DOUGLAS V. GIBBS<---------->RADIO<---------->BOOKS<---------->CONSTITUTION <---------->CONTACT/FOLLOW <----------> DONATE

Monday, July 18, 2016

U.S. Muslim Infiltration

By Douglas V. Gibbs
AuthorSpeakerInstructorRadio Host

Islam has declared war on America, and her allies.  Jihad is being committed worldwide against The West, and various other peoples who refuse to bow to Allah and the false prophet Muhammad.  Evil exists in the world, and it is being guided by a book of aggression called the Koran.  It is being carried out by people who claim to be committing their violence as members of a religion of peace.  Islam is no religion.  It is a totalitarian political system that masquerades as a religion.

They are at war with us, and we refuse to admit it.  In war the enemy does whatever it takes to win.  They attack, they kill, they lie, they deceive, they infiltrate, and in the case of this enemy, they play psychological warfare.  The Islamic jihadists use women and children as shields and as attackers.  They use ambulances as ammunition transports, and hospitals as centers of operation.  They use political correctness and deception to worm their way into our society, and leftist politicians to invade our countries.

Dissent will be punished.

Islam creates chaos.  In America, the chaos of late has been emerging from the Black Lives Matter movement.  The co-founder of Black Lives Matter is a MUSLIM.

Her name is Yusra Khogali  She is a black Muslim.  She believes only the lives of blacks and Muslims matter.  The lives of “men and white folks” do not.  Even notice the presence of CAIR whenever Black Lives Matter is stirring up hatred against whitey?

On February 9 Yusra said exactly what she means in a controversial tweet.  In the tweet, Khogali asks Allah for strength “to not cuss/kill these men and white folks out here today.”

Black Lives Matters activist Sandy Hudson blamed the media for focusing on the tweet, instead of the larger issues at hand. “This is extremely frustrating and emotional for me because we slept outside for two weeks to get somebody to care about death in our community and this is what you decided to focus on? It’s very, very, very irresponsible,” she said.

When repeatedly asked for a comment on the tweet, she refused.

The tweet vanished once it gained attention.

The man behind the Dallas Black Lives Matter protest, which provided the opportunity for a Black Power and Muslim to kill five police officers, is Muslim.

The Black Panthers, a Black Power group who also has ties to Islam, is calling for a new America.  The "National Minister of Defense" for the Black Panthers has proclaimed that along with their other goals, they seek their "own government in a nation within a nation."

In an interview with Aaron Klein, Babu Omowale said that a new "Black Nation" would be composed of five states: Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Alabama and Georgia.

"We just need to start migrating back to those states and taking control of the economics in those states," he said. "If black people move in, most definitely white people will move out. So it's not a hard process for us to have our own country within a country."

Omowale is the co-founder of the Huey P. Newton Gun Club, which states on their website that they seek to "develop over time to a regimented Black Army."

"Our mission is to educate the masses of black people on the necessity of self," states the website. "That includes self-preservation, self-defense, and self-sufficiency through militant culture."

"We want freedom. We want the power to practice self-determination, and to determine the destiny of our community and THE BLACK NATION."  He claims the movement is the result of being owed land, money, restitutions, and reparations.

The Black Liberation influence is Marxist and Muslim in nature, and the goal of Omowale is simply to create through violence a nation within the United States that can be used as a base to launch hostilities against America - to spread Marxism and Islam.

The infiltration is not only into our culture.  The infiltration is also in our government.

In 2008 the Democrats and Islam took advantage of a perfect storm - using the candidacy of the first black president to its fullest advantage, creating a fervor of praise for Barack Obama that spread across the country, and the rest of the world.

He promised "hope," a powerful word in the English language.  He also promised "change", the old standby for the Democrat Party.  Obama was young.  His skin color drew in more than 90% of the black vote.  He thrilled his followers with an incredible ability to read a teleprompter and fake it as a great orator.  He excited and enthralled people around the globe with his words.

The liberal leftists of the world who have bought into the idea that evil does not exist, except in the form of the American Military.  They took comfort in the fact that Obama spent his childhood in the Asia-Pacific. They saw it as a good thing that he had a connection to Islam.  They hated George W. Bush, and the liberal left of the world believed that the only reason Islam was at war with The West was because Bush invaded Iraq. Obama promised to end the hostilities, to end all wars in Muslim countries, and through all of that he would improve America’s standing on human rights, alleviate global poverty, and stop the man-made global warming induced rise of the oceans.  “Yes we can!” shouted the faithful.

Months later the new President of the United States was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for what he had been saying. . . a confirmation that the leftists of the world believed that Obama's rhetoric could save the world.

As far as they were concerned, he would keep his promises, and accomplish everything he said he would.

The people who listened, and believed in him, were either naive, or knew and supported his true agenda.

On June 4, 2009 a friend of mine was stationed in Bahrain.  He listened to Obama's Cairo University speech and heard things the U.S. Media edited out of the speech.  Obama praised Islam, gave his blessings to Islam, and claimed to be Muslim.  All we heard in the United States regarding that speech is that Obama was calling for a "new beginning between the United States and Muslims."

Within two years Muslim revolutionaries would sweep through Egypt, and several other countries, leaving in their wake war, suffering, and a massive rise in terrorism.

As Obama's presidency continued on, Russia would annex Crimea and invade Ukraine.  Russia had no fear.  Would would the appeaser in chief be willing to do about it?

The Obama administration committed more than $1.3 billion in foreign assistance to Ukraine, including training and equipment for its armed forces as well as humanitarian aid to make up for the mess that has emerged as a result of the Obama agenda.

According to a whistleblower, Islam has been a heavy influence in the White House when it comes to setting policy.

Philip Haney is a founding member of the Department of Homeland Security, and a retired Customs % Border Protection agent.  He served under both the Bush, and the Obama administrations.  During a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Oversight, Agency Action, Federal Rights and Federal Courts he testified that the federal government has been purposely deemphasizing radical Islam in their reports and efforts regarding confronting terrorism.

He spoke of how in January of 2008 he received the “Words Matter Memo,” which was circulated internally by the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL) division of DHS. The full title of the document was “Terminology to Define the Terrorists: Recommendations from American Muslims,” and it read in part:

[T]he experts counseled caution in using terms such as, “jihadist,” “Islamic terrorist,” “Islamist,” and “holy warrior” as grandiose descriptions.
Collapsing all terrorist organizations into a single enemy feeds the narrative that al-Qaeda represents Muslims worldwide, and the Obama narrative just couldn't have that.

We should not concede the terrorists’ claim that they are legitimate adherents of Islam. Therefore, when using the word [Islamic], it may be strategic to emphasize that many so-called “Islamic” terrorist groups twist and exploit the tenets of Islam to justify violence and to serve their own selfish political aims.
Regarding jihad, even if it is accurate to reference the term (putting aside polemics on its true nature), it may not be strategic because it glamorizes terrorism, imbues terrorists with religious authority they do not have, and damages relations with Muslims around the globe.
On November 5, 2009, at Ft. Hood, Texas, Nidal Hasan shot and killed 13 people, including one who was pregnant, and wounded 32 others, while calling out “Allahu akbar!” meaning “God is great” in Arabic.

Hassan was a U.S. Army major who had exchanged emails with leading al Qaeda figure Anwar Awlaki – which the FBI had seen and decided not to take action.

On January 27-28, 2010 an ‘Inaugural Meeting’ occurred between American Muslim leaders and DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano, hosted by DHS CRCL. The Inaugural Meeting created controversy because it included a number of Islamic fundamentalist individuals and organizations.

The threat of Islamic terrorism does not just come from a network of armed organizations such as Hamas and ISIS, who are operating ‘over there’ in the Middle East. In fact, branches of the same global network have been established here in America, and they are operating in plain sight.

The Obama administration is committing willful blindness because they are either really stupid, or the Democrats in the White House are complicit.

Questions have arisen about if the Obama administration is sympathetic to Islam, and more importantly, if Islam has infiltrated the federal government.  In response, the Obama administration has lied about, and has attempted to cover up, any connections to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Newly declassified documents obtained by the Clarion Project shows that members of the Obama administration misled members of Congress in 2012 about its involvement with Muslim Brotherhood-linked entities. The documents show that there were even a number of internal communications within the Office of the Director of National Intelligence expressing concerns about the Brotherhood links of these entities.

This administration has shown itself to be very close to groups such as the Council for American Islamic Relations (CAIR) and Islamic Society of North America (ISNA).

The Director of National Intelligence James Clapper testified to Congress on February 10, 2011 that the Muslim Brotherhood is “a very heterogeneous group, largely secular, which has eschewed violence and has described Al-Qaeda as a perversion of Islam.”  The assertion to those who are informed about Islam is laughable, but the statement shows how the Obama administration has tried to use language to protect their Muslim allies.

In the hearing in February 2011, Clapper was asked by Rep. Jeff Miller (R-FL) about the administration’s relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood. He answered, “There have been outreaches to the Muslim community in general, but I guess we’re not aware of any direct outreach to these particular organizations. That is, if you’re speaking domestically.”

Again, a lie.

FBI Director Mueller then chimed in, saying there is “no relationship with the Brotherhood. Period.” The CIA Director Leon Panetta then agreed, dismissively laughing in the process. Clapper’s office later issued a clarification, backtracking on his inaccurate statement that the Brotherhood is “secular.”

Just four months later, on June 12, 2012, a 90-minute “Roundtable Discussion” took place at National Intelligence’s headquarters in McLean, Virginia. At the meeting, Clapper met in person with a representative of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). Also present were National Counter-Terrorism Center Director Matthew Olson and Alexander Joel, ODNI Civil Liberties Protection Officer.

In 2007, the Justice Department listed ISNA as a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entity and designated them as an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terrorism-financing trial of the history of the U.S. In that trial, the Holy Land Foundation, a Muslim Brotherhood front, was found guilty of funding Hamas.  Read the Clarion’s report on ISNA here. In fact, ISNA was identified as Brotherhood front as early as 1987.

Yet in 2012, the president of ISNA, Imam Mohamed Magid, was invited to meet with the Director of National Intelligence.

Egyptians agree that Obama has a connection to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Constant chatter from Egypt says there is a connection between President Barack Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood.  Egyptians say America's president is connected through his half-brother Malik.

CBN News contributor, author, Middle East analyst Raymond Ibrahim has written about it on CBN News.

In February of 2015 the Obama administration released the names of the fourteen Muslim “leaders” who met with the President in one week.  Among them were a select few individuals with disturbingly close ties to the global Muslim Brotherhood.

Over the last few years, thousands of pages of documentation of the US State Department’s dealings with the Muslim Brotherhood have been declassified and released to the public.

For the past decade, two successive U.S. administrations have maintained close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Tunisia, Syria and Libya, to name just the most prominent cases.

The Obama administration maintained frequent contact and ties with the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood. At one point, in April 2012, US officials arranged for the public relations director of the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood, Mohammad Gaair, to come to Washington to speak at a conference on “Islamists in Power” hosted by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

The governments of Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates officially consider the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization, but the presidential directive reportedly shows the White House considers the group a “moderate” alternative to ISIS and al-Qaida.

Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy has written that the Muslim Brotherhood “is not moderate” and “there is no such thing as a moderate Islamist.”

Iran specialist Clare Lopez of the Center for Security Policy says “The Muslim Brotherhood is a jihadist organization, from the day of its founding and remains so to this day,” she said.

Whether violent or not, she said, all jihadists, such as the Muslim Brotherhood, seek the same two things: “Islamic governance and enforcement of Islamic law, or Shariah.”

Former Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., who tried to launch an inquiry three years ago into Muslim Brotherhood infiltration of the federal government, told WND, “It confirms the questions I originally asked of the inspector generals of five agencies.”

“The recent discovery of an Obama administration document evidencing support for the Muslim Brotherhood is unsurprising,” she said. “It merely confirms the consistent position of the White House’s support of the Muslim Brotherhood since Obama’s election.”

Frank Gaffney, former assistant secretary of defense during the Reagan administration, and president of the Center for Security Policy, said PSD-11 was part of a series of mistakes that “were the consequences of embracing, legitimating, funding and even arming the Muslim Brotherhood.”

“They will prove to be among President Obama’s worst security policy legacies — and that’s saying something!”

Nation of Islam Minister Louis Farrakhan went a step further than saying there are no moderate Islamists; he stated there is not even a moderate Islam.

A tweet from a supporter quoted Farrakhan as saying, “What is moderate Islam? There is no such thing,” during a speech at Shiloh Baptist Church in Washington, D.C.

Walid Shoebat says that the connection between Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood goes beyond his administration appeasing the terrorist group.  According to Shoebat, the Obama administration has within its ranks administration officials who are Muslim, and are linked to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Chairman Trey Gowdy identified 20 current and former members of the Obama administration who have a common thread.  With them, there is a connection to both the Obama administration and the Muslim Brotherhood, which was involved in the Benghazi attacks through its subgroups like Ansar al-Sharia, al-Qaeda, the Jamal Network and the Martyrs Brigade, which was inexplicably contracted to provide security at the Special Mission Compound (SMC) where Ambassador Christopher Stevens was murdered.

Names of individuals not on the list but who worked for either the State Department or the White House at the time of the Benghazi attacks and who are also connected to the Muslim Brotherhood include but are not limited to:

1.) Huma Abedin – Deputy Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton who also remains a close personal aid to Clinton. Though she never left the State Department during Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State, there is a highly questionable arrangement involving Abedin’s time as a Special Government Employee (SGE) at the time of the attacks. has reported on this extensively. At a minimum, Abedin had a serious conflict of interest at the time of the attacks; her immediately family is part of the Muslim Brotherhood, has reported on extensively. One of the members on this Committee, Rep. Lynn Westmoreland knows all about Abedin. He was one of the signatories on a June 13, 2012 letter to the State Department Inspector General that identified Abedin by name. The purpose of the letter was to express concerns about Muslim Brotherhood infiltration at the State Department.

2.) Mehdi K. Alhassani – At the time of the Benghazi attacks, Alhassani was Special Assistant to the Office of the Chief of Staff, National Security Council Staff, and Executive Office of the President. On September 14, 2012, he was one of the recipients of the now infamous ‘smoking gun’ email sent by Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes, which instructed Susan Rice to point to the Innocence of Muslims video as the reason for the attacks in Benghazi. first reported, Alhassani has a history that includes time as President of the Muslim Students Association (MSA) at George Washington University. He also partnered with Dr. Yahya Basha and Farah Pandith for a Muslim Brotherhood-friendly tour in 2006.

3.) Rashad Hussain – Very much connected to the global Muslim Brotherhood apparatus. Once tried to coverup his positive comments about convicted terrorist Sami al-Arian. As Obama’s special envoy to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), Hussain knows all too well what the primary goal of the OIC is – to make any and all criticism or speech against Islam criminal. In the wake of the Benghazi attacks, riots all over the middle east outside U.S. diplomatic institutions broke out and OIC member states attempted to exploit these riots and protests to push that OIC objective. As has revealed, evidence actually suggests that the Obama administration itself played a role in the production and marketing of that video.

In a letter to the Committee’s ranking member, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), Gowdy listed all 20 names. Among the more prominent names are: Jay Carney, former White House Press Secretary; Gen. Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; Tom Donilon, former National Security Advisor; Leon Panetta, former Secretary of Defense;Cheryl Mills, Counselor and Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton; Denis McDonough, former Deputy National Security Advisor and current Chief of Staff to Barack Obama; Thomas Pickering, Chairman of the Benghazi Accountability Review Board (ARB); Jake Sullivan, a Deputy Chief of Staff to Hillary Clinton at the time of the attacks;Susan Rice, former UN Ambassador and current National Security Advisor; William Burns,Deputy Secretary of State; Ben Rhodes, Deputy National Security Advisor who sent out the ‘smoking gun’ email the finally prompted the formation of the Select Committee; andDavid Petraeus, former CIA Director.

Note: As reported, the extent to which lead counsel for the Committee, Lt. Gen. Dana K. Chipman has a personal relationship with Gen. Dempsey should be vetted. It is known that a relationship exists. Dempsey hosted Chipman’s retirement ceremony from the military. The host of these ceremonies is typically chosen by the retiree and is often based on things like mentorship, friendship, etc.

Another figure who may have a conflict of interest that could interfere with any decision to interview Abedin, Alhassani, or Hussain is the Committee’s Executive Director Philip Kiko. As has reported, the lobbying firm that Kiko has worked for, the Smith-Free Group, lists the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights (LCCR) among its clients. One group in this consortium of groups – Muslim Advocates (MA) – is indeed connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, as has demonstrated. While Kiko has not represented MA, he has represented other LCCR organizations. If the potential exists for MA to pressure LCCR to pressure Smith-Free not to interview people like Abedin, Alhassani and Hussain, Kiko should recuse himself.

To be fair, Gowdy makes it clear that the 20 witnesses should not be perceived as the only ones. In his letter, he writes:

This list does not purport to or begin to identify the full universe of individuals the Committee expects to interview or who might have knowledge about the policies, decisions and activities related to the attacks of September 11, 2012.

The reality is that the Obama administration’s policy in Libya before Gadhafi was removed from power was a very pro-Muslim Brotherhood policy; it paved the way for the Benghazi attacks. Indications are that after Gadhafi was removed from power, the U.S. was involved in facilitating weapons shipments out of Benghazi and on to the Syrian rebels. Again, this was a very pro-Muslim Brotherhood policy. In fact, Alhassani’s 2006 partner, Basha, sits on the Board of the Syrian Emergency Task Force (SETF), which seeks to support those Muslim Brotherhood rebels in Syria and is led by Mouaz Moustafa, who also led the Libyan Emergency Task Force (LETF) until Gadhafi fell, as reported.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

No comments: