Tuesday, April 03, 2018

Constitution Class Corona: First Amendment

Instructor: Douglas V. Gibbs
 
 
 
Lesson 13
The First Amendment
 
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
 
            Freedom of Religion
 
The first part of the 1st Amendment addresses religion. The frame of reference of the Founding Fathers was Europe, and more specifically, England. In Europe, a movement to reform the Church began in 1517, influenced by Martin Luther's critiques of the Roman Catholic Church. The movement led to the Protestant Reformation. After the Pope denied the King of England the permission to divorce his wife, the English king created the Church of England, and established himself as head of the church, so that he may grant to himself the allowance to seek a divorce. In England the Church of England greatly influenced the centralized governmental system, and the politicians greatly influenced The Church. There was no separation between powers of the king and the church, a problem that revealed itself with the 1559 Act of Uniformity. According to the Act of Uniformity, it was illegal to not attend Church of England services. A fine was imposed for each missed Sunday and holy day. Penalties also existed if one decided to have church services not approved by the government, which included arrest, and larger fines. The problem, the Founding Fathers reasoned, was not faith in God, but the establishment of a State Church. Therefore, to protect the governmental system from the influence of religion, while also protecting the various religious sects from a government that may give preferential treatment to an established religion, the Founders determined that the federal government must not establish a state religion (Establishment Clause).
 
The second part of that clause, however, was clearly designed to protect the various religious exercises by Americans from the government by instructing government to not prohibit the free exercise of religion.
 
Freedom of religion was a big deal with those early Americans. The importance of religious freedom during that time period is common knowledge. Even the textbooks in today's public school system reveals the Pilgrims first came to the New World in search of religious freedom.
 
Through the passage of time secular forces in our society have worked to undermine the first clause of the 1st Amendment. Americans have been conditioned to believe in a concept known as the Separation of Church and State. The concept has determined the church is to have no influence, no matter how subtle, on government for any reason. Therefore, reason the secularists who support the modern concept of the separation of church and state, any mention of God in the same breath with the federal government is in direct violation of the 1st Amendment.
 
To understand the error of the concept of Separation of Church and State in today's society, we must go back and discover the origination of the idea. The truth demands we recognize the language used in the writings of the Founders, as well as grasp the history of the colonies - including a series of letters between the federal government and the Danbury Baptists of Connecticut, culminating in the letters to Thomas Jefferson after he became President of the United States after the Election of 1800.
 
Each of the colonies began as a collection of like-minded religious folk who wanted freedom for their religion (not necessarily freedom of all religions). In Jamestown, in 1610, Dales Law mandated the Jamestown colonists to attend Anglican worship. The law went so far as to have provisions against criticism of the church. Violation of Dales Law could even lead to death. The Puritan Colonies to the north had similar laws, even setting up their governments in accordance with Puritan Law. Connecticut was one of those Puritan Colonies, and in 1639 the colony enacted "The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut." The law set Connecticut up as a theocracy, disallowing non-Puritans from holding office. The government was the church, and the church was the government.
 
The practice of religious preference was not limited to Connecticut. All of the States enforced established religions, except Pennsylvania and Rhode Island.
 
Though Pennsylvania was largely a Quaker dominated State, William Penn believed that religion should be free from state control, so Pennsylvania did not persecute non-Quakers. However, in Pennsylvania, in order to hold office, you still had to be a Christian.
 
Rhode Island, founded in 1636 as a colony, was based on the principle of true religious liberty, and took in folks who were trying to escape the religious persecution of the other colonies.
 
Connecticut's Puritan dominated landscape included a group of Baptists in Danbury, Connecticut who were tired of being treated like second class citizens.
 
Thomas Jefferson drafted the Virginia Act For Establishing Religious Freedom in Virginia, and with James Madison's assistance, finally got it enacted into law in 1786. After many letters to President Adams that resulted in no assistance, the Danbury Baptists were excited about Jefferson winning the presidential election in 1800. Finally, they would have someone in office who would help them in their fight for religious freedoms in Connecticut.
 
The Danbury Baptists wrote to Jefferson to congratulate him for his win, and to appeal to him for help. Thomas Jefferson responded with a letter that carries the line, "a wall of separation between church and state," which has become the source from which the infamous concept of Separation of Church and State was eventually derived.
 
The Founding Fathers desired that Americans be free to worship as they wished, without being compelled by government through an established religion. The key, however, is that they not only did not want the federal government compelling a person through laws regarding religion, but the government shall not "prohibit the free exercise thereof."
 
Thomas Jefferson, as indicated in his letter to the Danbury Baptists, and his other writings, was against the government establishing a "State Church." However, he also believed that men should be free to exercise their religion as they deem fit, and not be forced to follow a government mandate that may prohibit religion.
 
The Danbury Baptists were concerned over local religious freedoms, but Jefferson was clear, the federal government could not mandate anything in regards to religion. It is a State issue, and the Danbury Baptists needed to address the issue themselves through their State government. Jefferson's reference to a wall of separation was an explanation that the federal government cannot prohibit the free exercise of religion for any reason, including on public grounds, but if a State was to prohibit the free exercise of religion, or establish a state church, it was an issue that must be resolved at the State level.
 
            Freedom of Speech and Freedom of the Press
 
The point of including in the Bill of Rights the freedom of speech, and of the press, was specifically designed to protect political speech, though other speech is protected by this clause as well. The Founding Fathers believed that freedom hinged on the freedoms of political speech and the press. Benjamin Franklin wrote in the Pennsylvania Gazette, April 8, 1736, regarding the American doctrine behind freedom of speech and of the press:
 
"Freedom of speech is a principal pillar of a free government; when this support is taken away, the constitution of a free society is dissolved, and tyranny is erected on its ruins. Republics and limited monarchies derive their strength and vigor from a popular examination into the action of the magistrates."
 
James Madison in 1799 wrote, "In every State, probably, in the Union, the press has exerted a freedom in canvassing the merits and measures of public men of every description which has not been confined to the strict limits of the common law."
 
            Freedom of the Right of the People To Peaceably Assemble, and to Petition the Government for a Redress of Grievances
 
The right to peaceably assemble means that citizens may peacefully parade and gather, and demonstrate support or opposition of public policy. This part of the 1st Amendment is closely tied to Freedom of Speech, guaranteeing one's ability to express one's views by freedom of speech and the right to peaceably assemble.
 
The need to protect the right to peaceably assemble was not a new concept during the Constitutional Convention. Before the Bill of Rights, the Declaration and Resolves of the First Continental Congress declared on October 14, 1774:
 
The inhabitants of the English colonies in North-America, by the immutable laws of nature, the principals of the English constitution, and the several charters or compacts, have the following rights: They have a right peaceably to assemble, consider their grievances, and petition the king: and that all prosecutions, prohibitory proclamations, and commitments for the same are illegal.
 
In 1776, Pennsylvania's declaration of rights guaranteed peaceable assembly. Pennsylvania was the first State to recognize this right.
 
Originally, the right to assemble was considered less important than the right to petition. Now, many historians consider the two to be equally important, and to actually complement each other.
 
The Founding Fathers felt that the right to assemble, and petition the government for a redress of grievances, were important keys to protecting States' Rights, and the rights of the people, from the federal government. The need to assemble, to come together and share common beliefs and act upon those beliefs, is what began the drive for independence, and ultimately what led to the American Revolution. The right to assemble and petition the government for a redress of grievances, the Founding Fathers believed, was one of the primary tools available to the citizens in their drive to stop tyrannies before they could take hold.
 
The right to peaceable assembly provides the opportunity for all citizens to participate in America's political life and in the electoral process. A recent example of this inalienable right in action is the Tea Party Movement. The Tea Party rallies are peaceful assemblies. These rallies are protected by the Constitution when they are for a lawful purpose, are conducted in an orderly manner, and publicize some type of grievance. Many groups and organizations use assembly as a way to show support for an idea, or dispute, as characterized by the Tea Party.
Terms:
 
1559 Act of Uniformity - In Britain it was illegal not to attend Church of England services, with a fine imposed for each missed Sunday and holy day. Penalties for having unofficial services included arrest and larger fines.
 
Protestant Reformation - Movement of the Church Reform begun in 1517 that was influenced by Martin Luther's critiques of the Roman Catholic Church. The movement led to the formation of the Protestant Christian groups.
 
Separation of Church and State - Distance in the relationship between organized religion and the nation state.
 
Theocracy - Form of government in which a state is as governed by religion, or by clergy who believes they are under immediate divine guidance.
 
Questions for Discussion:
 
1. How does today's definition of the separation between church and state differ from the attitude towards religion by the Founding Fathers?
 
2. Why did the Danbury Baptists appeal to Thomas Jefferson for help?
 
3. Why do you think that the Founding Fathers believed that our freedoms hinged on the freedoms of political speech and the press?
 
4. What are examples of the people peaceably assembling in protest?
 
Resources:
 
Danbury Baptist Association's letter to Thomas Jefferson, October 7,
1801: http://www.stephenjaygould.org/ctrl/dba_jefferson.html
 
Jefferson's Final Letter to the Danbury Baptists, January 1, 1802:
http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/9806/danpre.html
 
Joseph Andrews, A Guide for Learning and Teaching The Declaration of
Independence and The U.S. Constitution - Learning from the Original Texts Using Classical Learning Methods of the Founders; San Marcos: The Center for Teaching the Constitution (2010).
 
Philip B. Kurland and Ralph Lerner, The Founder's Constitution -
Volume Five - Amendments I-XII; Indianapolis: Liberty Fund (1987).
 
The Declaration and Resolves of the First Continental Congress declared
on October 14, 1774, U.S. History dot org: http://www.ushistory.org/Declaration/related/decres.htm
 
Thomas Jefferson, The Virginia Act For Establishing Religious Freedom,
1786: http://religiousfreedom.lib.virginia.edu/sacred/vaact.html
 
Copyright 2015 Douglas V. Gibbs

Marching Invasion



By Douglas V. Gibbs
Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host

Donald Trump has done what he does.  He pushed back.  He is addressing the illegal immigration problem, and he is working on building his border wall.

The battle against the illegal alien invasion is nothing new.  In July of 2014 we, in Murrieta, stood firm and turned around buses full of illegal aliens who were ill, and prepared to be dropped off to spread through our community.

Now, the war has escalated, and Mexico is preparing to do more than fire a shot across our bow.  An invasion force of more than 1,500 aliens (if not more) is marching towards California, preparing to arrive at the US-Mexico Border in the coming days to demand refugee status.

An embedded reporter, Adolfo Flores, states the group is organized with a leader, Pueblos Sin Fronteras, and the approaching horde has received guidance and training.

The procession, so far a week old, has crossed immigration checkpoints, military bases, and police in a desperate, chaotic march toward the United States, with the specific intent of illegally entering the United States and defying federal law.  The goal is for the invasion force to be so big that immigration authorities, and any other obstacle, will not be able to do anything to stop them. 


-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Monday, April 02, 2018

Biden: Prostitution of the 2nd Amendment

By Douglas V. Gibbs
AuthorSpeakerInstructorRadio Host

Former Vice President Joe Biden says the 2nd Amendment is badly misinterpreted.  Biden claims the 2nd Amendment was not for gun ownership for everyone, or the ownership of scary, high caliber guns.  He considers the conservative Republican view of the 2nd Amendment a "prostitution" of the amendment.

Biden said, “I think the 2nd Amendment is being very badly interpreted. It’s not consistent with what they’re — our founders intended, in my view. You saw Justice John Paul Stevens say that we should — because it’s been so prostituted, we should repeal the 2nd Amendment. It was about a standing militia. It’s a long story. I won’t go into all the legal side of that having taught it in law school. But there’s rational or irrational policy.”

He added, “What’s happened here is, the nation as a whole has decided it can no longer, in my view, continue to turn a blind eye to the prostitution of the 2nd Amendment here, and no longer can turn a blind eye to the enormous damage being done, not just in our schools, but on our streets, right here in Philly and Wilmington, Delaware, where I’m from, every night.”

Standing militia?

Even the U.S. Code recognizes that the citizens at large are a part of the militia, for one.

Title 10 of the United States Code provides for both "organized" and "unorganized" civilian militias. While the organized militia is made up of members of the National Guard and Naval Militia, the unorganized militia is composed entirely of private individuals.

United States Code: Title 10 – Armed Forces
Subtitle A – General Military Law
Chapter 13 – The Militia
Sec. 311. Militia: composition and classes
**(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
**(b) The classes of the militia are -
*****(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard
and the Naval Militia; and
*****(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of
the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the
Naval Militia.


Other than age, health, gender, or citizenship, there are no additional provisions for exemption from membership in the unorganized militia.
While in the corner of my soul I have hoped it will never be called to duty, the United States civilian militia does legally exist.  That said, the possibility of the civilian militia needing to be called into action to fight against a tyrannical government exists . . . and the ability for the people to use force to "alter or abolish" (as the Declaration of Independence puts it) the government should it become tyrannical is the whole point of the 2nd Amendment.

That's the reason the argument that the AR-15 is for the purpose of killing people is a bad argument for gun control.  The purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to kill people should it be necessary to keep the American System from devolving into a tyranny.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Developing: The Rise of the Golden State Coalition

By Douglas V. Gibbs
Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host

The Republican Party has pretty much written off California.  Aside from trying to protect Mimi Walters' seat, Dana Rohrbacher's seat, and Darrell Issa's seat (and perhaps helping Kimberlin Brown Pelzer in her race), money from the GOP is not going to be spent in California.  The big wigs don't wish to throw money into what they consider to be losing causes, so candidates for governor, or other major State offices, and most of the congressional seats and all of the State legislature seats aren't going to be bothered with.

What people don't realize is that in his losing effort in California, Donald Trump earned more votes than Governor Jerry Brown did in his winning effort.  Also, if it wasn't for California, Trump may not have been elected, at all.  It was volunteers from California, the largest volunteer force in the race, calling the battleground States that moved Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin and Michigan in Trump's direction.

I am in a meeting in Garden Grove right now for a group calling themselves the Golden State Coalition.  The united candidates under the calling God has on our lives is, so far, Travis Allen (for governor), Paul Taylor (for Senate), Mark Meuser (for Secretary of State), David Hernandez (for Lt. Governor), Edwin Duterte (for Congress) and Kimberlin Brown Pelzer (for Congress).

I will keep you posted as this coalition advances, and grows. . .

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Chinese Space Station falls to Earth

By Douglas V. Gibbs
Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host

According to the Daily Mail:

Chinese space station smashes to Earth at 17,000mph off the coast of Tahiti: Nine-ton installation the size of a school bus comes crashing into the atmosphere in a huge fireball and just misses tropical paradise


  • - The defunct Chinese space station Tiangong-1 re-entered the atmosphere over the South Pacific on Monday
  • - Craft re-entered the atmosphere around 8.15am Beijing time and 'vast majority' had burnt up upon re-entry
  • - Chinese space authorities had predicted it would re-enter off the Brazilian coast in the South Atlantic 
  • - Scientists monitoring the craft's disintegrating orbit said it posed only the slightest of risks to people
  • - Analysis from the Beijing Aerospace Control Center showed it had mostly burned up 

According to Sky News:

China's Tiangong-1 space module has re-entered the Earth's atmosphere and broken up over the South Pacific.
The "vast majority" of the defunct space lab burnt up on re-entry, which occurred at 1.15am UK time, China's Manned Space Engineering Office said.
It had originally said that the space station was expected to re-enter off the coast of Brazil in the South Atlantic, near the cities of Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.
The US Joint Force Space Component Command (JFSCC) also confirmed the spacecraft had re-entered the atmosphere over the southern Pacific after coordinating with counterparts in the UK, Europe, Asia and Australia.
Tiangong-1, which translates to "Heavenly Palace 1", was sent into orbit in 2011 for experiments as part of China's space programme.

Tiangong-1 is no more.

China's prototype space station, whose name translates as "Heavenly Palace 1," met a fiery end in Earth's atmosphere today (April 1), breaking apart and burning up in the skies over the southern Pacific Ocean at about 8:16 p.m. EDT (0016 April 2 GMT), according to the U.S. Strategic Command's Joint Force Space Component Command (JFSCC).

Some pieces of the school-bus-size Tiangong-1 almost certainly survived the fall, but the odds that they caused any damage or injury are extremely small: You had a less than 1-in-1-trillion chance of getting hit by a flaming chunk of the heavenly palace, according to experts with the Aerospace Corporation.

Tiangong-1 was about 34 feet long by 11 feet wide (10.4 by 3.4 meters), and it weighed more than 9 tons (8 metric tons). The space lab consisted of two main parts: an "experimental module" that housed visiting astronauts and a "resource module" that accommodated Tiangong-1's solar-energy and propulsion systems.

The craft launched without anyone aboard on Sept. 29, 2011, to an orbit about 217 miles (350 kilometers) above Earth. That's slightly lower than the orbit of the much larger International Space Station, whose average altitude is 250 miles (400 km). Tiangong-1's main mission was to help China master the technologies required to assemble and operate a bona-fide space station in Earth orbit, a goal the nation aims to achieve by the early 2020s, the country has said.

On Nov. 2, 2011, the robotic Shenzhou-8 spacecraft visited Tiangong-1, executing China's first-ever orbital docking. Another big milestone came in June 2012, when a crew of three spaceflyers linked their Shenzhou-9 vehicle to the heavenly palace and came aboard for a spell.

Three more "taikonauts," or Chinese astronauts, visited in June 2013, traveling on the Shenzhou-10 spacecraft. Each of these crewed missions lasted about two weeks.

Tiangong-1's design lifetime was just two years.

Tiangong-1's successor, Tiangong-2, launched to Earth orbit in September 2016 and hosted three visiting astrpnauts a month later. And a robotic vessel called Tianzhou-1 rendezvoused with Tiangong-2 a few months later, performing several automated docking and refueling operations from April 2017 to September 2017.

The largest craft ever to come down at least partially uncontrolled is NASA's 100-ton (91 metric tons) space shuttle Columbia, which broke apart as it was returning to Earth on Feb. 1, 2003, killing all seven astronauts aboard. An investigation later pinned the cause of the disaster on a piece of foam insulation from Columbia's external fuel tank, which broke off and punched a hole in the heat shield on the orbiter's left wing during launch, two weeks before the tragedy.


-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Sunday, April 01, 2018

Murrieta Regionalism Vote: Tuesday

By Douglas V. Gibbs
Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host

Fight Regionalism and keep Cap and Trade from rearing its ugly and destructive head in Murrieta.

While I will not be able to attend due to teaching a class in Corona, I urge all of you who are not Tuesday Night students at the Corona Constitution Class to be at the Murrieta City Hall City Council Meeting1 Town Square, Murrieta, CA 92562 (Phone: (951) 304-2489) on Tuesday Night April 2 --- 6 PM to voice your opposition to a government regionalism takeover of our electricity.  (a.k.a. Community Choice Aggregate "CCA") 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E912_fUTXlM

First, it was districting, now it's regionalism.  What's coming next?

Wait, we know.  They are also looking into raising local sales tax.  But, that's a battle for another day.

If these liars who claim to be Republicans, but who vote like Democrats, keep it up, we may be forced to recall them.  Let's hope it doesn't come to that . . . and that begins by stopping them now.

Notice, I am not naming names.  We have an ally on the Council on most of these issues in Jonathan Igram.  He's the only one to vote against districting, and he's been a voice against California's sanctuary status.  I hope he votes against CCA as well, as I believe he will.  The question is, are the rest of the turncoats willing to stop collectivist ideas like CCA, or are they the Marxist anti-localism knuckleheads that I believe them to be?

Be there on Tuesday.  Demand that the Murrieta City Council votes "NO" on Community Choice Aggregate (CCA).  And if you have the chance, tell them you don't want a higher sales tax, you want them to Opt Out of Sanctuary Cities (either by ordinance, or by joining Trump's lawsuit) and for them to abide by Murrieta Law by not running for reelection after they've termed out (based on the term limits initiative approved by voters in 2010).

Oh, did I say also that we want to stop the rise in sales tax?

Thanks for your advocacy.

Doug

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

The Message of Easter and the Power of Redemption

by Douglas V. Gibbs
Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host

He is Risen!  Jesus bore the sins of the world on the cross on Calvary, and then conquered death when the stone was rolled away and he walked out of the tomb.  We celebrate at Easter that Jesus’ death was not in vain, and that He has the power to overcome death.  The resurrection of Christ gives us hope for salvation and for our own resurrection and eternal life.

http://www.togetherweteach.com/Resources/easter.htm

Matthew 26-28
Mark 14-16
Luke 22-24
John 17-21
Matthew 26
The Plot Against Jesus
Jesus Anointed Bethany
Judas Agrees Betray Jesus
The Lord's Supper
Jesus Predict Peter Denial
 
Jesus Arrested
Before the Sanhedrin
Peter Disowns Jesus
Mark 14
Jesus Anointed at Bethany 
The Lord's Supper
Jesus Predict Peter Denial
 
Jesus Arrested
Before the Sanhedrin
Peter Disowns Jesus
Luke 22
Judas Agrees Betray Jesus
The Last Supper
Jesus Prays Mt. of Olives
 
Jesus Arrested
Peter Disowns Jesus
Guards Mock Jesus
Jesus Before Pilate/Herod
John 17
Jesus Prays for Himself
Jesus Prays for Disciples
Jesus Prays for All Believers

****
John 18
Jesus Arrested
Jesus Taken to Annas
Peter's First Denial
High Priest Questions Jesus
Peter's 2nd and 3rd Denials
Jesus Before Pilate
****
****
****
****
Matthew 27
Judas Hangs Himself
Jesus Before Pilate
Soldiers Mock Jesus
The Crucifixion
Death of Jesus
Burial of Jesus
Guard at the Tomb
Mark 15
Jesus Before Pilate
Soldiers Mock Jesus
The Crucifixion
Death of Jesus
Burial of Jesus
Luke 23
Jesus Before Pilate/Herod
The Crucifixion
Jesus' Death
Jesus Burial
John 19
Jesus Sentenced to Crucified
The Crucifixion
The Death of Jesus
The Burial of Jesus
****
****
****
****
Matthew 28
The Resurrection
The Guard's Report
The Great Commission
Mark 16
The Resurrection
Luke 24
The Resurrection
On the Road to Emmaus
Jesus Appears to Disciples
The Ascension
John 20
The Empty Tomb
Jesus Appears to Mary Magdalene
Jesus Appears to His Disciples
Jesus Appears to Thomas

****
John 21
Jesus Miraculous Catch of Fish
Jesus Reinstates Peter
****
****
****
****
Acts 1
Jesus Taken to Heaven
Matthias Replace Judas
Acts 2
Holy Spirit at Pentecost
Peter Addresses Crowd
The Fellowship of Believers
****

Psalm 73:26 - My flesh and my heart may fail, but God is the strength of my heart and my portion forever.

Isaiah 40:29 - He gives strength to the weary and increases the power of the weak.

Isaiah 40:31 - But those who hope in the Lord will renew their strength.  They will soar on wings like eagles; they will run and not grow weary, they will walk and not be faint.

Philippians 4:13 - I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me.

2 Timothy 1:7 - For the Spirit God gave us does not make us timid, but gives us power, love and self-discipline.

Proverbs 22:4 - So do not fear, for I am with you; do not be dismayed, for I am your God.  I will strengthen you and help you; I will uphold you with my righteous right hand.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Easter Morning

By Douglas V. Gibbs
Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host

Happy Easter.

Yesterday, after my radio program ended, a listener contacted me and complained my show is too Christian.

Really?

"Well," she said, "you are limiting your audience."

First of all, I am not ashamed of my Christianity.  Second, I believe if I was to try to silence my Christianity on my radio program it would lose me listeners, not gain them.

Then again, it seems like not too long ago Newsweek proclaimed we are no longer a Christian nation.

We no longer call Easter Vacation by its name.  Now it's "Spring Break."

Easter has become more about egg hunts, candy, and bunnies.  Isn't Easter supposed to be about the Resurrection of Jesus?  Or, is that too Christian?

Benjamin Franklin said that "Only a virtuous society is capable of freedom." 

If we are not Godly, how can we maintain our liberty?

Easter is about Jesus being crucified and risen again from the dead, and the very fact that there are those who consider believing that to be the case is being "too Christian" is exactly what is wrong with our culture.  We are in a culture war.  If we are not a Godly country, we cannot maintain liberty, and we are not capable of the Constitution.  The opposition, the purveyors of Godless leftism, understand that, and that is why they are intent upon killing God in our society.

I realize that in these troubled times it is sometimes difficult to keep our eyes on the Lord. Easter, however, is one of those days out of the year that many folks who would not normally look to Christ decide to come to church and worship Him. Some folks are full of faith, and are regular attenders, and that is great as well.

Whether you go to church, or not, it is important that we remember what Easter is all about.

Easter is an opportunity to remember His sacrifice.

The wages of sin are death.  The payment for sin is the spilling of blood.  That is why the Jews once sacrificed animals on an alter.

Jesus became that flawless lamb.  The sacrifice for the sin of the world.  And when that moment came, the burden of His sacrifice was so great that the human in him called out, "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me."

He was beaten.  The bloodied body of Jesus was hung mercilessly on a Roman cross on Calvary.  His body had been battered, and shredded by the beatings that came before he carried his own cross to Calvary.  Jesus had been betrayed by one of His own for 30 pieces of silver.  Peter had denied Him three times.  Then, during His crucifixion, a Roman soldier thrust his spear into Jesus Christ’s side, and out of the wound flowed the water of His blood.

When the beating heart of Jesus Christ ceased, the assumption was that His life had ended.  It was assumed that the end of Christ came upon the world on the hill of Calvary.

Imagine the surprise of the disciples when they found an angel waiting for them with good news. The angel said, "Do not be alarmed. You seek Jesus of Nazareth, who was crucified. He is risen! He is not here. See the place where they laid Him." (Mark 16:6 NKJV).

They thought He was dead, yet this angel had proclaimed He Lived.

Jesus Christ's death and resurrection means that we as believers do not have to fear death.  As Billy Graham would say, "I am only passing through this life."

Our home is beyond this place.  This is only a temporary part of our journey.

It can be hard for us to accept that our bodies are wearing out, and that death is on the horizon. However, the Bible says we will have new bodies one day. "And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the first fruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body." (Romans 8:23 KJV).

He is the resurrection and the life, and if we believe in Him, we shall die a physical death, yet shall we live.

Happy Easter, and God Bless.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Romans Road

Posted by Douglas V. Gibbs
Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host

Romans Road is a selection of Bible verses taken from the book of Romans presenting the plan of salvation through faith in Jesus Christ.  The preamble of Romans Road is

John 3:16 King James Version (KJV) - For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

With Easter upon us, let's travel down Romans Road so that we may fully understand the Sacrifice Jesus made for Us:
✞ Romans 3:10 KJV  – As it is written: There is none righteous, no, not one;
 Romans 3:23 KJV  – For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
 Romans 5:12 KJV  – Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:
 Romans 6:23 KJV  – For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
 Romans 5:8 KJV  – But God commendeth His love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.
 Romans 10:13 KJV  – For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
 Romans 10:9-10 KJV  – That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised Him from the dead, you shalt be saved. For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness: and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.



-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary