Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host
We've been hearing about the big conspiracy Nunes Memo that blows the door off of the Democrat Party's criminal use of a false dossier to spy on Americans and attempt to influence the presidential election. The memo has been released for your scrutiny. You can view it below, or download it so that you may have it on your computer, before the liberal left figures out how to make it disappear, here or here.
The memo largely doesn't tell us what we already knew, or already suspected. It points out that the false, and paid for by the Clintons and the Democrat Party dossier, was the sole evidence the FBI used to obtain a FISA warrant to monitor Carter Page (that was renewed three times ... wait, isn't there supposed to be, under oath, probable cause shown with each approval?). The memo suggests there were incidents of conscious conspiracy and collusion among members of the FBI and the political world. Names in the FBI and Justice Department are provided.
The Democrats, like Adam Schiff, are essentially saying, in response, "Nothing to see here, move along, nothing to worry about."
Based on the content of the memo, is there something to worry about? Or was it written in too ambiguous of a manner to really be what the Republicans hope it is? Is this a slam in the face of the Democrats? Should a memo by a member of an opposition party be used as evidence in any case? Is there more we don't know and this is simply a quick peek behind a curtain that contains much more which is on its way? Is this just a quick look into an imperfect FBI? Are there enough significant revelations and news in the memo to even care? Or, is the serious allegation it poses enough to move forward and go further, because it shows there is a continuing problem of law-breaking by a certain group of people?
Judge for yourself ...
No comments:
Post a Comment