In the 2012 Election, after President Barack Obama beat Republican Challenger Mitt Romney with a mere 5% or less in the swing States, and as strange strange stories about ACORN's unlawful registration tactics, The New Black Panthers committing voter intimidation, 100% Obama wins in some inner-city districts, massive local wins for Republicans in areas where Obama still wound up on top, and Florida's inconsistent numbers that defied imagination, it was pretty apparent to many GOP voters that Obama did not win the 2014 Election. . . he stole it. We knew there was fraud, because the numbers did not add up. But, except for a few cases where the fraud could not be ignored by the media (like with the woman caught voting 6 times), the allegations of monkey-business were ignored.
Welcome to the 2014 Election, where the Democrats are looking at possibly losing the United States Senate because of the failures of the Obama Presidency. Election fraud, suppression, and intimidation has already begun. The stories emerging are downright ridiculous. . . but the liberal media remains silent.
A Voting Machine in Chicago is Hardwired to Vote Democrat
Voter fraud and Democrats go together hand-in-hand. So it’s perhaps not surprising to find out that a voting machine in Chicago (of all places!) is shockingly hardwired to vote Democrat.
A Republican candidate in Chicago, Jim Moynihan, tried to vote for himself in early elections and was surprised to find that the voting machine registered a vote for his opponent, a Democrat:
While using a touch screen voting machine in Schaumburg, Moynihan voted for several races on the ballot, only to find that whenever he voted for a Republican candidate, the machine registered the vote for a Democrat in the same race. He notified the election judge at his polling place and demonstrated that it continued to cast a vote for the opposing candidate’s party. Moynihan was eventually allowed to vote for Republican candidates, including his own race.
Hey, Democrats get dead people to vote, so this is just another one of their cute little party tricks, right? Consider this proof that voters need to be extra cautious and remain on the lookout for shenanigans at the polls on election day.
-- Read about the Chicago Voting Machine on American Thinker, as well. The local Daily Herald also has the story.
Busted on undercover video: Dems encourage voter fraud, it’s not ‘like lying or stealing’
Undercover journalist James O’Keefe has done it again. . . and this time he gave the targets a fair warning.
The guerilla reporter released a Project Veritas Action video that showed three Colorado Democrats on hidden camera advocating voter fraud in the state’s all mail-in ballot election.
O’Keefe, who is probably best known for the undercover videos that led to the disbandment of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN, this time targeted Colorado, a state with several tight political races.
Among those caught on tape was Meredith Hicks, a director for the nonprofit group Work For Progress.
“If they are not eligible to vote, and all these people are throwing out ballots, let’s use those ballots to vote. So we can get as many votes as possible,” O’Keefe suggested to Hicks.
“Yes, definitely,” she replied.
“We don’t just want to discard the ballots. So I think that that’s what we’re going to do,” O’Keefe pressed on. “And I think that can make the difference in this election.”
“I agree,” Hicks said. “You’re totally right.”
“I mean they cheat and lie and steal all the time,” O’Keefe said, apparently speaking of the Republican opposition.
“I mean, that’s not even lying and stealing,” Hicks replied.
We note that Hicks didn’t argue that such a process wasn’t cheating.
“If someone throws out the ballot, if you want to fill it out, you should do it,” she added.
In fact, Hicks appeared to like the idea so much, she offered the undercover journalist a job at Work for Progress.
Watch the entire video here, via YouTube:
Surveillance video captures man stuffing ballot box with hundreds of ballots
Busted on undercover video: Dems encourage voter fraud, it’s not ‘like lying or stealing’
Undercover journalist James O’Keefe has done it again. . . and this time he gave the targets a fair warning.
The guerilla reporter released a Project Veritas Action video that showed three Colorado Democrats on hidden camera advocating voter fraud in the state’s all mail-in ballot election.
O’Keefe, who is probably best known for the undercover videos that led to the disbandment of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN, this time targeted Colorado, a state with several tight political races.
Among those caught on tape was Meredith Hicks, a director for the nonprofit group Work For Progress.
“If they are not eligible to vote, and all these people are throwing out ballots, let’s use those ballots to vote. So we can get as many votes as possible,” O’Keefe suggested to Hicks.
“Yes, definitely,” she replied.
“We don’t just want to discard the ballots. So I think that that’s what we’re going to do,” O’Keefe pressed on. “And I think that can make the difference in this election.”
“I agree,” Hicks said. “You’re totally right.”
“I mean they cheat and lie and steal all the time,” O’Keefe said, apparently speaking of the Republican opposition.
“I mean, that’s not even lying and stealing,” Hicks replied.
We note that Hicks didn’t argue that such a process wasn’t cheating.
“If someone throws out the ballot, if you want to fill it out, you should do it,” she added.
In fact, Hicks appeared to like the idea so much, she offered the undercover journalist a job at Work for Progress.
Watch the entire video here, via YouTube:
Surveillance video captures man stuffing ballot box with hundreds of ballots
“A person wearing a Citizens for a Better Arizona T-shirt dropped a large box of hundreds of early ballots on the table and started stuffing the ballot box as I watched in amazement,” said A.J. LaFaro, chairman of the Maricopa County Republican Party.
LaFaro confronted the man and was told to perform an anatomically impossible act upon himself, according to an account he provided to the Arizona Daily Independent. La Faro then submitted a request and received surveillance video.
It was between 12:54 and 1:04 that LaFaro said he was seated at one of the cubicles, heard a loud thud and turned around to see the man who he claims was caught on tape stuffing “hundreds” of ballots. LaFaro described the man as a “vulgar, disrespectful, violent thug” with “no respect for our laws.” He said he would have followed the man to his car to get his tag number but “feared for [his] life.”
According to Gateway Pundit, the ballot-stuffer was a Democrat Party operative.
LaFaro confronted the man and was told to perform an anatomically impossible act upon himself, according to an account he provided to the Arizona Daily Independent. La Faro then submitted a request and received surveillance video.
It was between 12:54 and 1:04 that LaFaro said he was seated at one of the cubicles, heard a loud thud and turned around to see the man who he claims was caught on tape stuffing “hundreds” of ballots. LaFaro described the man as a “vulgar, disrespectful, violent thug” with “no respect for our laws.” He said he would have followed the man to his car to get his tag number but “feared for [his] life.”
According to Gateway Pundit, the ballot-stuffer was a Democrat Party operative.
INELIGIBLE DACA BENEFICIARIES DISCOVERED ON NC VOTING ROLLS
With the North Carolina U.S. Senate race in a dead heat, state election officials say they have discovered 145 names on the voting rolls who are ineligible to vote because they are illegal immigrants who have been granted President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals status.
DACA beneficiaries in North Carolina are able to obtain drivers licenses, but they are not able to vote.
It is likely more ineligible people may still remain on the voting rolls.
“We want to know how such a large number of non-U.S. citizens were ever registered to vote in the first place,” Jay DeLancy, executive director of the Voter Integrity Project of North Carolina, told Watchdog.org. “There is clearly a system failure here and we need the Board of Elections and the DMV to help the Legislature and the public understand where the problem lies.”
850 voters in NYC are officially 164 years old
A single Bronx voter listed in official records as being 164 years old led Board of Elections officials to review their files — where they turned up another 849 New Yorkers who were supposedly alive when Abe Lincoln was president.
The stunning discovery came after The Post reported last week that the birth date of Luz Pabellon, a spry 73-year-old who has been living and voting in The Bronx since the 1970s, was recorded as Jan. 1, 1850.
This week, a search of the records in all five boroughs found 849 more voters with the same wacky birth date.
Board officials chalked up the implausible age snafu to previous practices that allowed residents not to provide their exact birthdays when registering to vote.
Some of the new voters — mostly women — simply wrote that they were “21+” — above the legal voting age.
There was a reason to be vague. Voter registration records are open to the public, so anyone with the inclination can discover the real age of anyone in the files.
“It’s a leftover vestige from a bygone era,” explained Board of Elections executive director Mike Ryan.
“They were all listed as age 164. This was no accident. It’s a little quirk in the system. It’s not widespread,” he added, noting there are more than 4 million registered voters.
The board switched to computerized databases in 1999 and 2006.
One wonders if they can't even get the ages of legal voters in the system, how is it they are able to guard against illegal voter activity?
---------------------
---------------------
Why all of this illegal activity? Why are the liberal left Democrats willing to go to any length, even illegal ones, to influence the election?
A single Bronx voter listed in official records as being 164 years old led Board of Elections officials to review their files — where they turned up another 849 New Yorkers who were supposedly alive when Abe Lincoln was president.
The stunning discovery came after The Post reported last week that the birth date of Luz Pabellon, a spry 73-year-old who has been living and voting in The Bronx since the 1970s, was recorded as Jan. 1, 1850.
This week, a search of the records in all five boroughs found 849 more voters with the same wacky birth date.
Board officials chalked up the implausible age snafu to previous practices that allowed residents not to provide their exact birthdays when registering to vote.
Some of the new voters — mostly women — simply wrote that they were “21+” — above the legal voting age.
There was a reason to be vague. Voter registration records are open to the public, so anyone with the inclination can discover the real age of anyone in the files.
“It’s a leftover vestige from a bygone era,” explained Board of Elections executive director Mike Ryan.
“They were all listed as age 164. This was no accident. It’s a little quirk in the system. It’s not widespread,” he added, noting there are more than 4 million registered voters.
The board switched to computerized databases in 1999 and 2006.
One wonders if they can't even get the ages of legal voters in the system, how is it they are able to guard against illegal voter activity?
---------------------
---------------------
Why all of this illegal activity? Why are the liberal left Democrats willing to go to any length, even illegal ones, to influence the election?
Could it be because they know they are in big time trouble because of the embarrassment of a President that inhabits The White House?
Years of disappointment and tension between Democrats and their president are now on open display as politicians, party leaders and strategists worried about their chances in the midterm elections begin casting about for someone to blame.
A party and its president often go their separate ways during the final years of a second term, and Democrats say they appreciate Obama's decision to avoid campaigning in competitive states. But that doesn't do much to soften frustration with what they describe as near-political malpractice by the White House, basic missteps that some blame on an insular president who they say takes advice from aides with little campaign experience. “Folks are beginning to scapegoat and second guess, but there are plenty of reasons to do that,” said strategist Jim Manley, a former aide to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. “President Obama doesn't like to get his hands dirty. He seemingly floats above it all.”
Because everybody knows that drunk pieces of a-waste-of-human-flesh will vote democrat if only a friend will tell them where in the heck the voting booth is.
Senate Democratic Officials Start Lashing Out at White House
"The ineptitude of the White House political operation has sunk from annoying to embarrassing," said one Democratic Senate strategist.
As the relationship between the White House and Senate Democrats hit a new low, the democrats are running for the hills as far away from Obama as they can get. . . hoping the voter fraud will get them into office.
As the relationship between the White House and Senate Democrats hit a new low, the democrats are running for the hills as far away from Obama as they can get. . . hoping the voter fraud will get them into office.
The White House is now making dumber errors than how they handle the issues, or the inability to keep fence jumpers off the White House lawn. Now, they are calling Senators, "Governors."
"The ineptitude of the White House political operation has sunk from annoying to embarrassing," one senior Senate Democratic aide told National Journal. Another Senate official told the Washington Post that Obama's comments were "not devised with any input from Senate leadership."
Democrats are growing increasingly pessimistic about their chances of holding onto the Senate, with most close races trending in the GOP's direction in a nationalized political environment. Republicans are now in position to net more than the six seats necessary to take the majority.
President Obama hasn't been invited to campaign in any battleground Senate races, with the exception of Michigan, where Democrats have long held a comfortable lead. Instead, he's spent most of his time headlining fundraisers for the Democratic campaign committees.
Democrats are growing increasingly pessimistic about their chances of holding onto the Senate, with most close races trending in the GOP's direction in a nationalized political environment. Republicans are now in position to net more than the six seats necessary to take the majority.
President Obama hasn't been invited to campaign in any battleground Senate races, with the exception of Michigan, where Democrats have long held a comfortable lead. Instead, he's spent most of his time headlining fundraisers for the Democratic campaign committees.
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
No comments:
Post a Comment