Wouldn't this constitute the Obama Regime literally subverting and seeking the overthrow of the Israeli government?:
Former [commissar] of state Hillary Clinton considered a secret plan created by her then-advisers to foment unrest among Palestinian citizens and spark protests in order to push the Israeli government back to the negotiating table, according to emails released as part of the investigation into the Democrat presidential candidate’s private email server.
In a December 18th, 2011, email, former U.S. ambassador to Israel Thomas Pickering suggested that [Mrs.] Clinton consider a plan to restart then-stalled peace negotiations by kick-starting Palestinian demonstrations against Israel.
Pickering described the effort as a potential “game changer in the region,” recommending that the United States undertake a clandestine campaign to generate unrest. [Mrs.] Clinton requested that his email be printed.
“What will change the situation is a major effort to use non-violent protests and demonstrations to put peace back in the center of people’s aspirations as well as their thoughts, and use that to influence the political leadership,” Pickering wrote.
"Non-violent" protests? In the Middle East, in general? By Palestinians in particular? There isn't any such thing. It's like the late Foster Brooks telling jokes sober. Not only would they not be funny, but nobody could imagine such a thing. And as the email exchange reveals, not only do Pickering and the Empress not even give a moment's thought to the guarantee of Pal violence, but they obsess over the prospects for triggering IDF "violence" against the "peaceful" Pals, all to set up the Jews for more international demonization for their obstinate refusal to commit national suicide.
The anti-Semitic hostility of the Left in general and the Obama Regime is long established, as is their despicable sneakiness, and this anti-Israel plotting was no different:
"A peace document with parameters like those at the end of the Clinton administration" - a near-total capitulation of Israel to the Pals, forced on the former by the U.S. - this having come after the Clintonoids overthrew Benjamin Netanyahu a year or so earlier and replaced him with a Labor regime that dociley did as it was told - that the late Yassir Arafat nevertheless rejected, having been given no reason to believe he couldn't demand and be given anything and everything he wanted. And when, incredibly, that proved too much for even Ehud Barak to stomach, Arafat launched Intifada II.
Thus was established the context of what Pickering and Hillary were plotting, except in their case, they were seeking the same outcome through cutouts and henchmen so as to create the fiction of being an "honest broker" when they were in fact pro-Palestinian/pro-jihadist partisans engaging in de facto espionage and sabotage against what had been a long-time and staunch American ally. It was an outrageous act of treachery and dishonor.
And if Obamunists like Mrs. Clinton and Ambassador Pickering did it once, one cannot help but suspect that this, too, may have been Regime SOP:
Gee, I wonder how many other foreign protests were facilitated by the State [Commissariat]? Were any others sparked against American allies in that region? One has to wonder after reading this how much the State [Commissariat] might have had to do with some of the pro-jihadist “Arab Spring” protests, too. (In fact, at one point Pickering says that the effort must be “just like Tahrir Square,” a mention that might interest our allies in Egypt.)
Versus, say, the 2009 Green Revolution in Iran, to which the Obama Regime's hostility was not just the antithesis of clandestine but openly palpable.
Seven years of the Obama Doctrine has plunged the world into war and chaos, and Hillary Clinton was one of its primary architects. Her election would clinch inevitable global Armageddon. But given her abysmal discretion and spinning abilities, pretty much everybody would be able to see it coming. God willing that will be the case before next November.