KMET 1490-AM (www.kmet1490am.com)
Call in Live during the Program!
951-922-3532Topics on Today's program:
- Justice Roberts and the Law of the Land (following quotes are from his dissenting opinion in a recent abortion case regarding the Texas law on the topic. The egregiously unconstitutional words or phrases are in bold and italics, emphasis provided is mine).
- https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-463_3ebh.pdf
- That law is contrary to this Court’s decisions in Roe v. Wade, 410 U. S. 113 (1973), and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U. S. 833 (1992). It has had the effect of denying the exercise of what we have held is a right protected under the Federal Constitution.1 Texas has employed an array of stratagems designed to shield its unconstitutional law from judicial review.
- The clear purpose and actual effect of S. B. 8 has been to nullify this Court’s rulings. It is, however, a basic principle that the Constitution is the “fundamental and paramount law of the nation,” and “[i]t is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 177 (1803). Indeed, “[i]f the legislatures of the several states may, at will, annul the judgments of the courts of the United States, and destroy the rights acquired under those judgments, the constitution itself becomes a solemn mockery.” United States v. Peters, 5 Cranch 115, 136 (1809). The nature of the federal right infringed does not matter; it is the role of the Supreme Court in our constitutional system that is at stake.
- Should we Electrocute the Oceans to Curb Climate Change - Huffington Post
- Anti-Vaccine doctor fired for trying to treat COVID-19 patients with ivermectin - CBS News
- White House Drug Czar Signals Possibility of Safe Consumption Sites to Address Drug Overdose Crisis - The Fresh Toast
- Mother and transgender son sue school for withholding child from boys' restroom and sports - Washington Examiner
No comments:
Post a Comment