Is the Obama administration in a state of denial? Or are they going out of their way to appease Islamic terrorists, while targeting the same folks Muslims consider to be their enemies?
As the savages of Islam burn people alive in cages, pour acid on the face of women who dare to have a mind of their own, cut off the heads of those that dare not to give all their praise to the false god of Allah or the false prophet Muhammad, use the skin covered detached skulls of Christians as soccer balls for their children to kick around, and as they march their non-Muslim enemies to the beach or to giant mass graves dug for a massive number of bodies to be brutally executed and dropped into as if they were a bunch of discarded animals while the dying infidels gurgle in their own blood, we must remember that our leaders tell us that if we capture these people we must make sure we don't point out that they are Muslim, that they committed their atrocities in the name of Islam, and let's make sure we don't pour any water up their nose to convince them to give us information to save countless lives from terrorism by Muslims that could not possibly be committed because they are Muslim. . . because that would be cruel.
Could you imagine if during the march westward by the hordes of Genghis Khan the people falling victim to the onslaught said, "Be careful not to call them Monguls, that would just be unfair and inaccurate."
How about after Pearl Harbor if we, after the bombing was all finished, proclaimed, "We will not go to war with Japan because of a few pilots that perverted what it is to be Japanese."
How about in Europe during World War II? "We are not at war with Nazis, just a perverted version of Nazism that is not consistent with the teachings of Adolf Hitler."
Ridiculous, right?
At an "anti-extremism summit" being hosted by the White House, President Barack Obama made similar statements about worldwide terrorism which is being committed by Muslims, in the name of Islam. President Barack Obama, in a speech at the summit, defended his decision not to call war against ISIS a religious one. "We are not at war with Islam, we are at war with those who have perverted Islam," he said.
Had those in history decided to refuse to recognize who the enemy was, the slaughter would have continued, and tyrants would have prevailed.
I understand that those that have been deceived by Islam are simply people. I get it. If it wasn't for the fact that they have been indoctrinated by an ideology that government officials refuse to recognize as being evil, they may not be the kind of people they are. I pray for those deceived by Islam. My love for those people desire that they turn away from the evil that grips them. But reality is reality, and Islam is what is behind the jihad, what is behind the war being waged against the world, and Islam (through those deceived that serve the monster) will not stop until it either dominates the world, or is destroyed. That is the reality, whether we like it or not. We can wish for peace, or make up stories to convince ourselves that if we just fling a few peace symbols in their direction they will suddenly drop their guns, stick flowers in their hair, and demand a job at a fast-food joint for $15 an hour. Or, we can recognize the evil behind the ideology, and take action as necessary to defend ourselves against the bloodlust frenzy that has taken hold of terrorist organizations, like ISIS, that commit their atrocities in the name of Islam because they believe the Koran tells them to.
The Obama administration, however, is not only content with refusing to recognize who the enemy is, and that the teachings of Muhammad drive the enemy's war against the infidel, but the liberal left progressives refuse to recognize that we must engage the enemy in a military manner in order to stop the advance of Islam against civilization. The Democrat Party, and the hard left progressives surrounding the anti-American President, hate the same groups that Islam considers to be their enemy, so they are taking advantage of the opportunity to not only appease, and aid, Islam in its destructive journey, but to try to take down Israel and Christianity while they are at it.
The liberal left progressive socialist commies are firing away at their own opposition with both barrels, while refusing to engage the real enemy.
At a national prayer breakfast, President Obama decided to take a pop shot at Christianity, through a comment about the Crusades, declaring that "Terrible deeds have also been committed in the name of Christ."
Eric Holder also defended the Obama narrative, not only refusing to connect ISIS, and all other terrorist groups, with Islam, but accusing Fox News (hated by The Left because Fox dares to refuse to be a hard left media outlet) of worsening the problem by connecting Islam to the terrorist jihad.
Marie Harf of Obama's State Department, however, is the latest to reveal the truth about where the Executive Branch stands on its opinion of Islam, Obama's agenda of appeasement, and the hard left's hate for those that dare to stand against the Islamic Jihad. After Harf's recent statement of utopianist idiocy on MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Mathews, that said the reason for the jihad is a "lack of job opportunities," Marie Harf doubled down on Morning Joe, proclaiming that not only does she believe poverty and a lack of opportunity is among the root causes of terrorism, but that the Lord's Resistance Army led by Ugandan Joseph Kony is an example of "a Christian militant group."
The Obama administration had to dig pretty deep to try to knock Christianity, and protect Islam.
The Obama anti-American war room found what they believe to be a "Christian Terror Group" and fed the information to Marie Harf. They are doing whatever they can to protect Islam, and try to slam Christianity.
Of course it is straight from the Obama playbook.
Harf also commented that people aren't talking much anymore about the Lord's Resistance Army. First of all, the reason for that is that the group's leader, Joseph Kony, is on the run. The group never posed a direct threat to any nation outside the region the group existed, and besides, wasn't the group created in response to Islam?
Interestingly enough, Harf, nor the rest of the Obama minions, dared to mention other sub-Saharan groups causing terror. What about Boko Haram, a group who has been slaughtering thousands of Christians in Nigeria. . . and doing it in the name of Islam? Why aren't they mentioning that group as an example?
Here's Harf's latest assault, from The Morning Joe:
"This week at the White House, we have over 60 countries from around the world who are facing a number of different kinds of extremist threats, who are coming together to say, okay. What are the best practices for how we can identify people who may become extremists before they do? To help prevent that? And then once they do, to help counter that. This is not -- you're absolutely right, Mike, this is not just a threat in one place. If you look at the Lord's Resistance Army and Kony, Joseph Kony, I don't remember people talking about that as much any more, but that's a Christian militant group. So there are a lot of different extremist groups we face and there are different tools we have to go after each one of them."
Had those in history decided to refuse to recognize who the enemy was, the slaughter would have continued, and tyrants would have prevailed.
I understand that those that have been deceived by Islam are simply people. I get it. If it wasn't for the fact that they have been indoctrinated by an ideology that government officials refuse to recognize as being evil, they may not be the kind of people they are. I pray for those deceived by Islam. My love for those people desire that they turn away from the evil that grips them. But reality is reality, and Islam is what is behind the jihad, what is behind the war being waged against the world, and Islam (through those deceived that serve the monster) will not stop until it either dominates the world, or is destroyed. That is the reality, whether we like it or not. We can wish for peace, or make up stories to convince ourselves that if we just fling a few peace symbols in their direction they will suddenly drop their guns, stick flowers in their hair, and demand a job at a fast-food joint for $15 an hour. Or, we can recognize the evil behind the ideology, and take action as necessary to defend ourselves against the bloodlust frenzy that has taken hold of terrorist organizations, like ISIS, that commit their atrocities in the name of Islam because they believe the Koran tells them to.
The Obama administration, however, is not only content with refusing to recognize who the enemy is, and that the teachings of Muhammad drive the enemy's war against the infidel, but the liberal left progressives refuse to recognize that we must engage the enemy in a military manner in order to stop the advance of Islam against civilization. The Democrat Party, and the hard left progressives surrounding the anti-American President, hate the same groups that Islam considers to be their enemy, so they are taking advantage of the opportunity to not only appease, and aid, Islam in its destructive journey, but to try to take down Israel and Christianity while they are at it.
The liberal left progressive socialist commies are firing away at their own opposition with both barrels, while refusing to engage the real enemy.
At a national prayer breakfast, President Obama decided to take a pop shot at Christianity, through a comment about the Crusades, declaring that "Terrible deeds have also been committed in the name of Christ."
Eric Holder also defended the Obama narrative, not only refusing to connect ISIS, and all other terrorist groups, with Islam, but accusing Fox News (hated by The Left because Fox dares to refuse to be a hard left media outlet) of worsening the problem by connecting Islam to the terrorist jihad.
Marie Harf of Obama's State Department, however, is the latest to reveal the truth about where the Executive Branch stands on its opinion of Islam, Obama's agenda of appeasement, and the hard left's hate for those that dare to stand against the Islamic Jihad. After Harf's recent statement of utopianist idiocy on MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Mathews, that said the reason for the jihad is a "lack of job opportunities," Marie Harf doubled down on Morning Joe, proclaiming that not only does she believe poverty and a lack of opportunity is among the root causes of terrorism, but that the Lord's Resistance Army led by Ugandan Joseph Kony is an example of "a Christian militant group."
The Obama administration had to dig pretty deep to try to knock Christianity, and protect Islam.
The Obama anti-American war room found what they believe to be a "Christian Terror Group" and fed the information to Marie Harf. They are doing whatever they can to protect Islam, and try to slam Christianity.
Of course it is straight from the Obama playbook.
Harf also commented that people aren't talking much anymore about the Lord's Resistance Army. First of all, the reason for that is that the group's leader, Joseph Kony, is on the run. The group never posed a direct threat to any nation outside the region the group existed, and besides, wasn't the group created in response to Islam?
Interestingly enough, Harf, nor the rest of the Obama minions, dared to mention other sub-Saharan groups causing terror. What about Boko Haram, a group who has been slaughtering thousands of Christians in Nigeria. . . and doing it in the name of Islam? Why aren't they mentioning that group as an example?
Here's Harf's latest assault, from The Morning Joe:
"This week at the White House, we have over 60 countries from around the world who are facing a number of different kinds of extremist threats, who are coming together to say, okay. What are the best practices for how we can identify people who may become extremists before they do? To help prevent that? And then once they do, to help counter that. This is not -- you're absolutely right, Mike, this is not just a threat in one place. If you look at the Lord's Resistance Army and Kony, Joseph Kony, I don't remember people talking about that as much any more, but that's a Christian militant group. So there are a lot of different extremist groups we face and there are different tools we have to go after each one of them."
The fact is, the extremist groups, the ones that are causing the world to shudder, all perform their violence in the name of Islam, and are supported by a majority of the Muslim populations.
While seeking to pin terrorism on Christianity, I was surprised they didn't do like most leftists do, and drag into the conversation Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City Bomber.
The hard left progressives love to drag McVeigh into the conversation, pretending he embodies the dangerous "white, right wing, Christian terrorists" they just know must be lurking about out there, waiting to cause all kinds of problems.
McVeigh was not even a Christian, and he didn't do what he did in the name of Christ. He is like all of the other examples the followers of Obamaism are using - a massive misrepresentation in an attempt to protect Islam, and shore up their anti-American, anti-Israel, and anti-Christian narrative. The Crusades was a response to an Islamic invasion of the Holy Land and Europe. Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army was not as much a terror group as much as it was a group using the Christian name to "resist" the onslaught of Islam, and fight against the Muslims in Sudan.
Unlike the Crusades, or the Lord's Resistance Army, Muslim terror groups are not in existence to resist an oppressive force, but to be an oppressive force. They are not in existence as a response to anything. Islamic jihadist groups exist to promote their violent call for jihad. How long is the list of Islamic terrorists? The Democrat Party's hate for Christians, and sympathy for Islam that is waging a world war against any and all people that refuse to bow to Islam's false god and false prophet, is so extreme that they are willing to send Marie Harf out to double down like that?
Pathetic.
A world war is upon us, it is being waged against us, but the leaders of the world are not only unwilling to admit the identity of the enemy, but they are doing what they can to provide aid and comfort for that enemy.
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
Obama's Crusades controversy highlights war on terrorism's rhetorical minefield - Yahoo News
Obama: We are not at war with Islam - WXII
State Department's Harf: Hey, There's a Militant Christian Group, too! - NewsBusters
Holder Blames Fox for Concern about Radical Islam - Daily Caller
While seeking to pin terrorism on Christianity, I was surprised they didn't do like most leftists do, and drag into the conversation Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City Bomber.
The hard left progressives love to drag McVeigh into the conversation, pretending he embodies the dangerous "white, right wing, Christian terrorists" they just know must be lurking about out there, waiting to cause all kinds of problems.
McVeigh was not even a Christian, and he didn't do what he did in the name of Christ. He is like all of the other examples the followers of Obamaism are using - a massive misrepresentation in an attempt to protect Islam, and shore up their anti-American, anti-Israel, and anti-Christian narrative. The Crusades was a response to an Islamic invasion of the Holy Land and Europe. Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army was not as much a terror group as much as it was a group using the Christian name to "resist" the onslaught of Islam, and fight against the Muslims in Sudan.
Unlike the Crusades, or the Lord's Resistance Army, Muslim terror groups are not in existence to resist an oppressive force, but to be an oppressive force. They are not in existence as a response to anything. Islamic jihadist groups exist to promote their violent call for jihad. How long is the list of Islamic terrorists? The Democrat Party's hate for Christians, and sympathy for Islam that is waging a world war against any and all people that refuse to bow to Islam's false god and false prophet, is so extreme that they are willing to send Marie Harf out to double down like that?
Pathetic.
A world war is upon us, it is being waged against us, but the leaders of the world are not only unwilling to admit the identity of the enemy, but they are doing what they can to provide aid and comfort for that enemy.
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
Obama's Crusades controversy highlights war on terrorism's rhetorical minefield - Yahoo News
Obama: We are not at war with Islam - WXII
State Department's Harf: Hey, There's a Militant Christian Group, too! - NewsBusters
Holder Blames Fox for Concern about Radical Islam - Daily Caller
No comments:
Post a Comment