Monday, July 27, 2015

Obama Seeks Iran-Style Nuclear "Deal" With....North Korea

by JASmius



Assuming, of course, that there are any nukes left in the U.S. inventory for the NoKos after O shipped them off to Tehran:

The recent nuclear deal with Iran showed that the United States can be flexible with a willing counterpart, including North Korea if it decides it wants talks on its nuclear program, a U.S. envoy said on Monday. [emphasis added]

You know, bending over and grabbing the ankles.  And there appears to be no shortage of "willing counterparts" that the Obama Regime cannot find.

North Korea has said it was not interested in an Iran-like dialogue with the United States to give up its nuclear capabilities, which it said were an “essential deterrence” against hostile U.S. policy.

Because Pyongyang ALREADY HAS NUCLEAR ICBMs.  As do the mullahs, of course, but we weren't supposed to talk about that.

Despite that, Sydney Seiler, U.S. special envoy for now-defunct six-party talks on ending the North’s nuclear program, said the United States left the door open to talks with the North when it is willing to end its diplomatic isolation.

“The Iran deal demonstrates the value and possibilities that negotiation bring,” Seiler told reporters in the South Korean capital, Seoul. [emphasis added]

That may be one of, in not the most ominous turns of phrase I have ever seen in my half century on this planet.  The "value and possibilities" that the Iran nuclear deal will bring is a Middle East nuclear holocaust and a U.S. EMP'd back to the eighteenth century.  Now the White House can't wait to form a line of "willing counterparts" for the honor of destroying us, consisting of two of them - Iran and North Korea - who have already been collaborating on their nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs.

Insanity and treason are words that are difficult not overuse when it comes to Barack Obama because no other terms come close to adequately describing the whirlwind of horror he is sewing.

I now yield the floor to Andy McCarthy:

A little over a year ago, I recounted Iredell’s cautionary words in Faithless Execution. They echo an instructive illustration offered by James Madison, the Constitution’s principal author: If the president were “to commit any thing so atrocious” as to fraudulently rig Senate approval of an international agreement, he would “be impeached and convicted.”

Interestingly, the perfidy in Madison’s hypothetical involved summoning into session only senators favorably disposed toward a formal treaty that the president wanted approved. That was more plausible in the late eighteenth century: Under the Constitution, a treaty may be approved by “two thirds of the senators present” for the vote; and back then, senators coming from far and wide could not fly to the nation’s capital at the drop of a hat.

The hypothetical is telling as we consider Obama’s Iran deal. The Constitution makes treason a ground for impeachment, but it seems to have been outside Madison’s contemplation that a president would actually be so insidious as to use his foreign-affairs power to give aid and comfort to an enemy of the United States. On that score, note that as soon as Obama’s deal was announced, not only was Iran’s foreign minister vowing to continue funding jihadist terror; the regime’s “supreme leader,” Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was also extolling the continued Iranian call for “Death to America.”

Madison could not fathom a president who undermines the Constitution’s treaty requirements by the ruse of labeling a treaty an “agreement” or a “joint plan of action.” Still less could he imagine a president who resorts to chicanery in communicating the terms of an international agreement to the Congress.

Such duplicity must have seemed inconceivable. Yet now, it is not just conceivable. It is happening. [emphasis added]

And now Obama wants to reprise his treason with North Korea as well.  Which raises the question of what concessions he could possibly offer the Norks to give up nuclear weapons and ICBMs they already have as opposed to a nuclear weapons program under development (if you accept that the mullahs don't already have nukes, which I don't think has been the case for at least seven years).  Food?  Economic aid?  We're already propping them up, and every time Kim Jong-Un rattles his sabre, we lavish more upon him.

But simple logic leads us to the answer: abandon South Korea and allow the Norks to "unify" Korea under communist rule.  Maybe Japan as well.  Betrayals that would fit quite nicely with Red China's goal of reprising Imperial Japan's "Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere".  And then would come the inevitable attack on the United States leading to the endgame that Kurt Schichter previewed over a year ago:

“I won’t use nuclear weapons. Ever,” said the President, confirming the opinion reached by the teams of Chinese and Russian intelligence analysts, psychologists and game theorists who had studied the Commander-in-Chief in preparation for that very moment. Deterrence only deters when the threat is credible.

“What are my other options?” asked the President. The general looked down, shuffling papers.

“We don’t have a conventional option.”

“The Army? The Marines?”

“There are a few units forward deployed, but we’ve brought most of our forces home. What we have left we can’t move fast enough and most of it is designed for counterinsurgency, not conventional warfare – we’ve cut our armored forces because they cost so much to maintain. And to move them we’d need foreign ships, but we can’t count on them. We can’t even count on the sea lanes being clear.”

“The Air Force doesn’t have bombers? Fighters?” the President asked.

“Not enough, and not modern enough to get through Chinese and Russian air defenses.”

The President turned to the Commissar of State. “What about our allies?”

“No commitments yet. In fact, there’s been no response from several key allies.”

“We invoked NATO Article 5, didn’t we? We’ve been attacked!” the President shouted.

“They don’t have any significant forces left. Even if they were inclined to assist…”

“Inclined?” asked the President, stunned.

“We need to understand that they may be making a calculated decision…”

The President did understand. “To go with the winner.”

No one spoke; the only sound was the noise of the 747’s jets until a communications officer spoke up.

“I have a video transmission off a Chinese satellite coming … to us. How did they get our communications data?” It was yet another security breach.

“Just put it onscreen,” ordered the President.

The transmission was a split screen, the Chinese Premier on the left, the Russian President on the right. They were smiling.

“What do you want?” the President asked.

The Russian President spoke. “We want peace. We want justice. And that is why we are here to provide you the terms of your surrender.”

This is our near future, my fellow conquered Americans.  It's only a matter of time.

Except that Obama won't be "stunned".  He'll grin and accept congratulations from Czar Putin and General Secretary Xi for a job well done.

No comments: