Thursday, April 18, 2013

The Militia: The Last Stand Against Governmental Tyranny


"What, sir, is the use of militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty... Whenever Government means to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins." -- Elbridge Gerry, 1789

By Douglas V. Gibbs

A militia that is in good order is necessary for the security of the sovereign States against an oppressive federal government should the winds of tyranny grab a hold of it.  The unorganized militia is you and I, therefore, our right to keep and bear arms must not be infringed in any way, shape, or form, by the federal government.  Any federal background check requirement, restrictions, mandate for liability insurance, or any other federal gun law, is in opposition of the Second Amendment, and is unconstitutional.  The federal government does not have the authority to control or restrict gun rights in any way, shape or form because the purpose of the Second Amendment was to ensure that the people were armed in order to protect them from an oppressive government that not only will try to take away the guns of the citizens, but execute unconstitutional laws with a standing army.  Any regulation regarding guns cannot be applied by the federal government, but the States do have the constitutional allowance to have gun laws.

The right to keep and bear arms, in other words, protects us from tyranny, and against the federal government creating a police-state, and compromising the autonomy of the various States.

After the United States Senate decided to vote down a draconian piece of gun legislation, the President of the United States, who is supposed to protect and defend the Constitution, called the vote a "shameful day for Washington," and blamed the failure of the gun bill on “The gun lobby and its allies [who] willfully lied about the bill,”

He should be impeached for his willful anti-constitution rhetoric, and his attempts to oppose the Constitution at every opportunity.

Barack Obama made his un-American comment against pro-gun groups while surrounding himself with family members of the Newtown, Connecticut shooting, and Gabby Giffords, the Congresswoman shot in the head in an assassination attempt in Tucson, Arizona in 2011.

While arguing against the notion that a national registry would create some kind of big brother system that would eventually lead to confiscation, we must be reminded that Adolf Hitler made the same argument, while surrounded by children, regarding his push for a national registry.  In Germany, gun confiscation soon followed, and millions of unarmed Jews, as well as others not considered to be an important part of the German Society, were rounded up, and murdered.

Actor and comedian Jay Mohr even went so far as to blame the Boston Marathon Bombing on guns, blaming the gun culture on the violence in our society.  These people see guns in ways that cannot even be fathomed.  They refuse to recognize that guns are merely tools, and the problem is not the tools, but the violent individuals who sometimes wield firearms in a manner not acceptable in a civilized society.

He is right, the culture is the problem, but the violent culture has emerged due to societal influences like liberalism, and pluralism, not inanimate objects like firearms.  When I was a young man, kids often brought their guns to school, in some areas of America because they went hunting before school started.  The kids were not shooting each other, though, because shooting people was not something the culture encouraged.  However, guns were even more prominent in our society at that time.  History of the gun culture in America is the greatest counter-argument against the liberal left's anti-gun agenda.

New York Mayor Bloomberg has equated gun ownership, and handing guns down to posterity, to be tantamount to child abuse. He said, If you sell a gun to your son, “there’s something wrong with your family."

Yet, Bloomberg, Obama, and all of these other high ranking liberals use gun-toting security to keep them safe.  Bloomberg even takes armed police with him to his home in Bermuda - where guns are illegal.

If gun control is such an important issue, and makes society safer, then why does Bloomberg need an armed entourage in Bermuda where the gun laws are so strict that guns are illegal?

The real kicker is that Obama, and the liberal democrats, keep telling us that they are doing the work of the people, and that most people want gun control. . .

Really?

A recent Gallup Poll says otherwise.  The survey states that only 4% of Americans think gun control is an important problem.  Only 4%!  Even as much as the left tries to manipulate polls, this is one that is hard to argue with.

Despite the liberal left's rhetoric, guns save lives.  The best defense against armed bad guys is a bunch of good guys with guns, as the NRA's LaPierre pointed out.

According to Gun Owners of America:

Fact Sheet: Guns Save Lives

A. Guns save more lives than they take; prevent more injuries than they inflict
* Guns used 2.5 million times a year in self-defense. Law-abiding citizens use guns to defend themselves against criminals as many as 2.5 million times every year -- or about 6,850 times a day. 1 This means that each year, firearms are used more than 80 times more often to protect the lives of honest citizens than to take lives. 2
* Of the 2.5 million times citizens use their guns to defend themselves every year, the overwhelming majority merely brandish their gun or fire a warning shot to scare off their attackers. Less than 8% of the time, a citizen will kill or wound his/her attacker.3
* As many as 200,000 women use a gun every year to defend themselves against sexual abuse.4
* Even anti-gun Clinton researchers concede that guns are used 1.5 million times annually for self-defense. According to the Clinton Justice Department, there are as many as 1.5 million cases of self-defense every year. The National Institute of Justice published this figure in 1997 as part of "Guns in America" -- a study which was authored by noted anti-gun criminologists Philip Cook and Jens Ludwig.5
* Armed citizens kill more crooks than do the police. Citizens shoot and kill at least twice as many criminals as police do every year (1,527 to 606).6 And readers of Newsweek learned that "only 2 percent of civilian shootings involved an innocent person mistakenly identified as a criminal. The 'error rate' for the police, however, was 11 percent, more than five times as high."7
* Handguns are the weapon of choice for self-defense. Citizens use handguns to protect themselves over 1.9 million times a year.8 Many of these self-defense handguns could be labeled as "Saturday Night Specials."
B. Concealed carry laws help reduce crime
* Nationwide: one-half million self-defense uses. Every year, as many as one-half million citizens defend themselves with a firearm away from home.9 * Concealed carry laws are dropping crime rates across the country. A comprehensive national study determined in 1996 that violent crime fell after states made it legal to carry concealed firearms. The results of the study showed:
* States which passed concealed carry laws reduced their murder rate by 8.5%, rapes by 5%, aggravated assaults by 7% and robbery by 3%;10 and * If those states not having concealed carry laws had adopted such laws in 1992, then approximately 1,570 murders, 4,177 rapes, 60,000 aggravated assaults and over 11,000 robberies would have been avoided yearly.11
* Vermont: one of the safest five states in the country. In Vermont, citizens can carry a firearm without getting permission... without paying a fee... or without going through any kind of government-imposed waiting period. And yet for ten years in a row, Vermont has remained one of the top-five, safest states in the union -- having three times received the "Safest State Award."12
* Florida: concealed carry helps slash the murder rates in the state. In the fifteen years following the passage of Florida's concealed carry law in 1987, over 800,000 permits to carry firearms were issued to people in the state.13 FBI reports show that the homicide rate in Florida, which in 1987 was much higher than the national average, fell 52% during that 15-year period -- thus putting the Florida rate below the national average. 14
* Do firearms carry laws result in chaos? No. Consider the case of Florida. A citizen in the Sunshine State is far more likely to be attacked by an alligator than to be assaulted by a concealed carry holder. 1. During the first fifteen years that the Florida law was in effect, alligator attacks outpaced the number of crimes committed by carry holders by a 229 to 155 margin. 2. And even the 155 "crimes" committed by concealed carry permit holders are somewhat misleading as most of these infractions resulted from Floridians who accidentally carried their firearms into restricted areas, such as an airport.15
C. Criminals avoid armed citizens
* Kennesaw, GA. In 1982, this suburb of Atlanta passed a law requiring heads of households to keep at least one firearm in the house. The residential burglary rate subsequently dropped 89% in Kennesaw, compared to the modest 10.4% drop in Georgia as a whole.16
* Ten years later (1991), the residential burglary rate in Kennesaw was still 72% lower than it had been in 1981, before the law was passed.17
* Nationwide. Statistical comparisons with other countries show that burglars in the United States are far less apt to enter an occupied home than their foreign counterparts who live in countries where fewer civilians own firearms. Consider the following rates showing how often a homeowner is present when a burglar strikes:
* Homeowner occupancy rate in the gun control countries of Great Britain, Canada and Netherlands: 45% (average of the three countries); and, * Homeowner occupancy rate in the United States: 12.7%.18 Rapes averted when women carry or use firearms for protection
* Orlando, FL. In 1966-67, the media highly publicized a safety course which taught Orlando women how to use guns. The result: Orlando's rape rate dropped 88% in 1967, whereas the rape rate remained constant in the rest of Florida and the nation.19
* Nationwide. In 1979, the Carter Justice Department found that of more than 32,000 attempted rapes, 32% were actually committed. But when a woman was armed with a gun or knife, only 3% of the attempted rapes were actually successful.20 Justice Department study:
* 3/5 of felons polled agreed that "a criminal is not going to mess around with a victim he knows is armed with a gun."21
* 74% of felons polled agreed that "one reason burglars avoid houses when people are at home is that they fear being shot during the crime."22 * 57% of felons polled agreed that "criminals are more worried about meeting an armed victim than they are about running into the police."23

Guns saves lives, and an armed militia protects our liberty from a tyrannical government.

A government that wishes to disarm the populace is a government that wishes to make the people nothing more than subjects.

Let us also not forget that when Mexico strengthened their gun laws, making it impossible for the average citizen to own guns, the drug cartels took control of the country, and the unarmed populace could only submit, forced at gunpoint to become prisoners in their own neighborhoods.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary









1 Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz, "Armed Resistance to Crime: The Prevalence and Nature of Self-Defense With a Gun," 86 The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Northwestern University School of Law, 1 (Fall 1995):164. 
Dr. Kleck is a professor in the school of criminology and criminal justice at Florida State University in Tallahassee. He has researched extensively and published several essays on the gun control issue. His book, Point Blank: Guns and Violence in America, has become a widely cited source in the gun control debate. In fact, this book earned Dr. Kleck the prestigious American Society of Criminology Michael J. Hindelang award for 1993. This award is given for the book published in the past two to three years that makes the most outstanding contribution to criminology. 
Even those who don't like the conclusions Dr. Kleck reaches, cannot argue with his impeccable research and methodology. In "A Tribute to a View I Have Opposed," Marvin E. Wolfgang writes that, "What troubles me is the article by Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz. The reason I am troubled is that they have provided an almost clear-cut case of methodologically sound research in support of something I have theoretically opposed for years, namely, the use of a gun in defense against a criminal perpetrator.... I have to admit my admiration for the care and caution expressed in this article and this research. Can it be true that about two million instances occur each year in which a gun was used as a defensive measure against crime? It is hard to believe. Yet, it is hard to challenge the data collected. We do not have contrary evidence." Wolfgang, "A Tribute to a View I Have Opposed," The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, at 188. 
Wolfgang says there is no "contrary evidence." Indeed, there are more than a dozen national polls -- one of which was conducted by The Los Angeles Times -- that have found figures comparable to the Kleck-Gertz study. Even the Clinton Justice Department (through the National Institute of Justice) found there were as many as 1.5 million defensive users of firearms every year. See National Institute of Justice, "Guns in America: National Survey on Private Ownership and Use of Firearms," Research in Brief (May 1997). 
As for Dr. Kleck, readers of his materials may be interested to know that he is a member of the ACLU, Amnesty International USA, and Common Cause. He is not and has never been a member of or contributor to any advocacy group on either side of the gun control debate. 
2 According to the National Safety Council, the total number of gun deaths (by accidents, suicides and homicides) account for less than 30,000 deaths per year. See Injury Facts, published yearly by the National Safety Council, Itasca, Illinois. 
3Kleck and Gertz, "Armed Resistance to Crime," at 173, 185. 
4Kleck and Gertz, "Armed Resistance to Crime," at 185. 
5 Philip J. Cook and Jens Ludwig, "Guns in America: National Survey on Private Ownership and Use of Firearms," NIJ Research in Brief (May 1997); available at http://www.ncjrs.org/txtfiles/165476.txt on the internet. The finding of 1.5 million yearly self-defense cases did not sit well with the anti-gun bias of the study's authors, who attempted to explain why there could not possibly be one and a half million cases of self-defense every year. Nevertheless, the 1.5 million figure is consistent with a mountain of independent surveys showing similar figures. The sponsors of these studies -- nearly a dozen -- are quite varied, and include anti-gun organizations, news media organizations, governments and commercial polling firms. See also Kleck and Gertz, supra note 1, pp. 182-183. 
6Kleck, Point Blank: Guns and Violence in America, (1991):111-116, 148. 
7George F. Will, "Are We 'a Nation of Cowards'?," Newsweek (15 November 1993):93. 
8Id. at 164, 185. 
9Dr. Gary Kleck, interview with J. Neil Schulman, "Q and A: Guns, crime and self-defense," The Orange County Register (19 September 1993). In the interview with Schulman, Dr. Kleck reports on findings from a national survey which he and Dr. Marc Gertz conducted in Spring, 1993 -- a survey which findings were reported in Kleck and Gertz, "Armed Resistance to Crime." br>10 One of the authors of the University of Chicago study reported on the study's findings in John R. Lott, Jr., "More Guns, Less Violent Crime," The Wall Street Journal (28 August 1996). See also John R. Lott, Jr. and David B. Mustard, "Crime, Deterrence, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handguns," University of Chicago (15 August 1996); and Lott, More Guns, Less Crime (1998, 2000). 
11Lott and Mustard, "Crime, Deterrence, and Right-to-Carry Concealed Handguns." 
12Kathleen O'Leary Morgan, Scott Morgan and Neal Quitno, "Rankings of States in Most Dangerous/Safest State Awards 1994 to 2003," Morgan Quitno Press (2004) athttp://www.statestats.com/dang9403.htm. Morgan Quitno Press is an independent private research and publishing company which was founded in 1989. The company specializes in reference books and monthly reports that compare states and cities in several different subject areas. In the first 10 years in which they published their Safest State Award, Vermont has consistently remained one of the top five safest states. 
13Memo by Jim Smith, Secretary of State, Florida Department of State, Division of Licensing, Concealed Weapons/Firearms License Statistical Report (October 1, 2002). 
14Florida's murder rate was 11.4 per 100,000 in 1987, but only 5.5 in 2002. Compare Federal Bureau of Investigation, "Crime in the United States," Uniform Crime Reports, (1988): 7, 53; and FBI, (2003):19, 79. 
15 John R. Lott, Jr., "Right to carry would disprove horror stories," Kansas City Star, (July 12, 2003). 
16Gary Kleck, "Crime Control Through the Private Use of Armed Force," Social Problems 35 (February 1988):15. 
17Compare Kleck, "Crime Control," at 15, and Chief Dwaine L. Wilson, City of Kennesaw Police Department, "Month to Month Statistics: 1991." (Residential burglary rates from 1981-1991 are based on statistics for the months of March - October.) 
18Kleck, Point Blank, at 140. 
19Kleck, "Crime Control," at 13. 
20U.S. Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, Rape Victimization in 26 American Cities (1979), p. 31. 
21U.S., Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, "The Armed Criminal in America: A Survey of Incarcerated Felons," Research Report (July 1985): 27. 
22Id. 
23Id.

No comments: