"Because of the power of Conservative ideas. . . the following is true:
. . .Every American now pays lower federal income taxes
. . .Twenty-five million taxpayers receive a child tax credit
. . .Thirty million married couples pay less in taxes, because of marriage penalty relief
. . .Every serviceman/woman in America is better equipped and better paid
. . .The U.S. Intelligence Community has more spy satellites and more agents, and operates in more nations, than ever before in the nation's history
. . .Some 2.3 million former welfare recipients have jobs; 3.5 million fewer families live in poverty; and 2.9 million fewer children live in poverty as a result of welfare reform
. . .Some 17 million seniors over the age of sixty-five now have prescription drug insurance coverage they never had before
. . .Every American can set aside tax-free money for unexpected health expenses
. . .Partial-birth abortion, the practice of partially taking a child out of a woman's womb and then murdering it, is now illegal
. . .The federal criminal appeals process has been streamlined, and the processes of prosecuting death penalty cases and carrying out a death sentence has sped up.
Looking back on history it is apparent that Conservative Legislation works. But what about Liberalism?
In opposition of the above items, the Liberal Left:
. . .Believes that everyone should pay higher federal income taxes so that they can pay for their social programs.
. . .thinks that children cause additional carbon footprints and would rather institute a child tax penalty
. . .believe that marriage is a silly little ritual and married couples receiving any tax advantage is unfair to unmarried couples anyway and they would then reinstate the marriage penalty tax
. . .will, as Clinton and Carter did, downgrade and gut the American military, reducing our Navy to dangerously low levels while expanding military commitments, but rarely in an effort to protect national security. The expanded military commitments will be to use the U.S. military as a kind of glorified Peace Corps in situations that do not place American interest at risk, or by spreading humanitarian aid to murderous dictators and sponsors of genocide as Clinton did in Kosovo and Somalia, among other situations
. . .will strip the U.S. Intelligence Community of their abilities to spy on the enemy, claiming that the very operation of an intelligence agency is in opposition of the ACLU and what they stand for (aaaargh!)
. . .thinks that you and I are not able to take care of ourselves (self-reliance bad!) and will increase the number of welfare recipients by making it easier to qualify and make welfare a lifestyle. Poverty will increase, and the successful will be penalized for it, being required "share the wealth" with people who refuse to work and refuse to be self-reliant
. . .will ensure that our older citizens will die sooner by enacting a socialized medicine program which will increase the waiting times for treatment as it has in Canada and Europe - so many of our elderly will simply die before receiving the care they so desperately need that they would have received sooner had the system remained under privatized medicine - and tax rates will remain high well into their later years to help pay for the socialized medical system - kicking the amount we pay in taxes to pay for the system that is inferior to nearly as much as we were paying for a superior privatized system
. . .make abortion legal at all points of a pregnancy and will find themselves and their socialized medical system overwhelmed by medical emergencies resulting from the abortions as well as needing to wash more often in an attempt to get the blood of millions of babies off their hands
. . .will outlaw the death penalty and lighten the penalties on most crimes, especially non-violent crimes.
. . .
If one studies the viewpoints of today's liberalism, and the games they play, it becomes apparent that Liberalism is simply an early stage of Communism. Liberalism, like socialism and communism, believes that it must destroy the existing system in order to place their system in control. And rather than being an example of doing what is best for the citizens and practicing the values of doing what is right, Liberalism pursues power. To reach that power, like Communism, they must destroy all obstacles that stand in the way by removing the message of the opposition, and by silencing the messengers. In their minds, to oppose Liberalism does not make you a person that has an opinion other than theirs. Instead, in the eyes of Liberalism, it makes you a narrow-minded Bush-bot who will be persecuted relentlessly by the Leftist Elite. Or as one liberal blogger puts it, opposing their viewpoint makes you a f***ing moron, vile Christian, a f***ing liar, a right-wing freak, authoritarian cult of the Christian right wing in America, and so on and so on and so on. Of course they overlook the fact that the Left is populated by hypocrites, and anti-American traitors.
Of course, when Conservatives say something that makes a little sense, the Left loves to quote us in an attempt to debunk it using age-old methods that includes conveniently misreading what we say or removing key elements so that the text can be construed as something different. And then they proudly proclaim that they have done nothing wrong, and are simply using our words against us. Conservative Bloggers are not the only ones that face this kind of attack. Ann Coulter does. And Rush Limbaugh is being silenced through their attempt to silence the messenger. Remember, if they can't beat the message, the Left tries to destroy it, and if that doesn't work, they go after the messenger. Next, our freedom of speech will be taken away by the Fairness Doctrine, if the Left has anything to do with it.
Well, personally, I am tired of the games the Left plays. So, I will close with a few items that gets them all up in an uproar, and ask them a few questions about it.
Hey Liberals, Answer this:
1. If someone threatens to kill you, should you seek the approval of your friends before you take measures to protect yourself? And if you take such measures to protect yourself on the advancing foe, is it a war-mongering attitude to hit back once the aggressor smacks you square in the face and is reaching for a weapon?
2. Since God is simply a delusion to the majority of the far left, who is more irrational? A man who believes in a God he doesn't see? Or a man who's offended by a God he doesn't believe in?
3. Would you be angry if your neighbors trashed their house, then moved into yours and claimed it was theirs in the first place, and that they had more of a right to your home, food, and yard than you did?
4. Would it be okay if you worked hard in school, earned an "A" in your class, and then the teacher said that your good grade ,which was achieved by your hard work, is unfair to the student in the back of the class who has turned in no homework and refuses to take tests and has an "F", so to be fair, your grade will be redistributed so that you both receive "C's"?
5. Would it be okay, since you want the fairness doctrine so bad, that on all of the CNN Shows, and MSNBC shows, and PBS, and so forth that Michael Savage and Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity (and so on) co-host with each of those hosts so that the conservative view is also given?
Just a few thoughts. Chew on that for a while. And if any of my readers have any more questions for the far left, comment away. I am curious what they are, and may pose them to a few of my liberal admirers.
Added note: John Bootie, my guest on the Political Pistachio Radio Show last Saturday, just suffered a tragedy in his family. His brother passed away in an auto-accident. His brother's wife and child are in critical condition. Please extend your prayers to John and his family. Thank you, and God Bless.