The question is, why did this gym revoke a transsexual's membership for being in its women's lockerroom? I mean, this was a "former man" who underwent "gender reassignment" and is now a "woman," right? So if "she" has a choice of only two lockerrooms, would "she" not choose the women's lockerroom? I don't get it.
Oh, wait, I got that backwards, it's the genuine woman who complained about the tranny being in the women's lockerroom who got tossed out. That makes perfect sense:
It’s a business that sells itself on being non-judgmental but Planet Fitness has allegedly revoked the membership of a woman for complaining. Yvette Cormier, a member at the Midland location, says she had no idea what that meant until a few days ago.
“I was stunned and shocked. He looked like a man.. He did not look like a woman,” Cormier said. Cormier is talking about a transgender woman who walked into the woman’s locker room while she was getting undressed. She says she couldn’t believe her eyes.
“This is very unprofessional. This is very scary,” Cormier said.
Not knowing why the person was in the women’s locker room, Cormier said she immediately complained to the front desk and eventually to corporate offices.
“They told me the same thing, that he was allowed in there because that’s the sex he wants to be,” Cormier said.
Cormier said she understands that some men self-identify as women and some women self-identify as men, but said the person looked like a man and that caught her off guard.
The company told TV5 that Cormier’s concerns about the policy regarding gender identity was inappropriate and disruptive by complaining to other members at the gym.
Representatives with Planet Fitness issued this statement:
“Planet Fitness is committed to creating a non-intimidating, welcoming environment for our members. Our gender identity non-discrimination policy states that members and guests may use all gym facilities based on their sincere self-reported gender identity. In expressing her concerns about the policy, the member in question exhibited behavior that club management deemed inappropriate and disruptive to other members, which is a violation of the membership agreement and as a result her membership was canceled.”
Boy, my lede was a "senior moment," wasn't it? I made the bonehead mistake of assuming that it was the tranny who got the bum's rush, which would have incurred the full fury and wrath of the Lavender Lobby and likely gotten the entire Planet Fitness chain shut down in a bleepstorm of litigation. But the normal female human being, concerned for her and her daughter's safety being thrown out? She's an sexually intolerant trannyphobe, so she "deserved" it.
Evidently this particular tranny hadn't completed "hir" "gender reassignment" transition yet. Maybe that explains why s/he had a tampon around "hir" whang when s/he exited the shower. As the old saying goes, "What could possibly go wrong?"
And besides, let's be practical about this: With an estimated fifty-eight "officially" recognized genders, if each Planet Fitness had an according fifty-eight different lockerrooms, there'd be no room for any exercise areas and equipment, and each of their locations would be the size of a small shopping mall. Losing the membership fees of one "h8ter" will impact their cash flow much, much less.
Just wait until the aforementioned becomes an official federal mandate.
Exit question: Might that not conflict with Agenda 21's drive to herd us all forcibly back inside small, overcrowded urban areas? The lady with the canceled PF membership may find herself and her daughter rooming with that tranny before too much longer.
No comments:
Post a Comment