 2016 still hasn’t addressed an issue the whole nation is talking about, even after Darren Wilson’s acquittal and the flames that engulfed Ferguson.

Actually, it speaks volumes that the Democrat Party has held down, oppressed, and exploited African-Americans for more than two centuries and the latter still vote 90% Democrat.

But H.A. Goodman is wrong about their future nominee in 2016 not addressing Ferguson.  Indeed, s/he is wrong about there even being a 2016 election, which arming black race warriors would make even less likely.

But I digress.

With all our advancements as a nation, there’s still a correlation between today and 1895, the year Ida B. Wells wrote The Red Record. We live in a surreal time period where the deaths of unarmed black males still take place, even though we have a black president and African-Americans today possess more rights than at any other point in U.S. history.

Which ought to tell you at least a little about why "unarmed" black males are "still dying," and how utterly, vanishingly little it has to do with "racist police brutality".

While rioting by a very small percentage of protestors....

You're not playing close enough attention, H.A.

....does a disservice to the memory of Michael Brown and the cause of saving black lives or preventing future Fergusons, there are legal and more effective ways to solve our nation’s moral conundrum pertaining to racial profiling, police brutality, and issues related to the deaths of unarmed citizens.

Like....arming violent, racist black "protestors"?  Aiding and abetting cop-killing?  To say nothing of black-on-black violence?

H.A., you and I define "effective" very differently.

Thank God for Charles Barkley, the voice of reason:

“The true story came out from the grand jury testimony,” Barkley said, adding that he was made aware of “key forensic evidence, and several black witnesses that supported Officer Darren Wilson’s story…” He continued, “I can’t believe anything I hear on television anymore. And that’s why I don’t like talking about race issues with the media anymore, because they (the media) love this stuff, and lead people to jump to conclusions. The media shouldn’t do that. They never do that when black people kill each other.”

He also called those who rioted after the decision was announced “scumbags,” and said “There is no excuse for people to be out there burning down people’s businesses, burning down police cars.”

And in a marked departure from other prominent black leaders who have questioned tactics used by officers and, in some cases, accused officers of racial profiling and outright racism, Barkley supported police officers, especially those who work in black neighborhoods.

“[W]e have to be really careful with the cops, because if it wasn’t for the cops we would be living in the Wild, Wild West in our neighborhoods,” he said. “We can’t pick out certain incidentals that don’t go our way and act like the cops are all bad…. Do you know how bad some of these neighborhoods would be if it wasn’t for the cops?”

Any of you Black Klansman want to call The Round Mound of Rebound an "Oreo"?  Lotsa luck with that.  Because what Mr. Barkley is saying isn't "thinking white," it's [BLEEP]ing common sense.

One might even call it "anti-madness".

I'm sure Dr. King would have approved.

No comments: