Friday, October 25, 2013

Hard Starboard Radio: The ObamaCare Clock Is Ticking



ObamaCare advertising is ‘bro’-ken beyond repair; More people have lost insurance than have enrolled; the web portal won't be "up and running" for months, and probably years, if ever; so at what point will Democrats start peeling away in droves towards delaying ObamaCare?  And should not Republicans at that point shake their Ted Cruz death-heads, grin diabolically, and exclaim, "No, not delay, not defund - REPEAL!"?

Join us at 6PM Eastern/3PM Pacific.  We do so enjoy that renowned Tholian punctuality.

Mike Reagan: Don't Delay ObamaCare, Let It "Crash and Burn"

by JASmius

Sound advice, from beginning to end......





You see, it was not, nor was it ever, that Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, et al were wrong - they were spot on target about ObamaCare.  It's what the entire Right has been full-throatedly shouting from the rooftops for the past four years.  Their only errors were in pulling the confrontation trigger too soon and being unable to accept the according criticism for it.

As I've said here before, it is human nature that people don't truly learn a lesson other than the hard way.  A man can be told something over and over and over again, but until he experiences it for himself, he won't internalize it.  As Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn put it, "When it happens to you, you'll know it's true."  Such was the case with ObamaCare.  A narrow majority of the public has consistently been against it, but that didn't prevent a narrow majority from re-electing Barack Obama, either.  That clearly suggests that while public opposition was widespread, it wasn't deep-seeded.  Ditto the greater unpopularity of a government shutdown than of O-Care itself.

No, the only way to truly turn the public against the ACA to Cruzian fervor was for it to take effect.  Now that we're nearly a month into it and more people have lost their coverage than have been able to enroll at gob-smackingly higher premium rates, drawing withering public ridicule to accompany burgeoning public anger, the ground is rapidly ripening for the kind of public backing for jettisoning of ObamaCare, and the Democrat Party along with it, that such a public campaign requires.  And another dual opportunity awaits come January 15th and Febuary 7th.

The Tea Party and the GOP "establishment" have a "platinum plan" opportunity to "shoot the moon" on the entire healthcare issue.  They would both be well advised to stop bashing each other and avail themselves of it.  They will not get another one.

Japan 7.3 Earthquake

By Douglas V. Gibbs

A magnitude 7.3 earthquake has hit the Fukushima region of Japan, according to the US Geological Service.  This is the same region of 2011's nuclear plant disaster.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Tea Teams

by JASmius

You gotta love the Navy SEAL analogy - though that also needs a little fleshing out, methinks, to assess its viability.....




Broken Republican Party?

By Douglas V. Gibbs

We often hear the disgruntled folks out there say that there is no difference between the two political parties in the United States. Some of those folks that question the current political atmosphere say the two-party political system is broken, and with the moderate establishment in possession of the GOP leadership positions, the Republican Party is broken beyond repair.  Any positive words about the Elephant Brand of Politics then brands you as the enemy to these people, and you are automatically considered to be a part of the problem.

On the other side of the coin, we have those that say our only hope is the Party of the Elephant, and that any battle within the Grand Ol' Party compromises any hope we have of stopping the hard left agenda of the Democrats.  The Art of War says that we have to carefully pick our battles, and that often a "wait and see" attitude can be more beneficial than a full frontal assault by a bunch of amateur TEA Party enthusiasts.

I lie somewhere in the center of the argument, not necessarily a big fan of the Red State Coalition of conservatives and libertarians that want to discard the Republican Party and replace it with a third party, but also not necessarily a big fan of all things "Republican" as well.  Party leadership has wavered, and compromised, and moved away from the overall "small government" platform the establishment claims to embrace.  When conservatives like Senator Ted Cruz takes a stance, and opposes the liberals as he said he would do when he campaigned for office, the progressives of the Republican Party are quick to target him, and verbally admonish him.  We have a serious problem in the party.  The Republicans have lost sight of their direction, because two factions are pulling the party in opposite directions, and they are willing to go at each other like ravenous wolves to gain control of the Republican Party's reins.

Should the GOP become more like their opposition in the hopes of gaining voters that float around in the middle of the political spectrum, or chase the conservative chalice that promises renewed life and longevity if only we are willing to have the intestinal fortitude to remain on course as the fiery darts are launched at us from academia, the media, and the establishment?

When Ronald Reagan uttered his eleventh commandment about not speaking ill of fellow republicans, did he mean it in a collectivist way where we are supposed to say nothing even as progressives gain control and steer the massive elephant towards a cliff?

An avid listener of my Constitution Radio program on KCAA AM 1050, and KCAAradio.com, on Saturdays at 2:00 pm Pacific wrote me a searing email, and proposed a challenge to me.  He made reference to a statement I had made in response to a question on the air about the difference between the two American political parties.  He wrote, "You made the claim republicans are for small government, and I ask you to show me one year from the Great Depression until now the republicans proposed a smaller budget from the previous year or years, excluding the Reagan Years. Either you educate or you propagate?"

The question was supposed to be a "gotcha" question that corners me and forces me to admit one thing, or another.  However, the writer's failure to recognize proper definitions neutralized the intended impact of his question.  He wants me to admit the Republican Party is broken, and in a sense, it is, but the moment to turn our backs on the Republican Party as the best vessel to defeat modern liberalism is not upon us just yet.

To respond to my reader, and correct his premise, we must remember that the definition of small government is not necessarily a smaller budget, though that may be the result.  Small government is not necessarily "less" as must as it is "what is authorized."

When I ran for Murrieta City Council in 2010, after a debate an audience member walked up to me and said, "You say you are for small government.  If elected, what do you plan to take away?  Parks?  The Senior Center?"

The question confused me, at first.  Then, I realized that his question was based on his idea of the definition of small government.  The whole premise of his question was wrong because his definition of small government, and my definition of small government, were two different things.

Small government, or limited government, is a government that remains within the authorities granted to it. Though the GOP is guilty of acting outside constitutional authorities, when compared to the Democrats, they have promoted smaller government more than the liberals of the Democrat Party.  The federal government is authorized to handle external issues, and a number of others, that are enumerated in the Constitution.  The ideal small government would be one that restrains itself, only acting upon the authorities granted to it by the Constitution.

I agree, the Republican Party is not a pure small government model.  The GOP has fallen way short of where they should be, but for the most part, the Republicans have been more in line with smaller government than the Democrats. Yes, yes, they still have a long way to go to get back to where they need be, and jerks like the moderates, and progressives, in the party are largely the problem.  Big government supporters definitely reside among the ranks of the Republican Party.  Those people, in fact, are largely the ones that control the party, having assumed the various leadership positions of the political party.  However, there are still some in the party that keep trying to bump the party back to the right, towards small government. And until the GOP collapses and is replaced with something better, it is what we have to work with.

That does not mean the Republican Party is broken.  The party is in the midst of a battle for the soul of the GOP, however, and with the help of the media, and Democrat Party establishment, the conservatives of the Republican Party are currently at a disadvantage.

I get it that there are people who think our governmental system has been compromised beyond repair. I agree to a point, that the America that once was in line with the U.S. Constitution has been forced out of existence, and we are poised to head in a direction that could compromise liberty in America for a very long time.  But I never believe there is no hope. I am an optimist. Even if only one person is left that believes in liberty, there is hope. Our system may have to hit rock bottom to rise again.  Perhaps.  I hope that is not the case with the United States, but I don't count that possibility out, either.

I hope for the best, and prepare for the worst.

We aren't broken yet, but the weary troops of the conservative right are on the verge of giving up. They are tired of the fight, and the continuous onslaught by leftism.  The battle to return us to the principles of the Constitution is a difficult one, but right now is not the time to give up, or give in.  The Republican Party, despite all of its current flaws, and infestation of progressives, remains our best vehicle for turning this all around.  If we can manage to turn around the GOP, the country will follow.

We must continue to fight the good fight, or we will surely become subjects again, as were the colonists before the Revolutionary War.  We must fight on our feet, or we will surely live on our knees.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Lights in the Ocean

By Douglas V. Gibbs

Upon first glance of the satellite image of the South Atlantic Ocean off the coast of South America, the formation of lights looks like the result of some unnatural phenomenon.  Conspiracy theorists and alien hunters would surely marvel at the scene if there was no logical explanation for it.  The answer, however, is more shocking than the silly speculations that could easily arise.

The lights, captured by Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite on the Suomi NPP satellite, are actually a large collection of squid fishermen.

NASA
explains, "There are no human settlements there, nor fires or gas wells. But there are an awful lot of fishing boats."

According to Yahoo! News, the night fishermen are hunting for Illex argentinus, a species of short-finned squid that forms the second largest squid fishery on the planet. The squid are found tens to hundreds of kilometers offshore from roughly Rio de Janeiro to Tierra del Fuego (22 to 54 degrees South latitude). They live 80 to 600 meters (250 to 2,000 feet) below the surface, feeding on shrimp, crabs, and fish. In turn, Illex are consumed by larger finfish, whales, seals, sea birds, penguins ... and humans.

Fishermen use the powerful lights, "generating as much as 300 kilowatts of light per boat," to draw the plankton and fish that the squid eat toward the surface.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Soros Joins 'Ready For Hillary' Team - For What It's Worth

by JASmius

And that ain't much:

Liberal billionaire investor George Soros kicked in $25,000 to Ready for Hillary, the super PAC organizing support for a possible 2016 presidential run by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Politico reported Thursday.

Soros will be co-chair of the group's national finance council, Soros' political director Michael Vachon said in an emailed statement.

"George Soros is delighted to join more than 1 million Americans in supporting Ready for Hillary," Vachon said. "His support for Ready for Hillary is an extension of his long-held belief in the power of grass-roots organizing."

Talking Points Memo reported the finance group is working to persuade the former first lady to run for president.

Lotsa luck with that, Georgie.  Because there are several reasons why Hillary Clinton will never, EVER get back to the Oval Office as its official occupant.

First and foremost is that I firmly believe that Barack Obama will contrive some sort of crisis to affect a coup de tat and suspend the Constitution, more specifically both Article II Section 1 and the 22nd Amendment, and without explicitly saying so, declare himself president-for-life.  His existing baseline of serial violations of the Constitution creates ample precedent for such a thing, and there's no restraining factor I can think of that would dissuade him from it, given his un-American upbringing, stupendous narcissism, and delusions of godhood.  And thus, there won't be a 2016 election.

But if there is, Hillary still has no shot at it.  Two overriding factors rule it out.

1) She's in the wrong party.  Which is to say, if Hillary is counting on the Clinton "brand" - itself staler than Lindsey Lohan's virtue - to pave the way for the coronation that got so rudely interrupted five years ago, the Democrat Party does not and has never gone in for that sort of dynasticism.  Even the Kennedy clan only managed to elevate one of its number to the presidency (Sirhan Sirhan's bullets kept us from finding out for certain in Bobby Kennedy's case, but Teddy couldn't even unseat a crumbling Jimmy Carter).  It doesn't matter how much she thinks it's her "turn," that just isn't how the Donk nominating culture works.  As she should know, as that was precisely the mindset that sent her husband to the White House in the first place.

The Democrats are all about the "white knight," the young, dynamic, charismatic demagogue, promising "a better way," a "new era," "hope and change," and....well, you get the idea.  And, of course, every single time it's just crass propaganda manipulation, as after the "white knight" sweeps to power with coattails longer than Princess Di's bridal train, they inevitably start "adjusting" all those grandiose promises into sneering double-crosses, and what emerges is the same old leftism that doesn't work, divides and impoverishes the country, and....well, you get the idea.

In the modern era it recurs on a sixteen-year cycle: JFK in 1960, Jimmy Carter in 1976, Bill Clinton in 1992, and Barack Obama in 2008.  Which would mean Julian Castro, probably, will come slouching towards the ballot box to be born in 2024, if only for his surname alone.  It's awfully difficult to see where a "first woman president" who's highly bereft of youth, dynamism, or charisma would fit into that template.

I suppose that wouldn't preclude Mrs. Clinton getting nominated in 2016 - witness John Kerry in '04 - but given that she'd be dragging around more baggage than Gladys Thornapple on Clearance Day, it certainly would preclude her from getting elected.

2) Rauch's Rule, or "The Law of 14":

As every grocer knows, many products have sell-by dates. Bread lasts a day or two, milk maybe a week. Well, presidential aspirants have a sell-by date, too. They last 14 years.

Herewith, Rauch's Rule. Actually, it was pointed out to me by a young political genius named -- but I can't tell you his name, because he works in a government job and asked me to keep his name out of my article. Sadly, I must myself take credit for the Law of 14:

With only one exception since the presidency of Theodore Roosevelt, no one has been elected president who took more than 14 years to climb from his first major elective office to election as either president or vice president.

George W. Bush took six years. Bill Clinton, 14. George H.W. Bush, 14 (to the vice presidency). Ronald Reagan, 14. Jimmy Carter, six. Richard Nixon, six (to vice president). John Kennedy, 14. Dwight Eisenhower, zero. Harry Truman, 10 (to vice president). Franklin Roosevelt, four. Herbert Hoover, zero. Calvin Coolidge, four. Warren Harding, six. Woodrow Wilson, two. William Howard Taft, zero. Theodore Roosevelt, two (to vice president). The one exception: Lyndon Johnson's 23 years from his first House victory to the vice presidency.

Wait a minute: zero? Right. The rule is a maximum, not a minimum. Generals and other famous personages can go straight to the top. But if a politician first runs for some other major office, the 14-year clock starts ticking.

"Major office" means governorship, Congress, or the mayoralty of a big city: elective posts that, unlike offices such as lieutenant governor or state attorney general, can position their holder as national contender. Bill Clinton became Arkansas attorney general in 1976, but his clock began ticking when he won the governorship two years later. Had he not won the presidency in 1992, his national career would have been over.

Updating that baseline, Barack Obama took four years (and won), John McCain took twenty-six years (and lost), and Mitt Romney took ten years (and, allegedly, lost).  As Rauch himself concedes, it's not an airtight axiom, but its a strong rule of thumb.

When applied to Hillary Clinton, we find that her "Rauch window" closes two years before she could run again in 2016, measuring from when she was elected to the Senate in 2000.  I've always measured from when she first became "co-president" in 1992, which is why I always thought she should have challenged Dubya in 2004 if she was going to run at all.  Waiting until 2008 closed that window, and we saw how that turned out.  By that yardstick she'd be at twenty-four years, so by whatever measure, she'd got hair growing out of her in very embarrassing locations.

There is one more very powerful reason why Hillary Clinton will never be president and most likely not even the nominee of O's party:





Do even the Dems want to slog through two years of that just to sate this old hag's sense of aggrieved entitlement?  I seriously doubt it.

Thursday, October 24, 2013

Kicking The Tiger

by JASmius

How long will the US military tolerate the abuse that Washington DC heaps upon them?





The most intolerable abuse of all?  Making the Marines look like the Kamino clone army in Chef Boyardee hats.

I can't help but wonder if Bill's lack of specificity in what he's actually suggesting the military do via-a-vie The One is all that hot an idea.  Is this just generalized venting or is he really urging a real life Seven Days In May?  Not to be a buzzkill (again), but wouldn't that breathe life into every cheap, paranoid uberleft propaganda stereotype Donks vomited out throughout the Bush presidency?  Or is it a case of, "Act now before the United States Armed Forces finish transforming into the Western Red (or, rather, Lavender) Army?"

Please clarify this, Bill.  Because if there's one thing a Boyardeeavore hates, it's uncertainty.

Temecula Constitution Class: Income Tax

Constitution Class tonight at 6:30 at Faith Armory in Temecula. . .

-12-

The Progressive Era


12.1 - Income Tax and the Federal Reserve

Income Tax

The income tax was never supposed to come into existence.  The Founding Fathers prohibited direct taxes in Article I, Section 9, Clause 4 of the U.S. Constitution, and the proposed amendment was never expected to be ratified by the States.

Progressivism was on the rise in the United States around the turn of the 20th Century.  Americans were concerned about the large national debt that remained with the United States as a result of the Spanish-American War, and the growing social inequality between the rich and the poor.  The idea that there should be a tax that “soaks the rich” began to take root among progressives of both major parties.  The Democrats took to progressivism more than the Republican Party, and the liberals of the Democrat Party were looking for a way to embarrass the conservative arm of the GOP so that they could gain some traction in the next election.

With social unrest rising among the population, a democrat proposed The Bailey Bill with the express hope the Republicans would reject it.  The theory was that after the Republicans rejected the bill, the democrats could then point a finger at the Republicans, claiming for political purposes that the Republicans were in cahoots with the corrupt wealthy corporate types, and their rejection of the Bailey Bill, which would have imposed an income tax on the rich, was proof of such an alignment between the Republicans and the wealthy.

The conservative Republicans knew what the progressives of the Democrat Party were up to, and launched a counter move.  They proposed a constitutional amendment that would impose an income tax on the rich, and when the States refused to ratify the amendment, the Republicans would use that failure to ratify the amendment as proof that the people, through their State legislatures, were against the idea of a new income tax.  In turn, that would defeat the Bailey Bill, for how could Congress approve an income tax against the rich through the Bailey Bill after the people and States rejected a constitutional amendment that would have done the very same thing?

The proponents of the 16th Amendment promised that if it were to be ratified (and remember, it was fully expected not to be ratified) the income tax would only be imposed on the top 5% wage earners, it would be voluntary, and it would be temporary.

The progressives of the Republican Party, however, rallied behind the proposed amendment, and the Secretary of State announced the amendment was ratified on February 12, 1913.

Progressives, satisfied the 16th Amendment was ratified, hoped to use it to tax the rich.  In the beginning, only 5% of the people were required to submit tax returns.  Many of the rich, however, avoided the tax with charitable deductions, and other creative strategies.

During World War II Franklin Delano Roosevelt saw the income tax as a way to vastly increase revenue, and initiated a policy of withholding from “all” wages and salaries, not just the highest incomes enjoyed by the rich.   Rather than the rich paying the tax at the end of the year, the tax was collected at the payroll window before it was even due to be paid by the taxpayer. This style of collection shifted the tax from its original design as a tax on the wealthy to a tax on the masses, mostly on the middle class.

In addition to violating the original intent of Article I, Section 9, the income tax also opposes the 4th Amendment which requires that a citizen’s privacy be protected.  An income tax enforced by the Internal Revenue Service violates the privacy of the home, business, personal papers and personal affairs of the private citizen.  Since the tax is based on income, the IRS has the task of making sure everyone pays his fair share. This task is physically impossible without prying into the private papers, private business and personal affairs of the individual citizens.

More amazing than the birth of the 16th Amendment in the sense of how it was simply a political ploy that was never expected to be ratified, is the fact that there is evidence that the amendment was not fully ratified.

According to some researchers, the 16th Amendment was never properly ratified by the requisite three-fourths of the states.  However, despite the failure of the States to fully ratify the amendment, Secretary of State Philander Knox fraudulently declared ratification.  Some may suggest that he did so under the urgings of wealthy bankers like J.P. Morgan.

Federal Reserve

The same year the 16th Amendment created the income tax, the federal reserve was also created.  The federal reserve is not a federal agency, and is actually a privately owned corporation owned by a secret group of international bankers.  The federal reserve holds a monopoly on the creation of money in the United States.  Whenever the U.S. Government needs money it borrows the money from the federal reserve.  The federal reserve gladly loans that money because doing so results in a good profit for the bankers.

The federal reserve is not the first central bank, but it is the longest lasting.  The first bank of the United States in 1791, created by Alexander Hamilton, became a system of control over the American economy, and was, as described by Jefferson and Madison, “an engine for speculation, financial manipulation, and corruption.”

In order to properly function, a central bank needs a collection of large sums of money from the people to pay off the interest on the money the government borrows.  The creation of the income tax provided that opportunity.

The Federal Reserve Act surrendered control of the monetary system to the international banking cartel and guaranteed the eventual abandonment of the gold standard. The Federal Reserve's debt-based money guaranteed the enslavement of every American under a crushing debt burden. The Federal Reserve guaranteed the ability of the international banking cartel to confiscate wealth through artificially created boom/bust cycles.

The result is that the U.S. Government, and the bankers in charge of the federal reserve, can manipulate the economy simply by the amount of money they decide to pump into the system.  The more currency is pumped into the system, the greater the rise of inflation rates.  A reduction of the printing of money then results in a recovering economy.  Government spending, in relation to the National Debt, has a direct impact on the economic cycles we experience.  The more the government borrows, the more fiat money is pumped into the system.  The result is increased inflation, and a stalled economy.  Cutting spending results in less money being borrowed, which then returns value to the dollar, and in turn reduces the level of inflation.

The welfare system was created to compensate for the damage caused by the Federal Reserve and the income tax.

The 16th Amendment allows for the taxation on income from whatever source derived, which gives Congress, for the most part, carte blanche to tax at will, while giving the IRS the power to do all of the things the founders specifically disallowed the federal government from doing.  This invasion of privacy, without due process, will continue as long as the 16th Amendment remains in force.

The income tax is in line with the Marxist philosophy of destroying a capitalist society by steeply graduating taxes on income and heavy levies upon the estates of people when they die.

Terms:

Bailey Bill - Income Tax introduced in April 1909 by Senator Joseph W. Bailey, a Democrat from Texas, designed to embarrass conservative Republicans when they voted against it.

Carte Blanche - Unrestricted power to act at one's own discretion; unconditional authority; derived from “blank cheque.”

Direct Taxation - A government levy on the income, property, or wealth of people or companies. A direct tax is borne entirely by the entity that pays it, and cannot be passed on to another entity.

Federal Reserve - A privately owned corporation that is owned by a secret group of international bankers.  The federal reserve holds a monopoly on the creation of money in the United States.  Whenever the U.S. Government needs money it borrows the money from the federal reserve, thus creating a national debt.

Fiat Money - Money that derives its value from government regulation or law, but is not backed by any tangible collateral; money that lacks any intrinsic value.

Inflation - A sustained, rapid increase in prices, over months or years, and mirrored in the correspondingly decreasing purchasing power of the currency.

Progressivism - Philosophy that views progress as seeking change in approaches to solving economic, social, and other problems, often through government sponsored programs.

Questions for Discussion:

1.  Why did the Founding Fathers not allow direct taxation by the Federal Government?

2.  What lesson can be learned from the story of the Bailey Bill and the passing of the 16th Amendment?

3.  Why didn’t “soaking the rich” work as hoped?

4.  Why did President Roosevelt extend the income tax to include all wages and earnings?

5.  How does the existence of Federal Reserve adversely influence our economic system?

Resources:

Abolish the Federal Reserve dot org: http://abolishthefederalreserve.org/

Bill Benson, The Law That Never Was: http://www.thelawthatneverwas.com/

Ethan Pope, America’s Financial Demise: Approaching the Point of No Return; Dallas, TX: Intersect Press (2010)

G. Edward Griffin, The Creature from Jekyll Island : A Second Look at the Federal Reserve; Appleton, WI: American Opinion Publishing (1994)

W. Cleon Skousen, History of the 16th Amendment, National Retail Sales Tax Alliance: http://www.salestax.org/library/skousen_16history.html

Hard Starboard Radio: Behold A God That Melts



All laws are oppositely named, just like the successes claimed for them; Guess who's not signing up for ObamaCare?  And neither are her pilfered puppies!; The next ObamaCare Red Line, and the ones after that; the White House's identify theft division; but relax, it's REALLY all the fault of the GOP - just ask that big-eared puddle of protoplasm.

Login in at 6PM Eastern/3PM Pacific and guzzle the whole works.  I hope it doesn't gives ya cobby wobbles.

ObamaCare Customer Service

by JASmius

A good start, GOP.  Keep it up, and keep building.....




Super Carrier USS Forrestal Scrapped for One Cent

Posted by Douglas V. Gibbs

The Navy has paid 1 cent to have the USS Forrestal, the first of the United States' supercarriers, towed from its berth in Philadelphia to Texas to be scrapped.

Read more at Philly.com

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Roger Furrer Preaches The Obamunist Gospel

by JASmius

....in NebraskaNebraska has been pestilated as well?

Oy.....

Communization Nebraska Executive Director Roger Furrer discuss social and economic injustice and more.





BTW, Communization Nebraska is a taxpayer-subsidized identity theft Navigator organization for ObamaCare.  Ready?  Altogether now on the count of three: 1....2....3....: "Well, of course they are!"  Because their identity theft information banks must have gotten stale, corrupted, and in need of updating.  Even in a gulag, it's difficult to make all the inmates sit precisely still for years on end - though not in a cemetery.

Good thing Nebraska is flat; that should make it easier to mass-fumigate.

Exit question: What do these animals do after there's no more wealth to redistribute?  Slave labor doesn't produce any.  Wouldn't it have to come from those who've already stolen it?

Grayson's Profuse, Groveling Apology

by JASmius

....will not be forthcoming for this.  Or for continuing to breathe, which is arguably the bigger offense.

How did this asshole get back in Congress again?





Exit question: If She-Man tells you you went too far, is that a moment for internal reflection or the ultimate validation?

Dean: The Blame For The ObamaCare Disaster In Three Letters: GOP

by JASmius

I don't know about you, but I've kind of missed Chairman How.  There's been all too little YEEEEAAARRRRGGGHHH in our national life these last few interminable years:





"Democrats looking for accountability"; is that anything like Miley Cyrus looking for her virginity?  I think the word MSNBCCCP headline editors were looking for was "scapegoats".  Or they would have been if they'd been undergoing a veracity fit.

My favorite two Captain Ed observations:

First we have to blame the party that (a) didn’t cast a single vote in favor of the ACA and (b) had no control over its 42-month rollout?  At which stage in the process do we hold responsible the people who spent $400 million in three and a half years, and who assured everyone all along the way that things were going swimmingly?
....aaaaaand.....

Dean suggests that the White House should have built regional systems rather than national systems in order to make the process less complicated.  How exactly would that have helped? HHS couldn’t even build one system that connects the consumers to the insurers and the IRS properly, but they could have built four or five simultaneously?


But my favorite is Dr. Demented's open, dripping, contemptuous disdain for the very notion of state sovereignty, exercised by three dozen of the states in simply refusing to follow O's orders and set up state exchanges.  You have to admit, it is classic Deano.

I'll leave you with a vid of Florida Donk Senator Bill Nelson, whose punchline comment needs no caption.....


video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player

World War II Plane Crash Kills Two

By Douglas V. Gibbs

Yesterday, a World War II-era P-51 Mustang airplane crashed in shallow water near Galveston, Texas, killing the two people on board.

The plane went down in water about four feet deep.

The plane was operated by the Lone Star Flight Museum in Galveston. The pilot was not in contact with air-traffic controllers when it crashed.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

White House Extends 'Individual Mandate' Deadline

by JASmius

Sorry, gentles, but I told y'all so.

Ted Cruz must be sooooooooo jealous:

The Obama administration is giving individuals who buy health insurance through government-run marketplaces until the end of March to enroll in a plan without a penalty, an administration official said.

The administration plans to issue guidelines soon to clear up confusion over deadlines under President Barack Obama’s healthcare law, according to the official, who asked for anonymity Wednesday because the change hadn’t been formally announced.

The open enrollment period extends from October 1 to March 31. Under the law, anyone who isn’t covered for three months or longer faces a financial penalty for not having insurance. In order for the insurance to take effect, uninsured Americans would have to sign up by Feb. 15 to avoid facing fines.

The change effectively gives individuals an extra six weeks to enroll.

It's illegal and unconstitutional, of course.  A president, under the law, has no more authority to legislate changes to the text of any statute than Lebron James does, under NBA game rules, to clothesline Derrick Rose into the basket support on his way to a game-winning dunk.  But he's done it anyway - again - because he believes he has the power to do it.  And he's got a five year baseline of support for that tyrannical view.

The reason why he did it is obvious - as rapidly as this fiasco is metastasizing, it was crystal clear that unless there was some kind, any kind of individual mandate deferral, lots and lots of youths were going to be getting hit with fines "punishment taxes" for failing to sign up for ObamaCare coverage they couldn't access through the web portal that doesn't work, the toll free number (800-F1UCKYO) that won't connect, the U.S. Postal Service that loses their paper forms, the Pony Express whose horses are all dead, the Greek messengers from Marathon who've all come down with gout, the passenger pigeons whose wings have all fallen off, the toy boats that have all sunk, and the paper airplanes that blew away on the first stiff breeze.  That would generate a tsunami of pissed-off-edness in so much of the electorate that 2014 would go from "Will the Democrats hold the Senate?" to "Will the GOP gain a filibuster-proof majority?"  And the House?  How about a veto-proof Republican majority?  And the hammer blow to O's own prestige and "aura" - and therefore power, particularly with the media beginning to disengage their interests from his - would vastly complicate any move to complete his coup ahead of schedule.

This represents the minimum the White House has to do right now.  It's a stop-gap to buy them six additional weeks to get "up and running" via their latest IT Choom Gang a system that Sebelius has already let slip needed three years more development time than they allowed it.  Which is to say, six weeks from now there'll be another "short delay," and then another, and another, while O spins more and more furiously and pathetically, until he's reduced to standing on D.C. street corners begging people to take free pocket shrimpers with the ObamaCare "NO PREMIUMS UNTIL THE TWENTY-SECOND CENTURY!!!" coupons he won't be able to unload as bathroom tissue.

You know the Overton window of ObamaCare repeal?  It's coming over the horizon - like a cruise missile.  O's latest act proves that he is harrowingly aware of it.

Hard Starboard Radio: Only The Beginning



Dems to GOP: "You've GOT to help us fix ObamaCare!!!" - my, but the next shutdown should be fun; White House ordering private health insurers to shut up on enrollments; Sebelius throws her messiah under his own bus; a sample of oceanic embarrassments; a sample of fake "success" stories; White House BSers unable to keep down their own BS; the Ten OCare Plagues to Come; and the Left's congenital hatred.

Get out of that damned truck and tune in at 6PM Eastern/3PM Pacific.  You've earned it.

How Uninformed Voters Encourage Tyranny

By Douglas V. Gibbs

A journalism student asked me about the neglect of the Constitution by our elected representatives.  She commented on my Constitution Classes I host in Temecula on Thursday Nights, and my Saturday afternoon radio talk show on KCAA, and asked if anyone had called into my show and told me they had no idea about a subject until I had brought it up.

I responded, "Not on the air, but often in the Constitution Classes, and in email responses to the radio program, I get that kind of statement."

She went on to tell me that "It was recently stated in Newsweek that 70% of 1000 citizens did not know what the supreme law of the land was.  The answer is the Constitution.  How does that affect government?"

A very good question because people don't realize how not being an informed voter, and not understanding the Constitution, could be detrimental to our system, and our liberty, as a whole.

I said to her, "When government is supposed to represent the people and the people are uninformed about the rule of law, it allows the government more elbow room to act tyrannical without fear of reprisal from the people."

Government does not fear the uninformed, and it is easier to buy the votes of uninformed voters.  Ultimately, those people are easier to control, as well.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Ryan to Sebelius: Why Won't You Testify?

by JASmius

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius' refusal to testify on Obamacare before the House Budget Committee is "raising serious questions" about the administration's "commitment to transparency and accountability," committee chairman Paul Ryan says.
What?!?

Well, we know that the House Budget Committee Chairman is not an idiot, so the question is, at the very least, rhetorical.  The answer is buck nakie obvious: Kathleen Sebelius, the "national health chief," is one of Barack Obama's top lieutenants; he and his Regime are unrepentant royalists who look upon congressional Democrats as pawns and drones and congressional Republicans as either non-entities or insects to be roach-moteled, and anything but partial controllers of a co-equal branch of government to whom respect, at the very least, must be paid.

So of course, Cruella Devile won't testify.  She'll stonewall just like Eric "The Red" Holder and every other Obama stooge has done for the past five years.  And there we get to Paul Ryan's intent in asking the question - because this isn't the first time he's asked it:

Ryan said he plans to release several letters dating back to August 15 that show a pattern of Sebelius refusing to testify before his committee on the progress of implementing the healthcare reform law....

In the August 15 letter, he asked her to appear before his committee on September 11, but her staff said she was unavailable, reports Fox News.

A week later, on August 22, Ryan asked her for an organizational chart of Obamacare implementation efforts, offices involved, number of full-time employees working on it, and all relevant spending items.

He asked for the list by September 11, but it never came, according to Fox.

I'm more than a smidge puzzled, given the Regime's graven-in-stone SOP of contemptuous defiance of legitimate, legal, constitutionally-mandated congressional oversight of the Executive Branch, why Chairman Ryan feels compelled to establish a fresh baseline of the same imperious crap they've been pulling like a masturbation addict for the past five years.  But fine, the raspberry baseline has been established.  Time to forget the "letters of request" and "polite notes of inquiry" and cut right to the bellicose subpoenas - which the Regime will ignore as well, of course, but which will also turn up the heat, the publicity level, and provide the stage, now that the public context has been so well established, from which the kind of questions about the OCare disaster can be asked - loudly - that neither the White House nor congressional Donks want aired, and which the public will demand

That, as an added bonus, can in turn pave the way for another ObamaCare battle that can actually make some progress towards rollback, retaking the Senate next year, and outright repeal in 2017 - or even sooner.

This, my friends, is what is meant by "strategy".  In political war, you cannot advance without first generating momentum.  And more often than not, momentum is initiated by the opposition's unforced errors.  It is now up to Paul Ryan and his fellow Pachyderms to take that momentum and disabuse President Popeil of the comforting delusion that he gained anything from Shutdowngeddon but a prelude to his own presidency's functional termination.


UPDATE: Chairman Ryan, this is what being "Mr. Nice Guy" gets you:

The Director of the Office of Health reform at the Department of Health and Human Services, will brief House Democrats only Wednesday about the ObamaCare fiasco in a closed door session.
In other words, it's a PR strategy session so everybody will be on the same page and the White House can control its Narrative.  We can count on that message bearing a heavy emphasis on demanding that the GOP help them "fix" ObamaCare to ensure "health care for the American people" and warning Republicans against "rooting for the ACA's failure".

Or, in short, stampeding them....into Ted Cruz's waiting arms, if they know what's good for them.

Best get a leg up on those subpoenas, Paul.  You're gonna need a blizzard of 'em.

CNBCCCP's Steve Liesman Says Mexican Music Should Be Played Behind Ted Cruz

by JASmius

Do you want to say "¡Ay, carumba!," or shall I?





So sayeth the love child of Mitch Pileggi and Ed Schultz.

I guess this ignorant racism much just be genetic with libs.  It's genuinely puzzling in this instance, given Senator Cruz's ongoing assault against his own party.  Stirring up a GOP civil war is something I would think petaQ'pu like Liesman (note the first four letters of his surname, BTW - it doubles as his career description) would want to encourage.  Oh, sure, the Texan's parallel crusade against ObamaCare is sacrilege to him, but wouldn't so slavish an Obamunist be supremely confident of the ACA's impregnability?  Even now?

And once again, if libs are going to vomit ethnic slurs, can't they be the slightest bit creative about it?  "Play some Mexican music behind him?"  Seriously?  Liesman doesn't know one single Mexican song title?  C'mon, man, even an I Love Lucy "Ted Cruz has got some 'splainin' to do!" reference would be more clever than that.  Which would actually be far more appropriate given that, like Dezi Arnaz, Ted Cruz is of Cuban descent, not Mexican, you cornfed dumbass.

Or Liesman could do a tremendous service to his country and CNBCCCP's audience AND ratings by allowing Rick Santelli to staple his lips shut on live television using the same apparatus as would be used for the hairweave he so desperately needs.  I might even tune in for that.

Democrats Compare TEA Party to KKK

By Douglas V. Gibbs

Let us not forget that the KKK was created by the Democrat Party to serve as the militant arm of the party to better enable the Democrats to keep blacks from voting, or from holding office, during the decades following the American Civil War.

Let us not forget that it was Democrat President Woodrow Wilson that segregated the military.

Let us not forget that Margaret Sanger, a staunch liberal, created Planned Parenthood with the goal of encouraging abortion among blacks so as to extinguish the race.  Today, abortions are more prominent among blacks than any other group.

Let us not forget that the Republicans proposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Democrats filibustered it.

Let us not forget that Robert Byrd, a recent democrat that passed away in a couple years ago was a kleagle in the KKK, and klan recruiter.

Let us not forget that the TEA Party, while being accused of being racist with no evidence other than anger by the left that the TEA Party dares to oppose them, has championed such black conservatives as Allen West, Alan Keyes, Herman Cain, Mia Love, Lloyd Marcus, Dr. Walter Williams, Dr. Benjamin Carson, Star Parker, Tim Scott, and so on and so on.  Strange tendency for a bunch of racists.

And finally, remember that at the MLK March Anniversary, conservative blacks were not invited. . . because according to the liberals, to be black is to be democrat.  Wait, isn't that quite a racist stance to take by the Democrats?

By the way, not only was Martin Luther King Jr. a Republican, but he would have been appalled by how Barack Obama was elected, and how he uses race as a weapon.  Any criticism of him is automatically considered racist, and polls have shown that most folks voted for Obama because he is black, not because of the content of his character.

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Alan Grayson Uses Cross-Burning Image in Email Comparing Tea Party to KKK - Huffington Post

Florida Congressman Compares Tea Party to Ku Klux Klan - ABC News

Conservative Blacks Irritated with Liberal Flavor of MLK March Anniversary - The Hill

Vote for Obama Just because he is black - Sun Journal

Marine Calls For John McCain's Arrest & Trial For Treason At Town Hall Meeting

by JASmius

This is simply something I cannot do justice by writing on it. You must hear it for yourself. The boldness expressed is due to McCain’s support of jihadists in Syria, his kowtowing to Barack Obama and the senator even going and having his picture made with enemies of the United States. The man couldn’t even keep his attention on the very serious matter regarding the support of jihadists in Syria. He was too busy playing poker.





The man wasn't playing poker; he was making an ass of himself.

Look, we all know what John McCain is.  He's corrupt going back to the Keating Five affair; he's waged war against his own party ever since his first presidential bid fell short against George W. Bush thirteen years ago; he was the architect of the infamous "memo of understanding" that kneecapped then-Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist's plan to put down the Democrats' filibustering of Dubya's appellate court nominees; he's played kissy-face with the media for years; he undermined the War on Terror with his "torture" grandstanding almost as egregiously as any Democrat; he took a dive against Barack Obama in 2008; and, yes, he lacks the strategic acumen to recognize that we have no ally in the Syrian "civil war" and the sense God gave a doorknob not to (1) recognize jihadists when he sees them and (2) pose for "road pics" for good measure.

But John McCain is not a traitor.

Sure, we also all know how much mileage he's milked out of the seven years he spent in the Hanoi Hilton.  If you didn't know better you could almost have believed that he deliberately let himself get shot down over Vietnam for the express purpose of undergoing that ordeal with an eye toward how useful it would be in a future political career.

But we do know better.  And the fact is that John McCain did spend seven years in the Hanoi Hilton, enduring all manner of torture that left him physically scarred and partially disabled, without ever breaking or being "turned".  Maybe he used up all his honor and courage in those seven years, leaving little or none left for his "service" as a congressman and senator.  Which would render him a skunk now.

But not a traitor.

It's just such overheated, ill-considered rhetoric on the part of, shall we say, "RINO-critics" that discredit and "crankize" them vastly more than the RINOs they condemn.

Yet another example of why "damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!" is not always the best approach, and political discretion is oftentimes highly underrated.

Grenade Maker Walks Into Mexico

Posted By Douglas V. Gibbs

From Fox News:

In a case that is prompting comparisons to the botched Operation Fast and Furious, police believe explosives found at a murder scene in Mexico may have come from an American bomb-maker whom the U.S. attorney in Arizona refused to prosecute.

According to an internal U.S. Department of Justice memo, a "Kingery grenade" was among the 10 explosives found at the scene of a shootout between police and drug cartels in Guadalajara on Oct. 10 in which three officers were killed.

The "Kingery grenade" refers to those manufactured by Jean Baptiste Kingery, a California resident who made grenades in Mexico from parts sourced in the U.S. He also converted AK-47s from semi- to fully-automatic weapons.

ATF agents arrested Kingery in 2010, but the assistant U.S. attorney in Arizona at the time, Emory Hurley, referred to the grenades as harmless toys and told the ATF the case "lacked jury appeal," according to the ATF supervisor in charge, Pete Forcelli. Forcelli had handled the case until the U.S. attorney declined to prosecute.

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., compared the situation to Fast and Furious, in which U.S. officials let weapons "walk" across the U.S.-Mexico border; weapons from the program were later found at the murder scene of Border Patrol agent Brian Terry.

"These aren't the only deaths that undoubtedly will come from weapons being allowed to walk and an individual allowed to escape justice for more than 18 months after he was in our hands and released," Issa said.

Read More

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Palin: Congress's "Endless Extortion Scheme"

Posted By Douglas V. Gibbs

From Breitbart:

Exclusive–Palin: Congress Has America Caught Up in 'Endless Extortion Scheme'

America is suffering from an epic case of Armageddon fatigue.

MORE

-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary