Ebola: Medical Martial Law?

by JASmius

Merely the suspicion of a limited Ebola outbreak in the United States would give the green light for federal authorities to seize draconian powers and detain Americans not even infected with the Ebola virus.

There's also this:

You'll notice if you read virtually any mainstream article on the topic that they make a point of insisting that Ebola is only transferred by physical contact with bodily fluids. This is not true, at all.

A study conducted in 2012 showed that Ebola was able to travel between pigs and monkeys that were in separate cages and were never placed in direct contact.

Though the method of transmission in the study was not officially determined, one of the scientists involved, Dr. Gary Kobinger, from the National Microbiology Laboratory at the Public Health Agency of Canada, told BBC News that he believed that the infection was spread through large droplets that were suspended in the air....

Translation: Ebola IS an airborne virus.

So the Obama Regime has already lied about this.

And then there's this:

This is the scenario in the days following Obama’s Africa Summit: Obama, his family and entourage will be at Martha’s Vineyard, August 9th to 24th. The Clintons will be in the same location with Hillary signing books there on August 13th.

“For over two weeks — from August 9th to August 24th — the airspace surrounding the island will be off limits to certain aircraft. (Daily Caller)....

Congress will be on holiday for the month of August.

What could possibly go wrong?

"Are you familiar with what Barack Obama's real power is?  Barack Obama can suspend constitutional government upon declaration of a national emergency.  Think about that.  What is a president with such broad, sweeping power doing cultivating viral outbreaks in southern Texas?...We have no context for what he is doing or any appreciation of the scale in which it will be unleashed in the future.  A plague to end all plagues.  A silent weapon for a quiet war.  The systematic release of indiscriminate organisms for which the man who is bringing them on has no cure....While we've been bickering with Democrats and RINOs, this man has been implementing a planned Armageddon.....The timetable has been set.  It'll happen on a holiday when people are away from their homes.  Barack Obama will declare a state of emergency, at which time all government, all federal agencies, and We, The People, will come under his direct control."

- Me, ten days ago

You know, I've never been a conspiracist.

Seriously.  I come from a very level-headed family.  When Orson Welles aired his radio dramatization of H.G. Wells's War Of The Worlds in 1938 - the infamous "Night That Panicked America" - my grandmother, having listened to it while washing dishes in her kitchen, went outside, looked up at the sky - probably to locate Mars - chuckled, shook her head slightly, and went back to the sink.  I don't go off half-cocked.  I don't panic.  Maybe that'll catch up to me if I'm about to be run over by a cross-town transit bus, but that equanimity has served me well thus far.

I am also quite the rationalist.  Any more so and my ears might be pointed.  Heck, my eyebrows are already upswept, despite my fluency in tlhIngan Hol.  I have always subscribed to Occam's Razor.  Which is why I've never been a conspiracist.  Conspiracies are the most complicated, convoluted means of accomplishing anything.  So many moving parts, and blanketing it all, the need for total secrecy.  Those two factors are flatly contradictory.  The more people involved in a secret scheme, the more inevitable the leaking of parts or all of it.  It is just too impractical to work.

However, there is a scene from a first season Star Trek: The Next Generation episode entitled, appropriately enough, "Conspiracy":

Admiral Aaron: What do you know of conspiracies, Captain?

Captain Jean-Luc Picard: Not nearly enough, I suppose.

Admiral Aaron: That's the charming thing about them, isn't it? When a machination is real, no one knows about it. And when it's suspected, it's almost never real.

That quote has an intriguing implication: that it is possible that a machination can be suspected, but then it is dismissed out of fear of ridicule as being "paranoid" or out of an thoroughly ingrained..... rationalism.

Is it paranoid to look at a set of facts, a body of evidence, that seems to quite evidently point in a certain disquieting direction and draw an at least preliminary logical conclusion?  We have then-Obama Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel's post-2008 election declaration that "you can never let a crisis go to waste, because it lets you do things you couldn't otherwise do."  We have the Obama White House deliberately and calculatedly creating the current border crisis, complete with countless communicable diseases, shipping untreated migrants all over the country to inflict them on unsuspecting communities by force.  Some of the illegals are from the very same area - west Africa - as the unprecedented ebola outbreak, whose ease of transmission the Obama Regime as already lied about.  And we know that Obama has signed an executive decree allowing him to arrest any American citizen without habeas corpus or due process for merely displaying "signs of respiratory illness".

Nobody wants to believe where that set of facts points.  God knows I don't.  I want to believe that this is just coincidence, that "this is still America" and "it can't happen here," that not even Barack Hussein Obama would go this far.

I want to believe that.

But then I look at the facts again.  And I wonder.  And I hold my breath.

Suddenly being "a bitter, disheveled recluse, whiling away his days in his dilapidated home" doesn't look so bad after all.