by JASmius
Well, it depends on what your definition of "end" is....
Well, tacking on the clause "as we know it" changes the entire phrase, now doesn't it? Doesn't make it any easier to define, though. Does anybody know, and can anybody reliably say, what ObamaCare is anymore? More to the point, does anybody know, and can anybody reliably say, what ObamaCare is going to be tomorrow? Next Tuesday? A month from now? Six months? A year? The only guidepost we have for that is the election schedule. Ironically, the only thing that may firm up the definition of ObamaCare is when O finally gets around to abolishing elections in this country, which may be the only thing more entrenched in this country than ObamaCare itself - but not for long.
But then, all the changes made by O's imperial diktats have been illegal and unconstitutional. And all those illegal, unconstitutional changes have been made to a law that is itself blatantly unconstitutional. It's like if Roy Neary had been carving his mashed potato sculptures of Devil's Tower in elephant dung instead; no matter how perfect a likeness he crafted of Devil's Tower, nobody would like it (except perhaps the National Endowment for the Arts) because it was made of Pachyderm poop. And there are a plethora of reasons to hate ObamaCare beyond its tyrannical fecality.
Nice of Juan Williams to give us a shout out, BTW. And I can see that MK Hammer decided to minimize her chances of getting pinched.
Funny that O'Reilly appears to have believed he was at the same risk.
No comments:
Post a Comment