By Douglas V. Gibbs
"Bullies" is the new term being used to attack society. It has turned out to be a more effective term than "bigot," "racist," "homophobe," or "Islamophobe." If you call someone a "bully," immediately an image of a mean, unfair, violent, nasty, overpowering radical rightwing extremist comes to mind. . .right?
As Christmas approaches, and we spend more time in the stores buying what we should have bought before the lines became holiday ridiculous, the stores know we are looking for deals. So, like hawks diving in to grab a poor, unsuspecting mouse, they throw their sales pitch at us, and we cave in to save 10% on our purchase on a card with a 25% interest rate.
In stores like Macy's, the employees are encouraged to sell credit card accounts, and falling below a goal given to them, not getting enough people to open new credit card accounts could result in negative job performance reviews.
In a recent poll, respondents stated that 31% of Americans feel bullied by store employees during the sales confrontation. 49% regret the decision to open a card, later. More than half of those folks said that they wouldn't be returning to the store where they felt bullied by employees. 73% of survey respondents said that they felt sorry for the store employees forced into pressuring customers about opening a store credit card.
An important part of living in a society where we are free, self-reliant individuals, we have to be grown up enough to understand that these things are going to happen. Sellers sell, and their sales techniques are going to be designed to convince you to buy. If you don't want to buy, say "no." Be an adult, and take responsibility for your own actions. To sit here and call sellers "bullies" because they succeeded in selling is ludicrous. Using the word "bully" for success is a direct attack on being successful.
This is the same tactic the liberal left progressive socialist Democrats used against the banks during the housing crisis that led to the 2008 economic downturn - when it was liberal policies, and government regulations put in place largely by Democrats that led the banks to offer sub-prime loans, and practice what the Democrats have called "predatory lending."
There is no such thing as "predatory lending," and "bullies" selling credit card accounts. As free individuals, we are capable of reading the fine print, we should be capable of making reasonable decisions, and we should be mature enough to say "no" when we don't want to do something.
Using the word "bully" to describe the sales tactics regarding store credit cards is an attempt to attack the free market, to handicap capitalism, and to herd an ill-informed public into a position to cry out, "The government's got to do something about this!"
"Bully" is being used in a number of places in our society to reshape our culture, to destroy individualism, and to fundamentally transform our system into something it was never designed to be. Grow up, and say "no" if you don't want the credit card. Or, open the account, get your discount, and then be responsible enough to pay off the balances quickly, use the card the minimum required, and then close it when its benefit has worn out.
Personal responsibility. Wow! What a concept!
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
Shoppers Claim Stores "Bully" Them Into Opening Credit Cards, Survey Says - Racked
Wednesday, December 03, 2014
YouTube Bans MEMRI For Exposing Muslim Hate Speech
by JASmius

Don't bother playing the video; I only posted it for the thumbnail pic because it is evidently impossible to find jpegs of anything having to do with YouTube, as no Bing or Google search combination produces anything about videos. (Update: I found a jpeg after all, but I like this lede so much - which means I want to come up with an updated lede so little - that I'm just going to leave this one. Any objections, take it up with my fingertips)
Okay, you can play the vid if you want. But know that there are far more worthy reasons to slam YouTube than not getting to post home movies with copyrighted music tracks in the background:
Doesn't the Muslim hate speech - and their demonstrated propensity for acting upon it - justify "Islamophobia," though? Not, apparently, to YouTube.
So somebody within YouTube wants MEMRI silenced and somebody within YouTube has a dim recollection of freedom of speech and remnant value for vigorous public debate - about every topic.
If this latest suppression of MEMRI is attracting this much public attention, they'll probably be reinstated again. But that other somebody or somebodies will continue looking for a way to shut them up that they can make stick.
Perhaps they should rename themselves "DhimmiTube". At least that would be truth in advertising.

Don't bother playing the video; I only posted it for the thumbnail pic because it is evidently impossible to find jpegs of anything having to do with YouTube, as no Bing or Google search combination produces anything about videos. (Update: I found a jpeg after all, but I like this lede so much - which means I want to come up with an updated lede so little - that I'm just going to leave this one. Any objections, take it up with my fingertips)
Okay, you can play the vid if you want. But know that there are far more worthy reasons to slam YouTube than not getting to post home movies with copyrighted music tracks in the background:
The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) is a valuable resource for those who want to learn what the Muslims in the Middle East are saying to each other away from the eyes of the [Oba]media. Early on Tuesday, YouTube deleted the MEMRI account for “repeated or severe violations of our Community Guidelines and/or claims of copyright infringement.” In other words, someone complained that MEMRI was sharing truthful videos of Muslim hate-speech (what some call Islamophobia).
Doesn't the Muslim hate speech - and their demonstrated propensity for acting upon it - justify "Islamophobia," though? Not, apparently, to YouTube.
Most MEMRI videos features Muslim speakers denouncing Israel, Jews, the West and/or the United States. MEMRI translates the text into English and adds it as a subtitle on the video. Recent examples of MEMRI videos posted on TruthRevolt include "Jordanian MP: The PA Must Not Defend The Interests Of The Filthy Jews" and "Yemeni Child Leads Crowd in Chant ‘Curses Upon the Jews, And Victory for Islam’".
This isn’t the first time YouTube has deleted MEMRI’s account. MEMRI can appeal the decision, which they have done in the past. They have always been reinstated.
So somebody within YouTube wants MEMRI silenced and somebody within YouTube has a dim recollection of freedom of speech and remnant value for vigorous public debate - about every topic.
If this latest suppression of MEMRI is attracting this much public attention, they'll probably be reinstated again. But that other somebody or somebodies will continue looking for a way to shut them up that they can make stick.
Perhaps they should rename themselves "DhimmiTube". At least that would be truth in advertising.
ObamaCare Has Skyrocketed HealthCare Costs 24%
by JASmius

"Bending the cost curve" up America's collective ass:
Why, how can this be? O promised, solemnly pledged, cheaper insurance, cheaper healthcare bills, and more competition in insurance, AND that we could all keep our plans and doctors. Remember?
My stars and garters, how could our president have been so wrong....across the board....about everything? I mean, he can't be incompetent, can he? He's the most brilliant human being who has ever lived, right? And such a messianic figure isn't capable of, and couldn't possibly have....lied to us about it all - could he?
Since this is all (1) excruciating snark and (2) old-hat review for the smartest audience in the Alpha Quadrant, I won't bother with a punchline. I'll simply observe that most of the private health insurance market has already been destroyed, the six or so million Americans who had the health plans they liked taken away from them a year ago are just the leading edge of the hundred million more that will lose their plans once his infernal majesty stops deferring the Employer Mandate, and this is a core reason why the Democrat "brand" is canine excrement.
At least for now. Not that O needs a "brand" anymore, anyway. It really is good to be the king.
"Bending the cost curve" up America's collective ass:
Health-care spending by middle-income Americans rose 24% between 2007 and 2013, driven by an even larger rise in the cost of buying health insurance, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis of detailed consumer-spending data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Why, how can this be? O promised, solemnly pledged, cheaper insurance, cheaper healthcare bills, and more competition in insurance, AND that we could all keep our plans and doctors. Remember?
My stars and garters, how could our president have been so wrong....across the board....about everything? I mean, he can't be incompetent, can he? He's the most brilliant human being who has ever lived, right? And such a messianic figure isn't capable of, and couldn't possibly have....lied to us about it all - could he?
Since this is all (1) excruciating snark and (2) old-hat review for the smartest audience in the Alpha Quadrant, I won't bother with a punchline. I'll simply observe that most of the private health insurance market has already been destroyed, the six or so million Americans who had the health plans they liked taken away from them a year ago are just the leading edge of the hundred million more that will lose their plans once his infernal majesty stops deferring the Employer Mandate, and this is a core reason why the Democrat "brand" is canine excrement.
At least for now. Not that O needs a "brand" anymore, anyway. It really is good to be the king.
Gallup: More Now Identify As GOP Than As Democrats
by JASmius

Looks like, thanks to Barack Hussein Obama, the Democrat "brand" is a big, steaming pile:
If only that were possible. <sigh>
I've always said that when bloggers post about polls (other than at election time), it's prima facie evidence of a slow news day. Which is why I so rarely, if ever, post about polls other than, you know, at election time. This one is no different. Gallup is correct that this pro-GOP shift is almost certainly a "bandwagon" effect of the 2014 midterms, and it will ebb and flow depending upon events and what both parties do to mold, and how they react, to ongoing events. We all know, due in no small part to the hair-trigger fratricidal tendencies of the Republican base, that the GOP will always have far less margin for error, and be held to a vastly tighter schedule, than the Democrats ever will. And, consequently, the Republican "brand" will also always be far less stable and much more fragile than that of their Donk enemies.
But both Tea Partiers and the "Establishment" need to understand two respective truths:
(1) The new Republican majorities aren't going to be any more successful advancing a conservative agenda into law than the GOP House has been the preceding four years because of fanatical Democrat obstructionism, both via Senate filibusters and presidential vetoes. Just because "we won" doesn't mean the other side doesn't still have the means to fight back and resist, at least defensively. If TPers are expecting the "red" electoral tide to continue on in policy terms and sweep away Red Barry, they're in for a rude awakening that will not be the fault of "GOP gutlessness".
However....
(2) Fanatical Democrat obstructionism presents a cornucopia of political opportunities for Republicans to show themselves taking policy action the electorate wants and for which they enthusiastically voted - the sort of pro-energy and pro-economic growth/jobs measures House Pachyderms have been passing for years only to have them die of neglect on Harry (G)Reid's desk. GOP leadership should not give a frog's fat leg about "governing" by compromising with the White House, but rather attempting to govern as We, The People elected them to govern, thus defining the 2016 battlefield and laying the foundation for Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker's capture of the presidency.
Politics is process, a cycle like any other. And a party and movement doesn't get where it wants and needs to go all in one fell swoop - especially as far down as the Right has been during the Age of The One. And that means, yes, "playing the political game," my Tea Party friends - because that is how politics, and government, work.
To win, the Right needs grassroots resolve and "Establishment" savvy. And for both to realize, accept, and never forget that they need each other if the Old American Republic is ever to be reborn.
Otherwise, we can kiss our short-lived "brand ascension" goodbye, and what's left of the Constitution right along with it.
Looks like, thanks to Barack Hussein Obama, the Democrat "brand" is a big, steaming pile:
The midterm election wave that swept Republicans to a majority in both the Senate and House also shifted Americans' political allegiance toward the GOP, a new poll shows.
According to a Gallup survey, 43% of Americans identified as Democrats or leaned toward the Democrat Party before the November 4th elections, while 39% identified as or leaned Republican.
But a day after the election, Republicans had wedged open a slight advantage, 42% to 41%, representing a net shift of five percentage points in the partisanship gap, Gallup reports.
"Americans are also now more likely to align themselves politically with the Republican Party than the Democratic Party," the poll analysis noted.
"The 2014 midterms were an unqualified success for the Republican Party, and that success has caused Americans to view the Republican Party more favorably than the Democratic Party, as well as to say congressional Republicans should have more influence than President Barack Obama over the direction the nation takes in the next year."
If only that were possible. <sigh>
I've always said that when bloggers post about polls (other than at election time), it's prima facie evidence of a slow news day. Which is why I so rarely, if ever, post about polls other than, you know, at election time. This one is no different. Gallup is correct that this pro-GOP shift is almost certainly a "bandwagon" effect of the 2014 midterms, and it will ebb and flow depending upon events and what both parties do to mold, and how they react, to ongoing events. We all know, due in no small part to the hair-trigger fratricidal tendencies of the Republican base, that the GOP will always have far less margin for error, and be held to a vastly tighter schedule, than the Democrats ever will. And, consequently, the Republican "brand" will also always be far less stable and much more fragile than that of their Donk enemies.
But both Tea Partiers and the "Establishment" need to understand two respective truths:
(1) The new Republican majorities aren't going to be any more successful advancing a conservative agenda into law than the GOP House has been the preceding four years because of fanatical Democrat obstructionism, both via Senate filibusters and presidential vetoes. Just because "we won" doesn't mean the other side doesn't still have the means to fight back and resist, at least defensively. If TPers are expecting the "red" electoral tide to continue on in policy terms and sweep away Red Barry, they're in for a rude awakening that will not be the fault of "GOP gutlessness".
However....
(2) Fanatical Democrat obstructionism presents a cornucopia of political opportunities for Republicans to show themselves taking policy action the electorate wants and for which they enthusiastically voted - the sort of pro-energy and pro-economic growth/jobs measures House Pachyderms have been passing for years only to have them die of neglect on Harry (G)Reid's desk. GOP leadership should not give a frog's fat leg about "governing" by compromising with the White House, but rather attempting to govern as We, The People elected them to govern, thus defining the 2016 battlefield and laying the foundation for Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker's capture of the presidency.
Politics is process, a cycle like any other. And a party and movement doesn't get where it wants and needs to go all in one fell swoop - especially as far down as the Right has been during the Age of The One. And that means, yes, "playing the political game," my Tea Party friends - because that is how politics, and government, work.
To win, the Right needs grassroots resolve and "Establishment" savvy. And for both to realize, accept, and never forget that they need each other if the Old American Republic is ever to be reborn.
Otherwise, we can kiss our short-lived "brand ascension" goodbye, and what's left of the Constitution right along with it.
Tuesday, December 02, 2014
Obama's Immigration Executive Order Unconstitutional. . . Take Action!!!
From Douglas V. Gibbs
Time to Activate!
Constitution Association Members and All Americans
Congressional Republicans have decided that they cannot do anything about Obama's illegal, unconstitutional executive order regarding immigration. Republican Congressman Ken Calvert, the 42nd District Congress Critter for Southwest Riverside County, and his fellow gutless representatives, say they can't defund Obama's illegal immigration tactic because the agencies in play receive their funding from fees, not appropriated money.
The United States Constitution requires all monies to be appropriated by Congress, originating in the House of Representatives. The Congressional Research Service (CRS) agrees, issuing a statement that says, "The money received as fees by federal agencies must still be appropriated by Congress to that agency in order to be available for obligation or expenditure by the agency."
"The funds available to the agency through fee collections would be subject to the same potential restrictions imposed by Congress on the use of its appropriations as any other type of appropriated funds."
It is time to flood the phones, flood the emails, and visit the offices of our Congress Critters. For the 42nd District, Ken Calvert's phone numbers are:
Washington: 202-225-1986 Corona: 951-277-0042
His local office is at 4160 Temescal Canyon Rd., Suite 214, Corona, CA 92883.
Send Calvert an email at http://calvert.house.gov/contact/ . . .
Ken Calvert's District Director's Email is Jolyn.Murphy@mail.house.gov
It is time to act. Join me in flooding Ken Calvert's, or your own Congress Critter's, mailbox and phone system. Let them know that immigration is a deal breaker. Immigration is an issue we expect them to act on NOW!!! . . . especially against a President acting illegal, against the Constitution, while thumbing his nose at the cowards in Congress, and the American People!!!
Blessings,
Douglas V. Gibbs,
Constitution Radio, KCAA AM1050
Author, "25 Myths of the United States Constitution," and "The Basic Constitution"
President, Constitution Association
www.douglasvgibbs.com
www.politicalpistachio.com
www.constitutionassociation.com
www.constitutioneducation.net
Hard Starboard Radio: Liberalism In Ruins
"Black lives matter" - and so, then, must black perpetrators (encore); Ferguson businesses and neighborhoods may never recover from the present anarchy; Al Sharpton takes the stage at the White House to help keep the Ferguson Insurrection alive; In 2014, the media delivered a torrent of anti-conservative bile; Barack Obama’s hubristic promises have been followed by a total discrediting of his ideology; and can we ever get around to brokering a truce in the "GOP Civil War"?
Can The One outrun his collapse at 6PM Eastern/3PM Pacific? Only if he doesn't come from the Prometheus school of escape.
Detroit Hit With City-Wide Power Outage
by JASmius

The term "liberalism runs everything into the ground" is not hyperbole, it is stone-cold fact:
Six decades ago, Detroit was a bustling, industrial metropolis of over three million residents. Then the Democrats took over and have run the city ever since. Now it is bankrupt, a quarter its previous size, vast swaths of residential areas abandoned and collapsing into ruin, and the city cannot even keep its basic infrastructure from catastrophically failing.
Detroit has, in other words, been run into the ground.
Wanna see its future if its stubborn voting perversities aren't reversed (45 seconds in)?
After more than half a century of Democrat misrule, Detroit would be better off without people altogether. Which ought to provide an indication of what it's going to take to restore the Motor City to its former glory, and how impossible to attain that dream will really be.
The term "liberalism runs everything into the ground" is not hyperbole, it is stone-cold fact:
Power is slowly being restored Tuesday afternoon after a widespread outage caused evacuations of buildings throughout the downtown, including Joe Louis Arena, Coleman A. Young Municipal Center, the Frank Murphy Hall of Justice, the Detroit Institute of Arts and some buildings at Wayne State University. According to Detroit Press Office shortly before noon: “The city’s public lighting grid suffered a major cable failure that has caused the entire grid to lose power at approximately 10:30 this morning. The outage is affecting all customers on the PLD grid. We have isolated the issue and are working to restore power as soon as possible.” “The city’s Public Lighting Department is working closely with DTE during this process.” DTE Energy Co. spokesman Scott Simons said “it looks like the entire Detroit Public Lighting system is down. Affecting about a hundred buildings, places like The Joe, Frank Murphy Hall of Justice, fire stations, schools. We were notified about 10:30 a.m. We’re working with them to help resolve the situation. We’ll help investigate the problem and make repairs. It’s too early yet to determine what has caused the shutdown.”
Six decades ago, Detroit was a bustling, industrial metropolis of over three million residents. Then the Democrats took over and have run the city ever since. Now it is bankrupt, a quarter its previous size, vast swaths of residential areas abandoned and collapsing into ruin, and the city cannot even keep its basic infrastructure from catastrophically failing.
Detroit has, in other words, been run into the ground.
Wanna see its future if its stubborn voting perversities aren't reversed (45 seconds in)?
After more than half a century of Democrat misrule, Detroit would be better off without people altogether. Which ought to provide an indication of what it's going to take to restore the Motor City to its former glory, and how impossible to attain that dream will really be.
U.S. Debt Tops $18 TRILLION
by JASmius

.....41% (and counting) of it courtesy of Barack Hussein Obama:
Well, they did say that the Obama presidency would be "historic".
To me it evokes this Geico commercial:
There are, in other words, two ways that anything "historic" can cut. Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, and Mao were "historic" leaders as well. Pity that empty-headed American voters twice opted to emulate their example, because they and their posterity - and all of us who DIDN'T vote for it - will be literally slaving away paying the literal price for that recidivist folly for a whole helluva lot longer than fifteen minutes.
.....41% (and counting) of it courtesy of Barack Hussein Obama:
Last week, total U.S. debt was a meager $17,963,753,617,957.26. Two days later, as updated today, on Black Friday, total outstanding U.S. public debt just hit a new historic level which probably would be better associated with a red color: as of the last work day of November, total U.S. public debt just surpassed $18 trillion for the first time, or $18,005,549,328,561.45 to be precise, of which debt held by the public rose to $12,922,681,725,432.94, an increase of $32 billion in one day.”
It also means that total U.S. debt to nominal GDP as of September 30th, which was $17.555 trillion, is now 103%. Keep in mind this GDP number was artificially increased by about half a trillion dollars a year ago thanks to the “benefit” of R&D and intangibles. Without said definitional change, debt/GDP would now be about 106%.”
Well, they did say that the Obama presidency would be "historic".
To me it evokes this Geico commercial:
There are, in other words, two ways that anything "historic" can cut. Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, and Mao were "historic" leaders as well. Pity that empty-headed American voters twice opted to emulate their example, because they and their posterity - and all of us who DIDN'T vote for it - will be literally slaving away paying the literal price for that recidivist folly for a whole helluva lot longer than fifteen minutes.
Fascinating Christian Prophecy Video Chronicles Final Week of November, 2014
By Douglas V. Gibbs
When you watch things like this, the safest thing to say is, "You decide."
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
When you watch things like this, the safest thing to say is, "You decide."
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
Remaining Constitution Class Schedule, 2014-2015
Instructor: Douglas Gibbs,
Subject: Constitution Classes Schedule: December and January

Subject: Constitution Classes Schedule: December and January
Constitution Classes by Douglas V. Gibbs December, 2014

As we reach the end of the year, we are also reaching the end of our Constitution Classes. By the end of January, we will have completed the entire Constitution. With the Holiday Schedule, vacations, and the New Year, there will be a shakeup in when we are holding classes, so this schedule should help.
Constitution Class Schedule: Dec. - Jan.
Corona Constitution Class, Tuesdays, 6pm
AllStar Collision, 522, Railroad St., Corona
2014
December 2 No Class
December 9 Amendments 9 and 10
December 16 Amendments 11 and 12
December 23 No Class (Christmas Week)
December 30 Civil War Amdts 13-15
2015
January 6 Income Tax, Amdt 16
January 13 State Voice, Amdt 17
January 20 Prohibition, Women's Vote,
Presidential and Congressional Procedures (Amendments 18-21)
January 27 Final Amendments 22-27
February 3: New Class Begins
Temecula Constitution Class, Thursdays, 6:30pm, Faith Armory, 41669 Winchester
2014
December 4 Amendments 9 and 10
December 11 Amendments 11 and 12
December 18 Civil War Amendments
December 25 No Class - Christmas
2015
January 1 No Class - New Years
January 8 Income Tax, Amdt 16
January 15 State Voice, Amdt 17
January 22 Prohibition, Women's Vote,
Presidential and Congressional Procedures (Amendments 18-21)
January 29 Final Amendments 22-27
February 5: New Class Begins
Learn More:
http://www.douglasvgibbs.com/constitution-classes.php
Corona Constitution Class
Tuesdays, 6:00 pm - 7:00 pm
AllStar Collision, Inc.
522 Railroad Street
Corona, CA 92882
Temecula Constitution Class
Thursdays, 6:30 pm - 7:30 pm
Faith Armory
41669 Winchester Road
Temecula, CA 92590
New Classes Begin February of 2015, Corona, Temecula, Lake Elsinore.
Coming in Summer of 2015:
Menifee.
Don't forget to catch Doug on the air on Constitution Radio with Douglas V. Gibbs, Saturdays on KCAA 1050AM/106.3FM . . . December 6 Guests include John Wohlstetter and Judge Andrew Napolitano.
Listen Online on Saturday at KCAAradio.com
Constitution Radio: Your Weekend Dose of Truth!
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

As we reach the end of the year, we are also reaching the end of our Constitution Classes. By the end of January, we will have completed the entire Constitution. With the Holiday Schedule, vacations, and the New Year, there will be a shakeup in when we are holding classes, so this schedule should help.
Constitution Class Schedule: Dec. - Jan.
Corona Constitution Class, Tuesdays, 6pm
AllStar Collision, 522, Railroad St., Corona
2014
December 2 No Class
December 9 Amendments 9 and 10
December 16 Amendments 11 and 12
December 23 No Class (Christmas Week)
December 30 Civil War Amdts 13-15
2015
January 6 Income Tax, Amdt 16
January 13 State Voice, Amdt 17
January 20 Prohibition, Women's Vote,
Presidential and Congressional Procedures (Amendments 18-21)
January 27 Final Amendments 22-27
February 3: New Class Begins
Temecula Constitution Class, Thursdays, 6:30pm, Faith Armory, 41669 Winchester
2014
December 4 Amendments 9 and 10
December 11 Amendments 11 and 12
December 18 Civil War Amendments
December 25 No Class - Christmas
2015
January 1 No Class - New Years
January 8 Income Tax, Amdt 16
January 15 State Voice, Amdt 17
January 22 Prohibition, Women's Vote,
Presidential and Congressional Procedures (Amendments 18-21)
January 29 Final Amendments 22-27
February 5: New Class Begins
Learn More:
http://www.douglasvgibbs.com/constitution-classes.php
Corona Constitution Class
Tuesdays, 6:00 pm - 7:00 pm
AllStar Collision, Inc.
522 Railroad Street
Corona, CA 92882
Temecula Constitution Class
Thursdays, 6:30 pm - 7:30 pm
Faith Armory
41669 Winchester Road
Temecula, CA 92590
New Classes Begin February of 2015, Corona, Temecula, Lake Elsinore.
Coming in Summer of 2015:
Menifee.
Don't forget to catch Doug on the air on Constitution Radio with Douglas V. Gibbs, Saturdays on KCAA 1050AM/106.3FM . . . December 6 Guests include John Wohlstetter and Judge Andrew Napolitano.
Listen Online on Saturday at KCAAradio.com
Constitution Radio: Your Weekend Dose of Truth!
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
Ferguson, Slavery & The Second Amendment
by JASmius

Well, I guess it just wouldn't be a proper race war without the corrupt, racist, 23-term Representative Charlie Rangel (D-NY18/19/16/15/13) making a crazed pitch for slavery reparations and the ubiquity of "collective white guilt":
How about, "Hands down, shut up, and learn the facts" Congressman?
No, Representative Rangel, the only "cancer" from which America is suffering is hard-left black racists like you who refuse to permit racial/ethnic healing and unity around common, traditional, American values. Or, as I've dubbed it, the "African-American Spring," a realization on the part of a small but growing number of black Americans that half a century of blind allegiance and fealty to the Democrat Party has yielded them nothing other than family destruction, poverty, welfare dependence, black-on-black crime, hopelessness, and an insatiable racist anger that has culminated in the Age Of Obama, the singularly most divisive, hate-mongering era this country has seen since at least the 1960s, and perhaps dating back to the (first) Civil War itself. The dynamic, in short, that cost Michael Brown his life.
You want that cancer, Mr. Rangel, because without it where would you be? Answer: Out of power, out of a job, and in need of having to earn an honest living for a change. It's people like you, and the malignant mentality you represent, who preach black superiority, who need to be cut out of American society as the tumors they are every bit as thoroughly as already has white supremacism. We cannot all move forward together as Americans until we ALL harken back to the words of Dr. Martin Luther King:
All Americans being "judged not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character" is not something that can, nor will ever be, tolerated by Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Marcia Fudge, Hakeem Jeffries, Charlie Rangel, or the "protestors" in Ferguson, Missouri, and their rabblerousing sympathizers around the country. Because they hate white people, they hate America, which is why they want to "fundamentally transform" it, and shove all whites to the "back of the bus".
The Black Klan is much like Kyle Reece's description of the Terminator:
Or at least reverse-enslaved for at least 246 years. Because nothing less will satisfy them.
Yes, it is madness. But madness taken to a level never before seen.
Would you believe....a (selective) embrace of the Second Amendment?:
Which, of course, are anti-American.
So the way to "alleviate tensions between the black community and law enforcement" is to arm the Ferguson "protestors" and thugs like Michael Brown? Enable rolling, endless inter-racial gun-battles throughout the streets of America? Escalate the race war?
Yes! It! Is!
Actually, it speaks volumes that the Democrat Party has held down, oppressed, and exploited African-Americans for more than two centuries and the latter still vote 90% Democrat.
But H.A. Goodman is wrong about their future nominee in 2016 not addressing Ferguson. Indeed, s/he is wrong about there even being a 2016 election, which arming black race warriors would make even less likely.
But I digress.
Which ought to tell you at least a little about why "unarmed" black males are "still dying," and how utterly, vanishingly little it has to do with "racist police brutality".
You're not playing close enough attention, H.A.
Like....arming violent, racist black "protestors"? Aiding and abetting cop-killing? To say nothing of black-on-black violence?
H.A., you and I define "effective" very differently.
Thank God for Charles Barkley, the voice of reason:
Any of you Black Klansman want to call The Round Mound of Rebound an "Oreo"? Lotsa luck with that. Because what Mr. Barkley is saying isn't "thinking white," it's [BLEEP]ing common sense.
One might even call it "anti-madness".
I'm sure Dr. King would have approved.
Well, I guess it just wouldn't be a proper race war without the corrupt, racist, 23-term Representative Charlie Rangel (D-NY18/19/16/15/13) making a crazed pitch for slavery reparations and the ubiquity of "collective white guilt":
Late Monday night, after the House took its final votes, members of the Congressional Black Caucus took the floor to speak for about one hour about race in the wake of a grand jury’s decision last week not to indict police officer Darren Wilson in the August shooting death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri.
“Hands up, don’t shoot,” Representative Hakeem Jeffries of New York-8 began.
How about, "Hands down, shut up, and learn the facts" Congressman?
Charles Rangel, the longtime New York Democrat, followed Jeffries and CBC Chairwoman Marcia Fudge of Ohio to deride America’s “cancer” and those who don’t acknowledge it. “Like anything else you love, if there’s an illness, if there’s a problem, you would want to know: What can you do to cure it? How can you make it all that our country can be?” Rangel said. “How can we say that we have a cancer until we recognize that we do, then we don’t really love the country? How can we be able to say that white and black in this country are equal and that those who work hard and live by the rules have the same opportunities as each other, when we know that we have this cancer?”
Rangel went on to address the idea of reparations for slavery, suggesting that it goes beyond money. “Some people may talk about payment for restitution for past crimes committed against human beings,” he said. “But that restitution could be the ability to say that we’re going to make certain that people of color in this country would be able to have access to the same type of education, live where they want to live, compete against anybody for the job, and not feeling that they’re inferior because people have been taught that just because they have a different complexion that they are superior.”
No, Representative Rangel, the only "cancer" from which America is suffering is hard-left black racists like you who refuse to permit racial/ethnic healing and unity around common, traditional, American values. Or, as I've dubbed it, the "African-American Spring," a realization on the part of a small but growing number of black Americans that half a century of blind allegiance and fealty to the Democrat Party has yielded them nothing other than family destruction, poverty, welfare dependence, black-on-black crime, hopelessness, and an insatiable racist anger that has culminated in the Age Of Obama, the singularly most divisive, hate-mongering era this country has seen since at least the 1960s, and perhaps dating back to the (first) Civil War itself. The dynamic, in short, that cost Michael Brown his life.
You want that cancer, Mr. Rangel, because without it where would you be? Answer: Out of power, out of a job, and in need of having to earn an honest living for a change. It's people like you, and the malignant mentality you represent, who preach black superiority, who need to be cut out of American society as the tumors they are every bit as thoroughly as already has white supremacism. We cannot all move forward together as Americans until we ALL harken back to the words of Dr. Martin Luther King:
All Americans being "judged not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character" is not something that can, nor will ever be, tolerated by Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Marcia Fudge, Hakeem Jeffries, Charlie Rangel, or the "protestors" in Ferguson, Missouri, and their rabblerousing sympathizers around the country. Because they hate white people, they hate America, which is why they want to "fundamentally transform" it, and shove all whites to the "back of the bus".
The Black Klan is much like Kyle Reece's description of the Terminator:
Or at least reverse-enslaved for at least 246 years. Because nothing less will satisfy them.
Yes, it is madness. But madness taken to a level never before seen.
Would you believe....a (selective) embrace of the Second Amendment?:
I never thought I’d be an open-carry advocate.
However, I’m a firm believer in working within the American political system in order to change the status quo. If the Second Amendment is cherished by millions of Americans, then why not use it to further certain liberal ideals?
Which, of course, are anti-American.
Protecting African-American lives and alleviating tensions between the black community and law enforcement should be a top priority of all Americans and especially Congress; however, this is not the case.
So the way to "alleviate tensions between the black community and law enforcement" is to arm the Ferguson "protestors" and thugs like Michael Brown? Enable rolling, endless inter-racial gun-battles throughout the streets of America? Escalate the race war?
Yes! It! Is!
It speaks volumes that African-Americans vote over 90% Democrat during national elections, yet our future nominee in 2016 still hasn’t addressed an issue the whole nation is talking about, even after Darren Wilson’s acquittal and the flames that engulfed Ferguson.
Actually, it speaks volumes that the Democrat Party has held down, oppressed, and exploited African-Americans for more than two centuries and the latter still vote 90% Democrat.
But H.A. Goodman is wrong about their future nominee in 2016 not addressing Ferguson. Indeed, s/he is wrong about there even being a 2016 election, which arming black race warriors would make even less likely.
But I digress.
With all our advancements as a nation, there’s still a correlation between today and 1895, the year Ida B. Wells wrote The Red Record. We live in a surreal time period where the deaths of unarmed black males still take place, even though we have a black president and African-Americans today possess more rights than at any other point in U.S. history.
Which ought to tell you at least a little about why "unarmed" black males are "still dying," and how utterly, vanishingly little it has to do with "racist police brutality".
While rioting by a very small percentage of protestors....
You're not playing close enough attention, H.A.
....does a disservice to the memory of Michael Brown and the cause of saving black lives or preventing future Fergusons, there are legal and more effective ways to solve our nation’s moral conundrum pertaining to racial profiling, police brutality, and issues related to the deaths of unarmed citizens.
Like....arming violent, racist black "protestors"? Aiding and abetting cop-killing? To say nothing of black-on-black violence?
H.A., you and I define "effective" very differently.
Thank God for Charles Barkley, the voice of reason:
“The true story came out from the grand jury testimony,” Barkley said, adding that he was made aware of “key forensic evidence, and several black witnesses that supported Officer Darren Wilson’s story…” He continued, “I can’t believe anything I hear on television anymore. And that’s why I don’t like talking about race issues with the media anymore, because they (the media) love this stuff, and lead people to jump to conclusions. The media shouldn’t do that. They never do that when black people kill each other.”
He also called those who rioted after the decision was announced “scumbags,” and said “There is no excuse for people to be out there burning down people’s businesses, burning down police cars.”
And in a marked departure from other prominent black leaders who have questioned tactics used by officers and, in some cases, accused officers of racial profiling and outright racism, Barkley supported police officers, especially those who work in black neighborhoods.
“[W]e have to be really careful with the cops, because if it wasn’t for the cops we would be living in the Wild, Wild West in our neighborhoods,” he said. “We can’t pick out certain incidentals that don’t go our way and act like the cops are all bad…. Do you know how bad some of these neighborhoods would be if it wasn’t for the cops?”
Any of you Black Klansman want to call The Round Mound of Rebound an "Oreo"? Lotsa luck with that. Because what Mr. Barkley is saying isn't "thinking white," it's [BLEEP]ing common sense.
One might even call it "anti-madness".
I'm sure Dr. King would have approved.
Reports say ISIS Leader's Wife and Son Detained in Lebanon
By Douglas V. Gibbs
Lebanese authorities state that they have detained a wife and suspected son of the leader of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. They have had the pair for several days, and she is currently being questioned.
The woman is a Syrian citizen, and her arrest has happened while ISIS and Nusra Front is trying to encourage Lebanon to release Islamic extremist prisoners being held by Lebanese authorities with a swap of captured Lebanese soldiers.
Earlier this week the Nusra Front threatened to kill one of the soldiers it is holding captive.
Al-Baghdadi's first wife is believed to be Iraqi citizen Saja al-Dulaimi, who was reportedly held by Syrian authorities and freed in a prisoner exchange with the Nusra Front earlier this year.
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
Lebanese authorities state that they have detained a wife and suspected son of the leader of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. They have had the pair for several days, and she is currently being questioned.
The woman is a Syrian citizen, and her arrest has happened while ISIS and Nusra Front is trying to encourage Lebanon to release Islamic extremist prisoners being held by Lebanese authorities with a swap of captured Lebanese soldiers.
Earlier this week the Nusra Front threatened to kill one of the soldiers it is holding captive.
Al-Baghdadi's first wife is believed to be Iraqi citizen Saja al-Dulaimi, who was reportedly held by Syrian authorities and freed in a prisoner exchange with the Nusra Front earlier this year.
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
Holder: End Racial Profiling
By Douglas V. Gibbs
In the wake of the Ferguson Riots in both August and November of 2014, Attorney General Eric Holder is calling for the federal government to put an end to racial profiling. Critics call the move an attempt by the federal government to stoke the fires of racial division. House Democrats pulling a "Hands Up, Don't Shoot" move on the floor of the House piles on the left's fanning of the flames. Milwaukee Sheriff David Clarke criticized the federal government, as well as local leadership, regarding the handling of Ferguson, calling the rioters "anarchists," and saying that political leadership is only making matters worse. Gun Owners of America President Larry Pratt states the federal government is using Ferguson as yet another excuse to go after gun ownership.
The question for many, as Holder calls for more federal involvement, is whether or not the federal government even has any authority to be involving itself in local issues, regardless of local say. The quick answer, when referring to the authorities granted by the United States Constitution, is a very stern "NO."
Like any issue, racial profiling has many faces. Should cops target certain groups for the sake of harassment because of their color, ethnicity, or religious affiliation? Of course not. But should law enforcement pay special attention to individuals that are members of groups that statistically dominate criminal activity, or societal unrest? Absolutely. Profiling, to a certain degree, is necessary, and unavoidable. The problem is, in the name of fairness, we are actually placed in greater danger, when "politically correct" rules against profiling are put into place because during the process certain groups become considered protected, and then receive the opposite attention they should be getting.
Local law enforcement understands the need for certain strategies. Those strategies may include some form of profiling, more than the federal government says it is willing to allow. For the federal government to be visiting with local law enforcement to "guide" them towards moving away from any form of profiling is not only unconstitutional, but will serve to handcuff local law enforcement, and will encourage more violence because certain groups will work to take advantage of the limitations on law enforcement.
I am not suggesting that members of certain groups should be harassed by police indiscriminately. Of course there should be care, and reasonable consideration. But if the problem in a neighborhood, for example, statistically shows that there are particular members of the community, wearing perhaps a certain gang color, or exhibiting a certain attitude, that are more likely to be a problem, law enforcement must be aware, and attentive regarding those realities, and use those observations to act as reasonably necessary.
In the end, what we are seeing is yet another infringement on local authority, and State Sovereignty, by a federal government carrying out an agenda that includes expanding their realm of powers, while doing so in the name of peace and safety.
What the Obama administration is doing is in line with what Rahm Emanuel said from the very beginning, "You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before."
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
Eric Holder's Speech on New Racial Profiling Guidelines Interrupted by Protesters, but his response gets a standing ovation - The Blaze
Holder: New Policy Will Help End Racial Profiling - CBS News
Sheriff David Clarke on Ferguson Response: Gov. Nixon "Afraid of Getting Criticized" - Right Wisconsin
Pratt: Feds Using Ferguson riot fears to clamp down on gun rights - Human Events
Eric Holder: We must seize the unique opportunity - Breitbart
Lawmakers make hands up gesture on House Floor - Politico
Holder says New Justice Department Policy will End Racial Profiling - CBS Atlanta
Black Sheriff: Political Leadership Stoked Ferguson Riots - NewsMax
In the wake of the Ferguson Riots in both August and November of 2014, Attorney General Eric Holder is calling for the federal government to put an end to racial profiling. Critics call the move an attempt by the federal government to stoke the fires of racial division. House Democrats pulling a "Hands Up, Don't Shoot" move on the floor of the House piles on the left's fanning of the flames. Milwaukee Sheriff David Clarke criticized the federal government, as well as local leadership, regarding the handling of Ferguson, calling the rioters "anarchists," and saying that political leadership is only making matters worse. Gun Owners of America President Larry Pratt states the federal government is using Ferguson as yet another excuse to go after gun ownership.
The question for many, as Holder calls for more federal involvement, is whether or not the federal government even has any authority to be involving itself in local issues, regardless of local say. The quick answer, when referring to the authorities granted by the United States Constitution, is a very stern "NO."
Like any issue, racial profiling has many faces. Should cops target certain groups for the sake of harassment because of their color, ethnicity, or religious affiliation? Of course not. But should law enforcement pay special attention to individuals that are members of groups that statistically dominate criminal activity, or societal unrest? Absolutely. Profiling, to a certain degree, is necessary, and unavoidable. The problem is, in the name of fairness, we are actually placed in greater danger, when "politically correct" rules against profiling are put into place because during the process certain groups become considered protected, and then receive the opposite attention they should be getting.
Local law enforcement understands the need for certain strategies. Those strategies may include some form of profiling, more than the federal government says it is willing to allow. For the federal government to be visiting with local law enforcement to "guide" them towards moving away from any form of profiling is not only unconstitutional, but will serve to handcuff local law enforcement, and will encourage more violence because certain groups will work to take advantage of the limitations on law enforcement.
I am not suggesting that members of certain groups should be harassed by police indiscriminately. Of course there should be care, and reasonable consideration. But if the problem in a neighborhood, for example, statistically shows that there are particular members of the community, wearing perhaps a certain gang color, or exhibiting a certain attitude, that are more likely to be a problem, law enforcement must be aware, and attentive regarding those realities, and use those observations to act as reasonably necessary.
In the end, what we are seeing is yet another infringement on local authority, and State Sovereignty, by a federal government carrying out an agenda that includes expanding their realm of powers, while doing so in the name of peace and safety.
What the Obama administration is doing is in line with what Rahm Emanuel said from the very beginning, "You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it's an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before."
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
Eric Holder's Speech on New Racial Profiling Guidelines Interrupted by Protesters, but his response gets a standing ovation - The Blaze
Holder: New Policy Will Help End Racial Profiling - CBS News
Sheriff David Clarke on Ferguson Response: Gov. Nixon "Afraid of Getting Criticized" - Right Wisconsin
Pratt: Feds Using Ferguson riot fears to clamp down on gun rights - Human Events
Eric Holder: We must seize the unique opportunity - Breitbart
Lawmakers make hands up gesture on House Floor - Politico
Holder says New Justice Department Policy will End Racial Profiling - CBS Atlanta
Black Sheriff: Political Leadership Stoked Ferguson Riots - NewsMax
Minnesota Bans ‘Gender Distinctions’ In High School Sports Programs
by JASmius

-Romans 1:28-32
Not just "hearty approval," either, but forced participation as well:
Stop the tape. There's a "transgender lobby"? Separate and distinct from the homosexual lobby? How would they know what colors to put in their flag?
Stop the tape again. Remember our little discussion of the war on home-schooling last week? Can we now expect State-sanctioned home invasions if Gopher State home-schooling parents don't treat their sons like girls and their daughters like boys? Or if they even use "gender-specific" references and honorifics? And if so, won't that require government monitoring and surveillance devices to be installed in each home-schooling home? How does genital mutilation fit into this?
I bet it won't apply to Muslim home-schoolers, though.
Stop the tape once more. You do realize this is a one-way street, yes? Boys aren't going to want to play any girls' sports (other than for the shower privileges - i.e. the Glenn Quagmire factor)....

....and it would only last until the first time there was "sexual harassment" (giggity) and/or the boys dominated the girls on the field, and/or a girl suffered an injury at a boy's hands. The feminazis, in other words, would go berserk.
No, the only direction this can go is girls playing on boys' teams, which also introduces all of the above factors. So to make it "fair" for the girls (or trannies, or whatever), boys' sports will have to be watered down to the maximum extent possible. And since certain physical realities cannot be overcome absent banning testosterone and mass penicide, the only other allowable outcome is the banning of all boys' AND girls' sports. Either that, or limiting sports only to "transsexuals". Which would have the effect of incentivizing rampant gender confusion. And life is all about incentives, isn't it?
Sure enough....:
And not just in Obamerikastan's Great White North, either:
I'm old enough to remember when parents had a counter to that "Everybody's doing it" canard: "If everybody else was jumping off a bridge to their deaths, would you want to do THAT, too?" Seriously, this shouldn't be a difficult media blitz to see through. Or wouldn't be if most Americans knew how to think. So, as a public service, allow me to do your thinking for you - a process, in this context, known as "extrapolation": The ultimate target of this madness is not boys, girls, the sexually confused, feminazis, or perverts; it is competition. Oh, certainly gender confusion and sexual perversion are collateral objectives, but the endgame is to eliminate competition, because competition is an inherently Western, capitalistic, American concept, one that has to be culturally eradicated if Barack Obama's "fundamental transformation" is to permanentize in the long term. And the most effective way of bringing that about is the same process by which the majority of present-day Americans were never inculcated with logic and critical-thinking ability: socialized education.
And you'll notice that private, religious, and home-schools will not be allowed to escape this insane edict.
Yes, banning "gender distinctions" is risible, and yes, it is madness. But there is without doubt a method to it in service of an end that is positively.....insidious.
And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God any longer, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not proper, being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, evil; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips, slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, without understanding, untrustworthy, unloving, unmerciful; and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them.
-Romans 1:28-32
Not just "hearty approval," either, but forced participation as well:
Minnesotans are currently facing a fast and furious onslaught by the transgender lobby....
Stop the tape. There's a "transgender lobby"? Separate and distinct from the homosexual lobby? How would they know what colors to put in their flag?
....which seems to be dictating policy to the Minnesota State High School League. The MSHSL decides policy for all extracurricular activities in public, private, religious, and home schools.
Stop the tape again. Remember our little discussion of the war on home-schooling last week? Can we now expect State-sanctioned home invasions if Gopher State home-schooling parents don't treat their sons like girls and their daughters like boys? Or if they even use "gender-specific" references and honorifics? And if so, won't that require government monitoring and surveillance devices to be installed in each home-schooling home? How does genital mutilation fit into this?
I bet it won't apply to Muslim home-schoolers, though.
It’s currently in the process of outlawing all sex distinctions in high-school sports. On December 4th, it plans to install an athletic policy granting transgender students the choice to play on either boys’ or girls’ teams.
Stop the tape once more. You do realize this is a one-way street, yes? Boys aren't going to want to play any girls' sports (other than for the shower privileges - i.e. the Glenn Quagmire factor)....
....and it would only last until the first time there was "sexual harassment" (giggity) and/or the boys dominated the girls on the field, and/or a girl suffered an injury at a boy's hands. The feminazis, in other words, would go berserk.
No, the only direction this can go is girls playing on boys' teams, which also introduces all of the above factors. So to make it "fair" for the girls (or trannies, or whatever), boys' sports will have to be watered down to the maximum extent possible. And since certain physical realities cannot be overcome absent banning testosterone and mass penicide, the only other allowable outcome is the banning of all boys' AND girls' sports. Either that, or limiting sports only to "transsexuals". Which would have the effect of incentivizing rampant gender confusion. And life is all about incentives, isn't it?
Sure enough....:
In this scheme, there would be no accounting for sex differences in high school sports on the field or in locker rooms, bathrooms, and hotel rooms. It forbids any camaraderie rooted in the biological reality of one’s sex, or any consideration of the reality of the opposite sex. In fact, to affirm that reality would basically be a crime. So the policy would ultimately abolish girls’ and boys’ sports alike.
And not just in Obamerikastan's Great White North, either:
Minnesota is a major trigger point for this policy’s application across the nation. If you haven’t noticed, the trans agenda is being pushed throughout the nation in a media shock-and-awe style intended to have folks get with the program, just like the proverbial teenager who says: “Well, everybody else is going along with it.” For the moment, on paper there will still be the illusion of male and female teams under this policy. . . . except that anybody claiming to be transgender can play on either the boys team or the girls team. In other words, there will not really be boys’ teams or girls’ teams. Follow me? No?
I'm old enough to remember when parents had a counter to that "Everybody's doing it" canard: "If everybody else was jumping off a bridge to their deaths, would you want to do THAT, too?" Seriously, this shouldn't be a difficult media blitz to see through. Or wouldn't be if most Americans knew how to think. So, as a public service, allow me to do your thinking for you - a process, in this context, known as "extrapolation": The ultimate target of this madness is not boys, girls, the sexually confused, feminazis, or perverts; it is competition. Oh, certainly gender confusion and sexual perversion are collateral objectives, but the endgame is to eliminate competition, because competition is an inherently Western, capitalistic, American concept, one that has to be culturally eradicated if Barack Obama's "fundamental transformation" is to permanentize in the long term. And the most effective way of bringing that about is the same process by which the majority of present-day Americans were never inculcated with logic and critical-thinking ability: socialized education.
And you'll notice that private, religious, and home-schools will not be allowed to escape this insane edict.
Yes, banning "gender distinctions" is risible, and yes, it is madness. But there is without doubt a method to it in service of an end that is positively.....insidious.
School: Refusal of Muslim Education is Racial Discrimination
By Douglas V. Gibbs
At what point do we finally say, "Enough is Enough."
Islam is not a religion, no matter how much it calls itself that. Liberal leftist socialist progressivism is more of a religion than Islam. Like the Liberal Left, Islam uses undying belief in statism to merge church and state into one. Political Islam is designed to deceive, and conquer.
Yet, the liberal leftist idiots of this nation refuse to see the truth, and how Islam uses our own freedoms to handcuff us into accepting their radical tyranny in our own nation.
At Littleton Green Community School, a controversial field trip was planned. The kids would be taken to a religious workshop about the Muslim faith, and failure to attend would be officially deemed as racist.
At what point do we finally say, "Enough is Enough."
Islam is not a religion, no matter how much it calls itself that. Liberal leftist socialist progressivism is more of a religion than Islam. Like the Liberal Left, Islam uses undying belief in statism to merge church and state into one. Political Islam is designed to deceive, and conquer.
Yet, the liberal leftist idiots of this nation refuse to see the truth, and how Islam uses our own freedoms to handcuff us into accepting their radical tyranny in our own nation.
At Littleton Green Community School, a controversial field trip was planned. The kids would be taken to a religious workshop about the Muslim faith, and failure to attend would be officially deemed as racist.
Of course, if the school had planned a trip that had even the most remote connection to Christianity, the school would be sued by every atheist and liberal left group within range for violation of their definition of the separation of church and state.
Parents were outraged when they discovered what was going on, and worse, the indoctrination of the Muslim religion was going to be applied to school children as young as eight years old.
The school has since retracted its attack against non-participants.
Parents were outraged when they discovered what was going on, and worse, the indoctrination of the Muslim religion was going to be applied to school children as young as eight years old.
The school has since retracted its attack against non-participants.
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
Infringing on Veteran's Gun Rights. . . to infringe on everyone's gun rights
By Douglas V. Gibbs
Michael Connelly says that the Obama administration is trying to disarm America's Heroes. Horror stories about the Veteran's Administration and the Obama administration working to disarm our veterans in the name of mental illness or physical disability are all too common. A friend of mine who served in the Middle East told me that many veterans suffer from PTSD, but will not say anything because to do so is to open the door for the federal government to begin taking away their rights, beginning with their gun rights. Even having your wife, he told me, paying the bills could be grounds for being considered incompetent, and therefore not allowed to own a firearm.
Michael Connelly says that the Obama administration is trying to disarm America's Heroes. Horror stories about the Veteran's Administration and the Obama administration working to disarm our veterans in the name of mental illness or physical disability are all too common. A friend of mine who served in the Middle East told me that many veterans suffer from PTSD, but will not say anything because to do so is to open the door for the federal government to begin taking away their rights, beginning with their gun rights. Even having your wife, he told me, paying the bills could be grounds for being considered incompetent, and therefore not allowed to own a firearm.
The uninformed, or those that have no problem with the government taking other people's rights, as long as theirs are left alone, see no problem with the strategy. However, it is only a matter of time before the tactic goes beyond the veterans, and to everyone in American Society.
Confiscation in the name of mental illness seems fair enough to most folks, on the surface, but when the government is the agency that defines what mental incapacity is, at what point do we realize that they definitions are politically motivated, and is targeting those they see as a threat against government power?
The definition will continue to broaden, until the very desire to own a firearm will be considered a mental instability, and grounds to disarm someone.
Tyranny always seeks to disarm its opposition.
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
VA to Veterans: Late Paying Bills, you can't own a firearm - Tea Party Crusaders
Monday, December 01, 2014
Obama Rewards Ferguson Rioters With $263 Million Payday
by JASmius

And to think that I wasted thirty years going to college, getting a business degree, earning my CPA license, and toiling thanklessly away until some fat, combed-overed corporate animal purged me and ended my career to make room for one of his cronies.
See where "thinking white" gets you?:
Which, constitutionally speaking, the federal government has no legal authority to muster, undertake, or impose, since the Ferguson insurrection is not (yet) an interstate phenomenon under Article IV, Section 4, the idiot Fergy-symps around the country notwithstanding. Although just give the Regime time, and it may yet reach that level, and in fact has to for their martial law plans to be realized.
i.e. Forcibly neutering legitimate state and local law enforcement and supplanting them with his "civilian national security force". "Eliminating competition" is another way of describing it. Also "putting his martial law chess pieces in place, ready to strike".
Which I interpret as his Regime having already fully armed his "civilian national security force" with all the military-style weaponry and equipment they will need when the coup is set in motion and the crackdown begins. Billions of rounds of ammunition procured by DHS, remember?
Again, I ask: Does anybody really still believe that Barack Obama is "incompetent"?
To answer my question above, I couldn't help "thinking white," because, genetics. Which is a shame, because if I had even a single black ancestor, no matter how far removed, I could put in for a modest share of The One's "stash," be set up (modestly) for life, and never have to fret about a bleak economic future ever again.
Or I could just switch parties. There don't seem to be any poor Democrats, after all.
Now, not even in Ferguson, Missouri.
And to think that I wasted thirty years going to college, getting a business degree, earning my CPA license, and toiling thanklessly away until some fat, combed-overed corporate animal purged me and ended my career to make room for one of his cronies.
See where "thinking white" gets you?:
Barack Obama made a forceful pledge on Monday to use his last two years in office to address the “simmering distrust” between police and minority communities as he requested $263 million for the federal response to the civil rights upheaval triggered in Ferguson, Missouri.
Which, constitutionally speaking, the federal government has no legal authority to muster, undertake, or impose, since the Ferguson insurrection is not (yet) an interstate phenomenon under Article IV, Section 4, the idiot Fergy-symps around the country notwithstanding. Although just give the Regime time, and it may yet reach that level, and in fact has to for their martial law plans to be realized.
Obama said he would set up a task force to study how to improve community policing with an eye toward building trust between law enforcement and communities of color.
i.e. Forcibly neutering legitimate state and local law enforcement and supplanting them with his "civilian national security force". "Eliminating competition" is another way of describing it. Also "putting his martial law chess pieces in place, ready to strike".
He also said he would consider imposing tighter controls on the proliferation of military-style weaponry and equipment provided to many police departments.
Which I interpret as his Regime having already fully armed his "civilian national security force" with all the military-style weaponry and equipment they will need when the coup is set in motion and the crackdown begins. Billions of rounds of ammunition procured by DHS, remember?
Again, I ask: Does anybody really still believe that Barack Obama is "incompetent"?
To answer my question above, I couldn't help "thinking white," because, genetics. Which is a shame, because if I had even a single black ancestor, no matter how far removed, I could put in for a modest share of The One's "stash," be set up (modestly) for life, and never have to fret about a bleak economic future ever again.
Or I could just switch parties. There don't seem to be any poor Democrats, after all.
Now, not even in Ferguson, Missouri.
Abortion Rates Fall To Historic Lows
by JASmius

Somewhere in a non-descript corner of hell, Margaret Sanger is weeping:
No, that's how they're desperately trying to spin it, because admitting to the alternative explanation - that the American people have already become (narrowly) majority pro-life, with that trend increasing at an accelerating pace - would be a death knell to the Left's child-sacrifice sacrament, as well as a concession of something - that history and culture can swing in both directions, or, in other words, against the Left - that is supposed to be impossible.
But if the GI wants to effectively blame the atrophying of the abortion industry on Obamanomics, they're free to do so. To the degree that that is the case, the irony is hilarious.
Post-twenty-week abortions are the finger in the dike, folks. Once they're outlawed (and yes, that should be done at the state level, as the federal government has no constitutional authority to do anything regarding abortion one way or the other absent an amendment to that end), as the American people already support, what's left? The other 98.6% percent of the dwindling abortion "pie".
You could say that the child-murderers fear a "reverse- slippery slope". Which helps explain the grotesquely criminal lengths to which they are willing to go, with the oftentimes-complicity of the governing authorities, to preserve what "business" and "clientele" they have left.
With genuine life-science, genetics, and American culture turning against them, what do the anti-lifers have left to sustain them? Barack Obama and the Democrat Party. Or, in other words, they still have the upper hand. And the more jeopardized that upper hand becomes, the more vicious, murderous, and authoritarian they will become.
"Cornered animals," and all that.
Somewhere in a non-descript corner of hell, Margaret Sanger is weeping:
The number of women having abortions dropped 13% between 2002 and 2011, new data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) show.
That trend is likely due to lingering effects of the recession, reproductive health experts, such as those at the Guttmacher Institute, have said.
No, that's how they're desperately trying to spin it, because admitting to the alternative explanation - that the American people have already become (narrowly) majority pro-life, with that trend increasing at an accelerating pace - would be a death knell to the Left's child-sacrifice sacrament, as well as a concession of something - that history and culture can swing in both directions, or, in other words, against the Left - that is supposed to be impossible.
But if the GI wants to effectively blame the atrophying of the abortion industry on Obamanomics, they're free to do so. To the degree that that is the case, the irony is hilarious.
The report also shed light on the number of abortions performed after the politically charged timeframe of twenty weeks of gestation.
Just 1.4% of abortions took place after twenty weeks, which has been the center point of debate in recent years as Republicans, including incoming Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, have vowed to introduce legislation banning abortions after that timeline.
…The rate of abortions decreased among women in every age group except those younger than fifteen years old, which increased slightly but remained fewer than 1% of all procedures.
Post-twenty-week abortions are the finger in the dike, folks. Once they're outlawed (and yes, that should be done at the state level, as the federal government has no constitutional authority to do anything regarding abortion one way or the other absent an amendment to that end), as the American people already support, what's left? The other 98.6% percent of the dwindling abortion "pie".
You could say that the child-murderers fear a "reverse- slippery slope". Which helps explain the grotesquely criminal lengths to which they are willing to go, with the oftentimes-complicity of the governing authorities, to preserve what "business" and "clientele" they have left.
With genuine life-science, genetics, and American culture turning against them, what do the anti-lifers have left to sustain them? Barack Obama and the Democrat Party. Or, in other words, they still have the upper hand. And the more jeopardized that upper hand becomes, the more vicious, murderous, and authoritarian they will become.
"Cornered animals," and all that.
Hard Starboard Radio: The Many Faces Of Hate
The New York Times' meaning in Ferguson; Officer Wilson should never even have been brought before the grand jury; Black lives matter, and so, therefore, must black perpetrators; In 2014, the media delivered a torrent of anti-conservative bile; and if the Right is going to avenge it in 2016, Tea Partiers and the "Establishment" are going to have to learn to get along.
"Justice" does NOT equal revenge at 6PM Eastern/3PM Pacific.
Black Ferguson Rioters Bludgeon White Immigrant To Death With Hammers
by JASmius

I guess Zemir Begic "murdered" Michael Brown, too. His guilt in that "injustice" was the unforgivable crime of sitting in his own car, minding his own business, when "Ferguson protestors" assaulted him, and he tried to use his "white privilege" to defend himself. And simply being white, of course.
Ten to one says the hammers were looted from a minority-owned hardware store:
Sorry, Mr. Nukic, but the "Ferguson protestors" are going to keep murdering pasty-white Bosnians (and other whites) until they force you to cast aside "peace," because "peace" isn't what they want.
And now we have two ethnic groups pitted against each other, with one cast as the pure-as-the-wind-driven-snow babyfaces, the other cast as "racist scum" heels. All that remains is for any sort of retaliation that injures or kills a black victim, and the race war will explode - just as the Obama White House wants.
More "social justice". Because, y'see, the black "juveniles" were entitled to trash Mr. Begic's car with him in it, and he only got out to confront them because he was a flaming racist. So he "got what he deserved".
My sardony levels may seem to have reached agonizing levels - rather like if Quint's fingernails on the chalkboard in Jaws had been magnified by the PA system in the Edward Jones Dome - but this is the mindless, drone mindset of the "Ferguson protestors," their equally brainwashed, idiotic sympathizers across the country, the Black Klan, the Obamedia, and all the way up to the Obama White House itself. It's another of the ironies of this disgusting spectacle that I would argue that not a single one of them actually gives a rat's ass about Michael Brown - and that includes his no-account racist parents and step-father. They raised their son to be a thug and a cop-killer, and his attempt to kill a cop backfired on him. Fatally. That wasn't Officer Darren Wilson's fault; he was acting entirely in self-defense, as the facts of the case indicated, which is why the grand jury declined to indict him. Just as the fact is that if Mr. Brown had simply done what Wilson told him to do, and had three iotas of common sense, self-control, and respect for legitimate authority, he would be alive and well today.
But he was much more useful to the Black Klan as a dead martyr than as a live human being who might eventually have started thinking for himself, which is what a growing number of African-Americans have been doing of late, causing them to question "black America's" yes, slavish indenturement to the Democrat Party for the past half-century. A degree of exploitation that includes "fundamentally transforming" young black men into rabid animals ready and willing to riot on cue and/or be effortlessly manipulated into serving as cannon fodder for whatever the Obamunist Left needs to advance its corrupt, despotic agenda.
Like....Michael Brown. And if they should happen to run up a retaliatory innocent white body count, like Zemir Begic, to stand in for Officer Wilson, well, they're "entitled" to do so in the name of "justice".
Several of his murderers have been arrested, thereby redundantly "proving" that the Ferguson police are "racist". No doubt the White House "solution" will be to "cleanse" Greater St. Louis of all non-blacks (except for the conscripted white work gangs trucked in to rebuild all the black infrastructure the "protestors" torched and trashed), but I imagine the race war will have to spiral a lot higher before they float that post-martial law trial balloon.
Maybe O will call it "the "Begic Protocol".
I guess Zemir Begic "murdered" Michael Brown, too. His guilt in that "injustice" was the unforgivable crime of sitting in his own car, minding his own business, when "Ferguson protestors" assaulted him, and he tried to use his "white privilege" to defend himself. And simply being white, of course.
Ten to one says the hammers were looted from a minority-owned hardware store:
St. Louis Bosnians outraged about a deadly hammer attack in the city’s Bevo Mill neighborhood spilled into the streets Sunday night to voice frustrations over violence touching their community.
“We’re just angry because we’re trying to protect our community,” said Mirza Nukic, 29, of St. Louis. “We’re just trying to be peaceful.”
Sorry, Mr. Nukic, but the "Ferguson protestors" are going to keep murdering pasty-white Bosnians (and other whites) until they force you to cast aside "peace," because "peace" isn't what they want.
Nukic was among at least fifty people, mostly, if not all Bosnians, who briefly blocked Gravois Avenue at Itaska Street on Sunday night to protest the killing. The intersection was near where Zemir Begic, a Bosnian man who moved to St. Louis this year, was attacked by at least three teens with hammers early Sunday.
And now we have two ethnic groups pitted against each other, with one cast as the pure-as-the-wind-driven-snow babyfaces, the other cast as "racist scum" heels. All that remains is for any sort of retaliation that injures or kills a black victim, and the race war will explode - just as the Obama White House wants.
Police said Begic was in his vehicle about 1:15 a.m. in the 4200 block of Itaska when several juveniles approached and began damaging his car. Police said Begic got out to confront the juveniles, who began yelling at him and hitting him with hammers.
Begic, 32, who lived in the 4200 block of Miami Street, suffered injuries to his head, abdomen, face and mouth. He died at St. Louis University Hospital.
More "social justice". Because, y'see, the black "juveniles" were entitled to trash Mr. Begic's car with him in it, and he only got out to confront them because he was a flaming racist. So he "got what he deserved".
My sardony levels may seem to have reached agonizing levels - rather like if Quint's fingernails on the chalkboard in Jaws had been magnified by the PA system in the Edward Jones Dome - but this is the mindless, drone mindset of the "Ferguson protestors," their equally brainwashed, idiotic sympathizers across the country, the Black Klan, the Obamedia, and all the way up to the Obama White House itself. It's another of the ironies of this disgusting spectacle that I would argue that not a single one of them actually gives a rat's ass about Michael Brown - and that includes his no-account racist parents and step-father. They raised their son to be a thug and a cop-killer, and his attempt to kill a cop backfired on him. Fatally. That wasn't Officer Darren Wilson's fault; he was acting entirely in self-defense, as the facts of the case indicated, which is why the grand jury declined to indict him. Just as the fact is that if Mr. Brown had simply done what Wilson told him to do, and had three iotas of common sense, self-control, and respect for legitimate authority, he would be alive and well today.
But he was much more useful to the Black Klan as a dead martyr than as a live human being who might eventually have started thinking for himself, which is what a growing number of African-Americans have been doing of late, causing them to question "black America's" yes, slavish indenturement to the Democrat Party for the past half-century. A degree of exploitation that includes "fundamentally transforming" young black men into rabid animals ready and willing to riot on cue and/or be effortlessly manipulated into serving as cannon fodder for whatever the Obamunist Left needs to advance its corrupt, despotic agenda.
Like....Michael Brown. And if they should happen to run up a retaliatory innocent white body count, like Zemir Begic, to stand in for Officer Wilson, well, they're "entitled" to do so in the name of "justice".
Several of his murderers have been arrested, thereby redundantly "proving" that the Ferguson police are "racist". No doubt the White House "solution" will be to "cleanse" Greater St. Louis of all non-blacks (except for the conscripted white work gangs trucked in to rebuild all the black infrastructure the "protestors" torched and trashed), but I imagine the race war will have to spiral a lot higher before they float that post-martial law trial balloon.
Maybe O will call it "the "Begic Protocol".
Man Leaves Wife for Gay Lover, Wins Custody of Children
By Douglas V. Gibbs
The gay agenda portrays the "plight" of the homosexual as victimhood. The gay behavior is being treated as if it is a poor, downtrodden racial minority and the supporters of the gay agenda are willing to do whatever they can to forward the agenda, even if it means taking away the rights of others, or completely ignoring common sense. For their belief they are willing to use the force of law to silence, and destroy, their opposition.
In one case, a homosexual man left his wife for his gay lover, and then fought her for custody of their children. The court not only handed the children to him, but gave him everything he wanted, and would have offered more if he'd asked for it. The courts, or at least this judge, has decided that the gay agenda must be supported at all costs, even if it means taking the children away from a mother to put them in a gay household, despite the mother's rights.
"Our divorce was not settled in mediation or with lawyers. No, it went all the way to trial. My husband wanted primary custody of our children. His entire case can be summed up in one sentence: “I am gay, and I deserve my rights.” It worked: the judge gave him practically everything he wanted. At one point, he even told my husband, “If you had asked for more, I would have given it to you.”
"I truly believe that judge was legislating from the bench, disregarding the facts of our particular case and simply using us—using our children— to help influence future cases. In our society, LGBT citizens are seen as marginalized victims who must be protected at all costs, even if it means stripping rights from others. By ignoring the injustice committed against me and my children, the judge seemed to think that he was correcting a larger injustice."
"My husband had left us for his gay lover. They make more money than I do. There are two of them and only one of me. Even so, the judge believed that they were the victims. No matter what I said or did, I didn’t have a chance of saving our children from being bounced around like so many pieces of luggage."
The homosexual agenda does not care about what is right, or what is in accordance with the law. Their activities, their decisions, all have to do only with what is best for their agenda. They will completely destroy society, and the Constitution, if that is what it means to culturally normalize homosexuality, and silence forever any and all opposition that dares to believe otherwise.
The gay agenda portrays the "plight" of the homosexual as victimhood. The gay behavior is being treated as if it is a poor, downtrodden racial minority and the supporters of the gay agenda are willing to do whatever they can to forward the agenda, even if it means taking away the rights of others, or completely ignoring common sense. For their belief they are willing to use the force of law to silence, and destroy, their opposition.
In one case, a homosexual man left his wife for his gay lover, and then fought her for custody of their children. The court not only handed the children to him, but gave him everything he wanted, and would have offered more if he'd asked for it. The courts, or at least this judge, has decided that the gay agenda must be supported at all costs, even if it means taking the children away from a mother to put them in a gay household, despite the mother's rights.
"Our divorce was not settled in mediation or with lawyers. No, it went all the way to trial. My husband wanted primary custody of our children. His entire case can be summed up in one sentence: “I am gay, and I deserve my rights.” It worked: the judge gave him practically everything he wanted. At one point, he even told my husband, “If you had asked for more, I would have given it to you.”
"I truly believe that judge was legislating from the bench, disregarding the facts of our particular case and simply using us—using our children— to help influence future cases. In our society, LGBT citizens are seen as marginalized victims who must be protected at all costs, even if it means stripping rights from others. By ignoring the injustice committed against me and my children, the judge seemed to think that he was correcting a larger injustice."
"My husband had left us for his gay lover. They make more money than I do. There are two of them and only one of me. Even so, the judge believed that they were the victims. No matter what I said or did, I didn’t have a chance of saving our children from being bounced around like so many pieces of luggage."
The homosexual agenda does not care about what is right, or what is in accordance with the law. Their activities, their decisions, all have to do only with what is best for their agenda. They will completely destroy society, and the Constitution, if that is what it means to culturally normalize homosexuality, and silence forever any and all opposition that dares to believe otherwise.
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
Chucky Schumer's Con Job For The Middle Class
by JASmius

Peter Morici notices what I did a week ago:
....aaaaaaaaand stick the middle class with the bill, all the while claiming it was all for the middle class's benefit.
In other words, Chucky is recycling the same old Donk scam, while attempting to foist the blame for its latest round of disastrous failures on what he thinks is a "lame duck" president.
There's plenty more red meat at the link. Suffice it for now to say that it appears that most, if not all, Democrats outside the White House will be caught as flat-footed as the rest of the country will be when Barack Obama pulls his coup and announces his lifetime presidency.
All for the sake and benefit of the "middle class," of course.
Peter Morici notices what I did a week ago:
Senator Charles Schumer, D-NY, in a recent speech, stated President Obama and Democratic majorities in Congress were elected in 2008 to get the economy working for middle-class families. Consequently, assigning extraordinary priority to passing the [Una]ffordable Care[-Less] Act (UCLA) was a mistake.
In 2008, most middle-class families had private insurance they liked; their incomes had been falling for about a decade.
The [UCLA] was really part of Democrats' agenda to assist the working poor — raising the minimum wage and expanding Medicaid, food stamps, the earned-income tax credit and higher education grants — while cozying up to big business to finance Democratic campaigns.
....aaaaaaaaand stick the middle class with the bill, all the while claiming it was all for the middle class's benefit.
In other words, Chucky is recycling the same old Donk scam, while attempting to foist the blame for its latest round of disastrous failures on what he thinks is a "lame duck" president.
There's plenty more red meat at the link. Suffice it for now to say that it appears that most, if not all, Democrats outside the White House will be caught as flat-footed as the rest of the country will be when Barack Obama pulls his coup and announces his lifetime presidency.
All for the sake and benefit of the "middle class," of course.
ISIS Claims To Have Nuclear Dirty Bomb
by JASmius

....fueled by a hundred pounds of uranium stolen in....Iraq, of all WMD-free places.
One thing we can count on: It won't stay in Iraq for very long:
It is most likely not an idle boast. Iraq's U.N. Ambassador Mohamed Ali Alhakim has already warned the U.N. of precisely this possibility, and ISIS did, after all, conquer Mosul six months ago, so they've had ample time to gather such nuclear materials for obligatorily nefarious purposes. It's also likely that since ISIS members are publicizing their nuclear acquisitions, they've already got a radiological weapon in place somewhere in a targeted Western city - perhaps more than one - and are only waiting for the opportune time to set it (or them) off.
New Year's Eve in Times Square, perhaps?

It's not Loki and his Chitauri army....
....but it would bring 2015 in with a bang, and would be Barack Obama's belated "fundamental transformation" Christmas gift.
....fueled by a hundred pounds of uranium stolen in....Iraq, of all WMD-free places.
One thing we can count on: It won't stay in Iraq for very long:
M[uslims] boasted of the device on social media, with one even commenting on the destruction such a bomb would wreak in London, four months after the chemical was reported missing from Mosul University.
Among [Muslim]s making online threats to the West is British explosives expert Hamayun Tariq, who fled his home in Dudley, West Midlands, for the Middle East in 2012.
Using the Muslim name, Muslim-al-Britani, he posted on Twitter: ‘O by the way Islamic State does have a Dirty bomb. We found some Radio active material from Mosul university,’ the Mirror reports.
He continued: ‘We’ll find out what dirty bombs are and what they do. We’ll also discuss what might happen if one actually went off in a public area.
‘This sort of a bomb would be terribly destructive if went off In LONDON becuz (sic) it would be more of a disruptive than a destructive weapon,’ before having his Twitter account suspended.
It is most likely not an idle boast. Iraq's U.N. Ambassador Mohamed Ali Alhakim has already warned the U.N. of precisely this possibility, and ISIS did, after all, conquer Mosul six months ago, so they've had ample time to gather such nuclear materials for obligatorily nefarious purposes. It's also likely that since ISIS members are publicizing their nuclear acquisitions, they've already got a radiological weapon in place somewhere in a targeted Western city - perhaps more than one - and are only waiting for the opportune time to set it (or them) off.
New Year's Eve in Times Square, perhaps?
It's not Loki and his Chitauri army....
....but it would bring 2015 in with a bang, and would be Barack Obama's belated "fundamental transformation" Christmas gift.
‘Time’ Magazine To Make Ferguson Protesters ‘Persons Of The Year’
by JASmius

There isn't yet word on whether O's "Ferguson Summit" will include Regime propagandists, but if not, Time is doing its part for the racist insurrectionary cause anyway:
i.e. on black racists fomenting violence on policemen.
When they should have been marching in solidarity with Officer Wilson and the Ferguson grand jury that refused to be intimidated by mob violence and adjudicated on the facts and evidence.
Huge, physically overpowering, and murderous
In self-defense
In passing-fad fashion. Which is why King Hussein is using his royal scepter to keep the pot of civil unrest well-stirred. Because, as the publishers of Time clearly believe, the true nobility of the black protestor can only be realized in direct proportion to the number of black neighborhoods and businesses torched and the quantity of white blood spilled.
But then what else can we expect from a rag that has in the past honored such upstanding dignitaries as Adolph Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Mao Tse-Tung, and of course, Barack Hussein Obama?
There isn't yet word on whether O's "Ferguson Summit" will include Regime propagandists, but if not, Time is doing its part for the racist insurrectionary cause anyway:
Ferguson protestors have gained the lead in TIME’s Person of the Year poll, with seven days to go in the voting.
Unrest in Ferguson and around the country focused attention on race and policing....
i.e. on black racists fomenting violence on policemen.
....helping to lift Ferguson protestors into first place in the TIME reader poll with 10.7% of the vote. Thousands of demonstrators marched in solidarity with the family of Michael Brown....
When they should have been marching in solidarity with Officer Wilson and the Ferguson grand jury that refused to be intimidated by mob violence and adjudicated on the facts and evidence.
....an unarmed....
Huge, physically overpowering, and murderous
....black man who was shot by the police....
In self-defense
....disrupting Black Friday shopping in San Francisco, Chicago, New York, Seattle and other cities.
Protests cropped up all across the United States in the wake of a grand jury’s decision in Ferguson Monday not to indict the white police officer who fatally shot Brown.
In passing-fad fashion. Which is why King Hussein is using his royal scepter to keep the pot of civil unrest well-stirred. Because, as the publishers of Time clearly believe, the true nobility of the black protestor can only be realized in direct proportion to the number of black neighborhoods and businesses torched and the quantity of white blood spilled.
But then what else can we expect from a rag that has in the past honored such upstanding dignitaries as Adolph Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Mao Tse-Tung, and of course, Barack Hussein Obama?
Obama Calls Ferguson Summit
by JASmius

Just what a dying conflagration needs: a deluge of napalm:
i.e. Toadies, Black Klansmen, the Obamastapo, and general worshippers.
i.e. The planning for O's eventual declaration of martial law.
i.e. Giving marching orders to his insurrectionists to block more traffic, burn down more black neighborhoods, murder more white people, and otherwise stir up more and more civil unrest nationwide.
Y'see, the White House's problem is that the Ferguson-inspired national race war isn't quite materializing - in fact, it's fading and fizzling, which is why the arrest of those New Black Panthers domestic terrorists was such a crippling blow:
Not exactly flames dancing on the horizon and rivers of white crackers' blood flowing through the streets.
That's almost quaint in its dainty ignorance. Ironic, also, since on the Raiders' first possession, the Rams' defensive line did a far more accurate portrayal of Michael Brown's actual actions on August 8th. Probably including trying to grab the referees' starting pistols.
Bottom line is, the embers need to be stirred up in order to keep the flames of revolution alive, and keep Ferguson on the front pages and in the leads of network "news" programs, because that suits Barack Obama's "fundamental transformation" agenda. The last thing he needs is Americans to calm down and run the risk of reflecting upon the facts and evidence - both in Ferguson and in Washington, D.C. - and concluding that the real enemy is not some exiled white cop in the Greater St. Louis area, but right in the White House itself.
Just what a dying conflagration needs: a deluge of napalm:
Barack Obama will discuss the situation in Ferguson, Missouri, Monday with his Cabinet, civil rights leaders, law enforcement officials, and others.
i.e. Toadies, Black Klansmen, the Obamastapo, and general worshippers.
The White House says Obama's Cabinet meeting will focus on his administration's review of federal programs that provide military-style equipment to law enforcement agencies.
i.e. The planning for O's eventual declaration of martial law.
The White House says the president will also meet with young civil rights leaders to discuss the challenges posed by "mistrust between law enforcement and communities of color." He'll then meet with government and law enforcement officials, as well as other community leaders, to discuss how to strengthen neighborhoods.
i.e. Giving marching orders to his insurrectionists to block more traffic, burn down more black neighborhoods, murder more white people, and otherwise stir up more and more civil unrest nationwide.
Y'see, the White House's problem is that the Ferguson-inspired national race war isn't quite materializing - in fact, it's fading and fizzling, which is why the arrest of those New Black Panthers domestic terrorists was such a crippling blow:
Protests have continued in Ferguson and around the nation, but have been more muted than the violence sparked last week by a grand jury's decision not to indict a police officer in the shooting of 18-year-old Michael Brown.
There have been demonstrations in more than a hundred cities around the country, on public roadways, in shopping malls and government buildings.
On Sunday, demonstrators temporarily shut down part of the busy Interstate 395 highway that runs through Washington, D.C., police said. The protest lasted less than an hour as people formed a human chain to block traffic in both directions.
Not exactly flames dancing on the horizon and rivers of white crackers' blood flowing through the streets.
Anger spilled onto the playing field when the NFL's St. Louis Rams played Oakland at home on Sunday. Some of the Rams entered the stadium with their hands raised overhead, a show of solidarity with Brown, who some witnesses say had his hands in the air when Wilson fired the fatal shots.
That's almost quaint in its dainty ignorance. Ironic, also, since on the Raiders' first possession, the Rams' defensive line did a far more accurate portrayal of Michael Brown's actual actions on August 8th. Probably including trying to grab the referees' starting pistols.
Bottom line is, the embers need to be stirred up in order to keep the flames of revolution alive, and keep Ferguson on the front pages and in the leads of network "news" programs, because that suits Barack Obama's "fundamental transformation" agenda. The last thing he needs is Americans to calm down and run the risk of reflecting upon the facts and evidence - both in Ferguson and in Washington, D.C. - and concluding that the real enemy is not some exiled white cop in the Greater St. Louis area, but right in the White House itself.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




