Honestly, I am not one to chase after conspiracy theories. On the same token, however, I realize that sometimes there is a bit of truth in a few of them. For example, the drive for a one world government, a new world order, if you must, is not just some silly conspiracy theory, though we have been taught by those that are proposing such that it is. The leftist statist progressives have been driving towards global governance longer than the United States has been a nation. Government based on what the English Colonists called "Utopianism" is the foundation of this drive for worldwide dominance. Socialism, utopianism by a different name, was a concept that dominated the early English Colonies, despite the Saxon influence of Natural Rights and a Free Market System. The result of the early colonists' communal systems was starvation, death, misery, and more often than not the complete failure of those early colonies. However, when the communal utopianism of those early colonies was abandoned, and replaced with individualism, where the colonists kept what they produced, and then could trade their excess products in a free market, the colonies prospered.
The American Revolution was inspired by patriots that demanded independence from Great Britain. The drive for independence did not begin with independency in mind, however. The inspiration for dissent in The Colonies began with a desire to be treated like freemen, based on the foundation of a free system where no one was above the law, including the king. The Colonists desired representation, and for their natural rights to be left alone by a government across the Atlantic Ocean that was beginning to view the colonies as little more than a source of revenue, and a way for Britain to pay her war debt.
Rallies and protests led to confrontation, and eventually shots fired in Boston, and later at Lexington Green, enabled the conflict to explode into a Revolutionary War. But the Americans were different than the Europeans. Their ideas of governance was based on what would become the foundational building blocks of a mixed constitution, based on the strengths of the systems that led to the prosperity of the Saxon System in Britain (Magna Carta, Declaration of Rights), Israel under the system established in the Biblical Book of Deuteronomy, Slovenian republics, the Roman Republic before statism turned Rome into a collapsing empire, and Solon's and Polybius's teachings from Ancient Greece.
History is filled with examples of tyrannies. Liberty is the exception, a rare gem that, in today's education system driven by leftist propaganda, is often revealed as nothing more than a minor footnote on the bottom of some obscure historical essay. The normal result of bloody revolutions throughout history are anarchy and oligarchy. But in the case of the United States, the Blessings of Liberty emerged. In America, a new world order of freedom emerged.
At about the same time, a new world order of utopianism was also maneuvering into position in Europe. May 1, 1776 the Bavarian Illuminati, a secret society designed to oppose superstition, obscurantism, religious influence over public life and abuses of state power, was founded.
The Illuminati was a radical answer to the idea that kings were divinely appointed. To stand against a king was to stand against God, but in a system ruled by an Illuminati oligarchy, where a true separation of church and state was the goal, the concept of divine appointment would be a thing of the past, and it was believed that the rule of tyrants would end. However, without a moral standard, there can be no freedom. The French Revolution was an example of the Illuminati in action, where their influence was strong enough to topple an entire government and replace it with their godless utopia, but the new system turned out to be more tyrannical than the religious monarchy it replaced.
The secular New World Order sought by the Illuminati was a different kind of new world order than the one emerging in North America. The United States emerged from revolution determined to base their system on one guided by a firm reliance on divine Providence, yet disallowing a particular religion to be established as a ruling force. While the attempt to escape a dominant authoritarian system immersed in the dictates of a religious hierarchy in France resulted in an opposite extreme that proved to be just as dangerous, in America the framers of the United States Constitution determined that their system should be guided by a system of moderation, where the politicians remained religious and prayed, and the pastors preached about the need for honest government guided by moral Christian values. In America, as Frenchman Alexis de Toqueville discovered, was a system where the church did not control the government, nor did the government control the church, yet the politicians and the citizens were deeply influenced by the Christian Faith. The New World Order that the United States sought was one steeped in the values of Judeo-Christianity, yet it also followed the teachings of philosophers that argued for a mixed constitution that used concepts of limited government, a separation of powers, and the sovereignty of the various States as the foundation of the system.
Catholic popes, clergy, and kings had been the voices of authority in the old monarchies. Illuminati leaders, individuals of Jesuit influence, staunch secularists, and power hungry oligarchs were the voices of authority in the new radically leftist European systems. We the People and the sovereign States were to be the voices of authority in the American System that rejected centralized power, and the extremes of established religion or the extremes of communal collectivism.
The Americans escaped the influences of the utopianists, rejecting the authoritarian system of collectivism they represented. The names changed, but the deep down goals of the statists remained the same. Whether they were called Illuminati, utopianists, socialists, communists, progressives, liberals (as opposed to Classical Liberals), trilateralists, the New World Order, or globalists, the drive for a globally united utopia that rejects the fundamentals of Judeo-Christian values, laissez-faire (limited government), individualism, a free market, and the liberty of all people based on choice and personal freedoms never changed.
America was not able to remain free from the influences of the statists, however. From the very beginning people like Alexander Hamilton and Chief Justice John Marshall reshaped the American System, seeking to move it into a model more like the leftist model gaining dominance in Europe. By the 1880s, the Progressive Era in the United States was in full swing. In 1913, with the establishment of the Federal Reserve, direct taxation (16th Amendment), and removal of the States' voice from the federal government (17th Amendment), the dynamics of the American System was being changed to better enable a transition from the principles of limited government to a system better prepared to join a global oligarchy. Herbert Hoover completed the task of throwing economic Laissez-Faire out the window, and the Keynesian theory of economics, along with the introduction of programs that would enslave the public with government dependence, completed its invasion of America's free market under Franklin Delano Roosevelt. More coffin nails were driven into place during Eisenhower's ridiculous progressive tax rates, Johnson's "Great Society" and Carter's "Community Reinvestment Act." By 2008, the system was ready to have its knees broken, so the housing market collapsed, and the perfect leftist stooge, Barack Obama, took the White House to finish the fundamental transformation of the United States from a Constitutional Republic to a Democratic member of the Global Community, complete with its own ruling elite, and globalists, in charge of the government. Any opposition, thanks to Obama's ethnic heritage, who dare to speak out in defiance are easily labeled as racists, anti-government extremists, and right-wing fringe kooks.
Which brings us to the image above from the Barney Miller show.
Barney Miller was a sitcom on ABC that aired from 1975 to 1982, centering around Captain Barney Miller in Greenwich Village's 12th Precinct police station house.
The January 15, 1981 episode showed us how the globalists have been using the entertainment industry to condition the public to believe any one world government scheme is just the nonsensical ravings of a conspiracy theory lunatic. In the episode, a man was arrested for breaking into the offices of the Trilateral Commission, and when he was taken to the 12th Precinct, he began ranting and raving about how the Commission was attempting to set up an "international community" and how they eventually wanted to take over the world. David Rockefeller was revealed in the episode as the founder of the Trilateral Commission, and the character caught breaking into the Trilateral offices claimed that the organization wanted to put David Rockefeller into a global position of authority. The laugh track echoed the silliness of the rantings and ravings of the anti-Trilateral Commission character, and the dialogue made him look to be a fringe kook, paranoid maniac, and some kind of nervous McCarthyite (although it turns out Senator Joseph McCarthy was right about the communist infiltration of the American System as revealed by released documents, and various testimonies).
Pope Francis, the current Catholic Pope, has shown us that the leftism that is guiding society towards worldwide governance has also infiltrated the Vatican. Once the enemy of the teachings of the Illuminati, now The Church has moved closer to what the globalists are aiming for. Pope Francis has been considered to be quite "liberal" compared to his more traditional predecessors, confusing traditionalists with his stances on social issues, Islam, statism, and globalist endeavors. For some, his radical positions are a surprise. For others, the positions of Pope Francis has been of no surprise. The reality is that like Adam Weishaupt, the founder of the Illuminati, the Jesuits played an important part in Pope Francis' life.
This is not to say that the globalists are running amok in black suits with their black briefcases, meeting in dark rooms in every city, with black helicopters circling above. I've always believed that there is some truth to the idea that globalists are desiring a new world order, and that their influences are being felt daily in our lives, but I've never bought into the claim that they have achieved this incredible level of power that some conspiracy folks attribute to the Bilderbergers, international bankers, Illuminati (of which most folks that call themselves Illuminati are posers - such as the hordes of them in Hollywood), and so forth.
I suppose the existence of a drive for a system of global governance is something that you cannot deny, but you have to be careful not to chase every conspiracy theory that emerges. But, isn't that the true power of the powerful elite that are moving us towards a leftist goal of a global tyranny? They exist in plain sight, convince you they don't exist, and if you dare suppose that they may exist you are a crazy conspiracy theorist that can't be taken seriously. But, if you do believe they exist, they grow their power incrementally so that it's hard to pinpoint for public consumption their "global strategy," and they make sure those "kooks" that prop up all of the conspiracies that surround them do so with a convincing argument that the globalists have nearly unstoppable power, so that when the system finally emerges, the surprise is not as severe as it ought to be.
Even more alarming than the incremental nature of the growth of globalism, and the use of hiding in plain site, is how the proponents of global governance have used language to convince people to accept the tyranny. They use words and phrases like "social justice," "sustainability," "equality," "fair share," "tolerance," "multiculturalism," and to move people away from issues they don't want them to pursue they add the word "phobia" to the end. Then, for a good cause, for the common good, for reasons of justice, sustainability, and tolerance they convince the masses that their global agenda is a good thing. . . and before you know it, the citizens are gladly raising the red flag of socialism, and global utopianism, without realizing that in reality they are placing shackles around their own ankles and wrists.
The solution is to go back to where the framers of the Constitution established their foundation of the American System. The Founding Fathers understood human nature, and the need for checks and balances throughout a system. Local issues must be maintained by local governance, and only external issues like common defense, international trade, issues regarding the national borders, or the need for a mediator regarding disputes between the States should be among the authorities of a centralized system. When there is a ruling elite that places themselves above the law, above the people, and above God, tyranny is the only logical outcome.
Liberty is best maintained when the members of a community or country are virtuous, and when government stands aside and allows individualism, self-reliance, personal responsibility, and the incentive of a free market to seek its own course. Then, tyranny is held back, and innovation and prosperity reigns.
Or, you can fall for the leftist globalist propaganda that hides in plain sight, such as shown in a final line in the movie, Buffy The Vampire Slayer: "They had fangs, they were biting people, they had this look in their eyes. Totally Cold. Animal. I think they were young Republicans."
-- Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary
Hoover's Attack on Laissez-Faire - Mises Institute
Another example of Satan hiding in plain sight, courtesy of Hollywood - Facebook
Global Water Governance in the 21st Century - Pacific Institute
Buffy Movie Young Republicans - YouTube
No comments:
Post a Comment