Let the conga line of freaks and perverts break down the wrong bathroom and locker room doors, and this is what you're going to get:
The administration at the University of Toronto was recently enlightened on why two separate washrooms are generally established for men and women sharing co-ed residencies.
The University is temporarily changing its policy on gender-neutral bathrooms after two separate incidents of “voyeurism”....
Or what used to be known as being a "peeping Tom", which has generally been construed as being creepy precisely because of the implied stalkeresque threat it poses to the female victims of it.
Which is why it's also a crime:
....were reported on campus September 15th and 19th. Male students within the University’s Whitney Hall student residence were caught holding their cellphones over female students’ shower stalls and filming them as they showered.
Melinda Scott, dean of students at the University of Toronto, told the Daily Wire that campus police had been contacted immediately and worked with residence staff to “support impacted students and ensure the safety of the Residences.”
That the university itself had endangered with its stupid-ass "genderless" bathroom/lockerroom regulation in the first place. Sweet Jesus, the stupidity in this one story is unfathomable.
"But," I hear some of you saying, "what has that got to to with 'transgenderism'"? Well, for starters, not only would it be easier for them to infiltrate the wrong "facilities," but in the shuddering new world of mandatory gender-benderism, they wouldn't even have to infiltrate at all. And how would girls and women even know the fakes from the genuine articles? At least they could see the boys, um, coming.
And that's not a heads-up the UT poobahs want to provide:
“Given the serious nature of these incidents and the impact on directly-affected students, we made the decision to specifically designate some washrooms in Whitney Hall for those who identify as men and those who identify as women,” Scott said. [emphases added]
The problem with UT's unisex bathrooms and lockerrooms was that guys were peeping at gals, right? So the solution is to separate the guys from the gals, right? And guys have an X and Y chromosome, and gals have two X chromosomes, right? Gender is genetically determined and immutable, right? So if a guy wants to keep peeping the gals, he's going to "identify as a woman" to get in their "facilities," right?
Right:
A man claimed a right to use a women’s locker room at a public swimming pool after his partial undressing there caused alarm.
According to Seattle Parks and Recreation, women alerted staff at Evans Pool when a man wearing swim trunks entered the women’s locker room and took off his shirt.
When staff told him to leave, the man reportedly said “the law has changed and I have a right to be here.”
Was he wrong to do what he did? Hell, yeah. Was his claim accurate? Hell, yeah. It'll be upheld all the way up the judiciary food chain and shoved right back down our throats from and by the White House. Because, culturally, speaking, if Sodom moved in on one side of us years ago, Gomorrah has now moved in on the other, and the neighborhood reeks of rancid Skittles.
Exit quote from Jazz Shaw: "This foolishness isn’t just wrongheaded.. it’s dangerous. This Canadian university learned a quick lesson the hard way, thankfully without anyone being physically assaulted. How far does it have to go in the United States before we acknowledge both science and reality as well?"
Answer: As far as it needs to go to fully assimilate science and subvert reality. And besides, the "Trannyphobe" victims will have "had it coming".
No comments:
Post a Comment