Those dorky glasses make Eric "The Red" look like an elderly Urkel, don't they?
Okay, that's not the most relevant lede possible to this post, but it's more intelligent than the subject matter of what follows:
Attorney General Eric Holder said Tuesday that Fox News obsesses over the terminology used to describe terrorists, while some Fox News hosts said it is Holder who is obsessed with Fox News.
"We spend more time, more time talking about what you call it, as opposed to what do you do about it, you know? I mean really," Holder said at a National Press Club luncheon in Washington. "If Fox didn’t talk about this, they would have nothing else to talk about, it seems to me."
Fighting the enemy begins with identifying them, Eric. You and your divotmonger boss obstinately refuse to identify the enemy, indeed, endlessly extol that enemy and whitewash all its crimes and atrocities. You're all Mohammed's public relations flacks. And that reflects, in turn, the fact that you're not doing a damned thing about the global jihad, other than aiding and abetting it.
As to Fox News' alleged "obsession," that's the ultimate in question-begging. Fox's commentators are commentating on what's actually happening, and you filthbags are in a prominent "newsmaking" and "controversy"-generating position. Your refusal to acknowledge the existence of Islamic Fundamentalism other than as the utopianist fantasy it most certainly is not is hardly the first time Fox has pointed out your foibles, scandals, idiocies, and leftwing extremism. They only stand out in that regard because the Obamedia conspicuously does not, and compulsively circles the wagons around this White House instead.
But in this instance, Fox is not, in fact, the only one to notice:
It isn't only Fox News that has questioned the White House on its choice of words. National Public Radio's Mara Liasson has grilled White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest about it.
Some congressional Democrats have joined in as well, including Iraq War veteran and Hawaii-2 Representative Tulsi Gabbard.
There's an old saying - call it the Batman corollary: "It's not who I am inside, but what I do that defines me." And what you say, and what you don't, or won't, say.
Personally, I don't like the term "radical Islam" because it's a redundancy. The Qu'ran itself is "radical," which is why I prefer the term "Islamic Fundamentalism". But, Eric, you and your demigod and all your fellow-travelers and bottom-feeders won't say either one. A French jihadist bursts into a kosher grocery store in Paris shouting "Allahu Akbar" to specifically murder Jews and Dear Leader calls it "random". ISIS beheads twenty-one Egyptian Coptic Christians, say they are doing so and why in the video, declare their intention to "conquer Rome" and "take the fight to the land of the Cross," and Josh Earnest will only refer to the victims as "Egyptian civilians." Quite simply, your collective Islamophilia and "radical dhimmism" has become so conspicuous that it has become extraordinarily difficult to ignore. The wonder would be if nobody was talking about it.
Exit question: Do you really think Fox News or anybody else shouldn't be discussing this topic? And are you going to take action to shut all of us up, or will you leave that for Miss Lynch to carry out?
No comments:
Post a Comment