When asked about a statement that left doubt regarding America's position should Iran attack Israel, Hillary Clinton stated, "I think it is U.S. policy to the extent that we have alliances and understandings with a number of nations. I don't think there is any doubt in anyone's mind that, were Israel to suffer a nuclear attack by Iran, there would be retaliation."
Notice, it would have to be a nuclear attack. Conventional invasion by Muslim nations against Israel will probably only result in Obama condemning Israel for existing, which is obviously the reason the Muslims are so angry at the tiny nation.
Then Hillary Clinton was pressed with the question, "By the United States?"
Hillary Clinton declined to commit, settling on, "Well, I think there would be retaliation."
Could it be that while pressuring Israel to settle for a two-state solution, which would ultimately lead to an attack against Israel since such a move would embolden Islamists who desire Israel destroyed, and is a clear indication that Obama supports Israel's enemies more than any support they'd be willing to give to Israel (so much for not meddling in the affairs of other nations), the Democrats are not willing to come to her defense should Israel be attacked, and face annihilation?
What kind of people remain silent when the Iranian people cry out for freedom, and calls the nation (Israel), who is surrounded by the enemy, and is constantly attacked by their neighbors, the oppressor, and expects them to give up land for peace that will never be given to them?
Oh, yeah, those mean, selfish idiots that call themselves Democrats.
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
By Douglas V. Gibbs
Clinton: Israel is on its own with Iran - Jihad Watch, Robert Spencer
No comments:
Post a Comment