DOUGLAS V. GIBBS<---------->RADIO<---------->BOOKS<---------->CONSTITUTION <---------->CONTACT/FOLLOW <----------> DONATE

Monday, August 29, 2016

Hillary Clinton's Socialist White House Run not a Foregone Conclusion

While the artist singles out the Washington Post,
I would say this represents all of the mainstream media.
By Douglas V. Gibbs
AuthorSpeakerInstructorRadio Host

Democrats and Never Trump folks of both sides have decided that Hillary Clinton is so far ahead that her election to the presidency is inevitable.  In fact, many of them believe that the candidacy of Donald Trump has solidified her win in November.  According to CNN, she's so far ahead there is no need for an election.

If that is true, it is an amazing thing.  It proves how powerful the spell the Democrats has their followers under is.  The evidence against Hillary Clinton is mounting, and unbelievably massive. . . yet they still want to vote for her.

Some people say that Hillary Clinton in the White House would simply be Obama's third term.  And granted, Obama has his own controversial socialist connections. He is, in fact, an associate of a Chicago-based
Marxist group with access to millions of labor union dollars and connections to expert political consultants, including a convicted swindler.

Obama’s socialist backing goes back at least to 1996, when he received the endorsement of the
Chicago branch of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) for an Illinois state senate seat. Later, the Chicago DSA newsletter reported that Obama, as a state senator, showed up to eulogize Saul Mendelson, one of the “champions” of “Chicago’s democratic left” and a long-time socialist activist. Obama’s stint as a “community organizer” in Chicago has gotten some attention, but his relationship with the DSA socialists, who groomed and backed him, has been generally ignored.

DSA describes itself as the largest socialist organization in the United States and the principal
U.S. affiliate of the Socialist International. The Socialist International (SI) has what is called “consultative status” with the United Nations.  In other words, it works hand-in-glove with the world body.

Another group associated with the SI is the Party of European Socialists (PES), which heard from Howard
Dean, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee, back in 2006.  Dean’s speech is posted on the official Democratic Party website, although the European socialist parties are referred to as “progressive.”
Democrats, Dean said, want to be “good citizens of the world community.”  He spoke at a session on “Global Challenges for Progressive Politics.”
Getting back to Hillary, her platform is right in line with the 1936 Communist Party Platform.  Her socialism is something more than Obama's has been.  Her's is right up there with the policies of the Soviet Union.

In addition to being a socialist, which we'll return to later in this article, her troubles are piling up, as well.  The Hill has reported that a new batch of 14,900 emails found by the FBI is threatening to be released, and will be released in a drip-drip fashion through Election Day.  As Hillary Clinton faces new questions about the Clinton Foundation after separate emails were released that showed a foundation official seeking time with Clinton for a donor, even the Associated Press has been willing to jump on the story.

The Republicans say they also have evidence to hit her with perjury charges.

Clinton's advisers seem not to be worried.  After all, it's hard to take down someone like Hillary when she has so many members of the system on her payroll, or fearful for their lives.

“I still think the email and foundation issues, while they will continue to be something of a distraction, are not fatal, and pale in comparison to the problems Trump faces,” one longtime Clinton adviser said.

“What she needs to do is keep beating up on Trump,” said Brad Bannon, a Democratic strategist. “The more this is about Donald Trump, the more likely it is that she's going to win. She needs to put the onus of the campaign back on him.”

Even though it is becoming more and more clear that Hillary Clinton cannot be trusted?

People are more and more realizing the Hillary Clinton is a pathological liar.  That reality becomes even more evident when those around her confirm it.  The Washington Examiner has reported that a technology company that provided the program Hillary Clinton's team used to scrub her private server of emails bragged on its website that it had prevented the FBI from accessing deleted records.

Rep. Trey Gowdy brought the involvement of the program created by the tech firm to light when he told Fox News that Clinton's emails were so fully deleted that "even God can't read them."

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange on “Fox & Friends” said that the “most interesting and serious” information on Hillary Clinton is yet to come.

“What is the most shocking thing that you have found out about Hillary Clinton,” co-host Ainsley Earhardt asked Assange.

“Well, I think the most interesting and serious,” he said, pausing to choose his words carefully, “relate to upcoming publications we have.

“A variety of different types,” he continued. “But a lot of information that we have already published, I mean it may not be that apparent to most people who are sort of not specializing in your politics and national security,” he said.

The Washington Times claims that Hillary Clinton is more than just a progressive democrat, as she claimed while talking to Chris Mathews.  Mrs. Clinton has adopted democratic-socialist ideals in ways beyond what Bernie Sanders believes in.  In order to win over Sanders' supporters, she has let out more of what she believes, verbalizing (for example) that she backs the creation of the “public option,” within Obamacare, and to allow people to enroll in Medicare at age 55. She accepted Mr. Sanders calls to abolish the death penalty, his team’s cries for a $15 hourly federal minimum wage indexed to inflation, promised to increase spending on community health centers, and has said she’d make public college education free.

While the Washington Times indicates they believe she has sprinted to Sanders' socialist platform, the dirty little secret is Bernie's socialism is nothing compared to Hillary Clinton's communism.

She's also proposed expanding Social Security in terms of adding pre-retirees and giving it to people who took some time off during work, guaranteeing 12 weeks of medical leave, adding $5,000 a year in subsidies for families enrolled in Obamacare to make their co-pays and deductibles more affordable, and has promised universal pre-K.  Her platform also has adopted amendment on criminal justice reform which calls for the Department of Justice to investigate all shootings involving police officers.

Sanders calls it the most progressive platform in the history of the Democrat Party.

While Obama's threat to fundamentally transform the American System was truly believed by the current President, Hillary's promise is much more vicious, and much more to the point.  She doesn't plan to hide or bob and weave.  She's going straight for the jugular, well knowing that with the next nomination for Supreme Court Justice, the sky's the limit for her totalitarian agenda.

According to Dennis Prager in a National Review article he wrote, 
"...if Hillary Clinton wins the presidency, this country will be so far from what the Founders wanted, so different from what the #NeverTrumpers have always fought for, that it is almost impossible to see how America would recover from her — or any Democrat’s — victory. Thanks to the universities’ leftist indoctrination of two generations of Americans, and thanks to Bernie Sanders, the Democratic party is now in all but name a socialist party. In fact, it is actually to the left of many European socialist parties. For example, if Clinton wins, the government will now tell companies how much they must pay employees: “If you believe that companies should share profits with their workers, not paid executive bonuses, join us,” she brazenly announced. And if you think that this is unconstitutional, remember that it won’t matter, because she will appoint left-wing Supreme Court justices and left-wing federal judges who do not view their roles as protectors of the Constitution. They view their roles as promoting “social justice,” which has as much to do with justice as “people’s democracy” has to do with democracy. RELATED: A Woman, Sure, but This Woman? There will still be a country called the United States, a geographic entity situated between Canada and Mexico, but it will not be the America envisioned by the Founders, or by most Americans until the middle of the 20th century. A few days before Barack Obama was elected president in 2008, he promised that if elected, “we are five days away from fundamentally transforming the United States of America.” He has been true to his word. And Hillary Clinton and the Democratic party will continue this fundamental transformation."
"As Bernie Sanders said in his speech to an ecstatic Democratic National Convention, “Together, my friends, we have begun a political revolution to transform America, and that revolution — our revolution — continues.” In other words, the Democratic party now acknowledges that its aim is revolution — a revolution that undoes the American Revolution. She spelled this out very clearly in her acceptance speech. Among its other highlights: “We’ll build a path to citizenship for millions of immigrants.” This means that our borders will mean nothing, that in order to guarantee Democratic-party victories for the foreseeable future, as president she will transform 10 or more million people who are here illegally into citizens. “We have the most tolerant and generous young people we’ve ever had.” She said this in order to pander to young Americans. But, thanks to the Left, it isn’t true. This generation is not only not “the most tolerant and generous we’ve ever had,” it is, in in many ways, the least tolerant and quite possibly the least generous “we’ve ever had.”"
As scandal-ridden as Hillary Clinton seems to be, the Panama Papers show she's connected to more scandals than we are even aware of. A slew of new connections have emerged between the Clintons and companies that used offshore accounts set up by the Panamanian law firm, Mossack Fonseca.

Some of the names found in the Panama Papers, which were reviewed by McClatchy Newspapers, have been tied to the Clintons in other scandals.

They include Canadian mining magnate Frank Giustra, who was a major focus of last year’s expose, “Clinton Cash.” A company started by Marc Rich, the international fugitive who was pardoned by Bill Clinton, is also included among the 11.5 million Panama Papers trove. As are two firms tied to Ng Lap Seng, the Chinese billionaire implicated in a major donor scandal involving the Clintons and the Democratic National Committee.

The ties listed are also a reminder of just how many relationships the Clintons have developed with shady businessmen over the years.

One such link stems all the way back to the Clintons’ Arkansas days. As governor, Bill Clinton met twice with Jean-Raymond Boulle, a diamond miner born in Mauritius. After the meetings Clinton granted Boulle mining rights in a state park near Hope, Ark., Clinton’s hometown.

According to McClatchy, Boulle was listed as director of two firms listed in the Panama Papers: Auk Limited, which was listed in the British Virgin Islands, and Gridco Limited, which was registered to the Bahamas.

According to Peter Schweizer, the author of last year’s “Clinton Cash,” Boulle was invited to Bill Clinton’s 1993 inauguration. At a party after the inauguration, then-First Lady Hillary Clinton donned a 3.5-carat diamond culled from one of Boulle’s mines, according to Schweizer.

Another mining company appears in the Panama Papers.

Giustra’s UrAsia Energy was registered in the British Virgin Island in May 2005, according to McClatchy. That September, Bill Clinton flew with Giustra on his private jet to Kazakhstan, where the Canadian hoped to secure a $500 million deal for uranium mining rights in the Central Asian nation. Clinton and Giustra met with Kazakhstan’s president, Nursultan Nazarbayev. Before leaving the country, Clinton publicly praised Nazarbayev, who was up for re-election.

The mining deal was awarded to UrAsia. Months later, Giustra made a $30 million contribution to the Clinton Foundation. The pair later formed the Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership.

A Russian businessman who was reportedly involved in setting up Clinton’s trip with Giustra is also linked to companies named in the Mossack Fonseca records.

Sergei Kurzin is tied to several oil companies listed in the papers, according to McClatchy. The mysterious financier — who reportedly pledged $1 million to the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative and gave at least $50,000 directly to the Clinton Foundation — has several connections to players in the Clinton world. Besides dealings with Giustra, he also helped Marc Rich develop business relationships in Russia.

On his last day in the White House, Bill Clinton pardoned Rich, who had been indicted by the U.S. government in the 1980s for tax evasion. The controversial move came after Rich’s ex-wife, Denise, contributed $1 million to the Democratic party, $100,000 to Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign, and $450,000 to Clinton’s library.

Rich’s Industrial Petrolium Limited appears in the Panama Papers. The company was registered in the Bahamas in 1992.

Ng Lap Seng also used Mossack Fonseca’s services. According to McClatchy, he’s listed as a shareholder of two companies registered in the British Virgin Islands.

Ng is the Chinese billionaire who in 1996 was accused of funneling $1.1 million to the Democratic National Committee through a restaurant owner in Little Rock. The restaurant owner pleaded guilty to campaign finance violations. Ng, who visited the White House nearly a dozen times in the mid-1990s, faced no charges. He was charged last year with bribing a United Nations official.

Hillary Clinton is knee-deep in corruption, and she is a democratic socialist. . . or shall we say "communist."

She is the most radical nominee for President the Democrat Party has every had, and therefore the party's platform is now the most radical it has ever been in the party's history.  She believes there should be no restrictions on abortion, she is calling for a repeal of the Hyde Amendment which prohibits federal funds from paying for abortion, the Democrats are even pushing to allow non-doctors to be able to perform abortions.  On immigration the new platform calls for virtually no borders, and they plan to suspend deportations.  The Democrat Party with Hillary in the lead is also calling for taking in 60 million or so Muslim "refugees".  The party platform document pledges to end even limited raids that the Department of Homeland Security has conducted to locate foreign children who have been ordered to be deported but failed to report. The platform would even take the unprecedented step of guaranteeing a taxpayer-funded lawyer for every unaccompanied minor who shows up at the U.S. border.

Ira Mehlman, a spokesman for the Federation of American Immigration Reform, said such a provision would paralyze the immigration system.

“That seems to be a clear objective. The immigration bar and advocates for illegal immigrants have recognized that if you can essentially grind the judicial system to a halt, they win,” he said.

The Democrat Party is also now the pro-drug party, favoring marijuana legalization, and supporting States by helping them from a federal level to decriminalize the drug.  A recently approved amendment to the Democrat Party Platform weekend calls for removing the drug from the Class I schedule of controlled substances, “providing a reasoned pathway for future legalization.”

The platform also calls for requiring that police be outfitted with body cameras and to stop “racial profiling.” It would require the Department of Justice to investigate all “questionable or suspicious police-involved shootings,” and would ban the possession of “weapons of war.”

Worse of all is the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which Hillary Clinton was a part of writing.  The language of the proposed deal is so subjective and open to interpretation that any politician — particularly Hillary Clinton — will be able to work around it … It creates a loophole so big, Hillary Clinton could drive the TPP and all 12 nations of the TPP through it with room to spare.

Ostensibly, Clinton opposes the TPP after earlier praising it.  she will reverse course again, following a pattern established by her husband. When Bill Clinton was running for president in 1992, he voiced opposition to the North American Free Trade Agreement. As president, he negotiated side agreements with Mexico and Canada on labor and environmental standards and then signed the pact.

The proposed Republican platform flatly rejects a vote on the TPP during a lame-duck session of Congress after the election.

She has even moved to the left of Barack Obama. . .

While Hillary, at this point, won't call herself a socialist, she is proud when she hears that socialists plan to vote for her.

Hillary's hard left agenda, corruption, and ties to socialism, however, also includes her connection to the notorious George Soros.  He's the money behind the shadow government that works behind governments with the goal of destroying liberty.  He's strong enough that when files were released about him on Twitter, it was suddenly shut down.

The behind the scenes tampering exists within our government at the highest levels.  And, Hillary Clinton is one of the main people who is involved in this intrusion into the American System by a foreign series of concepts largely funded by Nazi Sympathizer, George Soros.  The work is being done through the Government Unions, and the former organization ACORN.  These elitists are associated with a whole slew of people who hate the United States, like, but not limited to, David Brock, Jane Fonda, Terry McAuliffe, John Podesta, Andrew Stern, and Richard Trumka.

The infiltration is closely linked to Communism and Socialism. George Soros came up with the idea, and people like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have brought it to reality.

"Why would the Clintons do these things?" one might ask.

Money.  Power.  They support a sick ideology that they will stop at nothing to get into place.

For example, Bill and Hillary gave $1,042,000 to charity according to their tax return and $1 million of that went to, you guessed it, the Clinton Foundation.  And if Hillary Clinton becomes President, the corruption, the lies, and the deception will kick into high gear. . . and she won't let up until the United States is a socialist country, and when all dissent is silenced, or eliminated.

This is why the Democrats fear Donald Trump.  He's outside the system.  They can't control him.  They can't scare him into compliance.  And as Pamela Geller put it, he's just the kind of brass-knuckle fighter we need to stop her.  Her election to the White House is not set in stone, and in fact, Trump may be the only one that can fight off her corruption and scare-tactics to stop her.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

No comments: