Former Muslim Joins Political Pistachio To Discuss Uprisings In Egypt, and Around the Muslim World

Upcoming Show: 2/5/2011 7:00 PM Pacific

Political Pistachio Radio Revolution with IQ al-Rassooli to discuss Middle East Turmoil:

I have been quite nervous about the Egyptian uprisings, and have criticized Barack Obama and the leftist liberal progressives for encouraging the rebels. Though Islamists may not have launched the unrest, the jihadist opportunists will use the crisis to wiggle into power. I believe what we are seeing is the formation of an Islamic caliphate that will become the resurrection of the Ottoman Empire, and move into Europe with tremendous force, if we let it.

But how do you stop these dangerous happenings short of using military response?

As a nation, we cannot move in with our military to stop what is going on in Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen, Jordan, Algeria, Lebanon, and Albania. But if we allow the Islamic Revolution that has begun to proceed, we will have to deal with a much larger, and much more dangerous problem, in the future - that will no doubt end with the great loss of life.

First we must ask, are these uprisings simply a push for a democratic system, and an angry response to rising food and fuel prices? Or am I right that there is an insidious Islamic undertone to it all? Second, we much as, how do we combat the rise of an Islamic caliphate if the second possibility is true?

IQ al-Rassooli joins us tonight on the Political Pistachio Radio Revolution to tackle this topic tonight.

IQ al-Rassooli is normally in London, but tonight he will be calling us from Dublin. He understands who the enemy is because he was once a member of that ideology. The enemy is the ideology of Islam through the teachings of Muhammad's Koran and Sunna. The fact is that terrorists have infiltrated nearly every country on the globe, and every single Muslim that holds to the teachings of Muhammad is a potential terrorist.

IQ al-Rassooli was born in Iraq, and his mother tongue is Arabic. His parents sent him to study at a university in England, and while there he realized that the "programming" he received in his younger years by Muslim teachings about other peoples were one-sided and wrong. After almost 23 years of researching, analyzing, comparing, and contrasting as many points of view as possible, al-Rassooli determined that Muhammad's religion of Islam is a "depraved cult belief system." IQ al-Rassooli has decided to work to bring the truth to the would-be victims of the followers of Muhammad in the hopes of revealing "the complete exposure of the obscene facts and reality of what the media calls 'Islam,' based entirely on the very Arabic sources themselves." Tonight, IQ al-Rassooli joins the Political Pistachio Radio Revolution for a revealing interview with host Douglas V. Gibbs. Ignorance is Bliss, everyone else listens to the Political Pistachio Radio Revolution. Join us for your weekend dose of truth.

Also, during the final half hour of the show we are launching a new segment called "Nuts and Nuggets." I will be addressing your calls on any topic, as well as Emails and comments from Political Pistachio. Two of the comments I will be addressing are as follows (Note, they are both from Tom the Neurotic Liberal):

Comment 1: You say that as if Marbury vs. Madison doesn't exist, and the entire history of the judiciary in the US is null and void. You just can't get any more fringe than that. Opinions are useless and powerless. What you suggest is no check on Congress. They could pass any law they wanted, over ride a presidential veto, and it would be law.. with no challenge what-so-ever to it. They could outlaw people with blue eyes and deport them all.. and the courts would be powerless to stop it, because the bill of rights requires an arbiter.. and that arbiter is the courts. You have no idea how checks and balances have worked in this nation and why Marbury vs Madison was decided the way it was, and why the entire (and it is massive) legal system in our nation is based around the authority of the courts to nullify laws... leaving the appeals process ultimately the Supeme Court. You want to live in a nation that doesn't exist - legally. However, you did explicitly favor a judge striking down the HCR law because that was the only way it could be done. That was exactly what you said and if you want, I'll go look for it. You said that if a judge struck down a law that you agreed needed to be struck down, then that was fine.. because otherwise the scary "Socialism" was going to take over the US. My ultimate point is that you are completely incoherent in all your positions.. and we've been laughing about it over at my blog with Kris and Dan.. and giggling over how you've deleted their comments as well. It is pretty funny.

Comment 2: The only reason that you think "global warming" is a myth is because it's become something of a cause for lefties. If the left didn't care about it, you wouldn't either. Fact is, the vast majority of science behind climate change attributes very wild swings in climate to the so called "green house gasses". Your fringe view on it really isn't that important.

Join us live, or by archive, at BlogTalkRadio.