Saturday, June 04, 2011

Doonby: A Mysterious Drifter Living by the Second

A Story Worth Telling, A Life Worth Living.



By Douglas V. Gibbs

Last night I had the extreme pleasure of attending a pre-release showing of "Doonby." The film is slated to hit theaters in Fall 2011, but for our fortunate group of Murrieta-Temecula Republican Assembly members, we not only got to view this fantastic film, but meet with three of the actors.

I received a phone call from my good friend, Bob, who is also the president of the MTRA, a few days ago. He asked, "Doug, are you planning on attending the MTRA meeting this Friday Night?"

"Perhaps," I replied. "I might have a meeting with some folks that wish to assist me with my public speaking and Constitution classes."

"You really need to be there, Friday," he said. "A powerful pro-life film will be showing, and three of the actors from the movie will be present."

I changed my schedule and made sure I made it to the screening, and I am so happy I did.

The film opened with Sam Doonby (John Schneider) stepping off of a Greyhound bus in a rural area. He's a drifter, from nowhere in particular, seeking to spend a little time in the small town of Smithville, Texas. The mysterious man lands a bar tending job at Leroy's Country Blues bar, and his skills behind the bar leads to the place growing in popularity. As the crowds increase in size in the bar, Doonby one night picks up a guitar, and his musical talents immediately make him a small-town star, landing him an opportunity to be the opening act at a large venue. His talents, charisma, and charm also gains the attention of the local spoiled brat, daughter of the very successful Smithville doctor, and quite beautiful, Laura Reaper.

Her father, Dr. Cyrus Reaper, is not too sure about his daughter's relationship with this no-good drifter, but a relationship begins to develop anyway. Sam Doonby is like an angel from Heaven, and the troubled Laura can't help but melt whenever Doonby is around.

Events in town also benefit from Doonby's presence. It seems like he is always in the right place at the right time. His awareness, and powers of observation, enables Doonby to assist in preventing disasters, and saving lives. His knack for saving the town from these horrific events, however, also begins to lead folks to wonder about Doonby's presence. Suspicions lead the townspeople to question Sam's sudden appearance, and motives. Laura's jealousy of the barmaid that works with Doonby also rises, making Laura doubt the man she has come to love.

Then, as suddenly as he appeared, Doonby vanishes to leave the town wondering if there was more to Sam Doonby than they had truly realized. And in the wake of his disappearance painful revelations expose themselves, engaging the audience in a dramatic realization that leaves the viewers simply saying to themselves, "Wow, what a powerful film."

The thought-provoking film is a journey through a single life, examining the significance of that life, while also exploring the disastrous consequences should that life not be. When Doonby comes face to face with the key to his past, it is the audience that must come to grips with the horrifying truth.

The story told will have a profound impact upon those that view this film. . . for the rest of their lives.

-----

The lead character, Sam Doonby, is played by veteran actor John Schneider (Bo Duke, Dukes of Hazzard television series; Jonathan Kent on Smallville, a 2001 television adaptation of Superman; and a number of smaller roles as well as a successful career as a Country and Western singer). He is joined by a list of both veteran actors, and newcomers, including Jenn Gotzon as Laura Reaper, Ernie Hudson as Leroy, Robert Davi as Sheriff Woodley, Jennifer O'Neill as Barbara Ann Reaper, Joe Estevez as Dr. Cyrus Reaper, Will Wallace as Tony, and Erin Way as Lucy Mae Doonby.

-----

After the film I had the opportunity to speak with the three actors in attendance, Jenn Gotzon, Will Wallace, and Erin Way. I spoke mostly with Jenn, and her enthusiasm about the film was incredible. Jenn hoped her character's growth was apparent in the film (and it is) and she felt that this film serves as a fantastic message for the preservation of life. Interestingly enough, we have a couple mutual friends in the industry. Ms. Gotzon, after we discussed my small, independent streaming radio program, agreed to come on in the near future. I hope that along with Jenn, other members of the cast will join us when we air that episode. Keep visiting Political Pistachio for news of when that program will take place.

When our time in the meeting place expired, we all congregated at a place to eat, and the discussions continued. The enthusiasm by all three actors over this project was encouraging, because the message is so powerful, and for it to have such enthusiastic ambassadors behind it is truly a Godsend. The trio entertained us with their adventures regarding making the movie, and I had the wonderful opportunity to share with them what I am doing regarding educating people on the original intent of the Founding Fathers in regards to the U.S. Constitution, as well as my testimony about when I died in 1985, and then by God's Grace was miraculously saved.

The funny thing is, despite my short foray into acting in 1996, I am normally not a big fan of actors. There are very few thespians that I hold in high regard. I have this thing about people who regard themselves as better than others, or consider themselves as some part of an elite group. Actors are notorious for placing themselves on pedestals, and sticking their chests out simply because they are basically good at pretending in front of a camera, or on stage. Don't get me wrong. I fully understand the work and talent that goes into that industry. I've been around the industry enough to know the hard work these people put into their craft (or "art", depending on who you ask). But that does not make them any better than anybody else. It simply means they are good at what they do.

This group of actors I spent time with last night were not your normal crop of actors. These three folks were engaging, humble, and real. I felt the better person for having the opportunity to spend time with these folks, and I hope that we are more than mere acquaintances. I would like for in the future to cross paths with these folks again, and for the mutual friendship to still be in force.

When "Doonby" opens in the Fall, because it is an independent film that relies heavily on "word of mouth," please go and see it, and if you like the film recommend it to as many people as you can.

Oh, and when you go, take someone that is pro-abortion with you. This film may change their heart.


-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Founding Truth of the U.S. Constitution Radio Show

HOV Radio

Founding Truth of the U.S. Constitution

What is our government doing, to the American people, that is not following the Constitution? Listen here and find out!

Chile Volcano - 3500 Evacuated

Increase to 3500 evacuees volcanic activity Caulle Puyehue-Cordón - CNN Chile

The column of smoke from the volcano Puyehue reaches 10 miles high - Soy Chile

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Political Pistachio Radio Revolution: Death and Life

HOV Radio

Political Pistachio: John Edwards, Kevorkian, and Doonby



    John Edwards indicted for using campaign funds to cover up his extra-marital affair, Jack "Dr. Death" Kevorkian dies peacefully in a hospital, and John Schneider stars with Jenn Gotzon, Ernie Hudson, Robert Davi, Jennifer ONeill, Joe Estevez, Will Wallace and Erin Way in "Doonby" which is due out in the Fall of 2011 - - - and I got to see a pre-screening of the film last night, and hang out with three of the actors. All of that, and much more,
    on the Political Pistachio Radio Revolution . . . Conservative News and Commentary with a Christian Edge!

ADR Week In Review Radio Show

ADR Radio

ADR Week In Review

by ADR Radio








Call in number to speak with the host 646-595-4520


49129
upcomin
g

Log in for the weekly Blog Talk Radio summit as Doug Gibbs of Political Pistachio Radio Revolution and JASmius of Hard Starboard Radio weigh in and sound off on the political events of the day and whatever the heck else crosses their fertile minds.

Dr. Death Dead

By Douglas V. Gibbs

Jack Kevorkian is dead at the age of 83.

Dr. Jack Kevorkian, known as Dr. Death, killed terminally ill patients who desired to end their lives before the natural course of their affliction took their remaining moments from them. Between 1990 and 1998, Dr. Death claimed to have ended the lives of over 130 self-suicide victims. He performed these procedures with a machine, but when Dr. Death administered a lethal injection himself on a patient, he wound up serving a sentence of eight years in prison for second-degree murder.

Dr. Kevorkian's "suicide machine" was built from scrap parts, and delivered a fatal dose of poison to his patients intravenously, so that the people may kill themselves with his assistance.

Jack Kevorkian's murderous actions ignited a debate over a person's "right to die,"
which eventually led to States like Oregon passing assisted suicide laws. In 1997, Oregon became the first state to implement a law that allowed mentally competent, terminally ill patients to request lethal medications from their physicians; Washington and Montana have followed suit.

Dr. Death's first patient was 54 year old Portland, Oregon resident Janet Adkins. In 1990 Kevorkian used his untested suicide machine, called the "mercitron", on the mother of three adult children who was in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease and unwilling to let it progress further. Kevorkian's sisters, Flora Holzheimer and Margo Janus, drove Janet Adkins to Groveland Oaks County Park, where Kevorkian was waiting for her in his rusty white 1968 Volkswagen van. He performed the procedure on Mrs. Adkins in the back of that van.

Kevorkian's own death early Friday came pain-free and peacefully in a hospital in Royal Oak, Michigan. He was not hooked up to a suicide machine, nor was his death carried out in the back of a van. He chose to die naturally, listening to the music of his favorite composer, Johann Sebastian Bach, in the safety of an intensive care unit.

In an interview on CNN last year Kevorkian said, "The single worst moment of my life . . . was the moment I was born."

A person that hated life was the poster-boy for the Democrat Party's drive to legalize euthanasia. The pro-abortion party, by supporting assisted suicide, truly became the party of death. The Left's only regret is that Kevorkian died before he could head up the death panels for Obamacare.

The liberal media idolized Kevorkian just as the political nut cases did. The New York Times, in their obituary about Kevorkian's death, called the man "fiercely principled."

Think about that for a moment. The leftists, who support mothers killing their own babies, and support killing old folks through methods much like Kevorkian's, called this killer "fiercely principled."

Dr. Death took advantage of people who were emotionally distraught, and weakened psychologically because of their plight, and not only convinced them they'd be better off dead, but that he was willing to help them die.

The drug that Kevorkian used was thiopental, a drug banned from many countries, and now to be banned in America, from death row because it's considered to be too inhumane.

So let's get this straight. The liberal Democrats support killing babies while they reside helplessly in the womb, killing distraught patients who fear dying naturally, killing the elderly with a drug banned on death row, and withdrawing life saving care from the elderly through death panels of a single payer health care system, but they are against the death penalty because those murderous criminals have a right to live.

Do I have that right?

No suicide for Kevorkian, just as their was no government medical care provide for Teddy Kennedy. Kevorkian believed everyone should have the option to die before death became difficult, yet he was not willing to subject himself to the same. Teddy Kennedy support government health care for all, yet fought for his life with expensive private doctors. The liberals believe that government should provide any "benefit" they can think of for the people, but the politicians make themselves exempt.

The party of death is also the party of hypocrites. Crazy, loony hypocrites who are mourning the death of Dr. Death. . . a murderer.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Dr. Jack Kevorkian dies at 83; 'Dr. Death' was advocate, practitioner of physician-assisted suicide - Los Angeles Times

Assisted Suicide Advocate Jack Kevorkian dies at age 83 - The Detroit News

Kevorkian States the Day He Was Born Was the Worst Day of His Life - Free Christian Press

Dr. Jack Kevorkian Dies at 83; A Doctor Who Helped End Lives - New York Times

German Doctors: No Sodium Thiopental To US - NBC4i

Lawsuit Filed Against FDA To Prohibit The Importation And Use Of Unapproved Sodium Thiopental In Lethal Injections - Medical News Today

John Edwards Indicted

By Douglas V. Gibbs

Two-time Democrat presidential candidate John Edwards was indicted for using campaign funds to cover up his extra-marital affair. Edwards' wife, Elizabeth, died last December at the age of 61 of cancer. Faced with the charges that he illegally used campaign funds to cover up his affair, Edwards pled not guilty. The political figure indicated that his actions were in fact wrong, and he takes full responsibility for this actions, but he does not believe what he did was illegal.

The six charges against John Edwards includes conspiracy, four counts of illegal campaign contributions and a charge that he made false statements to federal officials.

Edwards' attorney claims that the nearly one million dollars Edwards received during his 2008 campaign from his various friends were personal gifts, not contributions to his campaign, therefore the claim is that Edwards did not break the law.

Conviction could result in as much as five years in prison, and a $250,000 fine on each of the six counts.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

John Edwards admits mistakes but ‘did not break the law’ - Yahoo News

Elizabeth Edwards, 61, Dies After Six-Year Battle with Breast Cancer - ABC News

Friday, June 03, 2011

Stephen Crowder: HOLLYWOOD BIGOTRY!



-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

MTRA Doonby


Click Image to enlarge

Two actors are coming to promote the film


mip://0a434da0/default.html?v=me700240713

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Obama Fights To Stay In Libya

The White House said Thursday that President Obama believes the NATO mission in Libya is succeeding, and he is opposed to ending that mission right now.

With a number of Democrats and some Republicans pushing for an end to U.S. involvement in the mission, White House press secretary Jay Carney said the president believes most members agree with the mission.

"We believe that the policy is working," Carney said. "We believe the goal the president has is shared by the majority of the members of Congress."

The Hill

The thing is, no American interests are directly affected by Libya - We need not be there at all!

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Wildfire in Arizona Forces Evacuation of Two Communities

Authorities have ordered issued a mandatory evacuation order for two communities in southeastern Arizona near the Horseshoe Two wildfire.

KTAR

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Japan Prime Minister Fighting For Political Life

Embattled Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan faces a no-confidence vote with a sizeable revolt expected from his own party, leaving the result balanced on a knife-edge.

Opposition parties in the lower house of parliament Wednesday submitted the motion against Kan, struggling with recovery efforts after the earthquake and tsunami in March that sparked a nuclear crisis, and a flagging economy.

His centre-left Democratic Party of Japan and its junior coalition partner have a majority but the motion could pass if about a quarter of DPJ lawmakers back it.

The contest is too close to call, according to Japanese media.

AFP/Yahoo News

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Thursday, June 02, 2011

Massachusetts Tornado Aftermath

Four people were killed in the twisters that hit western and central Massachusetts Wednesday afternoon. Two died in West Springfield, one in Springfield and one in Brimfield.

They are the state’s first tornado-related deaths in 16 years.

CBS Boston

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Temecula Constitution Study: U.S. Senate

Tonight at the Temecula Constitution Study we will continue through the Lesson Two handout, finishing with Article I, Sections 3-6.

Next Week we will move into a discussion about the enumerated powers, among other things.

Classes held at:

Faith Armory, LLC
27498 Enterpirse Cir. W. #2
Temecula, CA 92590

Thursdays from 6:00 pm to 7:00 pm

Myth #11: The United States "is," Rather Than "are"


This is the Eleventh Myth in the series: 25 Myths of the U.S. Constitution.

Note: These articles later were updated and combined into my first book: 25 Myths of the United States Constitution.

By Douglas V. Gibbs

The sovereign states formed the federal government as established by the U.S. Constitution for the express purpose to protect and preserve the union of individual states. The founders specifically designed the system with limiting principles, giving the federal government few authorities, while the States retained many powers. The United States was not seen as a nationalistic entity, but as a union of sovereign states. During the American Civil War, President Lincoln used what he perceived to be necessary war powers to subvert the Constitution, and change the perception of our American form of government from a union of individual states that had the ability to nullify and secede if they felt the federal government was acting in an unconstitutional manner, to a nationalistic entity in which the federal government dictates to the states what they can and can't do. Nationalism was never originally intended by the Founding Fathers. The strength of our republic, and the protection of individual liberty, comes from the original idea of state sovereignty.

In the U.S. Constitution the United States is referred to as "them" in Article I, Section 9, Clause 8; and Article III, Section 3, Clause 1.

Quotes by the Founding Fathers also provide clues to how they regarded the union of states. The language they used, including grammar, reveals that the founders did not view the United States under the federal government as formed by the U.S. Constitution as a single nationalist entity, but as a union of individual states.

"Governments, in general, have been the result of force, of fraud, and accident. After a period of six thousand years has elapsed since the creation, the United States exhibit to the world the first instance, as far as we can learn, of a nation, unattacked by external force, unconvulsed by domestic insurrections, assembling voluntarily, deliberating fully, and deciding calmly concerning that system of government under which they would wish that they and their prosperity should live." -- James Wilson, November 26, 1787 in remarks in Pennsylvania ratifying convention.

“The United States enjoy a scene of prosperity and tranquility under the new government that could hardly have been hoped for.” -- George Washington in a letter to Catherine Macaulay Graham, July 19, 1791.

In both quotes, if you locate the words “United States,” you will notice that in both cases the word following “United States” does not end with an “s”. This is a significant clue to understanding how the founders viewed the new country. They saw the United States not as a single nationalistic entity, but in the plural, or as a collection of sovereign states united for the purpose of the protection, and the preservation, of the American way of life under the union.

The first quote reads, “. . . the United States exhibit to the world the first instance, as far as we can learn, of a nation. . .” The United States is a nation, the quote says so. However, the fact that “exhibit” has no “s” at the end of the word reveals that Mr. Wilson did not see the United States in the singular, or as a nationalistic entity, but as a nation of states - a federation of states. The United States, in this quote, is in the plural. The United States, then, in this quote, could very well have read “these states that are united,” and it would have meant the same thing.

Mr. Washington’s letter reads, “The United States enjoy a scene of prosperity and tranquility under the new government that could hardly have been hoped for.” Once again, there is no “s” at the end of the word after “United States,” meaning that Washington was not referring to a single nationalistic entity, but to a collection of sovereign states. As with Mr. Wilson’s quote, George Washington could have written “The States that are united enjoy a scene of prosperity,” and the sentence would have meant the very same thing.

Understanding how the founders viewed the union is important because it reveals much about why they wrote the United States Constitution. The founding document was not written to create a national government, but to create a federal government with the power to protect the union of individual states. In other words, the Constitution enables a governing body to protect and preserve the union of the States that are united.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Social Services Line and the Roach Coach


By Douglas V. Gibbs

On the way back from a delivery of Permeable Base in Los Angeles, I drove by a social services office. The line of people hoping for benefits from the government because of their assumed dire financial circumstances was out the door, around the building, and down the parking lot to the street. Parked next to the line, about halfway down, was a lunch truck, and I noticed that business was good for the roach coach at the social services building.

When I was in construction for thirteen-plus years (interestingly enough, after I was a loan counselor at a credit union, and a business tax clerk for a city) I bought off of those trucks every once in a while, and let me tell you, those trucks are not cheap to buy off of.

I asked myself, as I watched the folks crowd the break truck: How is it that these folks that are having such problems feeding their loved ones that they need public assistance from the government can afford to buy junk off of the lunch wagon?

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Wednesday, June 01, 2011

Military Service Member Proposes Marriage at Royals' Stadium



-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Geert Wilders Hate Speech Trial Ends With Prosecution and Defense in Agreement

By Douglas V. Gibbs

Geert Wilders is in a hate speech trial for daring to tell the truth about Islam. He is accused of inciting hatred and discrimination against Muslims with remarks including some comparing the Qur’an to Adolf Hitler's "Mein Kampf."

Free speech rights is the defense's final all, and the prosecutors agree. Both are calling for Geert Wilders' acquittal.

Prosecutors say Wilders' remarks may offend Muslims, but they are part of political debate and protected by freedom of speech laws.

The end of it all still lies in the hands of the all-powerful judges.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Hate speech trial of Dutch anti-Islam lawmaker ends with defence, prosecution in agreement - the Canadian Press/Associated Press

Adam Kokesh Body Slammed by Police for Dancing at Jefferson Memorial

Adam Kokesh is a libertarian. I do not always agree with him. His anti-Iraq stance was one that I did not agree with, not because of the argument of whether or not we should have gone into Iraq in the first place, but whether or not we should have finished what we started. I am a firm believer that though an argument can be made for invading Iraq, and an equally persuasive argument can be made for not invading Iraq, once we were in that theater of war we had to complete what we started - no different than a doctor, after opening a body for a surgery, cannot just walk away. The doctor, whether the surgery was the right move or not, has to complete the operation, close the body, and apply the proper care after the operation is finished.

That said, I support Adam Kokesh's right to believe what he believes, and to protest in a constitutionally legal manner (Amendment I . . . freedom of speech . . . or the right of the people peaceably to assemble). His recent dance party at the Jefferson Memorial was designed to prove a point, and I think he proved it well. In this country we teeter on being a police state. I believe government has its place, and I believe that law enforcement has an important role in our society. However, since when can the police arrest without reason, or body slam a person for Adam Kokesh's actions?

You be the judge:



Dance Party at TJ's

Adam Kokesh

I may not always agree with Adam Kokesh, and some of his views are completely contrary to mine, but on this one Adam is correct to be angered by the treatment he received. It may have been perceived as a spectacle, and it may not have been consistent with the expected trail of behavior the police demand from us . . . but isn't that what is supposed to make America great? Our individuality?

Would a group have been arrested violently like this for praying?

Would a group have been arrested violently like this for singing God Bless America?

Would a group have been arrested violently like this for acting in any manner other than a good little tourist as expected?

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Myth #10: The United States is a Democracy


This is the Tenth Myth in the series: 25 Myths of the U.S. Constitution.

Note: These articles later were updated and combined into my first book: 25 Myths of the United States Constitution.

By Douglas V. Gibbs

Benjamin Franklin was asked: “Well, Doctor, what have we got—a Republic or a Monarchy?”

Ben Franklin replied: “A Republic, if you can keep it.”

Thomas Jefferson, though not at the Constitutional Convention, was very influential in the proceedings. His opinions regarding democracy were quite firm.

"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not."

“A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine.”


John Adams, the second President of the United States, felt the same about democracy, saying: “Democracy... while it lasts is more bloody than either [aristocracy or monarchy]. Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There is never a democracy that did not commit suicide.”

Finally, a quote often wrongly attributed to Benjamin Franklin, and probably one that sprang up in the last twenty or thirty years, though the true author is unknown, explains democracy in a very clear manner: "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner."

A pure democracy is a form of government in which the vote of the populace determines all functions and matters of government. Such a form of government invests all of the power of the government into the individual voter. Once the populace realizes it can vote itself gifts from the public treasury, and subvert freedom under the guise of "for the common good," the breakdown of the system becomes imminent. What then tends to emerge is a ruling class, not unlike the few powerful elites in oligarchies of authoritarian systems, which undermines the freedom of the individual for the perceived benefit of the State.

The Founding Fathers desired to design a system that used democratic processes so that the American People would have original authority, while also dividing the voting power in such a way that in most parts of government the vote of the people influenced the system in an indirect manner. The aim was to eliminate the likelihood of a closed ruling class making all of the decisions without representation of the population present, while ensuring the typically uninformed voter did not compromise governmental authority through a purely democratic voting system. The republic created in the United States was designed to ensure the individual was the original authority, while leaving the representation in government up to those that were educated about political processes.

As per the original intent of the U.S. Constitution, the only direct election the citizens of the United States would participate in at the federal level would be their choice for Representative. The Representatives were expected to serve as a voice for the people in the House of Representatives. The U.S. Senators were appointed by the State Legislatures, not by the people. This ensured that the State Legislatures also had a voice in the federal system. However, the process in which the Senators were chosen did not completely cut the influence of the populace out of the process, for it was the citizenry that put the members of the State Legislatures in place at the State government level in the first place. The same can be said for the electors in the Electoral College. Though it is actually the electors that vote the President and Vice President into office, the choice of the electors is influenced by the vote of the people on a state by state basis.

Modern language has begun to use the word "democracy" to describe the American form of government. The modern emphasis on "democracy" has created confusion, and has encouraged a new movement in this country to gain traction that emphasizes industrial democracy, also known as "socialism." Marketed as a government of the masses, the goal of this new movement is to control all means of production, distribution, and economics through the auspices of government for the supposed ever-progressing interests of its people. The proclaimed enemy in the rising movement that claims to be a democracy is the free-market system, making the progressive political system the very anti-thesis of a republican form of government.

The Founding Fathers understood that concentrated power is a dangerous thing. The best way to control power was to divide it at all opportunities. Individual liberty hinged on individual choice, and a limited government. The United States was to be a system of self-government at the local level, and a system designed to preserve the union at the federal level. Democratic processes interweave throughout our republican form of government, while a scheme of representation, which derives its powers directly and indirectly (depending on the part of government) from the body of the people, governs at the highest levels of government. The rule of law designed to act as a restraining mechanism should the excesses of democracy, or the threat of oligarchy, rise up in the American system, was enshrined in a constitution. The Constitution was the contract between the States and the newly formed federal government in which enumerated powers were expressly granted, and from which all other federal laws were to follow. In case changes, over time, were required, an amendment process was also provided. As originally intended, no changes to the Constitution can be made without three-quarters of the States ratifying the proposed amendment. This process quite literally is a mechanism in which the States give the federal government permission to have additional authorities.

In a democracy, the "will" of the people is unchecked. In a republic, the "will" of the people, though important, cannot extend beyond the bounds of what is constitutional, or beyond the opinions of the officials in government placed there directly, or indirectly, by the democratic vote of the people. In a republic, it is also easy for the people, should the representatives not govern in a way consistent with the will of the people, to vote out their representatives and replace them with officials more apt to govern in line with the preferences of the populace.

Democracies collapse when the people begin to entrust more of their freedoms to those they elect, instead of the voting public acting as the oversight against those they elect. To guard against the rise of tyranny in such a manner, the founders put into place a series of checks and balances against the parts of government, and against the vote of the people. The three branches of government operate under a doctrine of "separation of powers," enabling checks and balances to exist between the three independent branches, while keeping in place a limited connection between them. In the same way the two houses of Congress, the House of Representatives, having its members voted in by the people, and the U.S. Senate, having its members originally appointed by the State Legislatures, served as checks against each other, while together serving as a check against the other two branches of the federal government.

In a democracy, these checks and balances, and separations of power, would not be in place. In a republic, while each part of government is independent from the other parts, the built-in system of checks and balances ensures each part of government does not abuse or usurp. These safeguards were necessary to ensure each part of government acted independently, while also having a degree of constitutional control over each other. In other words, the system of checks and balances serves to enable constitutional control in the hands of each department while preventing any usurpation of power by any part of government.

While the United States uses a democratic process to elect the members of the representative government, the American form of government is not a democracy. The American inheritance is a form of government that is limited in its scope and powers, while designed around a system of checks and balances. The authorities of the federal government are few, while the powers of the member states are many. The representation was originally intended to be put into place both by direct and indirect election.

The United States is a Constitutional Republic.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Social Engineering, and the Deliberate Dumbing Down of America

Thank you, Susan, for making me aware of this very interesting video.



The consequences of progressivism. . .

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Why I Voted Democrat. . . Email of the Week

I wonder if they would deny or defend this!
Top 12 Reasons...................................
A List That Explains Most Everything – WHY PEOPLE VOTED DEMOCRAT!!!
When your friends(?) cannot explain why they voted for Democrats, give them this list. They can then pick their reasons from this TOP 12.
1. I voted Democrat because I believe oil companies profits of 4% on a gallon of gas are obscene, but the government taxing the same gallon of gas at 15% isn't.
2. I voted Democrat because I believe the government will do a better job of spending the money I earn than I would.
3. I voted Democrat because Freedom of Speech is fine as long as nobody is offended by it.
4. I voted Democrat because I'm way too irresponsible to own a gun, and I know that my local police are all I need to protect myself from murderers and thieves.
5. I voted Democrat because I believe that people who can't tell us if it will rain on Friday can tell us that the polar ice caps will melt away in ten years if I don't start driving a Prius.
6. I voted Democrat because I'm not concerned about millions of babies being aborted so long as we keep all death row inmates alive.
7. I voted Democrat because I think illegal aliens have a right to free health care, education, and Social Security benefits.
8. I voted Democrat because I believe that business should not be allowed to make profits for themselves. They need to break even and give the rest away to the government for redistribution as the Democrats see fit.
9. I voted Democrat because I believe liberal judges need to rewrite the Constitution every few days to suit some fringe kooks who would never get their agendas past the voters.
10. I voted Democrat because I think that it's better to pay billions to people who hate us for their oil, but not drill our own because it might upset some endangered beetle or gopher.
11. I voted Democrat because while we live in the greatest, most wonderful country in the world, I was promised HOPE AND CHANGE.
12. I voted Democrat because my head is so firmly planted up my butt it's unlikely that I'll ever have another point of view!!!!!


-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary