Sunday, November 25, 2018

Criminal Criticism of Islam in Europe

Douglas V. Gibbs
Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host

For daring to ask if Mohammed's marriage to Aisha is pedophilia, Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff has spent six years fighting for her freedom.  However, the verdict by the Austrian supreme court is that what she uttered was “hate speech.”
The ruling came on October 25, but the media never said a thing.
The court basically said that one's right to speak freely is less important than protecting the religious feelings of others.
That said, criticism of Christianity is considered art.
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

The Gift of Constitutional Knowledge

As we enter the Christmas Season, and we are searching for just the right gift for our loved ones, let's not forget that for some, the gift of Constitutional knowledge may be the gift they've been hoping for.

Douglas V. Gibbs has authored six books, with a seventh one hitting the bookshelves likely before Christmas.  Have you thought about buying a book about the Constitution for yourself, or a friend or family member?

Written in a comprehensible manner, Doug's books will make a fine addition to any library, but especially to the library of a Patriot.  Kindle versions are also available if you prefer an E-Book over a print version.

7 Worst Constitutional Liars

The Journey from Alexander Hamilton to Barack Obama, which is also the journey from a Constitutional Republic to a Liberal Democracy.  This book, however, has a surprise ending.  Who is the historical figure who is listed in the post script?

5 Solutions to Save America

In the U.S. Constitution the Founding Fathers gave us five tools to save our republic, and restore the supreme law of the land.  One involves revolution, and another involves education.  The remaining may seem even more unlikely as the first two . . . but, somewhere in our system is the proper tool on our tool belt to Save America.

Concepts of the United States Constitution

After reading Doug's first two books, 25 Myths of the U.S. Constitution, and The Basic Constitution, readers asked him to go deeper into certain concepts associated with the U.S. Constitution.  Concepts of the United States Constitution is that Constitution Series of Books companion.

Silenced Screams: Abortion in a Virtuous Society: In 1967 a young woman, alone in a small motel room, clung to life because of the sweet baby boy in her life...  This book is Doug's labor of love.  Our rights are God-given; is it possible for abortion to be a right?  Satan's greatest trick has been to convince an entire civilization that he doesn't exist.  His second greatest trick has been to convince civilization that killing their own children is not evil.

The Basic Constitution: An Examination of the Principles and Philosophies of the United States Constitution: The Basic Constitution takes a detailed journey through the text of the document that created the American System of Government.  The United States Constitution has proven to be the context of American conservatism, and the blueprint for American Exceptionalism.  During the Summer of 1787, a brilliant assembly of American Patriots created the Constitution of the United States. The Basic Constitution examines the details of the text from that document.  The book includes a glossary of terms, index, bibliography listing the resources used, The Declaration of Independence, and The Constitution of the United States.


25 Myths of the United States Constitution: If the United States Constitution is the Owner's Manual for America, 25 Myths is its Repair Manual.  25 Myths of the United States Constitution exposes myths regarding the U.S. Constitution that have emerged over time, designed to compromise, and ultimately dismantle, the American System of Liberty.  25 Myths presents a defense against the assault on the U.S. Constitution based on the original intent of the Founding Fathers as revealed by the debates during the Constitutional Convention, and the writings of the men of that era.


-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Glazov Gang: Kavanaugh Accuser Admits Her Lies

Douglas V. Gibbs
Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host



-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Saturday, November 24, 2018

Constitution Radio: Beyond the Crossroads Horizon

CONSTITUTION RADIO with Douglas V. Gibbs

KMET 1490-AM ... www.kmet1490am.com

Saturdays, 1:00 - 3:00 pm

Podcast Page: https://soundcloud.com/kmet-1490-am/sets/constitution-radio

AllStar/CARSTAR Collision Big Stories of the Week:

🔴 Chief Justice Roberts versus President Donald J. Trump

http://politicalpistachio.blogspot.com/2018/11/justice-roberts-versus-president-trump.html

🔴 The Bluing of California

http://politicalpistachio.blogspot.com/2018/11/blue-orange-county.html

http://politicalpistachio.blogspot.com/2018/11/leaving-california.html

🔴 The Orwellian Party

http://politicalpistachio.blogspot.com/2018/11/orwells-democrat-party.html


Justice Roberts versus President Trump

By Douglas V. Gibbs
Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host

Constitutionally, there is a lot wrong with our federal judiciary.  Judges are supposed to be apolitical, and they are only supposed to apply the black letter of the law to the cases they hear.  If they have a concern about the law, or the actions of the President, then they may write an opinion, but the court is not supposed to have any kind of enforcement power behind that opinion.  Also, before we get into any "co-equal" branches discussion, let's remember that from the point of view of the Framers of the Constitution, the federal courts are supposed to be the weakest of the three branches.

However, what we have seen is a judicial branch that has evolved into the most powerful voice in politics.

President Trump, it seems, won't stand for it.

After President Trump criticized a federal judge who ruled against the administration's asylum policy this week, calling U.S. District Court Judge Jon Tigar "an Obama judge," Chief Justice John Roberts responded with his own rebuke.

"We do not have Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges," Roberts responded to Trump in his statement.

"What we have is an extraordinary group of dedicated judges doing their level best to do equal right to those appearing before them."

Roberts is right, and wrong.  The justices are not supposed to be Obama judges or Trump judges, but the reality is, they are.  That's why the Kavanaugh hearing was such a big deal.

That has been our problem for a long time.  Ideology has been guiding our judges for a very long time, and it seems the Obama judges have their knives out for our current president.  Every time he does something within the law, they say its not.  Every time he does something that he has constitutional authority to do, they say he cannot.

Justice Roberts words are in line with the way it is supposed to be, but the reality is, Trump is right on this one.  Regardless of how things are supposed to be, we have a liberal left oligarchy in the court system, and they have been doing everything they can to delay and obstruct our president. . . in spite of the Constitution.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commmentary

Conservative Voice Radio . . . Thanksgiving



Saturday Mornings at 8:00 am Pacific ... KMET 1490-AM

Friday, November 23, 2018

Clash at the Border

By Douglas V. Gibbs
Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host

As the members of the caravan from Central America arrived in Tijuana, Mexican residents did not exactly receive them happily.

And it turns out, contrary to the liberal left's claims, the caravan participants are largely punks. . . rock-throwing violent types with ties to drug cartels, gangs, and other unsavory groups.

On Fox News, one Mexican was caught on camera, "dangerous people, America must close the door."

The hundreds of caravan migrants are only the beginning of a coming invasion, and they clashed heavily with Tijuana residents.

While the leftist coordinated and funded invasion force is claiming asylum, Trump says, "We’re going to be prepared.  Nobody’s coming in."

Immigration officials believe the number of migrants coming to Tijuana could reach 10,000 by years end.

The caravan in Tijuana includes Hondurans, Guatemalans, Nicaraguans and Salvadorans. It is made up of gangs, unskilled rejects, and transgender men and women.  In other words, the low end of society.  Why would we want Central America's worst in our country?

As tensions mount at the border, President Trump is not taking the invasion lightly, and is expected to close down the border entry points entirely.   According to international law, asylum seekers should be accepted in the first country they arrive into, which, in this case, is Mexico.  Whether they have a claim on entry to America, or not, President Trump's plan is to have the asylum seekers wait for the news about where they can go while in Mexico.  In the face of the invasion, the President is pushing harder for wall funding, considering it an important national security item.  The invaders are at the gate.  Do our Congress critters have the intestinal fortitude and the spine to get the wall funding in place before the Democrats take control in January?


Once again, if these people are such a problem, why would we want them in our country?  I am pro-immigration, but I want people to come who add to the melting pot, and are willing to go through the process legally.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Constitution Association Christmas Party. . . save the date

And yes, Santa will be there, too!!!


Thursday, November 22, 2018

Allstate's Classy Thank You to First Responders

By Douglas V. Gibbs
Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host

While I am not a fan of the entertainment industry, or the usual leftward tinge of the advertisers, every once in a while, a bit of class rises above the scum.  Allstate's "Thank You Notes" ad is one of those class act moments, and I felt it necessary to give them kudos for it.

As a Californian, the recent firestorms have reminded us how devastating, and fatal, wildfires can be.  We live through them every year, and sometimes I wonder if the thankless jobs of law enforcement and emergency services are ever properly thanked for their dedication to doing what they can to protect the populace.  The following ad nails it for us.

https://youtu.be/vY2TL5L0XEI

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Thanksgiving, the Rush Limbaugh Telling

Posted by Douglas V. Gibbs

The REAL STORY OF THANKSGIVING by Rush Limbaugh

"Well, let's allow our real undoctored American history lesson to unfold further. If our schools and the media have twisted the historical record when it comes to Columbus, they have obliterated the contributions of America's earliest permanent settlers, the Pilgrims. Why? Because they were a people inspired by profound religious beliefs to overcome incredible odds. Today, public schools are simply not teaching how important the religious dimension was in shaping our history and our nation's character. Whether teachers are just uncomfortable with this material or whether there's been a concerted effort to cover up the truth, the results are the same. Kids are no longer learning enough to understand and appreciate how and why America was created.

"The story of the Pilgrims begins in the early part of the seventeenth century The Church of England under King James I was persecuting anyone and everyone who did not recognize its absolute civil and spiritual authority. Those who challenged ecclesiastical authority and those who believed strongly in freedom of worship were hunted down, imprisoned, and sometimes executed for their beliefs. A group of separatists first fled to Holland and established a community. After eleven years, about forty of them agreed to make a perilous journey to the New World, where they would certainly face hardships, but could live and worship God according to the dictates of their own consciences. On August 1, 1620, the Mayflower set sail. It carried a total of 102 passengers, including forty Pilgrims led by William Bradford. On the journey, Bradford set up an agreement, a contract, that established just and equal laws for all members of the new community, irrespective of their religious beliefs. Where did the revolutionary ideas expressed in the Mayflower Compact come from? From the Bible.

"The Pilgrims were a people completely steeped in the lessons of the Old and New Testaments. They looked to the ancient Israelites for their example. And, because of the biblical precedents set forth in Scripture, they never doubted that their experiment would work. But this was no pleasure cruise, friends. The journey to the New World was a long and arduous one. And when the Pilgrims landed in New England in November, they found, according to Bradford's detailed journal, a cold, barren, desolate wilderness. There were no friends to greet them, he wrote. There were no houses to shelter them. There were no inns where they could refresh themselves. And the sacrifice they had made for freedom was just beginning. During the first winter, half the Pilgrims – including Bradford's own wife – died of either starvation, sickness or exposure. When spring finally came, Indians taught the settlers how to plant corn, fish for cod and skin beavers for coats. Life improved for the Pilgrims, but they did not yet prosper!

"This is important to understand because this is where modern American history lessons often end. Thanksgiving is actually explained in some textbooks as a holiday for which the Pilgrims gave thanks to the Indians for saving their lives, rather than as a devout expression of gratitude grounded in the tradition of both the Old and New Testaments. Here is the part that has been omitted: The original contract the Pilgrims had entered into with their merchant-sponsors in London called for everything they produced to go into a common store, and each member of the community was entitled to one common share. All of the land they cleared and the houses they built belong to the community as well. Bradford, who had become the new governor of the colony, recognized that this form of collectivism was as costly and destructive to the Pilgrims as that first harsh winter, which had taken so many lives.

"He decided to take bold action. Bradford assigned a plot of land to each family to work and manage, thus turning loose the power of the marketplace. That's right. Long before Karl Marx was even born, the Pilgrims had discovered and experimented with what could only be described as socialism. And what happened? It didn't work! Surprise, surprise, huh? What Bradford and his community found was that the most creative and industrious people had no incentive to work any harder than anyone else, unless they could utilize the power of personal motivation! But while most of the rest of the world has been experimenting with socialism for well over a hundred years – trying to refine it, perfect it, and re-invent it – the Pilgrims decided early on to scrap it permanently. What Bradford wrote about this social experiment should be in every schoolchild's history lesson if it were, we might prevent much needless suffering in the future."

Now, I'm going to cease and desist at this point because I don't want to get started and have to interrupt myself for a commercial break with the passage from Bradford in his journal about the decision to scrap socialism, this common share business, and he turned everybody loose, and this new social experiment, forerunner to capitalism, is profoundly detailed in his journal.

Here now, in its entirety, the William Bradford journal, what he wrote about the social experiment after abandoning what essentially was socialism shortly after the Pilgrims had arrived in the United States or in the new world:

"'The experience that we had in this common course and condition, tried sundry years...that by taking away property, and bringing community into a common wealth, would make them happy and flourishing – as if they were wiser than God,' Bradford wrote. 'For this community [so far as it was] was found to breed much confusion and discontent, and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort. For young men that were most able and fit for labor and service did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives and children without any recompense...that was thought injustice.' Do you hear what he was saying, ladies and gentlemen? The Pilgrims found that people could not be expected to do their best work without incentive. So what did Bradford's community try next? They un-harnessed the power of good old free enterprise by invoking the under girding capitalistic principle of private property. Every family was assigned its own plot of land to work and permitted to market its own crops and products.'"

Not just use themselves and not just send to a common store but they could market. They could grow as much, they could sell it for what they could get for it, and the incentive was clear to do as much as possible on both sides. "And what was the result? 'This had very good success,' wrote Bradford, 'for it made all hands industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been.' Bradford doesn't sound like much of a Clintonite, does he? Is it possible that supply-side economics could have existed before the 1980s? Yes. Read the story of Joseph and Pharaoh in Genesis 41. Following Joseph's suggestion (Gen 41:34), Pharaoh reduced the tax on Egyptians to 20% during the 'seven years of plenty' and the 'Earth brought forth in heaps.' (Gen. 41:47) In no time, the Pilgrims found they had more food than they could eat themselves. So they set up trading posts and exchanged goods with the Indians. The profits allowed them to pay off their debts to the merchants in London. And the success and prosperity of the Plymouth settlement attracted more Europeans and began what came to be known as the 'Great Puritan Migration.' Now, let me ask you: Have you read this history before? Is this lesson being taught to your children today? If not, why not? Can you think of a more important lesson one could derive from the Pilgrim experience?

"Guess what? There's even more that is being deliberately withheld from our modern textbooks. For example, one of those attracted to the new world by the success of Plymouth was Thomas Hooker. Thomas Hooker established his own community in Connecticut, the first full-fledged constitutional community, perhaps the most free society the world had ever known. Hooker's community was governed by the fundamental orders of Connecticut, which established strict limits on the powers of government. So revolutionary and successful was this idea that Massachusetts was inspired to adopt its body of liberties. The body of liberties included ninety-eight separate protections of individual rights, including no taxation without representation, due process of law, trial by a jury of peers, and prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment. Now, those no doubt sound familiar to you and they should because these are ideas and concepts that led directly to the U.S. Constitution and the U.S. Bill of Rights."

"Nevertheless, the Pilgrims and the Puritans of early New England are often vilified today as witch burners and portrayed as simpletons. But to the contrary, it was their commitment to pluralism and free worship that led to these ideals being incorporated into American history, and our history books purposely conceal the fact that these notions were developed by communities of devout Christians who studied the Bible and found that it prescribes limited representative government and free enterprise as the best political and economic systems. Now, there's only one word for this, folks. It's censorship. There was a time when every schoolchild did learn these basic lessons of the American culture. Now these truths are being and have been systematically expunged from history books in favor of liberal social studies clap trap," and the chapter goes on. "This brings us to our Founding Fathers, the geniuses who crafted the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution.

"These were men who shook up the entire world by proclaiming the idea that people had certain God-given freedoms and rights and that the government's only reason to exist was to protect those freedoms and rights from both internal and external forces -- and that simple, yet brilliant, insight has been all but lost today in liberalism's relentless march toward bigger, more powerful, more intrusive government," and that's why I wanted to add to the reading today the George Washington First Thanksgiving proclamation in 1789. Thanksgiving was about thanking God for bounty and freedom and opportunity and blessings. Thanksgiving is a time we celebrate the Pilgrims realizing the best way to enjoy prosperity in a new world that was foreign to them. Yes, there was cooperation with the Indians and, yes, the Indians did extend the handshake of freedom when we arrived by teaching the Pilgrims how to farm and so forth, but after that, all the bounty that was created by the first settlers were shared with the Indians.

There was no wiping them out. There was no infiltration. There was no introduction of various diseases and -isms like environmental wackoism or sexism or racism or any of this, as have been attached in recent multicultural curricula to the so-called white Europeans who invaded this pristine land and destroyed the goodness and the oneness that the Indians enjoyed with this land. That's what's being taught today. What is not being taught today is the devotion to God that these people had, but the failure of a socialist compact to adequately provide for the residents of the first colony and how William Bradford himself saw it was failing almost from the outset and devised a new compact which was basically capitalism and unfettered competition, and incentive, and then it was Katie bar the door. All of these things are part of the original Thanksgiving, and even when I go back and remember my days in school, I was not taught this. I was not taught the involvement and the references to God.

I was not taught that the Pilgrims had all this bounty after awhile and shared it with the Indians. It was quite the opposite. The purpose of teaching Thanksgiving when I was a kid was to tell all of us just how wonderful the Indians were and how well they treated us when we arrived because we were basically inept and incompetent. I enjoy passing this story along every Thanksgiving because we've been doing it here since I published and wrote the book, and the book is actually 1993. It came out in November of '93. By the end of the year, it had sold two million copies, and since then, I guess this is our 11th year now of reading the real story of Thanksgiving, and it always reaches new people. Every year we do it, people who have never heard it before are amazed. Now, if I was able to find it and get the true story, it's out there, but it's not in conventional history textbooks that you'll find in many of the public schools.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Early Thanksgiving

By Douglas V. Gibbs
Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host

The concept of a Thanksgiving Feast is not uniquely American.  The Spanish Colonies also had thanksgiving ceremonies and meals as well.  The colonists in the New World, be they English, Dutch, French, Spanish, or of any other European origin, were a deeply religious people, and felt it necessary to give thanks to God for their survival, and prosperity, in their new land.  The Pilgrims had plenty to be thankful for, and so theirs is the story that has been most publicized (perhaps with a little help from the 1861 push for a Thanksgiving Holiday).  However, Turkey was not the dominant item on the menu, nor was many of our other traditional favorites.

The original menu for the first Thanksgiving was very different to what we have on the table today. Wild Turkey may have been an item, but the likely collection of other birds probably included Goose, Duck, Crane, Swan, Partridge, and believe it or not, Eagles.  Other meats included Venison, and Seal.  Seafood was also a large part of the diet, so the banquet most likely included Cod, Eel, Clams, and Lobster.  The corn, not originally an item favorable to the palates of the colonists, was off the cob, ground down into a mush, and made into bread that resembled pita bread.  It was a three day banquet, and it was a celebration of survival as a result of good harvests, and capitalism.

The Pilgrims were religious separatists who wound up landing way north of their intended target.  Since they were separatists, I like to tell people they landed way north of the rest of the Massachusetts Bay Colonies "accidentally on purpose." Many believe as I do that since they were separatists, the Pilgrims from Plymouth, England purposely navigated north of their intended target.

The reason for the Pilgrim's journey to America was to seek religious freedom. They were persecuted in England as the King made it law that everyone be a member of the Church of England. To escape the tyranny, after a short stint in Holland, they braved a treacherous crossing of the Atlantic Ocean that lasted 66 days.

The Pilgrims established a village using a communal system that used a central dispensary for food, and other items. The colonists were expected to work for the good of the community, placing into the central store all of their labors, and taking from it as needed. As Christians, they felt they could trust each other to put forth a good effort, and to be honest about what they took from the central stores for survival. The first winter was brutal, and most of the colonists remained on board the ship. More than half of the new colonists died from exposure, scurvy, and outbreaks of contagious disease. Less than half of the original colonists survived that first winter.

Of the Mayflower’s original travelers that survived through that winter, life was difficult. They were sick, hungry, and psychologically devastated. In the Spring, the colonists all moved ashore, and continued to maintain their collectivist system of communal living.

Days passed, and the Pilgrims were greeted, in English, by an Abenaki Indian. Several days later, as the story goes, he returned with another Native American, Squanto, a member of the Pawtuxet tribe who had been kidnapped by an English sea captain and sold into slavery before escaping to London and returning to his homeland on an exploratory expedition.

Squanto taught the Pilgrims, weakened by malnutrition and illness, how to grow corn, extract and use sap from maple trees, catch fish in the rivers and avoid poisonous plants. Through the process, with Squanto's guidance, the colonists also formed an alliance with the Wampanoag, a local tribe. The friendship lasted more than fifty years, and is a shining example of how the colonists and the Indians attempted to live in harmony in the New World.

As I like to tell people, the English Colonists were families fighting for survival, and did not desire war with the Indians like the Conquistadors of the Spanish Colonies who wiped out entire tribes, and raped and forcibly took as wives the women of those tribes.  The English Colonists did not want to fight with the Indians largely because they needed their help in order to survive.  They were not their to create empire, like the Spanish.  They were there as individual families to start a new life.

Even after help from Squanto, starvation continued to rampage through the colony because under the communal system not all settlers were putting forth their best effort, and were taking more than they put into the stores. Those that did work hard were angry because they were expected, through their labors, to carry the entire colony. Unrest was breaking out, and the colony knew that if they did not do something about their situation fast, the colony would not survive.

A new system was devised that gave each Pilgrim a parcel of land. They were told this land belonged to them, and they could work the land as they pleased. The settlers would keep all that they produced, and could bring any excess to market to trade with other settlers for goods they desired.  This new system moved the colony away from the communal system they had been suffering under, and instead established a system that in today's world we would call "Free Market Capitalism."

The Pilgrims’ first corn harvest proved successful, and as a result of changing their system to a more capitalistic system based on personal incentive, personal responsibility, and self-sufficiency, the colony was not only prospering, but their food was bountiful. In fact, they had so much food, they began to trade with the Indians.

Governor William Bradford, wishing to give thanks to the Lord for their good fortune, organized a celebratory feast and invited their Indian allies, including the Wampanoag chief Massasoit. The festival lasted for three days, and based on writings from the time period the menu is believed to have been rich in fowl and fish.

The fish was most likely cod.  Other seafood items included clams, lobsters, and eels.  Five deer were brought by the Indians.  On the table were also ducks, geese, swan, crane, and perhaps a wild turkey or two. Pumpkin may have been on the menu, along with various berries. The Indians made a stewed mix of corn, roots, beans, squash and various meats called sobaheg. On the table were also onions, turnips, and greens from spinach to chard.

Many of the menu items, it is suggested, were also prepared with traditional Native American spices and cooking methods. Because the Pilgrims had no oven and the Mayflower’s sugar supply had dwindled, the meal did not feature pies, sweet cakes, or other desserts. Because of the culture, it is also possible that the women did not participate.

In 1623, after a long drought that threatened the year's harvest, and yet still a bounty encouraged by their "keep what you produce" capitalistic system, Governor Bradford once again called for a feast for the purpose of giving thanks for the survival and prosperity of the colony.

As the years progressed, a thanksgiving feast on an annual or occasional basis became common practice in other New England settlements. During the American Revolution, the Continental Congress designated one or more days of thanksgiving a year, and in 1789 George Washington issued the first Thanksgiving proclamation. He called upon Americans to express their gratitude and give thanks to God our Lord for the happy conclusion to the country’s war of independence and the successful ratification of the U.S. Constitution. His successors John Adams and James Madison also designated days of thanks during their presidencies.

In 1817, New York officially adopted an annual Thanksgiving holiday.

In 1827, noted magazine editor and prolific writer Sarah Josepha Hale, known for her nursery rhyme "Mary Had a Little Lamb," began to campaign to establish Thanksgiving as a national holiday. Hale published numerous editorials and sent scores of letters to governors, senators, presidents and other politicians over a period of about thirty-six years. In 1863 at the height of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln heard her cry, and issued a proclamation entreating all Americans to ask God to "commend to his tender care all those who have become widows, orphans, mourners or sufferers in the lamentable civil strife" and to "heal the wounds of the nation." He scheduled Thanksgiving for the final Thursday in November, and it was celebrated on that day every year until 1939, when Franklin D. Roosevelt moved the holiday up a week in an attempt to spur retail sales during the Great Depression. Roosevelt’s plan was met with passionate opposition determined to keep with tradition, and in 1941 the president reluctantly signed a bill making Thanksgiving the fourth Thursday in November.

Though turkey, stuffing, mashed potatoes, cranberries (cranberry sauce), and pies were not on that original menu, over the passing of time these have become the traditional menu items of Thanksgiving. The true essence of Thanksgiving, however, is not the meal. This unique American holiday was, and still is, a day for all of us to give thanks to God for our blessings, and for the difficulties we have endured that have made us stronger and wiser. And the story I have given you may not have been technically the "first Thanksgiving," for throughout the colonies there were ceremonies of thanks that predate the Pilgrims' celebration.

Despite the tales of a bloody relationship between the Indians and the settlers, which did exist to some extent as the colonies began to encroach on native hunting grounds, the early tales of Thanksgiving reveals that there was a time when the Indians and colonists existed in harmony, and gave thanks to God for their relationship, and the miraculous survival of the early colonists, thanks to a little concept (though this may not have been the first time a free market style system had been used) we now call today "capitalism."

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Wednesday, November 21, 2018

Thanksgiving is tomorrow, so no Class Tonight

Happy Thanksgiving.

For those of you locally in Southern California who attend my Constitution Class, there is no class, tonight.  We'll see you next Wednesday Night.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Leaving California?

By Douglas V. Gibbs
Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host

My wife and I said before the election that if Gavin Newsom won the governorship, and the Democrats took a super-majority control over the two houses of the State legislature, we would likely move out of California.  My sister moved to Arizona a year and a half ago.  My brother is also talking about moving to Arizona.  My folks ware going to Arkansas.

We all know people who have left, and as conservatives, we have all considered leaving the State as the Democrats continue to drive what was once a Golden State into the ground.

In truth, the only thing holding us back is the fact that my wife's parents continue to live (their lives are both near the midnight hour).

Well, there is that, and the willingness to make the leap in the first place.  It's a scary thing to walk away from a place you were born and raised.

Last night, while addressing my Corona Constitution Class, I decided to backtrack a little.  I told them I am not quite ready to leave, just yet.

If I leave, how long before the cancer of leftism in California spreads further through the country?

As a warrior, should I not stand and fight where the disease is at its worst?

In short, we're not going anywhere, just yet.  But, the socialist beast has devoured nearly all of the Golden State.  It makes the desire to flee the madness stronger.  But, when faced with evil, should I not be fighting instead of fleeing?

I wonder how long it will be before the collapse in California, as a result of Democrat Party radical policies, begins to more closely resemble Detroit, or Venezuela.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

California: After the Fires Comes The Rain

By Douglas V. Gibbs
Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host

The forecast is rain in northern and central California on Wednesday, with southern California joining the soggy mess Wednesday Nigh and on Thanksgiving.  With rain in the forecast, and the stripped ground in the wildfire areas no longer having living vegetation holding the ground in place, California could be looking at a great threat of flash floods.  Residents have been stacking sandbags in places like the hills over Malibu in preparation for the rains, recognizing that along with the water from the flooding there may be debris loosened or burned and unprotected after the fires.  The rains will also hamper search efforts as teams continue to search for persons missing since the fires.

The known death toll from the recent firestorms currently stands at 81, with about 870 people still unaccounted for.

In Paradise, the northern California town that the Camp Fire literally burned off the map, officials state that with the rains coming to wash away any evidence, it is possible that many of the remains of the missing may never be found.

While the coming rains will help in extinguishing much of the flames and embers that remain, hopes of identifying remains of people may wash away, while transforming many areas into nothing more than a thick, gray paste of wet ash.  Prior to the rain, the Camp Fire remains 75 percent contained.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Losing Europe

By Douglas V. Gibbs
Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host

The spiritual and political war for the soul of Europe is being lost.

Islamization: EUROPE CRIMINALIZES CRITICISM OF MOHAMMED (for fear of being like the Nazis, they have become the sheep led to a slaughter)

Culture of Death: Ireland Moving Ahead With Free Abortions, Will Kill Unborn Babies in Hospital Maternity Wards (women took to the streets to celebrate their new found legal ability to kill their own children)

Tyranny: French Finance Minister, "Europe Should Become an Empire." (tryanny is the absence of political sanity)

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Tuesday, November 20, 2018

Amendments and Conventions, Corona Constitution Class


Class will be tonight, Tuesday, November 20, 2018, at 6:00 pm to 7:00 pm at AllStar/CARSTAR Collision, 522 Railroad Street, Corona, CA

Constitution Class Handout
Instructor: Douglas V. Gibbs



Lesson 10
Amendments and Conventions

Article V is the section in the Constitution that provides the people and the States the opportunity to change the law of the land if needed by establishing the amendment process.  Originally, only the States were going to be able to propose amendments.  On the second to the last day of the Constitutional Convention, the Founding Fathers added as an afterthought to allow the Congress to propose amendments as well.  The amendment process is the only process through which the Constitution may be altered.

Amendments, according to Article V, may be proposed by either two-thirds of both Houses of the United States Congress, or by a national convention of States.  Amendments must then be ratified by approval of three-fourths of the States either through their legislatures, or through ratifying conventions.

Amendments proposed by a national convention is a process known as an Article V. Convention.

Current opinion regarding an Article V. Convention varies.  Some people and groups have warned against such a convention, fearing a runaway convention that could be used to re-write the Constitution.  The Constitution does not allow for a runaway convention.  In an Article V. Convention, only amendments may be proposed.

The call for an Article V. Convention is nothing new.  Forty-Nine States have called for it, many of those calls beginning longer than over a 100 years ago.  Over 700 applications have been made.  The convention has never taken place because the Congress will not set a time and place (the only federal duty in an Article V. Convention), for fear of the people proposing amendments, and the States ratifying them, that would limit the powers of the federal government.  Centralized systems do not like it when the individual mind gets involved, and demands change.

There are three kinds of conventions.  A con-con, which is a Constitutional Convention, and there was only one, held back in 1787, and there should only be one in our history.  In addition to the con-con, and the Article V. Convention, is a kind of convention called Republic Review.  A Republic Review may be used to audit the federal government, determine what is unconstitutional, and then form a plan of action to alter the federal government so that it falls in line with the principles of the United States Constitution.  An Article V. Convention, or the States working together through nullification, could be the result of a Republic Review.  The strategy to convene a Republic Review convention lies primarily with We the People.

Amendments, no matter how they are proposed, require three-quarters approval from the States.  This approval process is called “ratification.”  Ratification is the failsafe, according to Alexander Hamilton in his Federalist 85, against conventions that may be used to rewrite the Constitution.  Any change to the Constitution is possible, as prescribed by Article V, as long as the amendment is capable of receiving three-quarters of the States’ ratification votes.

The only exception to any amendment being possible is addressed at the end of Article V.  According to the Constitution, no amendment, without the consent of the State in question, may deprive a State of equal suffrage in the Senate.  This testifies to the importance, in the minds of the framers, to the need for the United States Senate to remain unchanged, with the Senators being appointed by the State legislatures.

Since the Constitution is a document that contains express powers for the federal government, granted by the States, the only way to change or add authorities is through the amendment process, with State approval.  When it is understood that the original authorities granted to the federal government were granted to the central government by the States, it is appropriate that it takes three-quarters of the States to ratify an amendment.  When Congress proposes an amendment, it is literally a case of the federal government asking for permission of the States to have a new authority, and approval by the States requires three-quarters agreement.


Terms:

Article V. Convention - A convention for the proposal of constitutional amendments applied for by the States and called by Congress.

Express Powers - Powers granted to the federal government by enumerated authorities expressly granted in the United States Constitution.

Republic Review - A convention of delegates representing the several States in order to audit the laws, actions, and composure of the United States federal government; a review of unconstitutional characteristics of the federal government based on the amendment ratification concept that if it takes three-quarters of the States to ratify an amendment, a quarter (plus one) of the States determining a law, action or department of the federal government to be unconstitutional allows the States to nullify the item.

Questions for Discussion:
1.  What two sources may propose amendments?
2.  Why does it require the States to ratify proposed amendments?
3.  How is an Article V. Convention an important part of restraining the federal government?
Resources:

Friends of the Article V. Convention: http://foavc.com/

G. R. Mobley, We the People: Whose Constitution is it Anyway?;
Hobart, Washington: Mobius Strip Press (2013)

G. R. Mobley, We the People: The Strategy to Convene a Convention for
Republic Review; Hobart, Washington: Mobius Strip Press
(2014)

Joseph Andrews, A Guide for Learning and Teaching The Declaration of
Independence and The U.S. Constitution - Learning from the Original Texts Using Classical Learning Methods of the Founders; San Marcos: The Center for Teaching the Constitution (2010).

Madison’s Notes Constitutional Convention, Avalon Project, Yale
University: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/debcont.asp

Mark R. Levin, The Liberty Amendments: Restoring the American
Republic; New York: Threshold Editions, a division of Simon & Schuster (2013)

Philip B. Kurland and Ralph Lerner, The Founder’s Constitution –
Volume Four – Article I I, Section 8, Clause 5 to Article VII; Indianapolis: Liberty Fund (1987)




Copyright: Douglas V. Gibbs, 2015